&w=3840&q=100)
Marrying for a green card? US crackdown could lead to deportation
'If you're out of status and apply for a marriage-based green card — or if you fall out of status while your case is pending — a denial could land you in deportation court,' said Abhisha Parikh, a US-based immigration lawyer. 'This is a major shift.'
In the past, Parikh shared in a social media push, a denial often meant applicants could try again. 'Now, USCIS may refer your case directly to immigration court — putting you at risk of removal from the country,' she said.
What counts as marriage fraud
According to the Herman Law Firm, marriage fraud can take several forms, including:
* Marrying someone for money or immigration benefits
* Entering a fake marriage where both people know it's not real
* Tricking someone into marriage under false pretences
'First, make sure you're not entering marriage to boycott the US immigration law, which is punishable by law,' the firm notes. Even in the most straightforward cases, USCIS will want proof that the marriage is real and legally valid — usually starting with a marriage certificate.
But that's just the beginning. 'Every piece of information, every deadline, and every piece of evidence can make or break your case,' the firm adds. Legal experts caution against trying to handle this process alone.
The Makwana case
The risks are real — and they're growing. On May 28, 2025, 29-year-old Aakash Prakash Makwana, an Indian national, pleaded guilty to entering into a fake marriage with a US citizen in an effort to get a green card.
Makwana arrived in the US on November 23, 2019, on a J-1 visa meant for temporary work in the hospitality sector. That visa expired on November 24, 2020, but he remained in the country unlawfully.
By August 2021, he had agreed to pay $10,000 (around Rs 8.32 lakh) to a US citizen to marry him so he could apply for permanent residency. He was living in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, and working without authorisation.
Makwana and his US citizen spouse married on September 3, 2021. To support his green card application, he faked documents showing they lived together. This included forging a lease agreement, adding her name to his utility bills and bank accounts, and even forging the property manager's signature — which resulted in an aggravated identity theft charge.
The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) warns against dishonesty in immigration applications. 'If you lie on your citizenship application, we will find out,' it said last month.
USCIS has an online portal where people — usually US citizens — can report suspected marriage fraud. It allows anonymous tips, although the agency encourages people to share as much detail as possible, including names, dates, addresses, and any supporting evidence.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Disproportionate Assets: CBI books NBRC engineer over 97% surge in his assets
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has registered a First Information Report (FIR) against an assistant engineer at the National Brain Research Centre (NBRC) in Gurgaon's Manesar, based on a preliminary inquiry in July, suggesting 'a more than 97 per cent increase in his assets in two years'. The preliminary inquiry into the alleged possession of disproportionate assets by assistant engineer Sanjeev Kumar Choudhary was initiated in January, following a written complaint filed by then NBRC Director Professor Krishanu Ray in September 2024, according to the CBI's FIR. The CBI booked Choudhary, who has been serving at the NBRC since March 2009, under Section 13(2), read with Section 13(1), of the Prevention of Corruption Act. During the investigation, the CBI assessed Choudhary's financial records for 2019 and 2020, suggesting: on January 1, 2019, he had Rs 2.34 lakh in his three bank accounts, which increased to over Rs 4 lakh by December 31, 2020, along with a surge in his total assets worth Rs 62.60 lakh, including the purchase of a house valued at Rs 50 lakh, a Maruti Suzuki Brezza priced at Rs 8.47 lakh, according to the FIR. The CBI calculated his total income during the given two-year period at Rs 38.85 lakh — Rs 24 lakh in salary and Rs 6.45 lakh family income from other sources — and pegged his expenditure for the same period at Rs 16.52 lakh, including Rs 8.67 lakh kitchen expenses; after deducting his expenditure, the available fund stood at Rs 22.33 lakh, the FIR reads. According to the CBI's FIR, the agency determined that Choudhary's disproportionate assets amounted to Rs 37.92 lakh, after subtracting available funds and the opening bank balance from his total assets as of December 31, 2020, reflecting a 97.59 per cent increase in assets in the given two years. In a report submitted on July 21, CBI Sub-Inspector Meenakshi Yadav recommended an FIR against Choudhary for 'accumulating huge assets to the tune of Rs 37.92 lakh, disproportionate to his known sources of income, and intentionally enriching himself illicitly, constituting an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act'. The NBRC is dedicated to advancing research on brain function in both health and disease, as well as cultivating skilled professionals capable of conducting interdisciplinary studies in neuroscience.


Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
2 house owners held for Bengaluru fire that took 5 lives, Deputy CM Shivakumar warns of demolition
A day after five persons, including a family of four, were charred to death, the Bengaluru city police Sunday arrested two owners of the building where the accident occurred. The arrested persons have been identified as Balakrishnaiah Shetty, 68, and Sandeep Shetty, 43. On Saturday, Madan Kumar Purohit, 36, his wife Sangeetha Kanwar, 32, their two children Mithesh, 8, and Vihan, 5, and a neighbour, Suresh Kumar, 26, died after a fire broke out in the central Bengaluru building where they lived. All deceased were natives of Rajasthan. A case was registered based on the complaint filed by Gopal Singh, brother of Madan Kumar Purohit. The initial probe has revealed that the fire took place due to a short circuit. According to a police officer, plastic mats were illegally stored on the ground and first floor of the building. Madan Kumar Purohit and his family lived on the third floor. Three workers who were sleeping on the first floor managed to escape, said the officer. Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar Sunday visited the spot and said, 'It is clear that the building owners are at fault. I am going to issue a notice to all the building owners to strengthen their buildings, or else we will have to demolish all of them. The state government has announced Rs 5 lakh compensation each for the victims' families.'


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Want to be a US citizen? USCIS will take a holistic view of your ‘good moral character'
The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced a major policy shift that restores a rigorous and holistic approach to evaluating 'good moral character' (GMC) of foreign nationals applying for American citizenship. To illustrate: Driving under influence could impair your eligibility, but if you have skipped on taxes – but subsequently coughed up your dues this could be a redeeming factor. Or if you have good educational qualifications and job stability, this too could score you brownie points. The policy memorandum, issued on Aug 15, emphasizes that US citizenship is more than a legal benefit—it represents a profound transformation into active and responsible membership in American society. In fiscal 2024 (year ended Sept 30), 8.18 lakh foreign nationals acquired US citizenship. Mexicans led with as many as 1.07 lakh becoming American citizens (13% of the total), this was followed by Indians, with a little over 49,000 (or 6% of the total) acquiring US citizenship. The trend was similar to earlier years, Indians are the second largest contingent to acquire US citizenship. Going forward, those aspiring to become US citizens will be subjected to the new policy guidelines. Titled – 'Restoring a rigorous, holistic and comprehensive good moral character evaluation standard for aliens applying for naturalization (citizenship)', under it USCIS officials will no longer treat GMC as a simple checklist of disqualifying offenses. Instead, they are directed to consider the 'totality of circumstances', weighing both negative conduct and positive contributions. The policy highlights that while certain offenses—such as murder, aggravated felonies, torture, or genocide—remain permanent and unconditional bars to naturalization, officials must now also assess evidence of rehabilitation and reformation in other cases. 'The regulations and policy affirm that GMC findings must go beyond the absence of disqualifying acts—it must reflect a genuine positive assessment of who the applicant is and how they have lived in their community,' the policy states. Positive attributes and contributions such as sustained community involvement and contributions in the US; family caregiving, responsibility, and ties in the US; educational attainments; stable and lawful employment history and achievements; length of lawful residence in the US, compliance with tax obligations and financial responsibility in the US will carry greater weight. . At the same time USCIS officials will scrutinize behaviours inconsistent with civic responsibility, including repeat driving under influence convictions, false claims to citizenship, unlawful voting, and even patterns of reckless or disruptive conduct. Immigration attorneys are largely of the view that a move away from a rule-based model to a more discretionary one may be a slippery slope. Eligibility results could vary based on the subjective discretion of the official vetting the application and could result in lack of uniformity across cases. In general individuals can apply for US citizenship, after they have been lawful permanent residents (green card holders) for at least five years. A Chicago based Indian family that was examining the possibility of applying for citizenship told TOI, 'Years ago, when we initially moved to the US, both of us faced tax disputes owing to interpretation of the India-US tax treaty. This could be a blot on our record.' Loss of jobs during the pandemic and non repayment of interest or principal amount against loans could also be issues that come up for many aspirants during processing of citizenship applications, they point out. However, there appears to be a ray of hope. For applicants with past 'wrongdoing' , USCIS officials will look for concrete evidence of rehabilitation, including repayment of taxes, compliance with court-ordered conditions, or testimony from community members. According to the policy guidelines, such evidence may support a finding of good moral character even where negative history exists, provided no permanent bar applies. It may be recalled that Joseph Edlow, who was confirmed as director of USCIS in July, told NY Times in an interview that the current US citizenship test is 'too easy'—noting that many applicants can simply memorize answers and pass without true understanding. This is another change that could be on the anvil.