'Inconvenient truth' that's a growing threat to Australia's international tourism reputation
Insects and birds thrive in the thick grassy understory that grows under open forest and woodlands, but most of the native mammals are already gone. Paper co-author Professor Euan Ritchie fears more losses are imminent. A 'perfect storm' of threats could mean the 'almost deafening' sound of insect noise could soon fall silent.
'You've got the impact of invasive species, you've got fire, you've got climate change. And now to propose a massive increase in land clearing is just going to make the situation worse,' the Deakin University ecologist told Yahoo News Australia.
Related: 🛥️ Alarming map highlights growing threats to $3.8 billion whale tourism industry
With the Great Barrier Reef facing an 'in danger' listing by UNESCO, and concerns about the degradation of the Pilbara's 40,000-year-old Murujuga rock art making international headlines over the last fortnight, there are concerns the crumbling state of the country's most important landscapes is rapidly becoming an international embarrassment.
"Australians are known for being wonderful at sport, but there's this inconvenient truth that we're terrible at conservation and protecting culture. It's shameful," Ritchie said.
"We're getting this pretty horrific reputation that we don't take care of the wonders that we have."
In 2023, around 84 million hectares of northern Australia burned, but because the region is sparsely populated, few people paid attention. When native grasses try to grow, they have to compete with invasive buffel grass, which has been seeded for decades by the cattle industry. The region is also riddled with cats and feral pigs, which contribute to the decline in native mammals like the northern quoll, brush-tailed rabbit-rat and black-footed tree-rat.
With the Top End already facing mounting challenges, ecologists are worried that the territory's already 'slack' environment protection laws are set to allow more habitat destruction that could tip the savannas over the edge.
The researchers estimate that between 2000 and 2020, around 45,000 hectares of savanna habitat was destroyed. Clearing of a further 146,000 hectares has already been approved and another 100,000 could be flattened for the expansion of the cotton industry.
As the State and Future of the Northern Territory's Savannas report was released, a senior Wagiman Traditional Owner, Jabul Huddlestone, spoke out about her concerns.
"I don't want this rubbish, knocking down trees on my country. They are going to take all the goanna away — take away — everything," she said.
"No goanna, no kangaroo, you can't find green plum, black plum, we got the wild potato... but now, there's too much hot fire, too many trees being knocked down — there is no green plum. There used to be big mob down by the riverside — nothing now — all knocked down. Black plum, all knocked down.'
🌏 Tourists to see 'extinct' animals behind national park's 25km predator-free fence
🚨 281 experts call for ban of 'toxic' product sold at Coles, Bunnings, Woolworths, Mitre 10
📸 Beach find highlights dark side of Queensland's $88 million tourism pledge
The report was a huge collaboration supported by Charles Darwin University, Deakin University, Wagiman Traditional Owner, Griffith University, The Environment Centre NT, La Trobe University, University of Tasmania, Wilderness Society and World Wide Fund for Nature Australia.
Environment Centre NT executive director Kirsty Howey said action from government is urgently needed to protect the savannas from bulldozers.
'These savannas are a fundamental drawcard for our tourism industry and represent the lifestyle we know and love as Territorians,' she said.
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Suncorp Group Ltd (SNMCY) Full Year 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Profit Growth and ...
Net Profit After Tax: $1.823 billion, supported by the sale of Suncorp Bank and New Zealand Li operations. Cash Earnings: $1.486 billion. Underlying Insurance Trading Result: Increased by 20% to $1.566 billion, or 11.9% on a ratio basis. Natural Hazard Costs: $1.355 billion, $205 million below allowance. Gross Written Premium (GWP): Growth of 7% in consumer and commercial portfolios. Final Ordinary Dividend: $0.49 per share, bringing the full year dividend to $0.90 per share. Share Buyback: $400 million announced for FY26. Total Shareholder Return: 33% for the year. Underlying ITR: Improved by 80 basis points to 11.9%. New Zealand Underlying ITR: 19%. Operating Expense Ratio: Reduced by 100 basis points to 18.6%. Capital Position: CET1 of $997 million above the midpoint of target. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with SNMCY. Release Date: August 14, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Suncorp Group Ltd (SNMCY) reported a net profit after tax of $1.823 billion, supported by the sale of Suncorp Bank and New Zealand Li operations. The underlying insurance trading result increased by 20% to $1.566 billion, reflecting strong business performance. The company announced a $400 million buyback, demonstrating confidence in its financial position and commitment to returning capital to shareholders. Investment returns were significant contributors to the financial results, showcasing the resilience of investment markets and the outperformance of the manager panel. Suncorp Group Ltd (SNMCY) declared a final ordinary dividend of $0.49 per share, bringing the full-year dividend to $0.90 per share, the highest since 2008. Negative Points Natural hazard costs were $1.355 billion, although $205 million below the allowance, they remain a significant expense. The company experienced deteriorating loss ratios in both the Queensland and New South Wales CTP portfolios. Elevated fire and water claims in the home insurance segment impacted margins. The New Zealand commercial market faced competitive pressures, impacting growth. The company noted ongoing challenges with insurance affordability and the impact of natural hazard claims. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you discuss the quarterly trends in Home and Motor insurance, particularly in the third and fourth quarters? A: Steven Johnston, CEO, explained that the company maintained a disciplined approach to pricing, ensuring they stayed ahead of inflation. In Q3, they observed a moderation in inflationary factors, especially in motor insurance, which allowed them to adjust pricing and increase marketing in Q4. This led to a positive response in the portfolio, with volumes picking up and continuing into FY26. Q: How did the reinsurance renewal impact your strategy, and what are your future plans regarding reinsurance? A: Jeremy Robson, CFO, noted that the reinsurance market was bifurcated, with favorable conditions for main covers but constrained and expensive aggregate covers. The company benefited from lower costs and maintained similar risk retention. They remain open to future reinsurance opportunities if they align with their strategic framework for optimizing capital and shareholder value. Q: What is the breakdown of the 13% growth in the natural hazard allowance? A: Jeremy Robson explained that half of the increase is due to exposure and inflation, while the other half is an increase in sufficiency. The changes in reinsurance did not impact the natural hazard allowance. Q: Can you provide insights into the inflation environment and your assumptions for next year? A: Steven Johnston highlighted that motor insurance inflation is moderating due to improved supply chain and repair shop capacity. However, home insurance faces challenges with fire and water claims, driven by factors like lithium batteries and flexi pipes. Jeremy Robson added that home inflation was in the high single digits last year and is expected to decrease, while motor inflation remains in the mid-single digits. Q: How do you view potential M&A opportunities, and what areas would you prioritize? A: Steven Johnston stated that while their bias is towards organic growth, they are open to inorganic opportunities, particularly in the commercial and New Zealand sectors. They will consider opportunities that align with their strategic goals and offer potential for growth. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Origin Energy Ltd (OGFGF) Full Year 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Customer Growth and ...
Energy Markets EBITDA: $1.404 billion, ahead of guidance. APLNG Production: 682 petajoules at a cost of $4.20 per gigajoule, in line with guidance. LNG Trading Gains: $441 million, at the top end of guidance. Octopus EBITDA: Loss of $88 million, within guidance. Customer Accounts Growth: Increased by 104,000. Cost to Serve Reduction: Decreased by $50 million. Dividends from APLNG: $797 million received during the year, plus $335 million on July 3, 2025, fully franked. 2P Reserves Increase: Up by 298 petajoules before production. Underlying Profit: $1.49 billion, up from $1.18 billion last year. Underlying EBITDA: $3.41 billion, lower than previous year. Net Debt-to-EBITDA: 1.9 times. Return on Capital Employed: 14.6% over 24 months. Total Dividends for the Year: $0.60 per share, fully franked. Dividend Yield: 5.1% before franking benefit. Net Debt: Increased to $4.6 billion. Dividend Payout Ratio: 86% for the fiscal year. Kraken Contracted Customers: Grew by 45% to 74 million. UK Energy Customers Growth: Increased by 13% to 7.6 million. Non-UK Energy Customers: Doubled to 2.7 million. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with OGFGF. Release Date: August 13, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Origin Energy Ltd (OGFGF) reported an Energy Markets' EBITDA of $1.404 billion, exceeding guidance. The company achieved a significant increase in customer accounts, growing by 104,000. Cost to serve was reduced by $50 million, indicating improved operational efficiency. APLNG production was in line with guidance, and LNG trading reached the top end of guidance with trading gains of $441 million. The company declared a final fully-franked dividend of $0.30 per share, supported by a strong balance sheet and cash flow outlook. Negative Points Octopus' EBITDA was at a loss of $88 million, attributed to investment in global growth and unseasonably warm weather. Integrated Gas' APLNG's EBITDA decreased by 3% due to lower production and realized LNG prices. Net debt increased to $4.6 billion, driven by investments in battery projects. The company faces challenges in predicting market volatility and plant availability, which could impact future earnings. There is uncertainty regarding the future capital requirements and potential equity contributions for the separation of Octopus and Kraken. Q & A Highlights Q: Just on the guidance for Origin's share of Octopus Energy EBITDA. It's been a little bumpy the last year or two. Can you just please share a little bit more color on the drivers of the wide range for fiscal '26, including the potential draw from the growth being pursued in the UK in the Energy Services division? A: Tony Lucas, Executive General Manager - Future Energy and Technology: There's been a few ups and downs this year with the weather, the settlement of the energy price guarantee, and some accounting adjustments. We increased the range compared to last year to account for increased investment in non-UK Retail and improvements in the Energy Services business. The non-UK Retail can adjust based on market performance, driving growth spend. Energy Services aims to optimize field force, increase sales, and unit margins. Q: Could you comment on how Origin is minded to deploy any proceeds it might receive from a potential value realization opportunity relating to Origin's interest in Kraken? A: Frank Calabria, CEO: We're focused on the separation of those businesses, which leads to choices and opportunities. We will assess investments based on the best choices for allocating capital. If Kraken becomes a separate entity, it will present choices, and we'll keep the market informed. It's early to predict how we might realize value, but we're supportive of the separation. Q: You've achieved electricity portfolio margin through the top end of that medium-term target range. Do you still expect this margin to grow during the period you continue to operate Eraring and the additional battery earnings into the business? A: Tony Lucas, Executive General Manager - Future Energy and Technology: With Eraring continuing to run and as we bring the batteries in, we expect to be near or above the top end of that medium-term target. The key risks are plant availability and market volatility. Q: Just wondering how you're thinking about further equity contributions, net to Origin, before a possible IPO of Kraken? A: Frank Calabria, CEO: Separating out Kraken needs to ensure both groups have capital for growth. We continue to assess each on their merits. If an equity raise occurs, it will depend on the purpose and merits. No firm decision has been made yet. Q: Could you share your latest thoughts on how electricity margins could change over the next few years when Eraring closes? A: Tony Lucas, Executive General Manager - Future Energy and Technology: We originally set the $25 to $40 per megawatt hour range, expecting to stay within it post-Eraring. Eraring's contribution is stronger than forecasted due to slower renewable transition. Batteries will make a material contribution by FY26. Coal earnings may fall as more renewables come in, but we're confident in staying within the range. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Australia's Falling Competition Cost $2,000 a Person, RBA Finds
A decline in business competition in Australia from the mid-2000s to the Covid-19 pandemic has hurt productivity and household incomes, according to new analysis by the Reserve Bank. If competition had not dropped, productivity and therefore output would have been 1% to 3% higher due to resources being better allocated across firms in the economy, the RBA's Jonathan Hambur and Owen Freestone said in a research paper released Thursday. This equates, at the upper end, to around A$3,000 ($2,000) per person, they said.