City of Albuquerque raises Pride flag over Civic Plaza
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – Pride Month is here, and the City of Albuquerque is showing its support to the local LGBTQ community. City leaders gathered at Civic Plaza Tuesday morning to raise the multicolored pride flag. They said it's important to promote inclusion, equity, and love.
Mexican gray wolf Asha gives birth to litter of pups
'Anytime we get a chance to stand up for ourselves and ourselves as marginalized citizens, it's alwasy a great day for me…we are here to support each other, no matter what struggles we're going through, no matter what walks of life we are, we are here for support,' said Board President Raymon Sierra-Lopez, Albuquerque Pride.
The annual Pride parade is set for Saturday morning in Nob Hill with a Pride festival to follow at Civic Plaza.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
20 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Supreme Court makes it easier to claim ‘reverse discrimination' in employment, in a case from Ohio
WASHINGTON — A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, siding with an Ohio woman who claims she didn't get a job and then was demoted because she is straight. The justices' decision affects lawsuits in 20 states and the District of Columbia where, until now, courts had set a higher bar when members of a majority group, including those who are white and heterosexual, sue for discrimination under federal law. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for the court that federal civil rights law draws no distinction between members of majority and minority groups. 'By establishing the same protections for every 'individual' — without regard to that individual's membership in a minority or majority group — Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone,' Jackson wrote. The court ruled in an appeal from Marlean Ames, who has worked for the Ohio Department of Youth Services for more than 20 years. Though he joined Jackson's opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas noted in a separate opinion that some of the country's 'largest and most prestigious employers have overtly discriminated against those they deem members of so-called majority groups.' Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, cited a brief filed by America First Legal, a conservative group founded by Trump aide Stephen Miller, to assert that 'American employers have long been 'obsessed' with 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' initiatives and affirmative action plans.' Two years ago, the court's conservative majority outlawed consideration of race in university admissions. Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has ordered an end to DEI policies in the federal government and has sought to end government support for DEI programs elsewhere. Some of the new administration's anti-DEI initiatives have been temporarily blocked in federal court. Jackson's opinion makes no mention of DEI. Instead, she focused on Ames' contention that she was passed over for a promotion and then demoted because she is heterosexual. Both the job she sought and the one she had held were given to LGBTQ people. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars sex discrimination in the workplace. A trial court and the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Ames. The 6th circuit is among the courts that had required an additional requirement for people like Ames, showing 'background circumstances' that might include that LGBTQ people made the decisions affecting Ames or statistical evidence of a pattern of discrimination against members of the majority group. The appeals court noted that Ames didn't provide any such circumstances. But Jackson wrote that 'this additional 'background circumstances' requirement is not consistent with Title VII's text or our case law construing the statute.'
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bank of America dropped private-prison clients. Now it's taking them back.
Six years after Bank of America fired him as a client, and 131 days after President Donald Trump publicly accused the bank's chief executive of political bias, Damon Hininger got a phone call. Upon reconsideration, Bank of America would be happy to offer his company, the second-largest operator of US prisons and detention centers, a bank account. 'Times change,' Hininger said in an interview from his office in Nashville, Tenn. His company, CoreCivic, took Bank of America up on its offer, which had been in the works for months. 'A deposit account is nice,' he said, but he's waiting for the Wall Street services — loans, stock offerings, and takeover advice — typically bestowed on favored clients. Financial firms are warming to customers they once shunned under progressive pressure, addressing conservative states lamenting the lack of 'fair access' to banks, and more recently, trying to avoid the wrath of a president bent on settling scores. Citigroup said Tuesday it would start lending to gun manufacturers again, and promised to conduct employee training to root out any political bias. Goldman Sachs and Nasdaq have both stopped requiring companies using them for an IPO to have diverse board members. This week, BlackRock's retreat from progressive stances was rewarded when Texas took it off an investment blacklist. CoreCivic operates 43 jails and prisons across the country, including several that house detainees for US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. Its longtime lender, Bank of America, dropped it as a client in 2019 during a retreat from banking private prisons, gun manufacturers, coal miners, and other industries then out of political favor. That July, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan delivered the bad news personally in what Hininger described as an uncomfortable meeting in Boston. Alluding to activist pressure — protesters had just shown up at the bank's annual shareholder meeting — Moynihan said CoreCivic could remain a client if it canceled its contracts with ICE or agreed to fulfill them at zero profit to the company. 'Clearly we were targeted for political reasons,' said Hininger, a Republican donor who earlier this year pressed Trump in person to look into political bias in financial services. A Bank of America spokesman declined to comment on specific clients, but noted that it changed its 2019 policy 18 months ago from an outright ban to a case-by-case assessment subject to enhanced scrutiny. 'We're happy to serve anyone,' Moynihan said in February. A JPMorgan spokeswoman said the bank had not changed its policies against financing private prisons or companies that make military-grade weapons for personal use. (It does lend to contractors for the military and law enforcement.) While the tide had been turning before the president's second electoral victory, corporate behavior is shifting quickly in the Trump age. Law firms and universities are striking deals, retailers that once leaned into Pride month are treading lightly this year, and companies are scrubbing their websites of diversity policies. Super Bowl ads, which had become venues to showcase corporate values, were neutral enough this year to win faint praise from arch-conservative provocateur Matt Walsh. June 2019 was a different time. With social activism against incarcerations and Trump's policies of separating immigrant families running high, several big banks including Bank of America, JPMorgan, and Wells Fargo said they would stop lending to private prisons. Progressive activists who had shown up that spring at Bank of America's annual meeting and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon's home celebrated. By the time Moynihan and his peers arrived in Davos for the World Economic Forum in January, the climate had changed radically. Conservative backlash had hit brands from Target to Budweiser to BlackRock, and swept Trump into office with a perceived mandate to roll back the progressive shift of the late 2010s and early 2020s. Moynihan was among a group of CEOs chosen to ask a question to Trump, who was video-conferencing in from his inauguration week in Washington. The president answered Moynihan's softball question with a sharp rebuke: 'I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank. What you're doing is wrong.' His comments signal-boosted a movement in conservative circles that believes banks discriminate against them by closing their accounts without warning or explanation, cutting off their access to the financial system. Among those decrying economic exile were venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, who told podcaster Joe Rogan in November that he knew 30 entrepreneurs who had been 'de-banked,' including his partner, Ben Horowitz's, dad. Andrew Torba, founder of the conservative social network Gab, posted a cancellation notice from his bank. The CEO of Anchorage Financial, a crypto outfit with sway in the Trump administration, told Congress in February that his firm had been cut off with 30 days notice. The Trump Organization sued Capital One this spring for closing its bank accounts after the Jan. 6 riots. What critics call 'de-banking,' banks call 'de-risking.' It traces back to the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, when new regulations forced banks to stop lending to risky borrowers. Tighter rules around bribery and money laundering followed as the US sought to crack down on terrorism and corruption abroad. The Obama administration's Operation Chokepoint cut off banking access to firearm dealers, payday lenders, and pawn shops. The result was banks weighing reputational risk equally alongside traditional worries like losing money. Sometimes that means cutting off entities linked to foreign governments, especially those in dubious standing with Washington, or customers making unusual withdrawals. It also extends to crypto companies, adult entertainers, or any client whose source of income is unverified, legally gray, or unseemly. (Message boards are full of advice for OnlyFans entertainers trying to open bank accounts. The key, apparently, is checking the 'other personal services' box when asked what the business does.) It's the latter category — legitimate businesses that are unpopular with a bank's employees, shareholders, regulators, or customers — that are at the heart of the current fight over financial access. A key regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, announced in March that it's no longer considering reputational risk as part of bank supervision. 'These banks should be blind to politics,' said Hininger, who started as a midnight-shift guard at the maximum-security Leavenworth, Kansas federal prison and became CoreCivic's CEO in 2009. 'The questions they get to ask are: Are we a good credit risk? Are we in good standing with the government?' For CoreCivic, getting cut off by big lenders had consequences. At the time, the company was structured as a real-estate investment trust, which required it to pass almost all of its income to shareholders. Like other REITs, it turned to banks for cash to grow. Bank of America had been the company's go-to lender over the years, arranging loans, underwriting stock offerings, and pitching takeover ideas. After being dropped by big lenders, CoreCivic cut its dividend and, in 2020, converted from a REIT into a corporation, which allowed it to conserve cash. The stock lost nearly half its value by the end of that year. 'We're in a great position now,' Hininger said. CoreCivic's stock, like those of other companies shareholders see benefitting from Trump's agenda, have soared since November. 'But that was a bad year. And it started with a decision… that I think was influenced by politics.' Hininger — who gave $1.3 million to Trump and other Republicans in 2024, filings show — pressed his case to the president at a recent event at Mar-a-Lago. 'This is a big, big issue for me personally, and we're going to be doing more work on this,' Hininger recalls him saying. Banks, like other companies, are moving rightward for the same reasons they moved leftward: They fear getting yelled at. In the late 2010s, it was pressure from progressive groups and a national reckoning with social justice and racism. In 2025, it's a public that has soured on diversity initiatives and a president convinced of anti-conservative bias and determined to root it out of American institutions. His success in getting universities and law firms to bend has sent a chill across banks, which are far more regulated and vulnerable to government pressure. When conservatives were howling about getting 'deplatformed' from social media in 2021, I was pretty unsympathetic. There's no constitutional right to post, and the argument that social networks were de facto town squares, rather than private companies, never made much sense to me. Banks are different: Anytime they want, they can go to the Federal Reserve and borrow money from you and me, essentially for free. That makes them a public good, and more accountable. Choosing whom to bank in 2019 was a choice, and perhaps a defensible one in the political climate that existed then, but the bill comes due. It always does, and it's a good reminder to companies now scrambling rightward: 2028 isn't that far away. Bank executives blame overregulation. 'Know your customer' rules and requirements to try to prevent criminals from accessing funds have heightened the risk of dealing with some customers. 'It's because [of] interpretations of anti-money-laundering [rules], the Bank Secrecy Act, KYC — know your customers,' Moynihan said in February. 'I have not heard of a single instance of anybody on the left getting de-banked,' Andreessen said on OnlyFans' CFO had his . ''Reputational risk' is a blanket term that they use.' — Financial Times When Brian Brooks was comptroller of the currency, he rolled his eyes at complaints of de-banking. Now he's a crypto executive, and converted to the cause. — The New York Times Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is Karine Jean-Pierre's exit from Democratic Party part of a larger trend?
(NewsNation) — Nina Turner, a Democrat and former Ohio state senator, told 'Morning in America' she believes former President Joe Biden's press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre is leaving the Democratic Party 'definitely for book sales' but acknowledged the two-party system is 'asinine.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
