Well-being of senior citizens essential for guiding families, society: Murmu
Speaking at the 'Ageing with Dignity' programme hosted at the Rashtrapati Bhavan here, Ms. Murmu underscored the invaluable contribution of senior citizens in shaping society and guiding future generations.
"Senior citizens are a vital link to our past and guides to our future," she said, urging all citizens to remain committed to their welfare and learn from their vast experiences.
"Our senior citizens represent wisdom, prudence, and tradition. We must ensure that their dignity and health are a shared duty," she said.
She appealed to citizens to "honour their presence, value their guidance, and cherish their companionship." Lauding the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (MoSJE) for initiating several measures aimed at ensuring dignity in the lives of the elderly, she appreciated the launch of a dedicated portal for senior citizens, describing it as a "one-stop digital platform" to support their needs.
'Respect for elders embedded in our traditions'
The president pointed to cultural values that uphold respect for elders, saying, "Respect for parents and elders is embedded in our traditions. In many households, children are happiest with their grandparents. Often, what children won't accept from their parents, they gladly accept when told by a grandparent." She also acknowledged the emotional and psychological support that elderly family members offer.
"When elders see their families thriving, their physical and mental well-being also improves. They are emotional pillars for their families," she said.
However, Ms. Murmu expressed concern over the evolving challenges faced by the elderly.
"With economic growth and modernisation, young people often migrate for jobs, leaving behind elders who crave love and respect. Sometimes, even when parents live with their children, they don't receive the affection and dignity they deserve. Sadly, some people even consider the elderly a burden," she said.
Calling them a "storehouse of knowledge," she highlighted their potential to guide the youth and strengthen the nation's progress.
"Our senior citizens can lead society and the country towards greater prosperity," she said.
Before the programme, Ms. Murmu interacted with five senior citizens who shared their life experiences. She praised their role in fostering unity in society through their stories and perspectives.
She also cited several government initiatives aimed at improving the quality of life for senior citizens, such as the Ayushman Bharat-PM Jan Arogya Yojana, which provides up to ₹5 lakh annually for citizens aged 70 and above.
"The health of our elderly is essential for guiding families and society," she noted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Punjab cops block its drive, BJP alleges ‘misuse'
Chandigarh: Punjab Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Wednesday accused AAP-led Punjab govt of misusing police force to "obstruct" its 'BJP De Sewadar Aa Gye Ne Tuhade Dwaar' campaign at 39 locations. Punjab BJP state general secretary Anil Sarin said state govt "forcibly stopped the campaign wherein poor and needy people were getting information about central govt's welfare schemes". In a clarification, an spokesperson of the Punjab govt stated the govt had received credible reports that certain private operators were illegally collecting personal data of local residents, allegedly on behalf of political parties. In a separate release, the official added, "The Punjab Police have formed several teams to investigate the camps which are allegedly collecting personal information of individuals in the name of govt schemes. " Sarin called the action "misuse" of police force. "This act not only denied the people of Punjab access to valuable information and guidance but also exposed the anti-development mindset of the Mann govt," Sarin added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Readers says this maybe the best Cable TV Communications Search Now Undo He added, "While the Centre has ensured free ration, health benefits under Ayushman Bharat, farmer support through PM Kisan Samman Nidhi, and numerous youth and women welfare schemes, the AAP government is creating deliberate obstacles to prevent their implementation on the ground in Punjab." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
New Indian Express
8 hours ago
- New Indian Express
SC asks if Constitution makers' vision of harmony between governors, states has been realised
On Tuesday, the top court questioned the Centre and the attorney general over the long pendency of Bills passed by assemblies with governors, underscoring the limitations of Constitutional courts in situations where legislation has been pending since 2020. The top court has said it would be expressing its views only on the law and not on the April 8 decision in the Tamil Nadu case, fixing a timeline for governors and the president for acting on Bills passed by state legislatures. The top court, while responding to the preliminary objections raised by Tamil Nadu and Kerala governments on maintainability of the Presidential Reference, said it would exercise its advisory jurisdiction as it was not sitting in the appellate jurisdiction. In May, President Droupadi Murmu exercised powers under Article 143(1) to know from the top court whether judicial orders could impose timelines for the exercise of discretion by the president while dealing with Bills passed by state assemblies. The Centre said in its written submission that imposing fixed timelines on governors and the president to act on Bills passed by a state assembly would amount to one organ of the government assuming powers not vested in it by the Constitution, and lead to "constitutional disorder". On April 8, the apex court while dealing with the powers of the governor with respect to Bills passed by the Tamil Nadu Assembly, for the first time, prescribed that the president should decide on the Bills reserved for her consideration by the governor within three months from the date on which such a reference is received. In a five-page reference, President Murmu posed 14 questions to the Supreme Court and sought to know its opinion on the powers of the governor and president under Articles 200 and 201 in dealing with Bills passed by the state legislature.
The Hindu
16 hours ago
- The Hindu
14 questions raised by President Murmu in Presidential Reference
On May 13, 2025, President Droupadi Murmu made a rare reference to the Supreme Court under Article 143 of the Constitution, seeking its opinion on 14 significant questions concerning the powers of the Governor and the President under Articles 200 and 201. These questions, all related to the authority to grant assent to Bills, follow the Supreme Court's judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu (2025), where the Court laid down timelines for constitutional authorities to act on Bills presented to them. Also read: Presidential Reference hearing LIVE A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court began hearing the Presidential Reference on these questions on the power to assent on Bills. Here are the 14 questions raised by Ms. Murmu in Supreme Court Reference: 1. What are the constitutional options before a Governor when a Bill is presented to him under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 2. Is the Governor bound by the aid & advice tendered by the Council of Ministers while exercising all the options available with him when a Bill is presented before him under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 3. Is the exercise of constitutional discretion by the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India justiciable? 4. Is Article 361 of the Constitution of India an absolute bar to the judicial review in relation to the actions of a Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 5. In the absence of a constitutionally prescribed time limit, and the manner of exercise of powers by the Governor, can timelines be imposed and the manner of exercise be prescribed through judicial orders for the exercise of all powers under Article 200 of the Constitution of India by the Governor? 6 . Is the exercise of constitutional discretion by the President under Article 201 of the Constitution of India justiciable? 7. In the absence of a constitutionally prescribed timeline and the manner of exercise of powers by the President, can time lines be imposed and the manner of exercise be prescribed through judicial orders for the exercise of discretion by the President under Article 201 of the Constitution of India? 8. In light of the constitutional scheme governing the powers of the President, is the President required to seek advice of the Supreme Court by way of a reference under Article 143 of the Constitution of India and take the opinion of the Supreme Court when the Governor reserves a Bill for the President's assent or otherwise? 9. Are the decisions of the Governor and the President under Article 200 and Article 201 of the Constitution of India, respectively, justiciable at a stage anterior into the law coming into force? Is it permissible for the Courts to undertake judicial adjudication over the contents of a Bill, in any manner, before it becomes law? 10. Can the exercise of constitutional powers and the orders of/by the President/Governor be substituted in any manner under Article 142 of the Constitution of India? 11. Is a law made by the State legislature a law in force without the assent of the Governor granted under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 12. In view of the proviso to Article 145 (3) of the Constitution of India, is it not mandatory for any bench of this Hon'ble Court to first decide as to whether the question involved in the proceedings before it is of such a nature which involves substantial questions of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution and to refer it to a bench of minimum five Judges? 13. Do the powers of the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India limited to matters of procedural law or Article 142 of the Constitution of India extends to issuing directions /passing orders which are contrary to or inconsistent with existing substantive or procedural provisions of the Constitution or law in force? 14. Does the Constitution bar any other jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to resolve disputes between the Union Government and the State Governments except by way of a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India?
