
AI experts reveal how the world could collapse under the control of smart technology
Experts in artificial intelligence left podcaster Joe Rogan stunned as they spoke about how quickly the technology is evolving.
The UFC commentator invited AI experts Jeremie and Eduoard Harris - the CEO and CTO, respectively, of Gladstone AI - onto his popular The Joe Rogan Show.
Gladstone AI is dedicated to promoting the responsible development and adoption of artificial intelligence.
Rogan got into his concerns about the emerging technology with his guests right off the bat, asking: 'If there's a doomsday clock for AI... what time is it?'
Jeremie said 'there's disagreement' among experts in the field, but concluded that AI 'could hit human-level... capabilities across the board' by 2027 or 2028.
He quipped: 'You'll be able to have AI on your show and ask it what the doomsday clock is like by then.'
But Rogan lamented that the AI probably would not laugh at his jokes.
Jeremie explained that a lab called METR recently conducted a study that showed how quickly AI models are improving.
In that study, researchers gave the models a realistic task to carry out and compared the times of completion between AI and humans.
They found that the technology completed tasks that would take humans less than four minutes with a nearly 100 per cent success rate and a 50 per cent success rate for tasks that take humans an hour to complete.
Eduoard then noted that the rate is increasing almost every four months, especially for tasks involving research and software engineering.
By 2027, they concluded, the kind of work an AI researcher does in a month could be done by the AI itself with a 50 per cent success rate.
At that point, Eduoard joked that Rogan could have an AI system as a guest and ask it itself what a doomsday clock looks like.
The interview comes after Demis Hassabis, the CEO of DeepMind at Google, shared his belief that scientists are on track to create Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) within the next five to ten years.
AGI refers to artificial intelligence with software that rivals the cognitive ability of a human.
It's a hypothetical stage of AI advancement as, currently, the technology can only pull from existing content and doesn't have the curiosity or imagination to create new concepts like humans do.
However, Hassabis believes that AGI is on track to become 'embedded' in our daily lives by 2035.
He also said that today's technology hasn't yet achieved 'consciousness' and revealed that it's a possibility that AI bots may eventually develop self-awareness.
When that does happen, though, Hassabis said it may be difficult for humans to recognize.
He said: 'With machines - they're running on silicon, so even if they exhibit the same behaviors, and even if they say the same things, it doesn't necessarily mean that this sensation of consciousness that we have is the same thing they will have.'
If the AI models continue to progress, Hassabis said it could be the end of human diseases and the climate crisis, he told Time Magazine in a separate interview.
He said: 'I think some of the biggest problems that face us today as a society, whether that's climate or disease, will be helped by AI solutions.
'I'd be very worried about society today if I didn't know that something as transformative as AI was coming down the line.'
At the same time though, Hassabis acknowledged that AI could cause destruction - especially if international cooperation isn't achieved.
He argued that the AI models need to be tested for dangerous capabilities, and legal guardrails need to be implemented to prevent the technology from falling into the wrong hands.
He noted that it is 'extremely difficult' to monitor AI advancement to prevent systems from acting autonomously.
Other AI experts have offered a more pessimistic perspective on the future. Microsoft founder Bill Gates expressed his concerns in a recent interview with Jimmy Fallon.
He said: 'I love the way it'll drive innovation forward, but I think it's a little bit unknown if we'll be able to shape it. And so, legitimately, people are like "wow, this is a bit scary." It's completely new territory.'
Elsewhere, computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton has predicted that AI will wipe out the human race.
Hinton is known as the 'Godfather of AI' for his work creating the foundations for machine learning.
He was a recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physics, but recently resigned from his job at Google out of concern that AI advancement was going in a dangerous direction.
'The situation we're in now is that most of the experts in the field think that sometime, within probably the next 20 years, we're going to develop AIs that are smarter than people,' Hinton revealed in an interview with the BBC.
'And that's a very scary thought,' he added.
Hinton also said that whether AI helps or hurts society in the future is dependent on how the government regulates it.
He said: 'We need regulations to stop people using it for bad things, and we don't appear to have those kinds of political systems in place at present.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Experts call on Government to deliver a 'bold' industrial strategy to reboot the British economy
Ministers were last night urged to deliver a genuine industrial strategy to reboot the British economy after Rachel Reeves backed research and development, AI and the British Business Bank. Experts demanded a 'funded and joined-up long-term vision'. Reeves backed an extra £2.2billion for R&D, a £2billion AI action plan and £1.2billion a year for training and apprenticeships. And she pledged to boost the financial capacity of the British Business Bank, which helps UK firms to access finance, to £25.6billion – a two-thirds increase. Labour promises a full industrial strategy this summer. Stephen Phipson, of manufacturers trade association Make UK, said: 'Industry needs a funded and joined-up long-term vision as a matter of urgency. 'This must include bold measures to address the UK's eye-watering industrial energy costs and skills crisis.' Jennifer Townsend, at property firm Knight Frank, said Reeves had shown science, technology and innovation 'are central to growth ambitions'. Jess Ralston, at the Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit, said: 'Will the Government act to reduce the impact of high gas prices, which UK steel has said is the main driver of disparities with industries in Europe?'


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Put the paintbrush down – AI can restore artworks quicker and better
Artificial intelligence (AI) could spell the end of art restoration by humans after MIT showed that damaged paintings can be repaired in just a few hours. Typically, conservators spend months or years researching and matching paints, colours and techniques to ensure the finished product is as close to the original as possible. But Alex Kachkine, an engineering graduate at MIT, has shown it is possible to use AI to fill in the damaged areas digitally, then print the restored layers onto a thin film to attach on top of the painting. It means the painting appears restored even though the original is still intact beneath. The method was applied to a highly damaged 15th-century oil painting, and AI immediately identified 5,612 separate regions in need of repair, and filled in these regions using 57,314 different colours. The entire process, from start to finish, took just three and a half hours. 'There is a lot of damaged art in storage that might never be seen,' said Mr Kachkine. 'Hopefully with this new method, there's a chance we'll see more art, which I would be delighted by.' In recent years, digital restoration tools have allowed conservators to create virtual representations of restored works. AI algorithms can quickly sift through huge amounts of data about artists and time periods to generate a digitally restored version of a particular painting, in a way that closely resembles the correct style. However, digital restorations are usually displayed virtually or printed as stand-alone works and until now there has never been a way to translate the digital restorations on to the original work. The new technique involves first scanning the painting and then using software to create maps of the areas that require repair, before matching the correct colours. The maps are then inkjet printed onto two sheets of a film. One film, which sits underneath, is printed in white so that the colours overlaid on the second sheet are not muddied by the colours of the original painting. The layers are carefully aligned and overlaid by hand onto the original painting and adhered with a thin spray of varnish. The printed films are made from materials that can be easily dissolved with conservation-grade solutions, in case conservators need to reveal the original, damaged work. The digital file of the mask can also be saved as a detailed record of what was restored. For the painting that Mr Kachkine used, the method was able to fill in thousands of losses in just a few hours. 'A few years ago, I was restoring this baroque Italian painting with probably the same order magnitude of losses, and it took me nine months of part-time work,' he said. 'The more losses there are, the better this method is.' The new technique may even help restore botched restorations such as Elias Garcia Martinez's Ecce Homo, which was restored so badly it was dubbed Monkey Christ, because of the Simian features of Jesus. Mr Kachkine acknowledges that there were ethical issues to consider, in terms of whether a restored version was an appropriate representation of an artist's original style and intent. He said the process should be carried out in consultation with conservators with knowledge of a painting's history and origins to check the AI programme was not going off-piste. 'Restoring a painting is fun, and it's great to sit down and infill things and have a nice evening,' he added 'But that's a very slow process.'


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Oracle beats quarterly revenue estimates
June 11 (Reuters) - Oracle (ORCL.N), opens new tab surpassed fourth-quarter revenue estimates on Wednesday, boosted by growing demand for its cloud offerings from companies deploying artificial intelligence. Revenue for the quarter stood at $15.90 billion, compared with the analysts' average estimate of $15.59 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG.