Sinn Féin members fear party is about to reverse course on trans rights
The party was set to hold a conference next month to specifically discuss its stance on trans rights, but it confirmed last night to
The Journal
that it has instead pushed the meeting back to next spring.
This surprise move came on foot of meetings with LGBT+ groups, combined with resistance from current members of Sinn Féin.
Several current and former members from an LGBT+ background who spoke to
The Journal
in recent days voiced 'huge concern' over the party's direction as they fear it's being engulfed by
culture wars in Ireland
.
They had also sought clarity on whether the party still supports the law that gives legal recognition to a person's preferred gender.
The party supported the 2015 Gender Recognition Act – and proposed its own version two years earlier – and also campaigned in support of the Marriage Equality referendum. However heated online debates and misinformation aimed at undermining trans people, coupled with comments made by two Sinn Féin TDs, have led some members to believe the party will seek to reverse course on trans rights.
Sinn Féin has responded to the concern by meeting with LGBT+ groups, but it's understood there remains unhappiness among some members over its stance.
When contacted, the party said that it will continue to hold meetings with LGBT+ groups 'across the island' in the months to come.
'Every opportunity to engage, exchange views and listen is hugely valuable to us and these meetings will continue in the time ahead,' a spokesperson said.
UK ruling sees issues come to the fore for Sinn Féin
The issue blew up for Sinn Féin recently after its
health spokesperson David Cullinane
said a ruling by the Scottish Supreme Court – that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in UK equality legislation do not include transgender women – was a 'common sense judgment'.
Trans groups have been strongly critical of the Scottish Supreme Court's findings, with opposition also coming from a
recent motion by a British doctors union
calling the ruling 'scientifically illiterate'.
Cullinane posted his thoughts on social media before later deleting them and apologising. But it was quickly followed by Sinn Féin's chief whip Pádraig Mac Lochlainn telling Highland Radio in Donegal that 'we need to have the conversation' surrounding trans rights in Ireland, saying 'the legislation isn't clear'.
That last point was cited by a number of current party members we spoke to who feared it was 'flying the kite' for a potential change to the party's previous support.
I want to apologise for the hurt and offence that I have caused to the Trans community following a tweet I sent last night. That was never my intention. This is a complex issue for many but we need to approach it with compassion, understanding and dignity for all.
— David Cullinane T.D. (@davidcullinane)
April 17, 2025
Cullinane's comments saw the party threatened with being
banned from Trans Pride
Dublin
if it didn't roll back on what he said.
The party has also faced fierce criticism when, as the co-lead party in the Stormont executive, passed a temporary ban on puberty medication for transgender youth last year.
Some party members said Cullinane attempted to 'make amends' in recent weeks by discussing trans rights with members, but one former member who is transgender said they are concerned that Sinn Féin may soon take a harder stance.
'I worry that we were just a political football rather than an actual belief for them,' said Caitlin Wilson, who was a member in west Belfast for seven years until she left last year.
Advertisement
Wilson said that 'anti-trans rhetoric' is at an 'all-time high' in the modern era across western Europe and the US, and that political parties needed to stand against it.
This 'silence' amounts to 'complicity' from Sinn Féin and other political parties if there are rollbacks to equality legislation down the line, according to Wilson.
'Less trustworthy'
As well as Wilson,
The Journal
has found several long-serving members have also left the party over the issue. Some have decided to remain inside Sinn Féin to fight to maintain its current stance.
Orla Ní Dhúil – who left last year after 15 years of membership, having been in a Glasnevin-based cumman – said she has felt the party's 'confused' stance has had the effect of making them 'less trustworthy' to those interested in progressive politics.
Ní Dhúil outlined that she had contacted the party's senior spokespeople seeking an outline of the party's stance on trans rights and found the response frustrating, claiming little engagement on policy discussions for trans rights and other LGBT+ matters.
This was a marked change to 2013, Ní Dhúil said, when Sinn Féin proposed a Gender Recognition Bill to allow trans people to legally change gender markers through self-determination. The party later backed the 2015 Gender Recognition Act, laws giving people a right to self-declare their gender.
Among the rank and file, Wilson said she believed that members 'by and large' have little to no issue with trans people.
'I do not believe that Sinn Fein is an inherently transphobic party – I do believe they are a populist party,' Wilson said.
She added that she wants to see all parties have a 'pro-trans stance, which I very truly just means ensuring trans people have a standard level of care'. As
reported recently by
The Journal Investigates
, some transgender people have resorted to DIY-healthcare due to delays in the health system.
Party leader interview
Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald weighed into the debate in the aftermath of her health frontbencher Cullinane's comments.
McDonald said that conversations about the rights of trans people need to be calm and respectful, while making reference to her own sister, who is a trans woman.
Speaking on The Late Late Show, McDonald said that Sinn Féin's position has not changed but that the implications of the UK Supreme Court ruling would need to be studied, particularly since it will impact Northern Ireland.
But the interview sparked concern among some members, with Kevin O'Hara, an election candidate at last year's local elections in Connemara, Co Galway, among those.
'Mary Lou's statement on the TV wasn't very clear,' said O'Hara, who also has a trans sibling.
It was very clear about how much she loves her sister but in terms of party policy, it wasn't clear. What I have been asking our elected reps is, what is Sinn Féin's policy on the Gender Recognition Act? Do we put support it? I haven't been able to find out yet.
O'Hara believes many people, whether living in a rural or urban area, have a 'live and let live' attitude to the issue.
This was why he was so shocked and disappointed at the recent statements by Sinn Fein spokespeople', adding that he believes they are 'jumping on every passing bandwagon'.
'It's a pity that this whole toxic debate has spread to this country, but given recent statements by Sinn Féin TDs I think Sinn Féin leadership needs to urgently clarify their position on this issue – so that members, supporters and trans people know where we stand.'
When contacted about whether Sinn Féin supports Ireland Gender Recognition Act, a spokesperson for the party said: 'Yes, the Gender Recognition Act is a matter of law since 2015.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
LGBTQ+ literary prize ‘paused' as nominees pull out over inclusion of Irish author John Boyne
Organisers of the Polari Prize said the awards have been put on 'pause' but have 'already secured strong representation for next year'. A campaign calling for a boycott of the Polari Prize, which included a statement signed by more than 800 writers and workers in the publishing industry, stemmed from Boyne's views on transgender issues and support for British author JK Rowling. Writing in the Sunday Independent last month, Boyne expressed support for JK Rowling and described himself as a 'fellow Terf', an acronym for trans-exclusionary radical feminist, a term for those who describe themselves as feminists but deny that transgender women are women and oppose trans-inclusive legislation. 'We are profoundly disappointed by the Polari prize's decision to include John Boyne on the longlist for this year's Polari book prize,' the statement from boycott organisers read. 'In any year, the decision to include Mr Boyne on the longlist would be, in our view, inappropriate and hurtful to the wider community of LGBTQ+ readers and writers. That the decision has been made this year – in the context of rising anti-trans hatred and systematic exclusion of trans people from public life in the UK and across the world – is inexcusable.' Of the 24 authors longlisted for the top Polari Prize, 16 authors withdrew, along with two judges. Nicola Dinan, the author who won last year's Polari Prize, resigned from the jury for one of this year's awards. Organisers released a statement confirming the decision to pause this year's Polari Prize, committing to increase 'representation of trans and gender non-conforming judges on the panels for all the awards and undertake a governance and management review to include our aims and values and work to better support everyone within our LGBTQ+ Polari community.' Co Dublin native Boyne, best known for his historical novel The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas, was named on the longlist for the 2024 novella Earth. The decision to pause this year's Polari Prize marked a change of heart for the organisers, who previously said they were 'committed to going forward' despite the controversy over Boyne's inclusion, saying he had been longlisted on merit. A statement released on August 7 said it was 'inevitable' that even within the LGBTQ+ community, 'we can at times hold radically different positions on substantive issues'. Writing in The Telegraph following the cancellation of this year's Polari Prize, Boyne said the statement released by Polari's organisers 'worries' him and it seemed 'absurd and wrong' for debut writers who withdrew from the prize to lose out on an opportunity. In a statement posted on X last week, Boyne said he had been a victim of 'bullying' and been subject to 'endless harassment at the hands of both strangers and fellow writers'. He asked that Earth not be considered for the shortlist should those who withdrew from the Polari Prize decide to return.
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Why has Sally Rooney been warned over supporting Palestine Action - and why did the UK ban it?
AUTHOR SALLY ROONEY could face prosecution in the UK if she delivers on promises to support Palestine Action, a group that the British government has proscribed as a terrorist organisation. Palestine Action is a direct action group that was founded in 2020. It has been protesting the UK's export of arms to Israel, as well as Israel's war on Gaza and treatment of Palestinians, through actions like demonstrations, building occupations and vandalism of properties it believes to have links to arms sales to Israel. Hundreds of people have been arrested in the UK since last month for showing their support for Palestine Action since it was designated as a terrorist association. The move by the government and the plethora of arrests that followed have sparked debate within the UK and internationally about the differences between a social movement versus a terrorist organisation, and about freedoms of expression and assembly. Rooney, the author of novels including Normal People and Intermezzo hailing from Co Mayo, has indicated that she intends to use proceeds from her work to support Palestine Action, but has been warned she could face consequences. What did Rooney say, how has the UK government responded, and why did it ban Palestine Action in the first place? What did Sally Rooney say about Palestine Action? Writing in the Irish Times at the weekend, Rooney said that she supports Palestine Action and its protesting of Israel's violence against Palestine, and that she would use proceeds from her work to support the group. 'If this makes me a 'supporter of terror' under UK law, so be it,' Rooney said. 'My books, at least for now, are still published in Britain, and are widely available in bookshops and even supermarkets. In recent years the UK's state broadcaster has also televised two fine adaptations of my novels, and therefore regularly pays me residual fees,' she wrote. 'I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can. 'If the British state considers this 'terrorism', then perhaps it should investigate the shady organisations that continue to promote my work and fund my activities, such as WH Smith and the BBC.' She also criticised the Irish government for not standing with Irish activists arrested for supporting Palestine Action in the UK. Rooney has been an outspoken critic of Israel's war on Gaza and a supporter of freedom for Palestine. Advertisement Nearly two years since October 2023, Israel has around 62,000 people in Gaza, displaced hundreds of thousands of people, and flattened countless homes and buildings. With Israel strictly limiting the amount of aid allowed in to Gaza, many people are now dying of starvation, including young children. How has the UK government responded to Rooney? A spokesperson for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer was asked in Westminster about Rooney's comments. They would not comment on her remarks specifically but set out the position that there 'is a difference between showing support for a proscribed organisation, which is an offence under the Terrorism Act, and legitimate protest in support of a cause'. Asked what Downing Street's position is in relation to anyone considering making donations to Palestine Action, the spokesperson said: 'Support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act and obviously the police will, as they have set out, they will obviously implement the law within the law as you'd expect.' Why has the UK banned Palestine Action? Among countries in Europe, the UK has been one of Israel's staunchest allies, including through being an exporter of arms to Israel, though it has also recognised the scale of devastation Israel has created in Gaza. In June, British Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said she was proscribing Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation under the UK's Terrorism Act. It followed members of the group allegedly breaking into a military airfield and vandalising Royal Air Force (RAF) aircrafts. Announcing the decision to proscribe it as a terrorist organisation, Cooper said that Palestine Action's activity has 'increased in frequency and severity since the start of 2024 and its methods have become more aggressive, with its members demonstrating a willingness to use violence'. The UK's Terrorism Act makes it an offence for a person to belong to a proscribed organisation, to show or invite support for such an organisation, to express an opinion or belief that is supportive of it, or to arrange or manage a meeting that involves supporting the organisation, furthering its activities, or hearing from a member belonging to it. A person found guilty of an offence under the relevant legislation can face imprisonment or a fine, or both. The UK's decision has received criticism internationally. UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk said that by international standards, understandings of terrorist acts should be 'confined to criminal acts intended to cause death or serious injury or to the taking of hostages, for purpose of intimidating a population or to compel a government to take a certain action or not'. 'It misuses the gravity and impact of terrorism to expand it beyond those clear boundaries to encompass further conduct that is already criminal under the law,' Türk said. Additional reporting by Press Association Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Adams donates BBC defamation damages to 'good causes'
Gerry Adams has said he has made donations to "good causes" after the BBC paid the former Sinn Féin leader €100,000 in defamation damages. The British broadcaster lost a defamation case earlier this year after Mr Adams took them to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme and an accompanying online story. They contained an allegation that Mr Adams sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson. Mr Adams denied any involvement. In May, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000, determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. Johnsons Solicitors, which represented Mr Adams in his action, confirmed that the BBC has discharged the order of the court in relation to the compensation to their client. Mr Adams said he intended to donate any damages awarded to good causes. The law firm said donations have been made to "Unicef for the children of Gaza", local GAA organisations, a support group for republican prisoners and their families called An Cumman Cabhrach, to the Irish language sector, to the "homeless and Belfast based youth, mental health and suicide prevention projects" and others.
