logo
#

Latest news with #GenderRecognitionAct

Why won't Anas Sarwar champion Sandie Peggie?
Why won't Anas Sarwar champion Sandie Peggie?

Spectator

time22-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Spectator

Why won't Anas Sarwar champion Sandie Peggie?

When nurse Sandie Peggie complained about the presence of a trans-identifying man in the women's changing room at Falkirk's Victoria Hospital, she was treated as a dangerous bigot. A witch-hunt saw her suspended from the job to which she had devoted thirty years of her life and she faced horrifying allegations of placing patients in danger. Today, Peggie is not only a household name in Scotland, she's fast becoming a national hero. An industrial tribunal called by the nurse – started in February, paused, then resumed last week – has heard how doctors and management turned on her while rallying round Dr Beth Upton, a man who claims to be a biological woman. Whether Peggie wins her claims of sexual discrimination against her employers, NHS Fife, and Upton remains to be seen, but it is already clear that public sympathy lies firmly with the working-class nurse rather than the middle-class doctor. This is a truth not only revealed in polling – a recent YouGov survey found more than 60 per cent of people backed the Supreme Court ruling that womanhood is a matter of biology – but also in focus groups commissioned by political parties. Gender ideology may remain popular among self-identifying 'progressive' politicians but voters from across the political spectrum have had more than enough of the 'trans women are women' hooey so enthusiastically pushed by the SNP and others at Holyrood over recent years. When the Scottish parliament voted in 2022 in favour of reforming the Gender Recognition Act (GRA), allowing anyone to self-identify into the sex of their choosing, Scottish Labour's Anas Sarwar whipped his MSPs into supporting the proposal. Back then, having swallowed the be-kind Kool-Aid, he showed no sign of recognising the irreconcilable conflict between the rights of women and the demands of militant trans activists. But, in February, as Peggie's case began making headlines, Sarwar saw (or chose to see) sense. Not only did he support the nurse's case, but he also expressed his regret over backing former first minister Nicola Sturgeon's plan to reform the GRA. If, said the Scottish Labour leader, he had known in December 2022 what he now knew, he'd never have voted in favour of changing the law. Fortunately for the women and girls of Scotland, then Conservative Scottish secretary Alister Jack blocked the new legislation in January 2023 on the grounds that it would conflict with the UK-wide Equality Act, which protects the sex-based rights of women. The backlash against reform of the GRA contributed to Nicola Sturgeon's decision to step down as First Minister. Her successors – both the hapless Humza Yousaf and the bland John Swinney – remain committed to the proposal (in theory, anyway,) even as public opposition to gender reform mounts. This baffling support for a discredited ideology left Swinney looking especially foolish as Peggie's tribunal resumed. The First Minister declared his complete confidence in NHS Fife, placing him on the opposite side of this high-profile battle to the majority of voters. Swinney missed his opportunity to free himself from the gender politics swamp. Anas Sarwar has been every bit as politically inept. When Scottish Labour's leader U-turned on gender reform, he managed to upset both those in favour of self-ID and those opposed. To the former – forever now lost to him – he was a traitor; to the latter, he was a cowardly opportunist. Every working day until next Wednesday, crowds of supporters will gather outside the tribunal hearing in Dundee to cheer Sandie Peggie as she arrives. Recording these moments will be camera crews from all major broadcasters. Why, then, isn't Anas Sarwar there, each morning? In common with other party leaders, Sarwar has seen the focus group results and private polling which show the majority of voters believe a woman is an adult human female, not a magical kind of man. The Scottish Labour leader – having made a fool of himself in February – should turn up in Dundee, brace himself for a spot of heckling, and brave it out. 'I know I'm late,' he should tell Peggie's supporters, 'But I'm here, now.' We're bang in the middle of 'silly season', when summer holidays and parliamentary recesses leave the news agenda rather bare. This being so, the already gripping case of Sandie Peggie is receiving blanket coverage across Scottish media (with the exception, of course, of the SNP's court comic, The National, which – as is always the case when things look embarrassing for the separatists – maintains a 'nothing to see here' position). There is a space, right now, for Sarwar to position his party as champions of women's rights. While Labour and the SNP (and, of course, the cranks of the Scottish Greens and Liberal Democrats) continue to fail women, this issue represents a free kick for the insurgent Reform UK, which will stand candidates in next May's Holyrood election. Nigel Farage's party is on course to devour much of the Scottish Tory vote but parties of the centre-left are also vulnerable when it comes to the issue of women's rights. Senior SNP and Labour figures privately conceded that Farage's party can take votes from them on the regional lists from which 56 of Holyrood's 129 MSPs are elected. John Swinney has set his course on this matter and he's heading away from voters. But, instead of capitalising on this foolishness, Scottish Labour's leader remains bafflingly unwilling to seize ownership of the issue. Anas Sarwar's past betrayal of women's rights was morally indefensible. His failure to attend Sandie Peggie's tribunal and declare Labour her champions is politically inept.

‘It was the first time I felt the State saw me as I see myself – I finally existed': 10 years of the Gender Recognition Act
‘It was the first time I felt the State saw me as I see myself – I finally existed': 10 years of the Gender Recognition Act

Irish Independent

time14-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Irish Independent

‘It was the first time I felt the State saw me as I see myself – I finally existed': 10 years of the Gender Recognition Act

On a bright September morning in 2015, just weeks after the Gender Recognition Act was passed on July 15, history was made in Ireland, not with the fanfare of a referendum or the flash of cameras outside Leinster House, but with something far more quietly radical. For the first time, transgender people in Ireland could legally self-declare their gender identity, without the need for medical intervention, psychiatric diagnosis, or court proceedings. This marked a transformative moment, both legally and culturally, for a community long marginalised and misunderstood. The road to that moment was neither short nor easy. It was paved by decades of advocacy, persistence, and personal sacrifice. At the heart of the campaign was Lydia Foy, a retired dentist from Athy, Co Kildare, who fought the Irish State for nearly two decades in an effort to have her gender legally recognised. In 1997, she first brought her case to the High Court after being denied a birth certificate reflecting her gender identity. What followed was a legal saga spanning 18 years, during which Ireland was repeatedly found to be in breach of its human rights obligations by the European Court of Human Rights and its own courts. Dr Foy's tenacity, coupled with tireless campaigning by organisations like Transgender Equality Network Ireland (TENI), BeLonG To, and Amnesty International Ireland, forced lawmakers to confront an uncomfortable truth: Ireland had failed its trans citizens. When the act was finally signed into law in July 2015, just two months after the country became the first in the world to pass same-sex marriage by popular vote, it was seen by many as a further sign of an Ireland on the cusp of meaningful social transformation. Since 2015, over 1,100 gender recognition certificates have been issued in Ireland. For many, the law has meant access to correct documentation — a passport, a driver's licence, a birth certificate — that affirms rather than misgenders. Yet for others, especially non-binary people and trans youth, the act has remained a symbol of progress unfinished. It wasn't until 2023 that the Irish Government began formally recognising non-binary identities in state documentation, and young trans people under 16 still face significant barriers to legal recognition. Campaigners continue to call for amendments that reflect the full spectrum of gender diversity, and for broader societal changes that extend beyond legal frameworks — in healthcare access, education, employment, and public life. The last decade has also seen a sharp increase in anti-trans rhetoric, fuelled in part by social media and global culture wars. In that climate, the 2015 act stands as both a milestone and a mirror, reflecting the best of what Ireland can be when it leads with compassion, and the distance that still lies ahead. Ten years on, how has that legislation held up against the lived realities of those it was meant to empower?

Nicola Sturgeon: Supreme Court judgment on definition of woman 'massively overinterpreted'
Nicola Sturgeon: Supreme Court judgment on definition of woman 'massively overinterpreted'

Scotsman

time18-06-2025

  • Politics
  • Scotsman

Nicola Sturgeon: Supreme Court judgment on definition of woman 'massively overinterpreted'

Nicola Sturgeon | John Devlin Nicola Sturgeon has warned that politicians should update the law if the Supreme Court judgment harms the lives of transgender people. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Nicola Sturgeon has warned the Supreme Court judgment defining a woman in the Equality Act has been 'massively overinterpreted" as she repeated her calls for Keir Starmer's government to amend the law if the fallout impacts on the lives of trans people. The former first minister has revealed that she has had more "misogynistic abuse" over the issue of gender recognition than any other during her career. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Former first minister Nicola Sturgeon | John Devlin Unsurprisingly, Ms Sturgeon has reiterated that she will always be an "ally of the trans community". Ms Sturgeon, speaking in events at the How the Light Gets In festival in Hay-on Wye in Powys, Wales, on Saturday, stressed that the Supreme Court judgment last month had said "what the law is, there is no gainsaying that". The court ruled that the definition of a woman in the Equality Act refers to a biological woman. Trans women can legally become a woman through the Gender Recognition Act. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Echoing her comments given at Holyrood earlier this month, Ms Sturgeon stressed that it was up to politicians to "decide what the law should be or has to be". Watchdog, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), has faced accusations of a kneejerk response to the ruling after issuing interim guidance which recommends transgender people should not be allowed to use toilets of the gender they live as, and that in some cases they also cannot use toilets of their birth sex. Ms Sturgeon pointed to comments last week from Baroness Hale of Richmond, the first female president of the Supreme Court, who said that the judgment had been "misinterpreted". Susan Smith, left, and Marion Calder, directors of For Women Scotland, cheer as they leave the Supreme Court in London following the landmark ruling against the Scottish Government Lady Hale said that there was "nothing in that judgment that says that you can't have gender-neutral loos". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Sturgeon said: "That judgment, I think, has been massively overinterpreted in terms of some of the immediate reactions to it. "But if it is the case that the judgment means we have to move to a situation where trans lives are almost impossible to live then I'm sorry but the law has to change because that is not an acceptable way to be." Ms Sturgeon said that despite the abuse she had received over her support for the trans community, she would "always" be its ally "no matter how difficult that might be". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She added: "Many of those who are on the other side [of the issue] say it is all about protecting women," she told the festival. "Isn't it ironic that I have probably had more misogynistic abuse as a result of this issue than on any other issue in my entire political career. Go figure." According to The Sunday Times, Ms Sturgeon's comments have been criticised by Susan Smith of For Women Scotland, the organisation that won the Supreme Court appeal against the Scottish Government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She said: "It would be quite ironic, although not unexpected, if the first female first minister was resolutely sticking to the notion that biological sex is some nebulous concept. "There has indeed been a great deal of misrepresentation of the Supreme Court ruling but the most egregious has come from trans activists who have spun the most outrageous interpretations. "Baroness Hale was correct in saying that the ruling does not outlaw gender-neutral toilets but any organisation which only provides such facilities should be mindful that this may result in discrimination against other protected characteristics, in addition to sex.

‘It's unfair on me to have to tell my employer my biological sex is female', says Luke, 27
‘It's unfair on me to have to tell my employer my biological sex is female', says Luke, 27

Irish Independent

time15-06-2025

  • Politics
  • Irish Independent

‘It's unfair on me to have to tell my employer my biological sex is female', says Luke, 27

Luke O'Reilly Kane, who was born a woman, says lack of clarity and foresight around the Gender Recognition Act means true equality is still a long way off Luke O'Reilly Kane was born a woman, but his views now go against the predominant transgender ideology. Now 27, he was aged 18 in 2016 and among the first people to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate under the 2015 Gender Recognition Act, which marks 10 years in existence next month. Under the act, he could legally change his gender from female to male, and he carries a certificate to this effect.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store