logo
‘It was the first time I felt the State saw me as I see myself – I finally existed': 10 years of the Gender Recognition Act

‘It was the first time I felt the State saw me as I see myself – I finally existed': 10 years of the Gender Recognition Act

On a bright September morning in 2015, just weeks after the Gender Recognition Act was passed on July 15, history was made in Ireland, not with the fanfare of a referendum or the flash of cameras outside Leinster House, but with something far more quietly radical. For the first time, transgender people in Ireland could legally self-declare their gender identity, without the need for medical intervention, psychiatric diagnosis, or court proceedings. This marked a transformative moment, both legally and culturally, for a community long marginalised and misunderstood. The road to that moment was neither short nor easy. It was paved by decades of advocacy, persistence, and personal sacrifice. At the heart of the campaign was Lydia Foy, a retired dentist from Athy, Co Kildare, who fought the Irish State for nearly two decades in an effort to have her gender legally recognised. In 1997, she first brought her case to the High Court after being denied a birth certificate reflecting her gender identity. What followed was a legal saga spanning 18 years, during which Ireland was repeatedly found to be in breach of its human rights obligations by the European Court of Human Rights and its own courts. Dr Foy's tenacity, coupled with tireless campaigning by organisations like Transgender Equality Network Ireland (TENI), BeLonG To, and Amnesty International Ireland, forced lawmakers to confront an uncomfortable truth: Ireland had failed its trans citizens. When the act was finally signed into law in July 2015, just two months after the country became the first in the world to pass same-sex marriage by popular vote, it was seen by many as a further sign of an Ireland on the cusp of meaningful social transformation. Since 2015, over 1,100 gender recognition certificates have been issued in Ireland. For many, the law has meant access to correct documentation — a passport, a driver's licence, a birth certificate — that affirms rather than misgenders. Yet for others, especially non-binary people and trans youth, the act has remained a symbol of progress unfinished. It wasn't until 2023 that the Irish Government began formally recognising non-binary identities in state documentation, and young trans people under 16 still face significant barriers to legal recognition. Campaigners continue to call for amendments that reflect the full spectrum of gender diversity, and for broader societal changes that extend beyond legal frameworks — in healthcare access, education, employment, and public life. The last decade has also seen a sharp increase in anti-trans rhetoric, fuelled in part by social media and global culture wars. In that climate, the 2015 act stands as both a milestone and a mirror, reflecting the best of what Ireland can be when it leads with compassion, and the distance that still lies ahead. Ten years on, how has that legislation held up against the lived realities of those it was meant to empower?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High Court action over use of Irish airspace for weapons transport
High Court action over use of Irish airspace for weapons transport

RTÉ News​

time31 minutes ago

  • RTÉ News​

High Court action over use of Irish airspace for weapons transport

A legal challenge to the use of Irish airspace for flights transporting weapons to Israel has been lodged at the High Court. Campaign group Uplift, along with news organisation The Ditch and Irish-born Palestinian surgeon, Dr Ahmed El Mokhallalati have lodged papers seeking permission to apply for judicial review. In the statement filed to ground the application, they say they are seeking declarations that the Minister for Transport has failed to investigate allegations that Irish airspace has been used for the transport of weapons for use by the Israeli Defence Force in its military operations in Gaza and that part of the relevant legislation is unconstitutional. They also claim the Irish Government is in breach of export legislation in the manner in which "dual use export licences" are being granted for goods which they say are used to manufacture weapons. Uplift says it published a report in May last year outlining its view that a surge in "dual use" trade between Ireland and Israel, since Israel commenced military action against Gaza may be linked to goods being used in the production of military equipment. They say there is a high risk that goods from Ireland are being exported to be used by two Israeli companies involved in manufacturing weapons and military equipment. The Government has said the level of dual use exports is not related to the ongoing military attack on Gaza. The Ditch has published research on tracking flights which appeared to be transporting weapons to Israel through Irish airspace. They say there's clear evidence that this is being done. They say in their statement of grounds, that it is legally impermissible to do this, that it's facilitating genocide being carried out by the IDF against the Palestinian people and that no exemptions were sought for the transportation of these weapons. They claim the Minister for Transport has failed in his duties under Air navigation and transport legislation to investigate the allegations about the use of Irish airspace. They also say the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment has been unlawfully granting dual use export licences. Surgeon Ahmed El Mokhallalati, who was born in Dublin, outlined his experiences in Gaza and described how he had contacted the Uplift organisation with a wish to do something about the ongoing death and destruction there. He said he believed Ireland had been facilitating the transfer of weapons and munitions of war to be used against the people in Gaza and he said these were the same weapons which destroyed his home, killed his friends and families and caused horrific and unspeakable harm to the people whose lives he worked hard to try to save. He said he was disappointed to see that the Government was continuing to ignore the abuse of its airspace in this manner and he said he felt compelled to take some action. He said he believed the Government was turning a blind eye to the use of Irish airspace to transport weapons and facilitating the most egregious crimes against humanity. Uplift say they are hoping to get a hearing at the High Court to seek leave to bring the judicial review proceedings before the end of this week.

State to oppose Omagh bombing survivors' bid to bring cases over failure to hold inquiry, court told
State to oppose Omagh bombing survivors' bid to bring cases over failure to hold inquiry, court told

Irish Examiner

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

State to oppose Omagh bombing survivors' bid to bring cases over failure to hold inquiry, court told

The State will oppose applications by two Omagh bombing survivors seeking to bring lawsuits aimed at compelling the Irish government to establish a public inquiry into the atrocity, the High Court has heard. Emmet Tunney and Shawneen Conway, both survivors of the 1998 dissident republican bombing, say the Government is obliged to establish a public inquiry in circumstances where state authorities allegedly held 'actionable intelligence' relating to the attack. A total of 29 people, including Ms Conway's 18-year-old brother Gareth and a mother pregnant with twins, died when a car bomb planted by the Real IRA exploded in the centre of the Co Tyrone town on August 15, 1998. The survivors, who are seeking to bring separate but similar cases, both point to a judgment of Northern Ireland's High Court, which found that the British and Irish government bore responsibilities 'arising from the cross-border nature of the attack and the intelligence failings that preceded it'. 'The High Court in Northern Ireland found that there was a real prospect that fresh investigative measures could yield new and significant information regarding the atrocity, including the possibility of preventing it had certain intelligence been acted upon,' the survivors' court papers state. Their cases state that a public inquiry is required to ensure an effective investigation of the atrocity. They allege the State's failure to hold such an inquiry is a breach of their rights under the Constitution and under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). According to their court documents, article two of the ECHR requires an 'effective, independent, prompt, and public' investigation in circumstances where State agents knew or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk to life. Articles 40 and 41 of the Constitution require effective investigations of deaths involving potential State failures, their papers say. An independent inquiry into the bombing established by the UK government opened in Omagh in January and is continuing. That inquiry is examining whether the atrocity could have been prevented by UK authorities. Ms Conway and Mr Tunney say the Irish government should hold a parallel inquiry. In the High Court this week, Stephen Toal KC, for the survivors with Ruaidhrí Giblin BL and Karl McGuckin BL, moved an application seeking permission to bring the proceedings against the Government, Ireland and the Attorney General. Mr Toal said the State had indicated it would be opposing their application seeking permission to bring the proceedings. Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty said she would hear Mr Toal's applications for permission to bring the proceedings in early November. The judge said the State should be put on notice of the applications. Both survivors are seeking various orders, including one compelling the Government to establish a public inquiry into the bombing, and a court declaration that the Government's failure to establish such an inquiry to date is in breach of their rights. Mr Tunney, of Omagh, Co Tyrone, is represented in the action by Strabane-based firm Roche McBride Solicitors. Ms Conway, from Dungannon, Co Tyrone, is represented by Pa Duffy Solicitors in Dungannon.

Omagh bombing survivors' attempt to compel inquiry in the Republic will be opposed, High Court hears
Omagh bombing survivors' attempt to compel inquiry in the Republic will be opposed, High Court hears

Irish Independent

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Omagh bombing survivors' attempt to compel inquiry in the Republic will be opposed, High Court hears

The State will oppose applications by two Omagh bombing survivors seeking to bring lawsuits aimed at compelling the Irish government to establish a public inquiry into the atrocity, the High Court has heard. Emmet Tunney and Shawneen Conway, both survivors of the 1998 dissident republican bombing, say the Government is obliged to establish a public inquiry in circumstances where state authorities allegedly held 'actionable intelligence' relating to the attack.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store