
Amid DEI Backlash, This Pro-Diversity Venture Capitalist Is Now A Billionaire
She now has another 'first' to add to her list. Gouw is America's first female billionaire venture capitalist, worth an estimated $1.2 billion. Much of her fortune stems from her 15-year tenure at Accel, where she was part of the team that led that firm's lucrative early bet on Facebook (now called Meta). She now runs Acrew Capital, an early-stage venture capital firm that she cofounded in 2019. Acrew raised $700 million in October to invest in data and security, health and fintech startups, bringing the firm's assets under management to $1.7 billion—with an emphasis on diversity, especially through its Diversify Capital Fund.
Women made up just 17% of VC decision makers (partners, managing directors and principals) in 2024, per a PitchBook report. The private market data firm also reported that firms with at least one female cofounder captured around 22% of VC funding in 2024, down from 25% in 2023. Things likely won't move toward parity anytime soon. On President Trump's first day in office, he issued an executive order mandating the termination of all federal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs—which he called 'radical and wasteful'—that have supported women, people of color, individuals with disabilities and others. In addition, some of the world's biggest companies with powerful corporate venture capital arms, including Google, Meta and Goldman Sachs, have rolled back DEI initiatives.
How Gouw will respond to the new environment isn't clear, but for many years she has been a strong advocate for DEI, doubling down on the practice in several ways: starting Acrew, with an founding investment team that's 83% women or people of color; spearheading an initiative to bring Historically Black Colleges and Universities into the VC world; cofounding DEI-focused fund of funds First Close Partners (now with some $35 million in assets); and cofounding All Raise, a nonprofit that helps female founders and investors in Silicon Valley network and find mentors.
Gouw didn't respond to a request for comment on this story or on Forbes' estimate of her net worth, but she did speak to Forbes in 2023.
'I'm really excited to be able to bring together my professional passion with my personal passion for better diversity and inclusion in tech,' Gouw said at the time, adding that Acrew's Diversify Capital Fund is the largest VC fund focused on increasing diversity of stock ownership in tech startups, then with more than $300 million in assets. 'You see a little bit of progress, and a little bit of pullback. It feels a little bit like two steps forward, one step back.'
Born in Indonesia in 1968, Gouw left three years later with her parents and sister, near the end of the Suharto-led political revolution that targeted people of Chinese descent like her family. They moved to a 2,000-person town near Buffalo, New York, where she learned math by watching Buffalo Bills football games with her father, who'd explain the statistics to her, according to Lowenstein Sandler startup lawyer Ed Zimmerman, who's known and worked with Gouw for nearly 20 years. (In December, Gouw bought a reported 2% stake in the team, worth some $100 million.)
In the mid 1980s, only 40% of students at Gouw's upstate New York high school went on to college. 'Someone once told me that you can improve your chances at luck by working hard and getting a good education,' Gouw told Forbes in 2023. So she worked her way into Brown University, where she majored in engineering (and now serves on its board of trustees), graduated, consulted for Bain & Company for a couple years, then earned an M.B.A. from Stanford in 1996.
She cofounded a software startup around then, but jumped ship in 1999 to work at Silicon Valley-based venture firm Accel, where she spent the next 15 years. There she rose to become a managing partner of the fund that in 2005 bet on Facebook when it was just a scrappy, year-old startup fresh out of Mark Zuckerberg's Harvard dorm room. Gouw has never appeared in Facebook (now Meta's) regulatory filings, but Forbes estimates she held around 8 million shares at its 2012 public offering—worth more than $5 billion today had she not sold any—and slowly diversified her stake over time. Had she not gotten divorced in 2013 in California, where assets are most often split evenly between ex-spouses, she'd likely be worth even more.
Photos, From Left: Daniela Amodei, Selena Gomez, Gwynne Shotwell. Illustration by Ben Kirchner for Forbes
In 2014, Gouw decided to strike out on her own, cofounding Aspect Ventures 'with the idea to create venture the way it was in the late 1990s'—meaning launching a fund that was 'just laser-focused on the early stage,' she told Forbes in 2018. She and cofounder Jennifer Fonstad co-led Aspect for five years before splitting up and spinning off into their own firms.
Gouw realized she wanted to build a shop that was 'more consistent with her values as a specialist investor,' and 'something with multigenerational staying power,' says Lauren Kolodny, who cofounded Acrew along with Gouw, Vishal Lugani, Asad Khaliq and Mark Kraynak—plus others that made up a founding team ranging in age from Gen X to Gen Z. 'To build the next great venture firm, you need to be much more culturally akin to our companies,'says Kolodny.
Acrew launched in 2019 with a core value of diversity of perspective and two main funds. It invests anywhere from $1 million to $20 million in startups, with smaller amounts for earlier-stage companies. The vast majority of its Diversify Capital Fund's investors come from 'diverse backgrounds and communities,' meaning women, people of color and immigrants, per Acrew's website. That fund's goal is to bring diversity to companies' investors and boards—thus increasing founders' access to a variety of perspectives and, hopefully, drive better returns, on the thesis that diverse teams make better decisions.
The firm hasn't adopted a specific mandate to invest a certain dollar amount or percentage of deals based on a diversity metric. 'Having a board member like Theresia who values DEI reinforces the idea that people will be judged on merits and not on what they look like or where they come from,' says Simon Taylor, founder and CEO of data protection startup HYCU. (Acrew led the firm's $53 million Series B in 2022.) 'There's a misnomer sometimes when you talk about DEI, that you're making exceptions for people. Not in her case at all. She wants to make sure her portfolio companies have access to talent, board members or other contacts that might be diverse.'
One notable investor in Acrew's Diversify Capital Fund: Fisk University of Nashville. In 2020, lawyer and Fisk trustee Zimmerman approached Gouw with an idea to get Acrew to donate a fully-funded investor interest in the fund to the historically Black university. ' I'd love to,' Zimmerman recalls Gouw saying immediately, then writing a $1 million check to Fisk to cover the investment in Acrew's fund. Zimmerman, who has represented Acrew in fundraising transactions and is himself an investor in Acrew, added that Gouw has quietly become one of the largest donors to Fisk.
Regardless of what happens to the investment, Zimmerman says the inclusion of Fisk as an investor helps because it's shown Fisk that 'this is what happens when you're in a venture fund.' HBCUs like Fisk—which has a $37 million endowment, tiny compared to Stanford's $37 billion—and other smaller colleges have never really been able to access the top VC funds that have helped to drive the exponential growth of the country's biggest university endowments. Gouw's initiative later expanded to other firms and HBCUs as well: The Historic Fund, which involves ten VC firms, including Acrew, General Catalyst and Union Square ventures and nine HBCUs, launched in 2023 with over $10 million in donations to the universities along with matching allocations in their venture capital funds.
In the five and a half years since it launched, Acrew has made around 150 investments, according to PitchBook. The firm has had some wins, including an investment in fintech Chime—which is planning to go public at an $11 billion valuation, and for which Acrew partner Kolodny landed on Forbes' 2025 Midas List of top venture capitalists—and real estate tech firm Divvy, which sold in 2021 to Bill.com (fittingly, Gouw's first investment at Accel) for $2.5 billion. Five portfolio companies have gone out of business so far, per PitchBook. Acrew's initial fund, which made its first investment in 2019, has an 8% internal rate of return so far, per data provider Preqin, putting it in the third quartile of firms that started investing that same year.
Taken together, it's too early to tell how the firm's strategy will play out, since venture returns typically materialize over the course of a decade. Plus, succeeding as an upstart venture firm is certainly harder than it was a few years ago. It's more difficult to raise funding now amid rising interest rates and threats of sweeping global tariffs. That's coupled with a more hostile political environment for diversity-forward businesses.
'Diversity, equity and inclusion have become terms that people now shy away from,' Zimmerman says. ' The waters have receded in terms of the popularity of both the sentiment and putting dollars behind the sentiment … but the problem has not changed,' referring to diversity among venture capital leaders, investors and founders.
Acrew appears to be hedging a bit, too. In the firm's October announcement of its fresh funds, there is no explicit mention of diversity or diverse voices—but rather a focus the firm's thesis-driven approach of investing in companies in the data & security and fintech sectors. In December, Acrew announced a new thesis focused on companies in the health space. In April, the firm released a report called 'All In on AI.'
'Funds are optimizing for fundraising ability instead of necessarily the substance,' says independent venture capital investor Andrew Chan, who wrote a blog post titled 'The Failure of DEI In Venture Capital' earlier this year. 'They'll play to trends that work.'
Still, Acrew touts the diversity of its founding team prominently on its website: 55% identify as female, 48% as Asian/Pacific Islander and 14% as Black, Indigenous or other people of color. And Kolodny says that Gouw's success stands on its own as a way to encourage diversity in venture capital.
'It's important for young women and young Asian American women to see someone like [Gouw] achieve what she's achieving,' she says. Or, as Zimmerman put it in a 2022 social media post: 'Theresia leads by quiet example. It has, however, been brought to my attention that if we are more public about these examples, others will follow.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ruane Cunniff's Strategic Moves: MSA Safety Inc. Takes Center Stage with 2.74% Portfolio Impact
Exploring the Investment Philosophy and Recent Portfolio Adjustments Introduction to Ruane Cunniff (Trades, Portfolio) Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with SCHW. Ruane Cunniff (Trades, Portfolio) recently submitted the 13F filing for the second quarter of 2025, providing insights into their investment moves during this period. Founded in 1969 by Bill Ruane and Rick Cunniff, the firm operates on the belief that investing in great businesses at reasonable prices can outperform the stock market. By conducting exhaustive primary research and adhering to their principles, Ruane Cunniff (Trades, Portfolio) has built an impressive track record. William Ruane, a Graham-and-Doddsville superinvestor, was recognized by Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) and was a student of Benjamin Graham. The firm focuses on owning quality businesses run by quality people, aiming for long-term growth and value. Their strategy is rooted in paying attractive prices for high-quality, fast-growing businesses, with the goal of achieving higher returns than the S&P 500 Index with less fundamental risk. Summary of New Buy Ruane Cunniff (Trades, Portfolio) added a total of six stocks to their portfolio, with the most significant addition being MSA Safety Inc. (NYSE:MSA). The firm acquired 949,067 shares, which account for 2.74% of the portfolio, with a total value of $158.997 million. The second largest addition was Bio-Techne Corp (NASDAQ:TECH), consisting of 152,417 shares, representing approximately 0.14% of the portfolio, with a total value of $7,841,860. The third largest addition was Dollar General Corp (NYSE:DG), with 2,144 shares, accounting for a total value of $245,230. Key Position Increases Ruane Cunniff (Trades, Portfolio) also increased stakes in a total of seven stocks. The most notable increase was in Icon PLC (NASDAQ:ICLR), with an additional 453,833 shares, bringing the total to 1,708,183 shares. This adjustment represents a significant 36.18% increase in share count, a 1.14% impact on the current portfolio, and a total value of $248,455,220. The second largest increase was in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (NYSE:TSM), with an additional 51,388 shares, bringing the total to 1,917,681. This adjustment represents a 2.75% increase in share count, with a total value of $434,335,570. Summary of Sold Out Ruane Cunniff (Trades, Portfolio) completely exited one holding in the second quarter of 2025: Builders FirstSource Inc (NYSE:BLDR). The firm sold all 4,700 shares, resulting in a -0.01% impact on the portfolio. Key Position Reduces Ruane Cunniff (Trades, Portfolio) also reduced positions in 17 stocks. The most significant changes include a reduction in Meta Platforms Inc (NASDAQ:META) by 113,414 shares, resulting in a -22.2% decrease in shares and a -1.19% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $617.26 during the quarter and has returned 19.31% over the past three months and 34.48% year-to-date. Additionally, the firm reduced its position in Liberty Broadband Corp (NASDAQ:LBRDK) by 494,166 shares, resulting in a -20.73% reduction in shares and a -0.76% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $83.86 during the quarter and has returned -33.63% over the past three months and -14.65% year-to-date. Portfolio Overview As of the second quarter of 2025, Ruane Cunniff (Trades, Portfolio)'s portfolio included 44 stocks. The top holdings included 10.37% in Charles Schwab Corp (NYSE:SCHW), 10.1% in Liberty Media Corp (NASDAQ:FWONK), 8.75% in Intercontinental Exchange Inc (NYSE:ICE), 7.76% in Capital One Financial Corp (NYSE:COF), and 7.48% in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (NYSE:TSM). The holdings are mainly concentrated in six of the 11 industries: Financial Services, Communication Services, Healthcare, Technology, Industrials, and Consumer Cyclical. This article, generated by GuruFocus, is designed to provide general insights and is not tailored financial advice. Our commentary is rooted in historical data and analyst projections, utilizing an impartial methodology, and is not intended to serve as specific investment guidance. It does not formulate a recommendation to purchase or divest any stock and does not consider individual investment objectives or financial circumstances. Our objective is to deliver long-term, fundamental data-driven analysis. Be aware that our analysis might not incorporate the most recent, price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative information. GuruFocus holds no position in the stocks mentioned herein. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Coherent Eyes Core Growth Markets Following Defense Unit Sale
On Wednesday, Coherent Corp. (NYSE:COHR) agreed to sell its Aerospace and Defense business to Advent, a private equity investor, for $400 million. Proceeds will be used to reduce debt and will be immediately accretive to Coherent's EPS. Coherent's Aerospace and Defense designs and manufactures optical and laser systems for defense applications. The business includes approximately 550 employees and 10 geographic sites.'We are pleased to have reached this agreement with Advent. As part of our strategic portfolio optimization process, this transaction furthers our strategy to concentrate efforts on core growth markets and products,' said Jim Anderson, CEO of Coherent. The deal is expected to close in the current quarter. During the earnings call, Anderson said the decision to sell the business was made because it was not aligned with the company's long-term strategic focus areas and did not support long-term financial targets. View more earnings on COHR Coherent reported quarterly earnings of $1 per share, which beat the analyst consensus estimate of 91 cents. Revenue came in at $1.52 billion, which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $1.5 billion and is up from revenue of $1.31 billion from the same period last year. Outlook Coherent expects first-quarter revenue to be between $1.46 billion and $1.6 billion. On the earnings call, CEO Anderson said the current tariff policy remains unchanged from last quarter and is not expected to have a significant impact this quarter. 'Though we do not have full details yet, we believe President Trump's recent announcement regarding semiconductor tariffs may present a competitive advantage for our business,' Anderson noted. The semiconductor exemption covers many of the company's products, such as transceivers, and with U.S. manufacturing operations, the company expects it could avoid the semiconductor tariff. Analysts' Reaction Bank of America Securities downgraded Coherent from Buy to Neutral while raising its price forecast from $92 to $105. Needham reiterated its Buy rating with a $120 forecast, while Stifel also maintained a Buy but lifted its forecast from $100 to $118. Rosenblatt kept a Buy rating but trimmed its forecast from $150 to $135. Barclays maintained an Overweight stance and raised its forecast from $90 to $110. Price Action: COHR stock is trading lower by 23.47% to $87.25 at last check Thursday. Read Next:Image via Shutterstock Latest Ratings for COHR Date Firm Action From To Oct 2021 Stifel Reinstates Hold Sep 2021 Susquehanna Downgrades Positive Neutral Feb 2021 Benchmark Downgrades Buy Hold View More Analyst Ratings for COHR View the Latest Analyst Ratings UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? COHERENT (COHR): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Coherent Eyes Core Growth Markets Following Defense Unit Sale originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's debanking order could create headaches for banks, sources say
By Nupur Anand, Pete Schroeder and Saeed Azhar NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order requiring banks not to discriminate against clients on political or religious grounds could create uncertainty and administrative headaches for the industry, sources said. Trump signed an executive order on Thursday directing the Treasury Department and bank regulators to ensure lenders do not have policies in place that deny services to customers based on political or religious beliefs, a practice known as "debanking." Any wrongdoing uncovered could result in fines, disciplinary measures, and even referrals to the Justice Department. The order came days after Trump accused JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America last week of debanking him, and alleged that lenders discriminate against conservatives. Large banks have denied rejecting clients on political grounds, and instead blamed unclear rules for some of the account closures. Banks have earlier said that certain decisions to close accounts were based on rules around reputational risk, a criterion that has been banned by Trump's order. The order also gave regulators about 180 days to conduct their review. While some lenders welcomed the order for its potential to streamline processes, they also expressed concerns about how onerous it could be to comply with the order. The scope and zeal with which regulators carry out Trump's directions are still unclear and causing some trepidation, experts and industry officials said. "There are words in the executive order which can be open to interpretation," said Matt Bisanz, a partner at Mayer Brown. "We will have to see what meaning the regulators attach to it, and what is the scope of the activities that they focus on." "It's not even clear if there will be regulations or just guidance, which will be enforced through the bank exam process or will be handled in a quiet, non-public manner," Bisanz added. Trump's criticism echoed longstanding debanking complaints from Republicans, who have accused Wall Street banks of "woke capitalism," in denying services to gunmakers, fossil-fuel companies and others perceived to be aligned with the political right. "Fair access to financial services is a fundamental principle of the U.S. banking system," said Jonathan Gould, the Comptroller of the Currency, in a statement in response to the new order. "It is unacceptable for banks to discriminate against any customer on the basis of political or religious beliefs or lawful business activities." The OCC, which oversees national banks, is currently reviewing banks for improper policies and will take remedial actions "as appropriate." Spokespeople for the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation declined to comment on how they plan to implement the order. Industry executives say there are many questions about the executive order that may only be clarified if regulators publish rules on debanking, said three sources who declined to be identified because the discussions are private. It is too early to tell how onerous it will be to comply with the order given the lack of details so far, another industry source said. Banks could also face myriad challenges if they are forced to review and potentially renew client relationships over debanking, said Stephen Gannon, partner at Davis Wright Tremaine. Reinstating or modifying arrangements, as the order suggests, would require banks to analyze large volumes of data on client activities and products, he said. Regulators are unlikely to hand out penalties for any historic account closures, but they could be asked to disclose reasons for past debanking, two sources said. Now that the order has been announced, banks could face regulatory penalties if debanking guidelines are not properly implemented, said Ed Mills, an analyst at Raymond James, a financial services firm. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data