Housebuilders' £100m offer after probe ‘definitely looks dodgy', Parliament told
They argued the Government should insist on the watchdog completing its probe.
Assurances were also sought that the housebuilders at the centre of the inquiry would not be involved in building the affordable homes funded by the payout, which would see the firms 'simply get their money back'.
The CMA announced last week that Barratt Redrow, Bellway, Berkeley Group, Bloor Homes, Persimmon, Taylor Wimpey and Vistry had offered the payment as part of a package of commitments to address concerns following the investigation, which was launched last year.
The settlement, which is set to go into affordable housing programmes across the UK, would be the largest ever secured by the CMA through commitments from firms under investigation.
The CMA will now consult on the commitments until July 24 and, if accepted, it will mean the regulator does not need to rule on whether the companies broke competition law.
As well as the payment, the housebuilders have agreed legally binding commitments not to share commercially sensitive information with rivals, such as the prices that houses were sold for, except in 'limited circumstances', the CMA said.
They also agreed to work with the Home Builders Federation and Homes for Scotland to develop industry-wide guidance on information sharing.
The firms have said the offer of voluntary commitments does not mean they admit any wrongdoing.
Speaking in the House of Lords, housing minister Baroness Taylor of Stevenage said: 'The £100 million additional funding proposed for affordable housing will mean more families can benefit from a safe and secure home.'
But Liberal Democrat Baroness Thornhill, a vice president of the Local Government Association, said: 'There could be an alternative version to this – major housebuilders pay £100 million to halt the CMA's investigation into potential illegal collusion through the sharing of competitively sensitive information that could have inflated house prices.
'While this settlement might appear a pragmatic, cost-effective solution, would it not be more useful to have some evidence-led answers about whether the business models of the major developers are a significant factor in the slow delivery of housing?
'Therefore, should not the Government insist that the CMA actually completes its investigation, rather than allowing a financial settlement that obscures the fact and definitely looks dodgy?'
Responding, Lady Taylor said: 'The CMA is continuing its work on this, and on July 9 it announced that it is consulting on its intention to accept commitments offered by the housebuilders in relation to the investigation.
'That consultation closes on July 25, and I have already set out some of the commitments that the seven companies have made.
'The £100 million payment, the largest secured through commitments from companies under investigation, will be split between affordable housing programmes across all our four nations.
'I hope that will make a significant contribution to delivering the affordable housing we all want to see.'
Tory former housing minister Lord Young of Cookham said: 'If the Competition and Markets Authority confirms this £100 million payment for anti-competitive activity, can the minister give an assurance that none of the affordable homes to be built with that money will be built by the volume housebuilders responsible for this activity? Otherwise, they'll simply get their money back.'
Lady Taylor said: 'I am sure that the Competition and Markets Authority, as part of its consultation, will be looking at the best way of distributing that money, so it is not just recycled to the people who caused the problem in the first place.'
Liberal Democrat Lord Rennard said: 'The one-off payment of £100 million towards affordable housing is only about 3% of the operating profit of the five biggest housebuilders this year. Is this a relatively small penalty for them to pay for anti-competitive practices over many years?'
Lady Taylor said: 'This is the biggest settlement ever achieved by the CMA.'
She added: 'We have to consider what is appropriate in these circumstances. I am sure the CMA has done that.'
A CMA spokesperson said: 'Our year-long study of the housing market found that the complex and unpredictable planning system, together with the limitations of speculative private development, was responsible for the persistent under-delivery of new homes in the UK.
'It was also clear that concerns about sharing of confidential information, while important, were not the main driver of the undersupply of housing.
'The £100 million payment we have secured for affordable housing would provide immediate benefits across the UK, without a lengthy further investigation.
'It is in line with fines levied in similar cases that have taken many years to conclude and comes alongside a set of commitments which fully addresses our competition concerns.'
Bellway, which has agreed to pay £13.5 million, said: 'Bellway's offer of commitments does not constitute an admission of any wrongdoing, and the CMA has made no determination as to the existence of any infringement of competition law.
'Bellway welcomes the CMA's consultation on the voluntary commitments and will continue to work constructively with the CMA throughout the process.'
Berkeley declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Winter fuel allowance: the scammers pounce on government U-turn
A text message arrives that claims to be a reminder from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). According to its records you have not yet sent your application for this year's 'winter heating allowance'. With last month's announcement of a government u-turn on the payment, you could be forgiven for thinking you need to do something to make sure you get what you are owed and that this is a genuine prompt. It isn't. Once again fraudsters are taking advantage of the news cycle to trap the unsuspecting. If you do get a text like this you can safely ignore it. The DWP says: 'We never send text messages or emails requesting your bank details for winter fuel payment purposes.' The real payment is only for pensioners and, in most cases, will be given automatically without the need to make a claim. The only people who need to do anything are those who are of state pension age and have never received the payment before, perhaps because they have deferred receiving their state pension. They should contact DWP. Details of how to do that are online here. A text message claiming to be from the DWP – in some that is written in full, in some it is just DWP. It says you have not yet submitted your application for this year's 'winter heating allowance' and that if you fail to do so in time, you will be ineligible for a £300 payment. You are told you need to click on a link to complete your application. The link typically includes some combination of uk and gov, so, at a glance, it may look like the genuine address. There is a deadline for the response – often the day the message arrives. If you click through you will be asked to give personal and bank details – on the MoneySavingExpert website one person who received a text reported being asked to pay £1 on their card which they were told would be refunded. Warn older friends and relatives about the scam if you think they may be vulnerable. Forward any scam texts to 7726, where messages are reviewed and suspicious numbers can be picked up and future communications from them can be stopped. If you have fallen victim, in the UK you can report the scam to the police through Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 or online.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
National Development Plan: Can Ireland deliver on €112bn schemes?
It is a mark of the Republic of Ireland's recent economic performance that listeners to a popular politics podcast had to be reassured this week they will not face a "hair shirt" budget in the an economic context "hair shirt" tends to mean punitive austerity policies which make citizens uncomfortable and was in the wake of Ireland's pre-budget report which pointed to a 6.5% increase in core public spending, a tax cut for hospitality businesses and a €112bn (£98bn) package of infrastructure most European finance ministers those numbers would be closer to a silk shirt than a hair podcasters perhaps felt they had to give a reassurance as the budget will not deliver quite as much to household finances as it has in recent years. Big cash injection for housing For example a €250 universal energy credit introduced during the worst of the cost of living crisis will not be the run up to October's budget is expected to be dominated by a drip feed of announcements on the specific projects which will flow from that huge infrastructure fund, known as the National Development government is able to spend this money because Ireland's long-held policy of low corporation tax has come good in spectacular fashion, delivering a huge windfall from US firms who pay their global taxes in the is money which desperately needs to be spent because Ireland's basic infrastructure is example, a chronic failure to build enough housing is contributing to economic and social problems, such as tensions around infrastructure backlog has built up because public and private investment collapsed during Ireland's years of financial crisis and firms across construction and development failed during that period and the workforce shrank as the economy recovered rapidly and the population grew there wasn't the capacity to provide the investment which was National Development Plan (NDP) is an attempt to remedy this as quickly as the biggest allocation is for housing which will get €36bn between 2026 and 2030. The next biggest chunk is for transport, which gets €22bn. Of that, €2bn is supposed to be used to start work on a long-planned underground Metro rail line from Dublin city centre to the airport and northern experience of the Dublin Metro can help explain some of the scepticism around the Metro has been planned since 2000 but not a centimetre of track has been current planning application has been under consideration for more than 1,000 days and the man leading the project has conceded it is likely to face more legal is also the continuing saga of the new National Children's Hospital in Dublin which has missed 15 completion dates and is almost €1bn over government has attempted to show people that the state does have the capacity to section of the NDP is a list of recent projects across education, health, roads and broadband which have been built without much section lists the reforms to procurement and planning which should reduce delays, such as changes to judicial review there is a more fundamental issue: who will do the actual construction work required to turn the €112bn into houses, roads and sewers?The most recent figures suggest there are around 177,000 active construction workers in Ireland, the highest number in a an analysis by the Department for Further and Higher Education estimates that another 80,000 workers will have to be found to meet the government's targets on housing, let alone other those additional workers at a time when the Irish economy is at close to full employment will be a challenge in itself.
North Wales Live
2 hours ago
- North Wales Live
Life becomes a nightmare for hunderds of Welsh holiday let owners snared by hidden legal trap
Thousands of holiday let owners in Wales have been left bewildered after being hit with massive council tax bills out of the blue. It comes as an industry survey suggests nearly half of the country's self-catering businesses are now losing money, or barely breaking even, after failing achieve new letting targets set by the government. A little-known change in the law has seen many owners receiving council tax demands that often run into tens of thousands. Payments are often expected within seven days with the prospect of legal proceedings if they fail to settle. The huge bills stem from a legal technicality over the number of nights a property has been let. Although many owners believed they have met new letting thresholds set by the Welsh Government, and so thought they would not be liable for council tax, they've been caught out by a legislative pitfall. According to critics, it's left the holiday let sector in Wales on a 'cliff-edge'. The Professional Association of Self-Caterers (PASC) said it is currently dealing with hundreds of cases with more inquiries coming in every day from disbelieving owners bereft at the iniquity of the situation. A Welsh-speaking family letting out the family home in Abersoch, Gwynedd, is facing a three-year bill for £21,000 despite meeting all of what they thought to be their targets. They say Cyngor Gwynedd is understanding but the situation is placing intolerable demands on the property's 85-year-old owner. Meanwhile, a couple in Flintshire have received a demand for nearly £10,000. Colin and Rebecca Jones, from Afonwen, were left shocked to get a 'ridiculous' bill for a small two-person cottage just 8ft-9ft from the family home, a former mill with its old water wheel still in the garden. 'You can imagine the stress,' said Rebecca, an NHS personal assistant. 'It's horrendous. It's having a terrible impact on our lives and we're now having to look at all options, including annexing the properties and stripping out the cottage's kitchen.' Join the North Wales Live Whatsapp community now Since launching their business in February 2022, Colin and Rebecca have met what they thought were their required targets. In the first year, they hit 164 nights – way over the 70-night threshold that apparently existed at the time. When the bar was raised in April 2023, requiring owners to let their properties for at least 182 nights, they redoubled their efforts and, with price-cutting, they managed to meet the 182-night target in the subsequent two years. In the current financial year, they've so far let the cottage for 101 nights and are confident of reaching the target again. Hitting the lettings threshold is important as it qualifies owners for cheaper business rates rather than more expensive second home council tax, which often come with an added 'second home' premium. As this premium is as high as 200% in some counties - effectively trebling council tax bills – it can make the difference between a business succeeding or failing Colin and Rebecca were shocked to discover that, when assessed by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA), they were deemed to have failed to have met their letting targets. Like many owners, they believed that as the law only changed from April 2023, they only needed to reach the new letting thresholds from then on. They hadn't realised the 182-night rule applies retrospectively - meaning they missed the threshold in the first year. This made them liable for council tax for each of the past three years. Nicky Williamson, Wales policy lead at PASC Cymru, said she was not surprised so many people can't understand what's going on. 'We're getting lots of exasperated calls every day,' she said. 'It's very confusing and it's difficult for people to get their heads around what's happening. Assessments must be made on a daily basis, so we have situations where owners are getting notices on March 31 saying they met the 70-day target, followed by notices on April 1 saying they hadn't as the rules had changed. 'It's awful, a total minefield. But whether we like it or not, unfortunately it's the law. We're working with the VOA on this issue and, to be fair, they're doing their best within the legal limitations. But they're in a pretty impossible situation, now facing extra demands at a time when they're already dealing with huge backlogs.' The upshot is that the 70-night target was an illusion for most holiday lets in Wales in 2022-23. The situation has been compared to a football match where, late in the second half, players are told the rules have changed and the goalposts have been shifted. Local authorities are not at fault – they can only act on VOA assessments of a property's status based on the law at the time. The fall-out is sending shockwaves through a sector that's already struggling to meet the higher 182-night threshold. Of the estimated 22,000 short-term lets in Wales, feedback suggests around half are failing to hit the target. For owners, the ramifications are disastrous. In a recent PASC Cymru survey, 47% of owners now paying premium council taxes said they are now losing money. In North Wales, only Wrexham Council doesn't charge a second home premium. Elsewhere, it ranges from 100% (double) to 200% (treble). Councils justify the policy as a necessary measure to manage the proliferation of holiday and second homes, aiming to alleviate the housing crisis. But with tourism a major contributor to the Welsh economy, critics claim the approach risks hobbling the industry. Nicky noted the typical holiday let in Wales is a two-bedroom cottage. 'The average turnover for these businesses is £20,000 which, after costs, returns an average profit of £3,000,' she said. 'So it's easy to see why nearly half of all lets are now losing money when faced with large council tax demands, some of them unexpected. Being moved to council tax from business rates is associated with around half of Welsh self-catering businesses becoming non-viable.' Amongst the worst cases known to PASC involves a three-generation, Welsh-speaking family forced to give up their home of 50 years. After buying a derelict farm, they developed it into a five-star holiday let complex with four cottages, focusing on family holidays for more than 20 years. When they received a back-dated council tax demand for £37,000, they had no option but to sell up. Feeling misled When recovering council taxes, local authorities have some discretion. However, Freedom of Information requests by PASC Cymru indicate few are applying it. An exception appears to be Cyngor Gwynedd. According to the Abersoch owners facing a £21,000 bill, they're now stuck in an endless cycle of demands, followed by pleas for delays and clemency. Invariably these are agreed, only for renewed demands to arrive in the post a few weeks later. They too met all their official letting targets – or so they thought. 'We are a Welsh family from the area who have owned this house since the 1930s,' said the owner's daughter, who asked not to be named. 'We are not someone who has bought into the area. This is a family home handed down the generations that we still use as well as letting it out. 'The council must have hundreds of owners in a similar position. They tell us they are waiting for the government to sort it out. In the meantime we're facing large and unfair bills.' Many in the industry consider the rule changes amounted to retrospective legislation. Although VOA letters were sent to holiday let owners in October 2022, alerting them to the upcoming changes, awareness remains low. Even had the sector realised the implications at the time, few businesses would have been able to shift gears and increase lettings to make up the difference, having missed the busy summer season. Many in the sector feel misled. PASC Cymru said there's little holiday let owners can do. 'It's difficult to challenge the legislation,' said Nicky Williamson. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Feeling trapped The VOA is encouraging all holiday let owners to continue paying their council taxes or business rates whilst any cases are reviewed. A spokesperson said: 'Following Welsh Government's announcement of the new business rates criteria for self-catering properties, we wrote to all self-catering property owners in October 2022 to let them know about upcoming changes and how this would be assessed. 'If businesses feel they have been incorrectly assessed they can provide evidence for our teams to review. If a customer informs us that they are experiencing financial hardship we will prioritise their case.' In Afonwen, Colin and Rebecca now feel trapped. As things stand, making a profit is difficult enough without large and unexpected bills. Mothballing their holiday let would not only depreciate the property, it would attract an empty home premium. Like the second home equivalent in Flintshire, this currently amounts to 100% on top of standard council tax bills. From next year, Flintshire's empty home premium will be levied on a sliding scale ranging from 150%-300%. In an attempt to stop the two properties being considered separate homes, one option being explored is to link them together via an extension, and stripping out the cottage kitchen. It's an approach that's been tried elsewhere in Wales but PASC Cymru said a legal precedent has yet to be set. Colin, a quantity survey, is determined to fight for justice and has raised a formal complaint with the VOA. He said: 'This is not a second home, it is literally less than 10 steps from our back door. We do not go there for weekends or on holiday!'
