Syrian Pro-Assad Fighter Jailed For Life in Germany for Crimes Against Humanity
The court in the city of Stuttgart found the former militiaman guilty of crimes including murder and torture after a trial which involved testimony from 30 witnesses.
Shortly after the outbreak of anti-Assad protests in early 2011, the man joined a pro-government militia in the southern town of Bosra al-Sham, according to AFP.
He proceeded to take part in several crimes against the local population with the aim of "terrorizing" them and driving them from the town, the court found.
German authorities have pursued several suspects for crimes committed in Syria's civil war under the principle of universal jurisdiction, even after Assad's ouster last December.
In 2022, former Syrian colonel Anwar Raslan was found guilty of overseeing the murders of 27 people and the torture of 4,000 others at the notorious Al-Khatib jail in 2011 and 2012.
That was the first international trial over state-sponsored torture in Syrian prisons and was hailed as "historic" by human rights activists.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
a day ago
- Al Arabiya
Syria to name justice commission including women, Alawites, Kurds, Christians
Syria will soon announce the members of the National Commission for Transitional Justice, official sources have told Al Arabiya. The announcement will come in a presidential decree issued by Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and will include women as well as members from the Alawite, Kurdish, Christian, and other communities that make up Syria's diverse population. The sources, who requested anonymity, said the commission has proposed and forwarded several names to the presidency. The commission was created last May by order of the president to pursue transitional justice and hold accountable anyone proven to have committed crimes against the Syrian people during the rule of former president Bashar al-Assad, particularly after the outbreak of the Syrian uprising in 2011. The sources added that the president's office will finalize the list of members, which will be officially named through a presidential decree. According to the sources, a technical committee vetted all qualified candidates for the role – including judges and legal professionals, men and women – drawn from all sects and backgrounds. More than a hundred individuals were considered. The commission will operate under presidential authority, giving it both the scope and flexibility to bring to justice anyone proven to have committed crimes – regardless of where they are, inside or outside Syria. The sources stressed that the names were chosen with care, deliberately avoiding any sectarian or ethnic quota system, so such a precedent would not become embedded in Syrian political life. The commission's president, Abdul Basit Abdul Latif – appointed by al-Sharaa – told Al Arabiya last week that channels of communication had been opened with Interpol and all relevant international bodies to pursue members of the al-Assad family and others proven to have engaged in torture, killings, and other crimes against the Syrian people. Syrians are awaiting a presidential decree in the coming days to formalize the commission's membership, paving the way for it to pursue al-Assad regime figures found guilty of crimes against Syrians. A core mission of the commission will be to provide material compensation to Syrians who suffered harm. This includes establishing a fund to aid the families of those killed, victims of massacres or disability, people whose homes were destroyed, detainees tortured in al-Assad-era prisons, and those forcibly disappeared. The commission's mandate extends beyond financial aid to psychological and social support programs designed to reintegrate victims into society and ease the trauma inflicted by the former regime and its associates. The commission has vowed to prosecute anyone found responsible for crimes, violations, or incitement against Syrians. This includes those who justified or participated in the al-Assad regime's crimes, such as Hezbollah fighters, militias involved in mass killings, certain institutions or businessmen, and all others who profited from Syria's 14-year crisis. According to Abdul Latif, this judicial-political body aims to reform and restructure the justice system, which he described as plagued by 'injustice and corruption.' His criticism also extended to prisons and military and security institutions, which he said must be reshaped to uphold human rights and avoid abuses, ensuring all Syrians are subject to the same laws regardless of sect or political affiliation. The commission's formation was informed by meetings with Syrian victims and their representatives, civil society organizations, and international bodies, as well as a wide range of academics, legal experts, and national figures. The commission also studied numerous international examples to design a body capable of delivering transitional justice across all of Syria – without excluding any sect, group, or ethnicity – based on the principle that all citizens must be equally subject to the law of the state.
Al Arabiya
5 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Turkish foreign minister in Damascus for talks with Syria's al-Sharaa, source says
Turkey's foreign minister will hold talks with Syria's president in Damascus on Thursday to assess bilateral ties, tensions between Syria and Israel, and recent clashes between a Kurdish-led group and the Syrian government, a Turkish Foreign Ministry source said. NATO member Turkey has emerged as one of Syria's main foreign allies after the ousting of Bashar al-Assad last year. It has pledged to help rebuild the war-torn country, train and advise its armed forces, and support it in the international arena. The source said Syria's reconstruction would be among the top agenda items during Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan's meeting with President Ahmed al-Sharaa, in addition to Ankara's security concerns over recent violence in Syria. 'The talks are expected to assess Turkey's national security concerns stemming from northeast Syria, as well as cooperation between the two countries in the fight against terrorist organizations... at a time when preserving Syria's territorial integrity and unity is more important than ever,' the source said. Ankara considers the Kurdish-led, US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces a terrorist organization. It has repeatedly said the SDF, which controls much of northeast Syria, must abide by an agreement it signed with Damascus in March to integrate into the Syrian state apparatus, while also providing technical, advisory and military support to Syria to increase its defense capabilities and fight IS militants. Fidan's visit follows clashes this week between the SDF and Syrian government forces in Manbij and Aleppo, and weeks of tensions between Israel and Syria over fighting between Druze and Bedouin forces last month, which Ankara has described as an Israeli sabotage attempt against efforts to achieve stability in Syria. Fidan, who has said Israel aimed to fragment Syria and that Ankara would not allow this, will also discuss 'the actions and rhetoric of Israel that pose a threat to Syria and the region's stability,' the source said.
Al Arabiya
6 days ago
- Al Arabiya
No easy way out: Lebanon's disarmament plan puts Hezbollah in a corner
Lebanon's government has taken an unprecedented step by instructing the army to prepare a plan to disarm the country's Iran-backed Hezbollah militia. For the first time since the 1989 Taif Agreement, which ended Lebanon's 15-year civil war and led to the disarmament of all participating militias, the government has issued a formal decision aimed at removing Hezbollah's weapons. Hezbollah was the only armed group allowed to keep its weapons after the war, under the pretext of resisting Israeli occupation. The move strips Hezbollah's arms of the political legitimacy they once enjoyed. Successive governments had endorsed the so-called 'Army, People, and Resistance' formula in official policy statements – language that effectively enshrined Hezbollah's military role. This was during a period when Hezbollah was the country's most powerful political and military force, enjoying backing from Syria's former regime and Iran. But times have changed. The current government was formed amid a shift in political dynamics. Hezbollah emerged weakened after its latest war with Israel last year, while Tehran suffered major losses during a 12-day conflict with Israel in June. And the regime of Bashar al-Assad, Hezbollah's key Syrian ally, has fallen. Past attempts to address Hezbollah's independent military infrastructure or its separate communication networks have sparked crises. In 2008, when the Lebanese government tried to dismantle Hezbollah's private telecommunications network, the group responded by storming parts of Beirut. Clashes with political opponents left more than 65 people dead. Since then, Hezbollah's weapons have remained a divisive political issue. One camp has consistently called for the state to monopolize all weapons and decision-making on war and peace. The other, led by Hezbollah, insists on keeping arms to confront Israel. Now, with the landscape shifting, the question is: What are Hezbollah's options? A 'grave sin' Hezbollah's initial response has been combative. The group rejected the government's disarmament decision, saying it would treat it 'as if it doesn't exist' and labeling it a 'grave sin.' Despite limited options, each path forward carries significant risks and costs for the group. Hezbollah could escalate politically by having its four ministers – and those from its ally Amal Movement – resign from government, thereby disrupting parliamentary work where they hold a strong bloc with allies. It might also mobilize supporters in the streets, possibly with visible displays of arms, to create an atmosphere of intimidation. An armed confrontation with the army is another possibility. But any internal confrontation would have major consequences for civil peace and Hezbollah's role in Lebanon, and would likely turn the majority of the Lebanese public against the militia, especially if it comes into direct conflict with the military. Clashing with the army David Wood, a Lebanon analyst at the International Crisis Group, told AFP he believes Hezbollah will do everything it can to avoid a military clash with the army, because it knows the majority of Lebanese would side with the army in such a confrontation. Hezbollah MP Ali Ammar dismissed the idea of a confrontation, saying that the army and Hezbollah 'have a strong understanding and cooperation in serving Lebanon's interests.' Still, Hezbollah could escalate tensions with Israel. But as military analyst Riad Kahwaji explains, such a war would be devastating. With supply lines compromised by the collapse of the Syrian regime and weakened intelligence and logistics capabilities, the group is in a poor position to fight. The optimistic scenario The most hopeful scenario would see Hezbollah eventually agreeing to disarm and fully enter civilian political life, much like other militias did after the civil war. But a Lebanese source familiar with the talks told AFP that Hezbollah won't do that without something in return. The group's decision will also depend heavily on Tehran's position. Nicholas Blanford, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, expects Hezbollah to try to buy time. He said it's unlikely Hezbollah agrees to complete disarmament. What's at stake for Lebanon? Lebanon is facing intense pressure from international and Arab donors to ensure that only the state holds weapons – one of several conditions for securing much-needed aid and stabilizing the country. President Joseph Aoun recently stated that Lebanese leaders must choose 'either collapse or stability.' Meanwhile, Israel may act militarily again. It has already issued multiple warnings through media and diplomatic channels, signaling it will not hesitate to launch destructive strikes if Hezbollah's disarmament is not enforced. Hezbollah emerged from its last war with Israel in a weakened state. Many of its commanders were killed, and much of its arsenal destroyed. Getting weapons and funding from Iran has also become far more difficult as Lebanon and Syria's new authorities tighten border controls and impose stricter financial regulations. Several of Hezbollah's funding sources in Lebanon and abroad are now under scrutiny and targeted by sanctions.
