Financial markets weigh up conflict
Samantha Donovan: Investment analysts say the Israel-Iran conflict is seeing an uneasy calm on global financial markets. AMP's Shane Oliver helps manage billions of dollars for the superannuation firm AMP. He's told our business correspondent David Taylor that calm could disappear if Iran decides to close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical sea passage for the world's oil supply.
Shane Oliver: The financial markets seem fairly relaxed about things. There was the initial knee-jerk reaction a week or so ago when the news struck that Israel had hit targets in Iran and that Iran was retaliating. So, you saw this initial knee-jerk reaction. Oil prices sort of rose from about $68 a barrel to $74 or thereabouts. Share markets came down a bit. Ever since then, they've sort of been treading water waiting to see what happens. Of course, at the back of everyone's mind, there's always this fear that we're going to see a rerun of what happened in 1973 or 1979. But most of the time, that doesn't happen. This time around, though, there's probably a bit more nervousness simply because Iran has potentially getting closer to nuclear capability, nuclear weapons capability, and of course, Israel is determined to wipe that out. So that's why the situation is a lot more tense this time around. But I think investors are still thinking, well, maybe it'll turn out OK and be a non-event.
David Taylor: When Donald Trump says via the White House press secretary that he's simply going to make it as he wants an extension for two weeks, he's going to make a decision within two weeks or at the end of two weeks, you're the ANP's strategist for a lot of money, a lot of investments. When you hear something like that, what's your thought? Is your thought that he's stalling or is your thought that markets simply just have to wait day by day as to what's going to happen next?
Shane Oliver: Yeah, I guess his eyes done a very good job in terms of Iran, got the situation to a point where they can almost wipe out Iran's nuclear capability. And so maybe he should take that point. On the other hand, he worries that it could just lead to a worse situation, retaliation by Iran against shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 per cent of global oil supplies flow on a daily basis, and that it might bog the US down in a longer-term conflict. So the fact that he's thinking about it, I think, is a good sign. By the same token, it may just be giving more time for Iran to come to the party and surrender unconditionally. So it could be about that. Or alternatively, it could just be giving more time for the Israelis and the US to prepare the situation to go into trying to take these strikes. But the fact that it's not happening rashly, I think, is a good thing that he is thinking about it. So that gives me a little bit of comfort. And that's, I think, why share markets have ended the week, at least in the Australian time zone, reasonably in a reasonably calm mode. You haven't seen this sort of freefall that might have occurred if we'd gotten up in the morning and found that the US had struck Iran.
David Taylor: But I guess that's a possibility still.
Shane Oliver: It's still out there. It's still a possibility. I mean, the best outcome for everyone is Iran comes to the table and says, yeah, we're going to negotiate. We'll give you clear access to inspect nuclear facilities to make sure that we're not building nuclear weapons. That's probably the best outcome for everyone. The situation in the Middle East settles down. Oil prices fall back to where they were a few weeks back. And we move on to the next thing, back to focusing on tariffs. But it looks like we could be in for a period of uncertainty regarding this, not only whether the US will act, but when they do, how Iran then responds. And this could take some time before it's finally resolved. And then if Iran does respond and disrupt shipping, they don't have to block the whole of the Strait of Hormuz. They just have to provide enough of a threat to stop shipping going through there. Then how long it takes for the Americans to clear the situation again and remove the threat. And all of that could take quite a while.
Samantha Donovan: That's AMP's Head of Investment Strategy, Shane Oliver. He was speaking with our business correspondent, David Taylor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Blood on his hands': Pakistan turn on Donald Trump over Nobel Peace Prize furore
A former Pakistani opposition leader has claimed Donald Trump's hands are 'stained with blood', calling for his nation to withdraw its Nobel Peace Prize nomination for the US president. Over the weekend, Pakistan revealed it would formally recommend Mr Trump for the prestigious award for his role in resolving the recent conflict with India. News of the nomination arrived just before Mr Trump confirmed US strikes on nuclear sites in Iran. The fast-developing situation has since evolved into a tenuous ceasefire between Iran and Israel, which saw Republican congressman Buddy Carter nominate the US President for the Nobel Peace Prize on Tuesday 'in recognition of his extraordinary and historic role in brokering an end to the armed conflict'. The ceasefire appeared to hold after the first night with Mr Trump lambasting both sides in the aftermath of the US' attack on Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend. While the US President called it an 'obliteration' of Iran's nuclear capabilities, bombshell reports have since emerged that the nation's nuclear program remains intact. 'President Trump's influence was instrumental in forging a swift agreement that many believed to be impossible,' Mr Carter wrote in the letter. 'President Trump also took bold, decisive actions to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions and ensure that the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism remains incapable of acquiring nuclear weapons.' Nobel Peace Prize nominations can come from heads of state down to politicians serving at a national level, international courts of law as well as university chancellors and professors of social science, history, philosophy, law and theology, directors of foreign policy institutes, past recipients of a Nobel prize and members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee. But the support in Pakistan appears to be wavering after the US' actions in Iran. On Saturday, Pakistan's government praised President Trump's 'great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship', adding he was a 'genuine peacemaker'. On Sunday, Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the US attack on Iran, stating the move violated international law. 'The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran is deeply disturbing,' Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. 'Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond.' Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in a statement that he had contacted Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and 'conveyed Pakistan's condemnation of the US attacks'. It comes as thousands protested in the streets of Pakistan's biggest city Karachi against the US and Israeli strikes. Pakistani politicians have also called for their government to withdraw their nomination. President of Pakistan's Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam party and former leader of the opposition Maulana Fazal-ur-Rehman called for his nation to withdraw its nomination. 'President Trump's claim of peace has proven to be false; the proposal for the Nobel prize should be withdrawn,' Rehman told party members at a meeting on Sunday. 'Trump has supported the Israeli attacks on Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Iran. How can this be a sign of peace? 'How can a man with the blood of Afghans and Palestinians on his hands claim to be a peacemaker?' Similarly former senator Mushahid Hussain said on X: 'Since Trump is no longer a potential peacemaker, but a leader who has wilfully unleashed an illegal war, Pakistan government must now review, rescind and revoke his Nobel nomination!' Veteran politician Afrasiab Khattak posted on X: 'The sycophancy adopted by Pakistani ruling elite in nominating President Trump for Nobel Peace Prize is not part of normative conduct in international diplomacy. It was most embarrassing to announce the nomination hours before Trump ordered to bomb Iranian nuclear sites.' In more bad news for Mr Trump, senior Ukrainian politician Oleksandr Merezhko withdrew his Nobel Peace Prize nomination for the US President, claiming he'd lost 'any kind of faith' that he could end the war in Ukraine. Mr Merezhko nominated Trump in late 2024, telling The Telegraph he believed it would help the then president-elect to follow through on his promises of ending the war. In May 2023, Mr Trump said he could settle the war between Russia and Ukraine in '24 hours', a claim he repeated 53 times throughout the campaign according to a CNN fact check. He walked the claim back in an interview with Time, saying he 'said that figuratively, and I said that as an exaggeration, to make a point'. 'Obviously, people know that when I said that, it was said in jest, but it was also said that it will be ended,' he added. Since taking office, Mr Trump has had a disastrous meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, while Russia and Ukraine appear to be no closer to peace as the US President's attention turns to the Middle East. In a letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Mr Merezhko wrote: 'This appeasement of aggression encourages Putin to continue the attack. Trump just turns a blind eye to all of it. 'I lost any kind of faith that Trump will deliver in any of his promises.' Of Mr Trump's actions in the Middle East, Mr Merezhko said: 'I understand his position in relation to Israel. It is the right thing to do in order to help Israel to survive because Iran has said they want to destroy Israel. 'I wish he would do the same for Ukraine. Russia also wants to destroy Ukraine. Russia and Iran help each other. Trump should be consistent and help Ukraine.' However, Mr Trump has renewed support from Israel to achieve his coveted Nobel Peace Prize aspirations. Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon warned Iran that any violation to the fragile ceasefire will be met with a 'forceful response'. But he also praised Mr Trump for his involvement in the ceasefire, saying he 'deserves' a Nobel Peace Prize. 'I think we should thank him for his leadership, for the brave decision that he took, and to recognise the effort of the United States.' Mr Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize several times during his presidencies, but has yet to win the award. It's a fact he is well aware of judging by a post last Friday on Truth Social after he announced a peace deal between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do,' Mr Trump wrote. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between Serbia and Kosovo. 'No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me.'

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Fears Iran-Israel conflict may unleash ‘global heavyweights'
Broadcaster Lucy Zelic shares the 'fear' she felt amid the Iran-Israel conflict, revealing she believed it could lead to another world war. 'I genuinely had fear when there was news emerging that the Foreign Minister of Iran Abbas Araghchi, when he was heading over to Moscow I thought wow, this is going to be interesting,' Ms Zelic told Sky News host Paul Murray. 'And then the Strait of Hormuz, the potential to close that, how that would affect China knowing that they are their biggest customer with respect to oil, I thought are we on the precipice of World War III? 'Are we going to see these two global heavyweights drawn into this conflict now and exact their powers?'

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Doesn't he deserve some praise?': NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte hails US President Donald Trump's Middle East impact
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has hailed United States President Donald Trump's handling of the conflict between Israel and Iran. Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday, Mr Rutte was asked to comment on an effusive message he sent to the President following the announcement of a ceasefire in the Middle East. NATO's Secretary-General refuted suggestions the message made him look weak, before talking up President Trump's handling of the conflict and his impact on global defence spending. "Doesn't he deserve some praise?" Mr Rutte said. "When it comes to Iran, the fact he took this decisive action, very targeted, to make sure that Iran would not be able to get its hands on a nuclear capability, I think he deserves all the praise." Watch all the live coverage and analysis from our hosts and experts amid the escalating Israel-Iran conflict with a Streaming Subscription.