Senate probe into commercial fishing within 15-km municipal waters sought
Under proposed Senate resolution no. 11, Pangilinan called on the Senate committee on agriculture, food, and agrarian reform to conduct a comprehensive inquiry, in aid of legislation, into such impacts and the scientific basis—or lack thereof— for the 15-km municipal water delineation and the 12.8-meter depth restriction.
To recall, the Supreme Court (SC) upheld a regional trial court (RTC) ruling that declared certain provisions of the Philippine Fisheries Code and its implementing rules and regulations unconstitutional.
The RTC had permanently barred authorities from enforcing the 15-kilometer municipal waters limit.
Pangilinan pointed out that the 15-kilometer municipal water zone for small-scale fishers is 'crucial for the sustainability of marine ecosystems, the preservation of fish stocks, and the food and livelihood security of millions of Filipinos living in coastal areas."
He said the proposed probe would thus explore possible legislative interventions and amendments to existing laws and policies to protect the rights and welfare of small-scale fishers.
'This is about more than boundaries,' the returning senator said. 'It's about protecting the very communities who have long been the stewards of our seas—and ensuring that our oceans remain a source of life and livelihood, not a battleground for survival.'
Several fisherfolk groups have been protesting against the SC ruling to allow commercial fishing within the 15-kilometer boundary of municipal waters.
The Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) has also filed a motion for reconsideration before the SC to reconsider its ruling. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
an hour ago
- GMA Network
DA expanding P20 per kilo rice program to cover middle class
The coverage of the Marcos administration's P20 per kilo rice initiative—currently accessible to members of vulnerable sectors—will include middle-class families by 2026, the Department of Agriculture (DA) said Tuesday. The P20 per kilo rice is currently being sold at KADIWA ng Pangulo outlets across the country, but only members of vulnerable sectors—including indigents, senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and solo parents—are eligible to buy the subsidized National Food Authority (NFA) rice. The rice is sourced from the stocks of the NFA, which are procured directly from local farmers. The government subsidizes the program through the Food Terminal Inc. 'Our plan is… we will sell the P20 [per kilo] rice to 15 million households… or about 60 million Filipinos. These are middle-income families and below,' Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel Jr. said at the Post-State of the Nation Address (SONA) forum in San Juan City. The DA will set a monthly cap of 10 kilos that middle-class households can purchase. 'This can be increased further as we go along,' Tiu Laurel said. Vulnerable sectors have a higher limit of 30 kilos a month. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., in his fourth SONA, said that the P20 rice program is expanding nationwide, adding that his campaign promise has already been achieved. The Agriculture chief said the DA is setting aside P18 billion next year for the P20 per kilo rice initiative. 'But in the future, the way to make it sustainable is we plan to buy rice from the farmers with the additional funds,' he said. He added that the DA is eyeing selling 80% of rice procured from local farmers in the retail market. The DA chief said the agency is pushing for the amendment of the Rice Tariffication Law to bring back the powers and market intervention functions of the NFA ''so we can buy rice as we sell rice; unlike now, it's just for buffer stocking.' —VBL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Chiz: No reason for Senate not to follow SC ruling on VP Sara impeachment
Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero on Tuesday expressed his personal opinion on the Supreme Court's decision regarding the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte, saying that he does not see any reason why the upper chamber should not follow it. Escudero, however, stressed that the Senate will decide on the matter as a collective body. 'Personally, ang posisyon ko bilang abogado ay ito: Nag-desisyon ang Korte Suprema, sangayon ka man do'n o hindi, dapat ito'y sundin. Kung hindi, magkakaroon tayo ng constitutional crisis at baka tignan tayo ng mga karatig bansa natin at ibang tao na isang banana republic kung saan sinusunod lang natin ang gusto natin,' he told a press conference. (Personally, my position as a lawyer is this: The Supreme Court has made a decision, and whether you agree with it or not, it must be followed. Otherwise, we will have a constitutional crisis, and our neighboring countries and other people might view us as a banana republic where we only follow what we want.) 'Ito ay pagpapasyahan namin pero wala akong nakikitang rason at dahilan personally para hindi namin sundan at sundin ito. Maliwanag ang desisyon ng Korte Suprema—the impeachment complaint is null and void ab initio, meaning from the beginning,' he added. (This is for us to decide, but I see no reason personally for us not to follow it. The decision of the Supreme Court is clear—the impeachment complaint is null and void ab initio, meaning from the beginning.) Voting 13-0, the SC on July 25 declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, saying that they were barred by the one-year rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. The high court also found that the articles violated Duterte's right to due process. The high court also emphasized that it was not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her, but any subsequent impeachment complaint may only be filed starting February 6, 2026. The SC decision is immediately executory, but a motion for reconsideration may be filed. The House of Representatives said on Sunday that it would appeal the decision. Escudero said that the impeachment case may be discussed at the senators' caucus scheduled for Tuesday afternoon. 'Wala sa agenda subalit tiyak akong mapag-uusapan 'yun dahil imposible namang hindi. That is considered what we may call the elephant in the room, so malamang mapag-uusapan 'yun mamaya,' he said. (It's not on the agenda, but I'm sure we will talk about it because it's impossible not to. That is considered what we may call the elephant in the room, so we will probably talk about it later.) According to him, the Senate should decide the issue without convening the impeachment court because the SC has ruled that it lacks the authority to hear the articles of impeachment. 'Sa tingin ko mas safe na Senado ang magpapasya kaugnay nito imbis na impeachment court dahil baka matignan pa na paglabag ang pag-convene ng impeachment court matapos ang desisyon ng Korte Suprema,' he added. (I think it's safer for the Senate to decide on this instead of the impeachment court because convening the impeachment court after the Supreme Court's decision might even be seen as a violation.) Escudero was reelected Senate president at the opening session of the 20th Congress on Monday. —VBL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Escudero to file bill banning officials' relatives from serving as contractors, suppliers
Senate President Francis ''Chiz'' Escudero said Tuesday that he would introduce a bill that would ban government officials' relatives up to the fourth degree of consanguinity and affinity from serving as suppliers and contractors. ''Bilang katugunan sa panawagan ng Pangulo kaugnay sa corruption, conflict of interest, at hindi tamang paggamit ng pondo, maghahain kami ng panukalang batas na ang layunin ay ipagbawal up to the fourth civil degree of consanguinity and affinity ang sinumang mambabatas o opisyal ng pamahalaan, nasyunal man o lokal, na maging contractor o supplier sa pamahalaan,'' Escudero said at a press conference. (In response to the call of the President in connection with corruption, conflict of interest, and mishandling of funds, I will file a bill that will ban relatives of public officials up to the fourth degree of consanguinity and affinity from being contractors and suppliers for the government.) ''Para sa akin, klarong conflict of interest 'yun at hindi dapat pinapahintulutan 'yun,'' Escudero added. (For me, that's a clear conflict of interest, and it should not be allowed.) The Senate leader said he wants this measure to be included in the priority bills, a topic that will be tackled during the senators' caucus later in the day. On Monday, President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. said during his fourth State of the Nation Address that government personnel who steal public funds, such as those for flood control projects, should be ashamed. The President tasked the Department of Public Works and Highways with submitting a list of flood control projects in the last three years. Marcos also vowed that those at fault would be charged and held liable for their actions. —VBL, GMA Integrated News
