Escudero to file bill banning officials' relatives from serving as contractors, suppliers
''Bilang katugunan sa panawagan ng Pangulo kaugnay sa corruption, conflict of interest, at hindi tamang paggamit ng pondo, maghahain kami ng panukalang batas na ang layunin ay ipagbawal up to the fourth civil degree of consanguinity and affinity ang sinumang mambabatas o opisyal ng pamahalaan, nasyunal man o lokal, na maging contractor o supplier sa pamahalaan,'' Escudero said at a press conference.
(In response to the call of the President in connection with corruption, conflict of interest, and mishandling of funds, I will file a bill that will ban relatives of public officials up to the fourth degree of consanguinity and affinity from being contractors and suppliers for the government.)
''Para sa akin, klarong conflict of interest 'yun at hindi dapat pinapahintulutan 'yun,'' Escudero added.
(For me, that's a clear conflict of interest, and it should not be allowed.)
The Senate leader said he wants this measure to be included in the priority bills, a topic that will be tackled during the senators' caucus later in the day.
On Monday, President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. said during his fourth State of the Nation Address that government personnel who steal public funds, such as those for flood control projects, should be ashamed.
The President tasked the Department of Public Works and Highways with submitting a list of flood control projects in the last three years.
Marcos also vowed that those at fault would be charged and held liable for their actions. —VBL, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
4 hours ago
- GMA Network
Chiz to House: Senate not a playground to run after foes
"To these people, I say this, the Senate is not your playground to run after your political enemies. We are not an accomplice in any grand scheme,' Escudero said. Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero on Wednesday asked members of the House of Representatives to refrain from trying to use the Senate as a tool to go after political adversaries. Escudero made the remark as he explained his vote for archiving the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte. 'To the House of Representatives I say, do not allow yourselves to be used for the blind hatred and ambition of a few who did things haphazardly, gravely abused their discretion, and violated due process, rights under the Constitution as found by the High Court itself,' the Senate president said. 'In spite of all these, you expect everyone to roll over in obedience. When we did not, you moved hell and high water to destroy personalities, malign reputations, and tarnish institutions," he added. "To these people, I say this, the Senate is not your playground to run after your political enemies. We are not an accomplice in any grand scheme,' Escudero said. Escudero also said that he is not willing to play such politicians' game, stressing that he will 'never bow to a mob [and] never cower to the shrillest of voices.' To recall, the House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. Duterte, in return, had entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her, which she called merely a 'scrap of paper.' Recently, the Supreme Court declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, stressing that it is barred by the one-year rule under the Constitution and that it violates her right to due process. The high court said the Senate cannot acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings. However, the SC said it was not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her and that any subsequent impeachment complaint may be filed starting February 6, 2026. The House , through the Office of the Solicitor General, then filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the SC decision. The lower chamber argued it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case.
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
Senate archives articles of impeachment vs. Sara Duterte
"Let this chamber be remembered not for the passions we inflamed, but the principles we upheld,' Escudero said. The Senate on Monday voted to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte, following the decision of the Supreme Court (SC) blocking the impeachment trial of Duterte. In the explanation of his "yes" vote, Senate President Francis Escudero said that he would 'never bow to a mob [and] never cower to the shrillest of voices.' 'Let history, Mr. President, record that in this moment, we chose the Constitution, we chose the rule of law by defending the integrity of the Supreme Court and maintaining the system of checks and balances under our republican system of government," Escudero said. "Let this chamber be remembered not for the passions we inflamed, but the principles we upheld,' he added. Senate Minority Leader Sen. Vicente Sotto III and other members of the minority argued that the Senate should wait for the decision of the Supreme Court on the motion for reconsideration that the Office of the Solicitor General filed on behalf of the House of Representatives To recall, the House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. Duterte, in return, had entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her, which she called merely a 'scrap of paper.' Recently, the Supreme Court declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, stressing that it is barred by the one-year rule under the Constitution and that it violates her right to due process. The high court said the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings because the articles of impeachment were void. However, the SC said it is not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her and that any subsequent impeachment complaint may be filed starting February 6, 2026. The House then filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the SC decision. The lower chamber argued it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case. Before voting on the motion of Sen. Rodante Marcoleta, as amended by Senate Majority Leader Sen. Joel Villanueva, the Senate also voted to dismiss the motion of Senate Minority Leader Sen. Vicente Sotto III "to table" the Marcoleta motion. 'With five affirmative votes, 19 negative votes, the motion to table the motion of Senator [Sotto] is lost,' Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero said. The Senate minority leader voted in favor of his motion, saying he has voted numerous times with the minority. 'I know that it will be a vote in the minority, but I have always voted in the minority on many issues in the Senate since 1992 up to the present. I always prayed I was wrong. Unfortunately, I was always right,' Sotto said. 'May God have mercy on your decision,' he added. The SC previously ruled unanimously that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution. The SC also ruled that the articles violate the right to due process. It said that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings and that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction to constitute itself into an impeachment court. –NB, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
Escudero slams ex-justices critical of SC ruling on VP Sara impeachment
Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero on Wednesday slammed retired Supreme Court (SC) justices who are critical of the high court's ruling on the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte. 'Bahagi ako ng Kongresong nagtangka na i-impeach si dating Chief Justice Davide. Bakit ko sinabing tangka? Dahil pinigilan po kami ng Korte Suprema. In-enjoin at nag issue ng TRO ang Korte Suprema at ito ang desisyon na iyon,' he said during the plenary session. (I was part of the Congress that attempted to impeach former Chief Justice Davide. Why did I say attempted? Because we were stopped by the SC. The SC issued an injunction and a TRO, and this is that decision.) Escudero named retired SC justices Conchita Carpio-Morales, Antonio Carpio, and Adolfo Azcuna, as well as former chief justices Reynato Puno and Artemio Panganiban. They all voted in 2003 that the impeachment complaint against then Chief Justice Hilario Davide was barred under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution. Written by Carpio-Morales, the decision in Francisco vs. House of Representatives said that an impeachment is deemed initiated upon the filing of the impeachment complaint and referral to the House Committee on Justice, or when an impeachment complaint is filed and verified by at least one-third of the membership of the House. (Where are all those who are complaining now and questioning the Supreme Court's decision? The justices who are now questioning it are already retired, they voted in favor of it back then.) 'Subalit ngayon tila nag iba ang posisyon. Ano nga ba ang pinagkaiba kung meron man? Klaro ang pinagkaiba, iba ang pangalan ng nasasakdal,' he added. (But now, it seems their position has changed. What exactly is the difference, if there is any? The difference is clear, the name of the accused is different.) In its July 25, 2025 ruling, the SC declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, saying that they were barred by the one-year bar rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. The high court also found that the articles violated Duterte's right to due process. As a result, the SC said the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings. The House of Representatives appealed the ruling on Tuesday. The SC meanwhile ordered Duterte to comment on the motion for reconsideration. 1Sambayan coalition, which includes Carpio-Morales and Carpio, previously filed a motion for reconsideration, urging the SC to issue a status quo ante order and set the case for oral arguments. Escudero asked if those critical of the SC ruling are 'truly for accountability' or 'simply anti-Duterte.' 'Remove the name of the vice president in this case, apply the decision of the high court, as Senator Cayetano said earlier, to another impeachable official, would our positions, would your positions be the same?' he said. —VBL, GMA Integrated News
