
Senate archives articles of impeachment vs. Sara Duterte
The Senate on Monday voted to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte, following the decision of the Supreme Court (SC) blocking the impeachment trial of Duterte.
In the explanation of his "yes" vote, Senate President Francis Escudero said that he would 'never bow to a mob [and] never cower to the shrillest of voices.'
'Let history, Mr. President, record that in this moment, we chose the Constitution, we chose the rule of law by defending the integrity of the Supreme Court and maintaining the system of checks and balances under our republican system of government," Escudero said.
"Let this chamber be remembered not for the passions we inflamed, but the principles we upheld,' he added.
Senate Minority Leader Sen. Vicente Sotto III and other members of the minority argued that the Senate should wait for the decision of the Supreme Court on the motion for reconsideration that the Office of the Solicitor General filed on behalf of the House of Representatives
To recall, the House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes.
Duterte, in return, had entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her, which she called merely a 'scrap of paper.'
Recently, the Supreme Court declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, stressing that it is barred by the one-year rule under the Constitution and that it violates her right to due process.
The high court said the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings because the articles of impeachment were void.
However, the SC said it is not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her and that any subsequent impeachment complaint may be filed starting February 6, 2026.
The House then filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the SC decision. The lower chamber argued it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case.
Before voting on the motion of Sen. Rodante Marcoleta, as amended by Senate Majority Leader Sen. Joel Villanueva, the Senate also voted to dismiss the motion of Senate Minority Leader Sen. Vicente Sotto III "to table" the Marcoleta motion.
'With five affirmative votes, 19 negative votes, the motion to table the motion of Senator [Sotto] is lost,' Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero said.
The Senate minority leader voted in favor of his motion, saying he has voted numerous times with the minority.
'I know that it will be a vote in the minority, but I have always voted in the minority on many issues in the Senate since 1992 up to the present. I always prayed I was wrong. Unfortunately, I was always right,' Sotto said.
'May God have mercy on your decision,' he added.
The SC previously ruled unanimously that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution.
The SC also ruled that the articles violate the right to due process. It said that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings and that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction to constitute itself into an impeachment court. –NB, GMA Integrated News

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Marcos says he's taking all threats very seriously
President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. said that he has taken all kinds of threats very seriously. In an interview with India's Firstpost, Marcos was asked if Vice President Sara Duterte is capable of hatching an assassination plot against him. The Philippine leader said he is not in a position to say if Duterte is really capable of doing it. ''I don't know, you know... I am really not in a position to say what that's about,'' Marcos said. ''But you have to be careful... but then you know in my position, there always is some kind of threat and we take them all very seriously,'' he added. To recall, Duterte's ''assassination'' statement against Marcos, First Lady Louise ''Liza'' Araneta-Marcos and Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez was made during a virtual press conference in November last year, wherein she slammed the House of Representatives' order to transfer Atty. Zuleika Lopez, her then chief of staff, from the House detention facility to the Correctional Institution for Women in Mandaluyong City. Her remarks were immediately referred to the Presidential Security Command (PSC) for proper action. In response, Duterte clarified that her statement was not a threat, saying that she only highlighted the alleged threat to her security. In February, the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) filed sedition and grave threat complaint against Duterte over the alleged kill order. To recall, one of the seven Articles of Impeachment against the Vice President included the conspiracy to assassinate Marcos. the First Lady, and the Speaker.—AOL, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
VP Sara impeachment raps in 2026? Diokno, UP prof say it's possible
A refiling of the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte is possible in 2026 if the Supreme Court (SC) maintains its decision declaring her current impeachment charges unconstitutional, House prosecutor and Akbayan Representative Chel Diokno said Thursday. 'Kung talagang sarado na 'yung lahat ng kalsada para ituloy ang impeachment pansamantala ngayon, yung pinaka-last resort siyempre ay mag-file ulit pagdating ng February 2026,' Diokno told GMA Integrated News' Unang Balita in an interview. (If all avenues are really closed to continue the impeachment for now, the last resort, of course, is to file again by February 2026.) With 19 votes for, four against, and one abstention, the Senate on Monday voted to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment against Duterte with some senators citing the SC decision. Voting 13-0, the SC ruled that the articles of impeachment are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. It also ruled that the articles violate the right to due process. However, motions for reconsideration were filed in connection with the ruling of the high court. For his part, UP College of Law Assistant Professor Paolo Tamase also sees another filing of an impeachment complaint against Duterte next year if the SC maintains its decision despite the motions. 'Kung babaliktarin ng Korte Suprema ang desisyon niya, maaari may maghahain ng tama ng motion sa Senado upang buhayan ulit ang kaso ng impeachment,' Tamase said. (If the Supreme Court reverses its decision, someone might file a motion in the Senate to revive the impeachment case.) 'Kung hindi po babaliktarin ng Korte Suprema yung desisyon nila sa Duterte v. House, mukhang refiling po ang susunod na mangyayari sa House of Representatives,' he added. (If the Supreme Court does not reverse their decision in Duterte v. House, it looks like the next thing to happen in the House of Representatives is a refiling.) Duterte's camp earlier said that it remains ready should there be a new impeachment complaint filed against her in 2026. "Kung dumating man ang pagkakataon na there will be another impeachment, sabi nga nila, subject to the one-year bar, we will be ready to face those allegations,' said Atty. Michael Poa in a previous interview. (If there will be another impeachment, as they say, subject to the one-year bar, we will be ready to face those allegations.) The vice president was impeached by the House on February 5, with more than 200 congressmen endorsing the verified complaint against her. Duterte was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. She has denied the allegations. –Joviland Rita/ VAL, GMA Integrated News

GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Brazil's Bolsonaro appeals house arrest order
BRASILIA — Lawyers for former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro appealed on Wednesday a house arrest order imposed against him earlier this week, a document sent to the Supreme Court and seen by Reuters showed. Bolsonaro was placed under house arrest on Monday after an order was issued by Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes against him. Moraes' decision cited a failure to comply with restraining orders he had imposed on Bolsonaro for allegedly courting US President Donald Trump's interference in the case. Bolsonaro's lawyers had already said that they would appeal the decision to place him under house arrest. In the document sent on Wednesday, the lawyers said that Bolsonaro did not breach the restraining orders. They also asked for the house arrest order to be voted on by a wider panel of Supreme Court justices. — Reuters