Children raised by strict parents do better at school, but is that you? Take our quiz to find out
While parents of baby boomers gave little thought to how to bring up their kids, modern families are bombarded with advice and philosophies on nurturing their youngsters in a world where rapidly evolving technology is making the job much harder.
But the raging debate about the best way to do it, fuelled by a vast industry where the parenting app market alone is estimated to be worth over £500m, could finally be settled.
A new UK study which has tracked nearly 6,000 children for more than a decade has provided solid evidence about what parenting style is associated with the best outcomes. And the answer is: 'authoritative'.
By plotting the progress of children since the age of two, the research has concluded that authoritative parenting, typified by high expectations, stricter limits on behaviour and warm relationships, is more likely to yield higher academic scores and better wellbeing.
Researchers at the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) discovered that the approach produced better outcomes than 'permissive' styles where parents are engaged but discipline is lacking, as well as 'authoritarian' styles, where warmth is in short supply.
A challenge to the 'gentle parenting' phenomenon
Children raised in a household with an authoritative parenting approach were more likely to reach the expected standard in the reading, writing and maths tests at the end of primary school, even after taking into account variables such as parents' educational level, according to the report, published this month by the Department for Education.
'At Key Stage 1 [children aged five to seven], higher parental limit-setting was associated with a greater likelihood of children achieving the expected level in Key Stage 1 reading, maths and science,' researchers say. 'An authoritative parenting style, characterised by high responsiveness and high levels of psychological control and clearer parental limit setting was also found to have a positive impact on Key Stage 2 [children aged seven to 11] attainment.'
The findings of the Study of Early Education and Development (SEED) appear to be a direct challenge to the 'gentle parenting' phenomenon that has taken the parenting world by storm in recent years.
Social media is awash with influencers pushing the approach, beloved of millennials, which teaches that the needs of the child must come first and that raised voices and the word 'no' are verboten.
Taken to extremes, the approach can seem outlandish. Actress Mayim Bialik's children went nappy-free as babies. Bialik, star of the hit TV series Blossom and The Big Bang Theory, practised something called 'elimination communication' that involved trying to read a baby's signals, and following them around with a potty. Fellow Hollywood actress Alicia Silverstone, of Clueless fame, posted a video of herself on YouTube in 2012 feeding her then 11-month-old son, Bear Blu, by chewing food and spitting it into his mouth.
According to gentle-parenting advocate Sarah Ockwell-Smith, misbehaviour is 'a cry for help... It is a sign that all is not well in the child's world. But most of the behaviour-control methods used today penalise the child for having a problem, rather than trying to help them solve it,' she says in The Gentle Parenting Book.
Ockwell-Smith and other devotees argue that gentle parenting is a form of 'authoritative' parenting, and insist that it does involve setting boundaries, just ones that 'validate a child's feelings and employ kindness, empathy and understanding'.
But as gurus preach the gospel of 'respecting' your child, exasperated mothers who have given gentle parenting a go are reporting that, in practice, it might only work with 'gentle children', and that more feisty offspring are running rings round them.
As one frustrated mother of a three-year-old puts it: 'It's a distressingly short journey from validating a child's feelings to letting them cause mayhem in a supermarket.'
Critics claim that whatever the good intentions, in a fast-moving world where parents have little time to endlessly negotiate with their toddler, the gentle parenting approach has morphed into a permissive free-for-all and is spawning a generation of spoilt, entitled children.
Katharine Birbalsingh, founder of the hugely successful Michaela Community School, in north London, and known as the UK's strictest headteacher, is one of them. She has attacked 'middle-class gentle parenting' for creating a culture where parents are more interested in being friends with their children than holding them to account.
Teachers argue that the impact of this approach in schools is leading to chronic disruption and misbehaviour.
'Young people are more sensitive to simple things like being moved away from a friend for being too chatty in lessons, almost as though they aren't used to consequences at all. There's an unspoken sense of entitlement,' says Nadeine Asbali, a secondary school teacher in London. 'When we give young children the impression their own feelings are superior, we create teenagers and young adults who are selfish and inward-looking and who believe they are exceptions to the rules.'
'What children want are boundaries'
Prof Vivien Hill, psychologist and programme director at University College London's Institute of Education, agrees that the real-world application of gentler parenting styles can run into problems.
'That child is going to be entering the world of school where a teacher has to be able to control and teach 30 children. Nobody has the capacity to negotiate in that environment,' says the academic, who is also a member of the British Psychological Society's Division of Educational and Child Psychology.
'There is nothing more irritating to a teacher than giving a pupil a quick direction to keep somebody safe and they ignore you or want to have a 45-minute conversation about the pros and cons of their preferred course of action. There is something about how that style of parenting translates into wider communities and certainly the world of education and schooling.'
Scaled up, that lack of discipline can bring a school to its knees. School 21, a free school in east London founded in 2012 by Peter Hyman, Sir Keir Starmer's senior adviser for education from 2022-2024, and Oli de Botton, who has just been appointed by the PM in the same role, was initially upheld as a shining example of progressive education.
It opened with one year group and was given a glowing first Ofsted report. As it grew larger, however, the wheels began to fall off. In 2023, it was judged as 'requiring improvement' by Ofsted inspectors who found lessons were 'too often disrupted by poor behaviour'.
According to the new head, Moray Dickinson, who is turning the school around after joining in 2022, behaviour at the secondary school was 'really bad'. Despite this, suspension rates were 'extremely low' and there were no permanent exclusions.
'There was a huge amount of lost learning in class. Teachers were at times frightened and they were not happy in their jobs,' he said. 'There were fights. And as a result of that, the expectations for behaviour were very low.'
His top-down approach which has 'tightened things up significantly' has just been rewarded by a 'good' Ofsted rating.
The head is adamant that establishing clear structures and limits on behaviour do not have to come at the expense of good relationships with pupils. As the NatCen research confirms, with its findings on 'authoritative' parenting, the key ingredients of warmth and stricter limits do not have to be mutually exclusive – in families or in schools.
'What children want are boundaries, but you don't have to be authoritarian to operate boundaries,' says Prof Hill. 'It is about knowing when to give them freedom to explore and do their own thing, but also knowing when they need boundaries. That should be being developed from birth through early years but it becomes essential in adolescence when getting it wrong can be quite catastrophic.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Why does your mind goes 'blank'? New brain scans reveal the surprising answer
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. You look up from your phone screen and suddenly realize you weren't thinking about anything. It's not a lapse in memory or a daydream; it's literally a moment when you're not thinking of anything at all. Neuroscientists have a term for it — mind blanking — which they define as a brief, waking state when conscious thought simply stops. Scientists used to think our waking minds were always generating thoughts, but recent research shows that's not the case. Mind blanking is now recognized as a distinct conscious state associated with changes in arousal, which in neuroscience refers to alertness and responsiveness to stimuli. Studying this curious state could shed light on how consciousness works, some researchers think. "For some, it's kind of a blip in the mind, and suddenly there's nothing," Thomas Andrillon, a neuroscience researcher at the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research and the Paris Brain Institute, told Live Science. "But not with that feeling, 'There was something that I forgot.'" Often, people are unaware of the lapse until they are prompted to answer "What were you just thinking about?" "When we interrupt them randomly," Andrillon continued, "it's clear it's more frequent than what people realize." Although the frequency of this phenomenon varies among individuals, various studies suggest about 5% to 20% of a person's waking hours may be spent in this state. Related: Super-detailed map of brain cells that keep us awake could improve our understanding of consciousness An investigation of 'mind blanking' In a study published in the July issue of the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Andrillon and his team used electroencephalography (EEG) — which involves placing electrodes on participants' heads — to measure brain activity while people experienced lapses in attention, such as mind wandering or mind blanking. Mind wandering occurs when people's thoughts drift to tasks or ideas unrelated to the one at hand, while mind blanking involves the absence of all thought. While wearing EEG caps, participants watched numbers flash rapidly on a display screen. They were instructed to press a button every time a number appeared except for 3, which they were told to skip. This task tests how quickly people react when a response is required and how well they can inhibit that response, when necessary. Because most of the presented numbers required a response, people often pressed the button by mistake when they saw a 3 onscreen. The researchers paused the task once a minute to ask what the participants were thinking, finding that they were either focused on the task, their mind was wandering, or they were experiencing a "mind blank." Participants pressed the button more quickly when their minds were wandering, whereas their responses slowed noticeably during mind blanking, suggesting these two mental states are distinct. Brain activity told a similar story. The EEG data showed that the participants' brain activity tended to slow down slightly more when their minds were blank than when they were wandering, compared to the baseline of their paying attention. 'The connectivity changes as if the inner workings of the brain were specific, in a way, to that state," Andrillion said. EEG data is great for tracking rapid changes in brain activity, but it can't pinpoint exactly which brain regions are involved. That's in part because it records brain waves through the skull, and the signals blur as they make their way through the brain tissue, fluid and bone. Andrillon explained it's like listening through a wall. You can tell if a group inside is noisy or quiet, but you can't tell who is talking. The EEG results from the study suggest that during mind blanking, the brain's activity slows down globally, but the technique couldn't identify specific areas. That's where functional MRI (fMRI) came in. Related: 'Hyper-synchronized' brain waves may explain why different psychedelics have similar effects, rat study reveals Hypersynchronization fMRI provides a clearer view of which regions are active and how they interact, but its tracking speed is slower because the technique tracks bloodflow, rather than directly following brain signals. fMRI is more like peeking into the room and seeing who's talking to whom, but not knowing precisely when, Andrillion said. Study co-author Athena Demertzi, a neuroscience researcher at the GIGA Institute-CRC Human Imaging Center at the University of Liège in Belgium, led the fMRI portion of the study. As people rested in an fMRI scanner with no particular task at hand, Demertzi and her team periodically asked what they were thinking. The results were surprising: when people reported mind blanking, their brains showed hyperconnectivity — a global, synchronized activity pattern similar to that seen in deep sleep. Typically, when we are awake and conscious, our brain regions are connected and communicating but not synchronized, as they appear to be during mind blanks. "What we think happens in the case of mind blanking is that the brain is pushed a little bit toward the side of synchronization," Andrillon said. "That might be enough to disrupt these sweet spots of consciousness, sending our mind to blank." Research into mind blanking is still in its early stages, but Andrillon and Demertzi noted that its similarity to brain patterns seen during deep sleep may offer an important clue as to its function. Deep sleep, also known as slow-wave sleep, coincides with important cleanup work for the brain. It clears away accumulated waste, cools the brain, conserves energy and helps reset the system after a full day of mental activity. RELATED STORIES —Why do we forget things we were just thinking about? —Electronic' scalp tattoos could be next big thing in brain monitoring —'Hyper-synchronized' brain waves may explain why different psychedelics have similar effects, rat study reveals Andrillon and Demertzi suggested mind blanking may act as a mini-reset while we're awake. Demertzi said it's like "taking five to steam off" or "to cool your head." Early studies in Demertzi's lab suggest sleep-deprived people report more mind blanks, adding support to this idea. Both researchers stressed that this state is likely a way for the brain to maintain itself, though "it's not ideal for performance," Andrillon said. Andrillon believes it's possible but unlikely that there are people who have never experienced mind blanking. Detecting a mind blank can be a challenge. "It can require being interrupted," Andrillon said, "to realize, 'OK, actually, there was no content.'"
UPI
4 days ago
- UPI
You might inhale ight Inhale 68,000 microplastics per day
The French team used high tech equipment to measure concentrations of microplastics in 16 air samples from their own apartments and cars. Photo by Adobe Stock/HealthDay July 31 (UPI) -- Scientists say the average person may be inhaling microscopic, lung-penetrating plastic particles at a rate that's 100 times what was previously assumed: 68,000 per day. "Everywhere we look, we find microplastics, even in the air we breathe inside our homes and cars," said the French team that conducted the study. "The biggest concern is how small these particles are, completely invisible to the naked eye. We inhale thousands of them every day without even realizing it." The study was led by Nadiia Yakovenko of the University of Toulouse and published July 30 in the journal PLOS One. As the researchers noted, prior research has sought to estimate how many microplastics people breathe in daily. But those studies focused on relatively large particles -- about 20 to 200 micrometers in diameter. Yakovenko's team tracked even more minute plastic particles, ranging from 1 to 10 micrometers across - far smaller than a human hair. Their incredibly small size means these invaders can penetrate deep into the lungs. The French team used high tech equipment to measure concentrations of microplastics in 16 air samples from their own apartments and cars. They found that in their apartments, an average of 528 microplastic particles per cubic meter floated in the air they breathed. That rose to 2,238 particles per cubic meter for car interiors, tested under normal driving conditions. Most (94%) of these particles were very tiny -- between 1 to 10 micrometers in diameter. Yakovenko's team estimated that people breathe in 3,200 larger (10 to 300 micrometers in diameter) microplastic particles per day and 68,000 smaller ones (1 to 10 micrometers). The findings point to "indoor air as a major and previously underestimated exposure route of fine particulate microplastic inhalation," the researchers said. Just how harmful are these microplastics? The jury is still out on that. However, in a study presented in April at a meeting in Chicago of the American College of Cardiology, researchers from Case Western Reserve School of Medicine in Cleveland reported that high blood pressure, diabetes and stroke rates are higher in coastal or lakefront areas of the U.S. with greater concentrations of microplastics in the environment. Research presented at meetings is typically considered preliminary, until published in a peer-reviewed journal. Microplastics might even be harming the brain. In a study published in 2024, researchers in Germany and Brazil found that 8 of 15 autopsied adults had microplastics detected within their brain's smell centers, the olfactory bulb. Particles have also been detected in human lungs, intestines, liver, blood and testicles, and even in semen. More information Find out more about microplastics at Stanford University. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Humans may be inhaling 100 times more microplastics than previously assumed, scientists warn
Humans are likely inhaling far greater amounts of lung-penetrating microplastics than previously assumed, scientists are warning. People may be breathing in about 100 times more of these tiny fragments than past estimates indicated — from sources based both outside and indoors, including in homes and cars, researchers revealed in a new study, published on Wednesday in PLOS One. These tiny, inhaled particles can invade the lungs and cause oxidative stress, while wreaking havoc on the immune system and other organs, according to the study authors. 'Everywhere we look, we find microplastics, even in the air we breathe inside our homes and cars,' they said in a statement. 'The biggest concern is how small these particles are completely invisible to the naked eye.' While research has thus far largely focused on larger microplastics ranging from 20 to 200 micrometers in diameter, the study authors — from the Université de Toulouse in France — decided to focus on those 10 micrometers or less, which penetrate the lungs more easily. 'Something we can't see can still harm us,' co-lead-authors Nadiia Yakovenko, a postdoctoral scholar at the university, and Jerome Sonke, a research director at the French National Center for Scientific Research, said in joint remarks. 'Our findings show that microplastics in the air, especially indoors, may be an invisible threat we are only beginning to understand,' Yakovenko and Sonke added. To better quantify the typical number of inhaled microplastics, the scientists said they collected air samples from their own apartments and cars, under realistic driving conditions. The researchers then employed a technique called Raman spectroscopy, through which they measured concentrations of microplastics in 16 air samples. The median concentration of detected microplastics was 528 particles per cubic meter in the apartment air samples and 2,238 particles per cubic meter in the cars, with 94 percent of all detected particles measuring less than 10 micrometers. 'We inhale thousands of them every day without even realizing it,' the authors said. 'Deep inside our lungs, microplastics release toxic additives that reach our blood and cause multiple diseases.' After combining their results with previously published data regarding indoor microplastics, the researchers estimated that adults inhale about 3,200 microplastic particles in the 10-300-micrometer range daily. But they also found that these same individuals breathe in about 68,000 particles of 1-10-micrometer particles per day — more than 100 times more than previous research estimated for these small-diameter fragments. These findings, the authors stressed, suggest that health risks from inhaling lung-penetrating microplastic could be much higher than previously thought. As such, they called for more research into this critical question. Yakovenko and Sonke, the co-lead-authors, expressed particular concern about car cabins, which they stressed have limited ventilation — enabling microplastic particles to accumulate and concentrate in the air. Under these circumstances, they explained, people can inhale microplastics in greater quantities during long commutes. The two researchers said they hope that by raising awareness about this issue, their study could help guide future public health recommendations and indoor air quality standards. Their team, the scientists continued, plans to assess a wider variety of indoor exposures and relevant daily habits. 'We hope to shed light on a more personal and constant route of microplastic exposure through inhalation that has so far remained under the radar,' they added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
