2020 Delhi riots: Court acquits 12 men accused of murdering Muslim man
The Special Public Prosecutor in this case had relied on WhatsApp chats from a group in which the accused persons had made 'extra-judicial confessions', stating that 'your brother has killed two Muslim men'.
Referring to these chats, Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala of Karkardooma Court, in his order dated April 30, noted: 'Such posts/messages may be put in the group solely with intention of becoming hero in the estimation of other members of the group and it could be a boast also, without truth.'
'The argument of Ld. Prosecutor [is] that the chats show [the accused] Lokesh and others…, who were members of that group, were involved in the riots. However, I find that this plea is just a general presumption without support of substantive evidence,' the Court said.
It acquitted the 12 — Lokesh Kumar Solanki; Pankaj Sharma; Ankit Chaudhary; Prince; Jatin Sharma; Himanshu Thakur; Vivek Panchal; Rishabh Chaudhary; Sumit Chaudhary; Tinku Arora; Sandeep; and Sahil.
The FIR lodged in this case had alleged that the accused persons were involved in the killing of nine Muslim persons. Of these nine, two were Hashim Ali and his brother Aamir Khan. The prosecution had alleged that the accused had conspired to teach Muslims a lesson for attacking the Hindus during the 2020 riots.
Witnesses examined by the prosecution had alleged that the accused persons were carrying stones, sticks, swords and iron rods and were shouting slogans like 'Jai Sri Ram' and 'Har Har Mahadev'.
The Delhi Police had filed multiple chargesheets naming a WhatsApp group, named 'Kattar Hindu Ekta', in connection with the nine murders. Lokesh was the first person arrested in the case, and during his questioning, he named the other accused persons who were a part of the group.
Between February 24 and 26 in 2020, the riots engulfed the Capital, leaving 53 dead, over 500 injured, and damaging property worth crores.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Temple priest loses over Rs 12 lakh in stock market investment fraud
HYDERABAD: A temple priest lost Rs 12.5 lakh to fraudsters posing as stock market investment advisors. On the complaint of the victim, Rachakonda cybercrime police registered a case on Wednesday and launched a probe to identify the offenders. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The 43-year-old complainant from Meerpet received a WhatsApp invitation on July 20 from an unknown number to join a group titled 1052/UBS Securities. The group's administrator, Adithi Das, instructed members to open accounts on the website and invest in what she claimed were pre-IPO and over-the-counter stocks. On the instructions of the fraudster, between July 22 and 23, the victim transferred Rs 50,000 in two transactions to different bank accounts via the platform. The virtual balance of his account on the fake portal surged to Rs 1.26 crore. When he tried to withdraw the amount, the operators demanded an additional payment of Rs 12 lakh towards tax and processing fees. "After I paid Rs 12 lakh, the fraudsters cut off all communications with me. My access to the portal was also blocked," the victim said. Based on his complaint, Rachakonda Cyber Crime officials booked a case under sections 338, 316(2) (punishment for criminal breach of trust), 318(4) (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), and 319(2) (cheating by personation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), along with Sections 66-C and 66-D of the Information Technology Act. Police are analysing the money trail to identify the accused.
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Review: In ‘Tehran', an Indian police officer inserts himself into the Iran-Israel conflict
In the Hindi movie Tehran, a high-ranking Delhi Police officer tries to out-Mossad Mossad. Arun Gopalan's thriller on ZEE5 marries the rule-breaking cop valourised by Indian filmmakers with the espionage dramas that emerge out of Israel with predictable regularity. In 2012, Iranian agents carry out bomb attacks on Israeli diplomats in three cities, including Delhi. Special Cell unit member Rajeev (John Abraham) is pained by the deaths of Indian bystanders, especially a girl who sells flowers. Rajeev vows that he will not allow terrorists to use India as a staging ground for such attacks. Until their very hands are cut off, nobody will take India seriously, he declares. Although described by his superiors as 'insane' and a loose cannon, Rajeev has friends in the right places, including Research and Analysis Wing officer Sheilaja (Neeru Bajwa). Accompanied by Divya (Manushi Chhillar) and Vijay (Dinker Sharma), Rajeev embarks on an unsanctioned covert operation to punish the perpetrators of the blast, much to the horror of his boss Neeraj (Alyy Khan) and RAW chief Himadri (Qaushik Mukherjee). Rajeev's antics could jeopardise a crucial gas deal between India and Iran, so both governments are understandably outraged too. The Israelis, not so much. While the diplomats officially distance themselves from Rajeev, Mossad thinks he might be useful. After Rajeev is disowned by India and hunted by Iran, an Israeli agent helps him on the sly, a mark of admiration for a man who doesn't follow the rules of combat. Tehran is purportedly inspired by actual events. Based on a story by Bindni Karia and a screenplay by Karia and Ritesh Shah, the movie wades into a diplomatic quagmire from which it is unable to extricate itself. The film tries to be wise about and up-to-speed with geopolitics in Asia and the Arab world in the early 2010s. Gritty and fast-paced, with chunks of Farsi dialogue, Tehran attempts to appear authentic but operates in the same realm of fantasy from which emerge tall tales of Indian agents matching the prowess of their Western counterparts. Tehran is out at a time when Israel's relations with Iran are in tatters and Israel's brutal offensive in Gaza has surpassed all limits of morality. Given the deadly serious realities of the moment, it's hard to care for Rajeev's kill-or-be-killed mentality, his bizarre quest to destroy ties with India's allies, his Rambo-like tendencies, or even his anguish at being abandoned by his government. Explicit links are made in the film between the Iranian militant Afsar's support for the Palestinian cause and his murder of a rabbi – a 'Free Palestine' banner hangs in the background as Afsar (Hadi Khanjanpour) brutally slays the rabbi. Mossad's decision to use Rajeev is surely this Indian cop's dream come true. John Abraham plays Rajeev with quiet ferocity – a mien the actor has previously adopted in Batla House and The Diplomat. Among the supporting cast, Alyy Khan and Qaushik Mukherjee are compelling as government officials who do stick to the rules, and with good reason. Play
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Too harsh, too vague
Uttarakhand is following in big brother UP's footsteps as its state cabinet approves what can be fairly described as draconian amendments in anti-conversion law via the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill 2025. Aside from harsher punishment (minimum prison sentence of seven years, fine up to ₹10L) and expanding its scope (property seized), the law is even more problematic thanks to loosely worded conditions defining the offence. For instance, inducement/allurement has been expanded to include 'glorifying one religion against another'. It bans 'social media applications aimed at building online communities of people who share interests and activities or are interested in exploring the interests and activities of others…' for the purposes of the law. Whatever does this mean? The law in a 2022 amendment had already imported terms of the most stringent of laws – anti-terror legislation UAPA. So, 'illegal conversion' is a cognisable nonbailable offence, police already need no warrant to arrest, suspicion will suffice, and the burden of proof is on the accused. New amendments increase jail-term to life of 14 years. Similar to UP's law, if convicted of illegal conversion of minors or SC/ST, jail-term may be 20 years or remainder of life. Mass conversion is defined as 'when the religion of two or more persons is converted'. CM Dhami justifies the amendments because allegedly a 'demographic change' is being wrought in the state through 'illegal/forced conversion'. For the record, Uttarakhand population is 83% Hindu, about 14% Muslim, a smattering of Christians and others. The long arm of the law has stretched into what is legislative and executive overreach. The legislation is to be amended to allow local govt to confiscate property belonging to the accused if there is not evidence, but mere suspicion of 'foreign funds' being involved. DMs can order seizure of any property they have 'reason to believe' is related to alleged conversion. And this can be done '…regardless, whether a court has taken cognisance of such offence.' This, when the burden of proof is already on the accused. There is disquiet in the state about harsh measures being exploited by officials for witch-hunts. A law where anyone can be arrested on mere suspicion of 'intent', where the accused's property can be seized, which places the onus of proving the charges wrong on the accused is at the least a poorly designed legislation. It demands a thorough review, or reversal. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
