Minnesota AG says state lawsuit against Trump administration aims to protect trans youth
Ellison on Tuesday provided details of the lawsuit in a noon news conference at the State Capitol.
CBS News Minnesota
will be streaming a replay of his remarks at 12:30 p.m. Watch in the live player above.
According to Ellison, the lawsuit is an attempt to prevent the U.S. Department of Justice from filing a civil lawsuit against the Minnesota Department of Education.
Last week, the
DOJ sued Maine's education department
for "discriminating against women by failing to protect women in women's sports" in what U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi alleged is a violation of Title IX.
"The Department of Justice will not sit by when women are discriminated against in sports," Bondi said. "This is about sports, this is also about these young women's personal safety."
The federal government said in its lawsuit filed in Maine's federal court that the state's Department of Education is "openly and defiantly flouting anti-discrimination law by enforcing policies that require girls to compete against boys in athletic competitions designated exclusively for girls," arguing that the practice violates Title IX's "core protections." It cited three examples of boys participating in girls' sports.
Bondi added that the DOJ's actions in Maine could be followed by moves in other states, including Minnesota.
"We're looking at Minnesota, we're looking at California," Bondi said. "We're looking at many, many states, but they are the top two that should be on notice."
Bondi
previously sent letters
to Ellison and Erich Martens, director of the Minnesota State High School League (MSHSL), warning them "Minnesota should be on notice," and her department "will hold accountable states and state entities that violate federal law."
In February, President Trump
signed an executive order
banning transgender girls and women from competing on
sports teams
that match their gender identity. In that order, Trump mandated that Title IX be interpreted as prohibiting transgender girls and women from participating in female sports. Title IX is a federal law that bans sex discrimination in schools.
Ellison announced the president's ban was
in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act
after the MSHSL turned to his office for legal opinion following its announcement on Feb. 7 that
it wouldn't comply with the order
, citing the state law.
While testifying before the U.S. Congress in December 2024, NCAA President Charlie Baker said he was aware of "less than 10" transgender athletes among the more than half a million student-athletes governed by the organization.
This story will be updated.
Jacob Rosen
and
Kaia Hubbard
contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
NY judge denies DOJ bid to unseal grand jury records in Ghislaine Maxwell case
NEW YORK — A federal judge in Manhattan on Monday denied a request by the Department of Justice to unseal grand jury records in Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's case — finding the Trump administration's bid appeared not to be about public transparency but 'the illusion of such.' Federal Judge Paul Engelmayer, in his 31-page opinion, said the DOJ, facing growing turmoil over the decision not to release investigative materials on Epstein, portrayed the sealed records from Maxwell's case as something they were not. 'Contrary to the Government's depiction, the Maxwell grand jury testimony is not a matter of significant historical or public interest. Far from it. It consists of garden-variety summary testimony by two law enforcement agents,' Engelmayer wrote, noting much of what was contained within the agents' testimony was revealed at Maxwell's 2021 trial. The judge said that any members of the public who followed Maxwell's trial, leading to her conviction on sex trafficking charges and a 20-year prison term, would 'learn next to nothing new' from the materials. The records, his order notes, do not identify anyone other than Maxwell and Epstein as having sexually abused a minor. 'They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's. They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes. They do not reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred,' the judge wrote. 'They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein's death. They do not reveal the path of the Government's investigation.' Grand jury proceedings, in which prosecutors seek to secure an indictment, are confidential. In his blistering opinion, Engelmayer noted that the DOJ had failed to cite a single case in which 'special circumstances' warranted the highly unusual step of unsealing grand jury records because 'there is none,' going on to describe the government's public explanations for trying to make the Maxwell materials public as 'disingenuous.' The government had acknowledged in filings last week that little information from the sealed proceedings would be new to the public. 'A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such,' the judge wrote. Spokespeople for the DOJ did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Manhattan Federal Judge Richard Berman, presiding over Epstein's case, is still mulling a request from the DOJ to unseal the grand jury records in that matter. A judge in Florida last month shot down a similar request by the DOJ surrounding 2005 and 2007 grand jury proceedings relating to Epstein. The Trump administration has failed to contain the growing Epstein scandal after the DOJ and the FBI last month released a joint memo saying they would not publicly release upwards of 300 gigabytes of data and physical evidence recovered in Epstein investigations, the so-called 'Epstein files.' The decision led to an uproar from Trump's MAGA supporters, given Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino had hyped up a supposed treasure trove of information on the mysterious money manager who was found dead in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019 during Trump's first term, around a month after his arrest on sweeping sex trafficking charges and more than a decade after he evaded meaningful accountability in a sweetheart deal with federal prosecutors in Florida. Epstein's death was ultimately ruled a suicide, but conspiracy theories have abounded on account of his connections to some of the world's most powerful people. Trump, who was friends with Epstein for years before a falling-out in the early 2000s, himself stoked conspiracy theories about the Brooklyn-born wealth manager, questioning whether he had actually killed himself in one 2020 interview. While running for reelection last year, Trump told Fox News he would likely declassify the Epstein files. The president has since pulled a 180, chiding his supporters who have called on him to make the records public and accusing Democrats of fabricating an Epstein 'hoax.' Trump's about-face was followed by a set of bombshell exposés published last month by the Wall Street Journal that revealed he had recently learned his name featured multiple times in the Epstein files. The news outlet, owned by longtime Trump ally Rupert Murdoch, also reported that Trump had written a cryptic message to Epstein for the financier's 50th birthday inside a drawing of a naked woman, including the line, 'may every day be another wonderful secret.' Trump has denied the reports and is suing the newspaper. Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, who could not immediately be reached for comment Monday, had opposed the government's long-shot unsealing request. Last week, he told the court that while Epstein is dead, she is very much still alive and in the midst of asking the Supreme Court to review her appeal of her conviction on charges alleging she procured young girls for Epstein's abuse. Maxwell has long claimed the feds scapegoated her after Epstein's death. Outraging Epstein and Maxwell's victims, the Trump administration's reaction to the scandal has also included Todd Blanche, the deputy Attorney General and Trump's former personal lawyer, twice interviewing the British former socialite in jail. Since those sit-downs last month, Maxwell has been transferred from a Florida prison facility to a cushy dormitory-style prison in Bryan, Texas. Women who were sexually exploited, serially raped, and abused in their youth by Epstein have criticized the Trump administration for putting any faith in Maxwell and accused Trump appointees of treating them as political pawns and sidelining them during the efforts to unseal grand jury materials. In his scathing Monday order, Engelmayer noted the victims' alarm and that none of the prosecutors who worked on the cases against Epstein and Maxwell, 'presumably most familiar' with the materials, had joined in on the unsealing request, but that it was made by Blanche alone 'under circumstances suggestive of haste rather than reflective deliberation.' The judge said that the entire premise of the government's unsealing request — that making the records public would shine a light on Epstein and Maxwell's depravity and the probes into the perverted duo — was 'demonstrably false.' 'Insofar as the motion to unseal implies that the grand jury materials are an untapped mine lode of undisclosed information about Epstein or Maxwell or confederates, they definitively are not that,' the judge wrote, adding anyone deeply interested in the matter who expected to learn something new 'would come away feeling disappointed and misled.' 'There is no 'there' there.' _____
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Dana White On How UFC Landed A $7.7 Billion Streaming Deal With Paramount
W hen David Ellison sat in the front row at a pair of UFC events in April and June, just a few seats away from Donald Trump, media analysts wondered whether the 42-year-old CEO of Skydance Media—and son of the world's second richest man, Larry Ellison—was using the opportunity to smooth over any political concerns about his $8 billion acquisition of Paramount. The deal, which was held up by Trump's FCC for months, officially closed last week, but it appears the merger wasn't the only multibillion-dollar deal Ellison was working on in those ringside seats. On Monday, the Las Vegas-based UFC announced a seven-year, $7.7 billion media rights deal with Paramount to stream all of its fights on Paramount+ in the United States, with select events to be simulcast on CBS. UFC CEO Dana White tells Forbes he had a preexisting relationship with Larry Ellison and spoke with David at each of those events, one of many network executives looking to land the MMA behemoth. But it was Ellison who swooped in and knocked out the competition just days after the merger between his Skydance and Paramount was approved. 'These guys came in aggressive with an all-or-nothing approach and said, We want the whole thing,' White says. 'The Ellisons are brilliant businessmen and have a whole game plan behind this thing. I can't wait to be in business with them.' At $1.1 billion per year in average annual value, the UFC will now earn nearly as much in media rights fees as MLB ($1.8 billion), the Olympics ($1.3 billion), March Madness ($1.1 billion) and Nascar ($1.1 billion), dwarfing the likes of the NHL ($635 million) and the PGA Tour ($700 million). And that figure only covers the United States. The UFC will continue to sell its international rights territory by territory through IMG, a category worth an estimated $250 million per year. Unlike other sports leagues, however, the UFC funds its own broadcast productions to maintain control over the look and feel of its events. Any talk of offloading those costs to a partner, and thus ceding control, was a non-starter. 'It's going to be like that until I leave,' says the 56-year-old White. Paramount's annual payouts nearly double the UFC's current media rights revenue from ESPN, the promotion's partner since 2019. The existing deal will continue through the end of 2025, and pays the UFC an estimated $350 million per year to distribute 30 UFC Fight Nights per year on ESPN+. Additionally, under the most recent extension signed in 2023, ESPN pays an estimated $250 million per year up front for the UFC's 13 'numbered' events, which the network then offers to ESPN+ subscribers for an additional pay-per-view fee, keeping all of the PPV sales revenue. The major change in this new deal is the elimination of the pay-per-view model that has been a bedrock of UFC programming since its inception in 1993. Mark Shapiro, president and chief operating officer of UFC-parent company TKO Holdings, says UFC has wanted to ditch the PPV model since the beginning of negotiations with potential partners in February. At nearly $100 per month for fans to access both tiers of UFC events, he says the model had gotten too expensive for many fans, leading to a massive spike in pirated streams during the biggest events. 'That's when we really knew the price point or the double paywall had gotten out of control,' says Shapiro, who was previously head of programming and production at ESPN. 'We were seeing piracy number up tenfold, which is what you see for big boxing pay-per-views.' As negotiations continued this summer, White and Shapiro assumed the UFC would need to divide its media rights package among several partners. At one point, they considered using as many as five different distributors, with Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery reportedly included among the suitors. The Fight Stuff: David Ellison (seated, black suit) had a ringside seat with Donald Trump and Elon Musk at UFC 314 in April, and was seated near the president again at UFC 316 in July. Over time, Paramount emerged as the likely partner for Fight Nights, but conversations with multiple networks and streamers continued for the premium event rights until last Thursday when Ellison's Skydance officially took over Paramount and hammered out a deal for the entire package within 48 hours. 'Every time we do a media rights deal it's monumental—one, because obviously the money goes up,' White says. 'And two, because you start looking at all the different things we can do with leveraging the assets they have and what their plan is for their business over the next five years.' Paramount stock was down slightly on Monday following news of the new streaming deal while TKO's stock was up more than 10 percent. White and Shapiro are confident that UFC fans will move en masse to the Paramount+ platform next year, showing the same loyalty to the brand as they did in 2012 when the UFC moved from Spike to Fox, and then again in 2019 with the move to ESPN. The incoming Paramount leadership is no doubt counting on the bump. As of July 31, the company reported 77.7 million subscribers for its Paramount+ streaming service, trailing major competitors including Netflix (300 million), Amazon Prive Video (200 million), Disney+ (150 million) and HBO Max (125 million). According to Nielsen, Paramount+ accounts for just two percent of all TV viewing on a monthly basis. In an effort to boost those figures, Ellison has already signed a $1.5 billion agreement to bring South Park to Paramount+, a deal that made the show's creators, Matt Parker and Trey Stone, billionaires. But the UFC deal is a far bigger bet that a year-round global sport can drive new viewers to the platform, slow subscriber churn, and increase engagement. Now as the exclusive home of the UFC, Ellison has made the MMA promotion a pillar of the new Paramount. The political implications of such an association—given Trump's affinity for combat sports and personal friendship with White—cannot be ignored. White confirms plans to host a UFC event at the White House around July 4, 2026, a 'one of one' experience similar to the UFC's event at the Sphere in Las Vegas last fall, which he says would almost certainly be broadcast on CBS. White, who has long had the president on speed dial, says he had yet to hear from Trump regarding the new deal. 'Not yet,' White says with a laugh. 'But I'm sure he will. He always does.' MORE FROM FORBES Forbes Populist Capitalist: How The UFC's Dana White Epitomizes Business In The Trump Era By Matt Craig Forbes Inside Dana White's $20 Million Plan To Bring UFC 306 To The Sphere By Matt Craig Forbes South Park's Creators Are Now Billionaires By Matt Craig Forbes How The World's Second-Richest Person And His Son Pulled Off The $8 Billion Paramount Deal By Phoebe Liu
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
What's next as Trump takes over DC police, deploys National Guard
President Trump on Monday announced he was putting the Washington, D.C., police department under federal control and deploying the National Guard in what he portrayed as a crackdown on crime in the nation's capital. 'This is liberation day in D.C. and we're going to take our capital back,' said Trump, who has long floated plans to overhaul the District, which is governed by a council of elected representatives and a mayor. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not going to let it happen anymore,' the president told a packed White House press briefing room. With D.C. police now under federal control, here's what to expect next. Bondi, DEA chief to run point Trump's declaration of taking over the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) delegates authority of the city's police force to Attorney General Pam Bondi. A few hours after Trump's announcement, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said she would follow the executive order and had reached out to Bondi to meet. Trump also announced he was designating Terry Cole as MPD's interim federal commissioner. Cole was confirmed just under three weeks ago to lead the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Trump at his press conference lauded Cole as the 'most highly recommended person' and 'one of the top in the country.' 'He better be. Terry, if not, I'm going to get rid of you so fast,' Trump joked. MPD Chief Pamela Smith said she was in contact with federal partners, telling D.C. residents the announcement meant residents should expect an 'enhanced presence' in the city. One expert thinks it could have longlasting efforts on the department – and not in a good way. Tahir Duckett, executive director of the Center for Innovations in Community Safety and an adjunct professor at Georgetown Law, said some in the D.C. police force may get frustrated by reassignments and being overseen by a federal force that does very different work from community policing. It could also shake DC residents and further hamper crime-fighting. 'It's going to break down community trust, which any police officer will tell you, that the only way that you actually solve murders [or] armed robberies, is when you have really deep trust,' Duckett said. Congress to intervene Trump is taking over MPD by invoking a provision of the D.C. Home Rule Act, a law Congress passed in the 1970s that established a city council and gave it and the mayor control over local affairs. The provision, Section 740, provides Trump – and any U.S. president – some temporary ability to unilaterally seize control of MPD in emergency situations, but it also provides key levers for congressional intervention. Trump already met the initial requirement to provide written notification to Congress of the takeover within 48 hours. House Oversight Committee Republicans confirmed receipt on Monday. With the notifications delivered, Trump can unilaterally take over the police force for up to 30 days. Congress must pass a joint resolution to extend it further, which could leave Democrats in the position of voting against it, thus providing the GOP with a prime opportunity to portray the opposing party as 'soft on crime.' 'Congress will work with President Trump to restore law and order in Washington, D.C.,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) wrote on X. Lawmakers could also vote at any time to immediately take away Trump's control of MPD, and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said he would introduce such a measure. But Republicans' majorities in both chambers make any rebuke unlikely. Congress is also on recess until after Labor Day. Trump has additionally previously floated a federal takeover of the city more broadly, but that would require congressional approval. 800 National Guard troops to patrol DC Beyond the MPD takeover, Trump said on Monday that he's deploying 800 D.C. National Guard troops as the push to rid the capital of crime moves forward 'very rapidly.' Last week, the president had ordered federal law enforcement officials to patrol Washington streets for a week, an effort led by the U.S. Park Police with officers and agents from the FBI, DEA, ICE and other groups. 'The Metropolitan Police Department and the federal authorities will be supported in the effort, a really big effort, [by] the 800 DC National Guardsmen that we'll put on and much more if necessary,' Trump said. 'If necessary, we're going to move service members directly to joining the guardsmen. And that'll take place very rapidly.' The announcement drew sharp pushback from Democrats, arguing the capital's crime rates don't align with Trump's drastic move. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) argued there's 'no basis' for the takeover and suggested Trump 'get lost.' Trump controversially deployed more than 2,000 members of the National Guard in June to Los Angeles to crack down on protests over the administration's immigration policies, a move that bypassed the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). 'The president operates like he is the governor of D.C., and the governor of a state can deploy the National Guard in times of emergency. Here, I think there's an argument that there's no particular urgency,' said Paul Schiff Berman, a former dean of the George Washington University Law School. 'Even if there is an emergency with regard to some law enforcement priorities, it's not at all clear that the President really has the authority to unilaterally suspend the mayor's other governmental responsibilities.' Trump says he'll appoint judges, end no-cash bail Citing crime concerns, the president also shared plans to appoint new D.C. judges and end no-cash bail as part of his crackdown. 'We're going to be appointing some judges. You know, we have some open spots, and we're going to take people — because the judges are letting killers out,' Trump said at Monday's press conference. The president has the power to nominate D.C.'s local judges, and they must clear Senate confirmation. Trump added that Bondi, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and others had already recommended several candidates. 'We've got 10 open spots, and we can probably create some more. We need them,' Trump said. D.C.'s local trial court had 13 vacancies as of July 18, and its appeals court had two openings, according to the city's Judicial Nomination Commission. Trump also blasted no-cash bail systems in cities such as D.C., New York and Chicago. Illinois was the first state to eliminate cash bail as a condition of pretrial release back in 2023, while D.C. largely removed cash bail back in the 1990s. 'This dire public safety crisis stems directly from the abject failures of the city's local leadership. The radical left City Council adopted no cash bail,' Trump said. 'We're going to change no cash bail. We're going to change the statute and get rid of some of the other things, and we'll count on the Republicans in Congress and Senate to vote. We have the majority, so we'll vote.' DC attorney general considering legal options D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb (D) is leaving the door open to taking legal action against the president. 'We are considering all of our options and will do what's necessary to protect the rights and safety of District residents,' Schwalb said in a statement. Schwalb rebuked Trump's assertion that crime is out of control in D.C., pointing to recent data showing violent crime is down 26 percent so far in 2025. 'The Administration's actions are unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful. There is no crime emergency in the District of Columbia,' Schwalb said. But it remains unclear whether courts would have the power to review Trump's emergency declaration taking over MPD or otherwise intervene. And for the D.C. National Guard, Trump has greater control compared to state units across the country. The force in D.C. is always under the command of the president, not the mayor. That's in contrast to Trump's bid to federalize the California National Guard, which remains under a legal challenge from Newsom. 'One of the most important bulwarks against authoritarian rule in the United States is the fact that we have a Federalist system with shared sovereignty, so that the president or the federal government generally can't simply take over states,' said Berman. 'The problem is that D.C. is not a state. And so it gives the President more leeway. And that's really dangerous.'
