Gavin Newsom's office says Linda McMahon's ‘fake' threats over trans kids in sports ‘divorced from reality'
Keep up with the latest in + news and politics.
In an appearance on Fox & Friends, McMahon said California must 'send a letter of apology to all of the female participants in sports,' 'return the titles that were taken away,' and 'make it right' — or risk the loss of K–12 education funding. 'Talk is cheap,' McMahon said of Gov. Gavin Newsom. 'We've investigated... and found that it was an infraction. Now we are demanding that they take action, or we'll take action.'
Related: Gov. Gavin Newsom faces backlash over comments he made about transgender student athletes
Her comments came just hours before the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights formally announced its conclusion that the California Department of Education and the California Interscholastic Federation are in violation of Title IX, the federal civil rights law barring sex-based discrimination in education. The department claims that California's policy of allowing transgender girls to compete in girls' sports constitutes unlawful sex discrimination.
In a press release Wednesday, the department said California must rescind its guidance permitting participation based on gender identity, issue written apologies to cisgender female athletes, restore records and titles 'misappropriated by [transgender] athletes,' and adopt binary 'biology-based definitions' of sex. If the CDE and CIF do not accept the proposed resolution agreement within 10 days, the department said that the matter will be referred to the U.S. Department of Justice.
Related: Andy Beshear lambastes Gavin Newsom for hosting Steve Bannon on podcast
'The state must swiftly come into compliance with Title IX or face the consequences that follow,' McMahon warned in the release. She added that Newsom himself 'admitted months ago it was 'deeply unfair' to allow men to compete in women's sports,' referencing the governor's controversial March podcast interview with far-right activist Charlie Kirk.
That interview drew sharp condemnation from LGBTQ+ advocates, including the Human Rights Campaign, who accused Newsom of legitimizing anti-trans narratives. 'It is an issue of fairness,' Newsom said during the debut episode of This Is Gavin Newsom, agreeing with Kirk's framing of trans girls in school sports. Although his office later attempted to clarify his position, civil rights groups argued that the damage was done.
Related: Gavin Newsom cut LGBTQ+ health funding. The CA legislature is set to restore $40 million
Newsom's office rejected McMahon's threat. 'It wouldn't be a day ending in 'Y' without the Trump Administration threatening to defund California,' Newsom's director of communications, Izzy Gardon, told The Advocate. 'Now, Secretary McMahon is confusing government with her WrestleMania days — dramatic, fake, and completely divorced from reality. This won't stick.'
According to an administration official, the CIF is an independent nonprofit organization, not part of the Newsom administration, and they noted that California is one of 22 states with laws requiring schools to allow students to participate in athletics consistent with their gender identity. The state's law — AB 1266 — was enacted in 2013 under then-Gov. Jerry Brown. The number of transgender student-athletes in California's public school system, the official said, is estimated to be in the single digits among 5.8 million students.
Related: California bans forced outing of LGBTQ+ students as Gov. Gavin Newsom signs landmark law
Last year, the president of the NCAA told Congress that of the 510,000 student-athletes, fewer than 11 are trans.
McMahon, a former WWE executive and major Trump campaign fundraiser, has led the administration's renewed push to enforce Title IX in line with the president's executive order banning transgender participation in women's sports despite Trump's moves to eliminate the Education Department. In a separate Fox News interview Wednesday, McMahon said the administration may consider criminal prosecution for school or state officials who defy federal directives. 'If the president would like us to look into it, we certainly would,' she said.
The OCR's enforcement announcement also coincides with what the department is now calling 'Title IX Month,' which it claims honors the 53rd anniversary of the landmark law. The Trump administration no longer acknowledges June as Pride Month.
This article originally appeared on Advocate: Gavin Newsom's office says Linda McMahon's 'fake' threats over trans kids in sports 'divorced from reality'
Andy Beshear lambastes Gavin Newsom for hosting Steve Bannon on podcast
Gavin Newsom cut LGBTQ+ health funding. The CA legislature is set to restore $40 million
California bans forced outing of LGBTQ+ students as Gov. Gavin Newsom signs landmark law
Gov. Gavin Newsom faces backlash over comments he made about transgender student athletes
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After outcry, L.A. restricts duplexes in Pacific Palisades
As rebuilding ramps up in Pacific Palisades, Los Angeles leaders are restricting the building of duplexes on single-family-home lots. The move follows an executive order issued Wednesday by Gov. Gavin Newsom that allows exemptions for the Palisades and other areas devastated by January's Palisades and Eaton fires from Senate Bill 9. The landmark 2021 law, passed in response to the state's housing shortage, lets property owners divide single-family-home lots and build duplexes, triplexes or fourplexes. In recent days, Palisades residents have raised alarms about SB 9, worrying that their historically single-family-home community would be transformed by the additional density allowed under the law and become more dangerous in the event of future fires. On Jan. 7, the chaotic evacuation amidst the flames led residents to abandon their cars on Sunset Boulevard and escape on foot, forcing bulldozers to clear the road so emergency responders could enter the area. No outcry has erupted over the addition of accessory dwelling units in Palisades rebuilds, even though they could bring similar increases in building, and have been far more common in permit applications. Some 4,700 single-family homes were destroyed or majorly damaged in the Palisades fire, the majority of which were in the city of Los Angeles. Read more: After push from L.A., Newsom plans to weaken state duplex law in wildfire areas Newsom's order applies to the Palisades and parts of Malibu and Altadena — areas that burned and that are designated as 'very high fire hazard severity zones' by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. It implemented a week-long pause on SB 9 projects to allow the city and county of Los Angeles and Malibu to develop restrictions. In response, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who alongside City Councilmember Traci Park had urged Newsom to act this week, issued an executive order blocking future SB 9 development in the Palisades. "I thank Governor Newsom for working with my office to provide some sense of solace for a community working to rebuild,' Bass said in a statement accompanying the order. Since the fire, the prospects of greater density, including increased affordable housing, has raised tensions in the neighborhood. Some of the debates have been mired in misinformation and conspiracy theories falsely asserting that the wealthy community would be rezoned for mass building of low-income apartments. But residents retain deep scars from January's tumultuous evacuation and fear it would be even worse with a larger population, said Larry Vein, founder of wildfire recovery group Pali Strong. They also desire the area to return to the predominately single-family-home neighborhood it was, he said. 'The community does not want higher density,' Vein said. Read more: Conspiracy theories thwart rebuilding plan after L.A. County wildfires Officials' push to restrict SB 9 construction stands in stark contrast to their efforts to allow more building on single-family-home lots through different means. Newsom and Bass each issued earlier executive orders to streamline permitting reviews for accessory dwelling units on single-family-home properties in burn zones. There are some practical distinctions between the two ways of adding homes. Generally, ADU law permits up to three units on a lot. SB 9 can allow four or potentially more if combined with ADU law. SB 9 units often can be larger than ADUs as well. Yet the possibility of increased ADU construction has not attracted the same opposition in the community; instead, data indicates it's been popular. The Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety does not specifically track permit requests for ADUs or SB 9 projects among home rebuilds, and could not immediately verify their numbers. However, department rebuilding data analyzed by the Times includes a description of each proposed development that is supposed to note if an additional unit is planned. As of July 28, 500 homeowners had submitted permitting applications to rebuild in the Palisades, the Times analysis of department data found. Of those, 73 — nearly 15% — included at least one ADU, according to project descriptions. Per the descriptions, three intend to use SB 9, but that number is an undercount, said Devin Myrick, the department's assistant deputy superintendent of building. Myrick said the department was still analyzing its data to come up with the actual amount of SB 9 projects. Property owners have cited ADU construction as a way to return to the Palisades more quickly, with some planning to build an ADU before tackling their primary home. For others, the opportunity for building any additional unit, under ADU law or SB 9, provides a financial benefit that could be used to cover gaps in the cost to rebuild. Read more: Palisades could rebuild with more affordable housing. But many in the wealthy area oppose the idea Vein said Palisades residents are friendlier to ADUs because their construction may not necessarily lead to a larger population. Many people, he said, would use an ADU to work from home, as a guest house or allow members of multigenerational families to have their own space. By contrast, he said, SB 9 duplexes inevitably will add people. 'You've just doubled the density,' he said. Some pro-development organizations are blasting the SB 9 restrictions. Matthew Lewis, a spokesperson for California YIMBY, which advocates for greater homebuilding across the state, said that residents' evacuation concerns are legitimate but that officials should focus on resolving that issue rather than limiting duplexes. Lewis said the proliferation of ADUs in the rebuild shows that it's not actually the potential for increased building that's motivating the opposition. Instead, he said community groups and L.A. politicians are using that argument to thwart a law they've long disliked because it expressly calls for changes to single-family-home neighborhoods. 'What we're talking about is a powerful constituency making enough noise to cause a suspension of laws that were duly passed by the state Legislature,' Lewis said. 'That's very concerning.' Bass believes her backing of ADUs and opposition to SB 9 in the Palisades do not conflict, mayoral spokesperson Zachary Seidl said. SB 9 was not anticipated to be used after a major wildfire, he said, while streamlining ADU permitting assists property owners with reconstruction. 'The mayor with both of these positions is supporting community members in the Palisades rebuild,' Seidl said. Times staff writer Douglas Smith contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kamala Harris is not running for California Governor
Kamala Harris has decided against running for Governor of California, after months of speculation. The 2026 election will determine who will replace Gavin Newsom. Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Brown University strikes deal with Trump administration to restore half a billion dollars in federal funding
Brown University reached an agreement with the Trump administration Wednesday to restore $510 million in federal funds that were frozen amid a probe into possible civil rights violations at the Ivy League school. As part of the deal, Brown University will contribute $50 million to 'workforce development organizations' in the state; end programs that promote 'race-based outcomes, quotas, diversity targets or similar efforts'; and maintain 'women-only and men-only' facilities and sports teams on campus. 'The Trump Administration is successfully reversing the decades-long woke-capture of our nation's higher education institutions,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement. 3 Trump has targeted several Ivy League schools over concerns about antisemitism on campus. REUTERS 'Because of the Trump Administration's resolution agreement with Brown University, aspiring students will be judged solely on their merits, not their race or sex,' McMahon continued. 'Brown has committed to proactive measures to protect Jewish students and combat Antisemitism on campus.' 'Women's sports and intimate facilities will be protected for women and Title IX will be enforced as it was intended.' Brown University President Christina Paxson noted that as part of the agreement, there is 'no finding or admission of wrongdoing' on the part of the Rhode Island school. 'The University's foremost priority throughout discussions with the government was remaining true to our academic mission, our core values and who we are as a community at Brown,' Paxson wrote in a letter to the university community announcing the agreement. 'This is reflected in key provisions of the resolution agreement preserving our academic independence, as well as a commitment to pay $50 million in grants over 10 years to workforce development organizations in Rhode Island, which is aligned with our service and community engagement mission,' she added. 3 The Trump administration had been investigating potential civil rights violations at the Ivy League school. wolterke – In March, Paxson indicated that she was willing to strike a deal that would allow Brown to uphold 'ethical and legal obligations under Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964' and 'defend academic freedom and freedom of expression.' 'By voluntarily entering this agreement, we meet those dual obligations,' Paxson said Wednesday. 'We stand solidly behind commitments we repeatedly have affirmed to protect all members of our community from harassment and discrimination, [and] we protect the ability of our faculty and students to study and learn academic subjects of their choosing.' Paxson added, 'We applaud the agreement's unequivocal assertion that the agreement does not give the government the 'authority to dictate Brown's curriculum or the content of academic speech.'' The university has taken out $800 million in loans since the Trump administration announced the funding freeze for federal grants and contracts in April, according to Bloomberg. 3 The Trump administration moved to freeze $510 million in federal funds for Brown University in April. AP The Trump administration had been investigating Brown's response to alleged cases of antisemitism on its Providence, R.I., campus, as well as the institution's Diversity, Equity and Inclusion policies. Brown was one of 60 colleges and universities that the Department of Education's civil rights arm warned earlier this month could have federal funding taken away over alleged antisemitic discrimination and harassment on campus. The private institution's $7.2 billion endowment is the lowest among schools in the Ivy League. Brown also reported a $42 million budget deficit in 2024, which the school expects 'to grow significantly in the near term.' The Trump administration previously froze about $400 million in federal funds from Columbia University and clawed back $2.6 billion from Harvard University over antisemitism concerns. Columbia agreed to pay a $200 million fine earlier this week to restore funding, and Harvard is in talks to settle with the Trump administration for as much as $500 million. 'Restoring our nation's higher education institutions to places dedicated to truth-seeking, academic merit, and civil debate — where all students can learn free from discrimination and harassment — will be a lasting legacy of the Trump administration, one that will benefit students and American society for generations to come,' McMahon said.
