New police twist as neo-Nazi leader has symbol charge dropped in court
Melbourne resident Sewell, 31, was among 17 NSN members arrested after marching in Adelaide in January.
On Thursday, a charge of using a Nazi symbol was withdrawn in his criminal case in the Adelaide Magistrates Court.
Sewell remains charged with one count of loitering.
Since the Australia day arrest, Sewell has since claimed that police wanted to kill members of his neo-Nazi group.
He has published audio online that allegedly captures SAPOL officers on Australia Day joking about shooting the neo-Nazi group.
'I'm happy to shoot them,' one person said.
'Happy to?' another person asked.
'I'm happy to shoot them' the first person answered.
Sewell is scheduled to return to court next week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
5 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Woman convicted of murdering partner on yacht files new court bid
A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole. Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht. On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania. The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction. Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf. HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression. "Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said. "Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment. "When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration." Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case. The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10. Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009. Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder. She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years. She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term. An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years. A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole. Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht. On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania. The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction. Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf. HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression. "Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said. "Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment. "When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration." Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case. The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10. Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009. Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder. She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years. She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term. An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years. A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole. Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht. On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania. The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction. Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf. HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression. "Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said. "Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment. "When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration." Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case. The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10. Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009. Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder. She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years. She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term. An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years. A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole. Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht. On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania. The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction. Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf. HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression. "Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said. "Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment. "When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration." Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case. The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10. Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009. Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder. She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years. She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term. An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years.
News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
‘Nazi capital': Chilling message about Aussie city after neo-Nazi march
The organiser of a neo-Nazi march through Melbourne's CBD has issued a disturbing message describing the city as a 'Nazi capital'. About 100 masked members of the National Socialist Network (NSN) marched through Melbourne after midnight on Saturday, touting flags and a sign reading 'White Man Fight Back', while police looked on. The march was condemned by leaders of the Jewish community and politicians - among them Victoria Premier Jacinta Allan, who called the participants 'goons'. But the group has deemed the march a success and warned it was 'just the beginning'. In a video shared with thousands of followers in private messaging app Telegram, NSN figure Joel Davis boasted the procession had been 'our biggest march in history'. 'People say that Melbourne is the left-wing capital of Australia - it's becoming the Nazi capital of Australia,' Mr Davis said. 'It was quite something because the police just had to accept our presence. We've been treated very poorly by the police in the past. 'We've now grown large enough that they simply have to accept the fact that we want to march... We're all on a dopamine rush because we know this is just the beginning.' The march caused outrage and led Ms Allan to declare, 'Nazis don't belong in this country and they know it'. 'That's why they hide behind masks in the dark.' The Jewish Council of Victoria, meanwhile, urged the state government to act when parliament resumes next week. 'Eight months after promising anti-masking and anti-hate symbol laws, the government must act now,' it said in a statement. 'They (the NSN) are a tiny fringe, rejected by the overwhelming majority of Victorians, who proudly embrace our multicultural communities.' Victoria Police said officers responded to the protest to 'ensure public order was maintained'. No arrests were made but a man was allegedly assaulted when he confronted the group, a police spokesperson said. He was taken to hospital with non-life-threatening injuries and as of Tuesday, police were still investigating the incident. Footage circulated online appeared to show the moment a member of the public confronted the marchers and a fight broke out. Messages from Mr Davis to the group also boasted the march had been the 'top story on the news tonight'. He called on his followers to march again - next time, in a nationwide anti-immigration rally planned for August 31. 'This could be the beginning of something massive,' he said. The 29-year-old Victoria man is currently facing a charge of displaying a Nazi symbol on a belt buckle at an earlier march in Adelaide on Australia Day. His defence lawyer, Andrew Hopkins, has argued the allegation impinges on Mr Davis's implied constitutional rights to political expression. Mr Davis, speaking outside court after a hearing in May, said he would go 'all the way' to the High Court to fight the charge. The next hearing is set down for September 23. South Australian police arrested and charged 16 people with loitering and displaying Nazi symbols after the Australia Day rally, although charges against some of the men, including NSN leader Thomas Sewell, have since been withdrawn.
Perth Now
2 days ago
- Perth Now
Backpacker kills dad in e-scooter crash
A British backpacker who killed a Perth father riding an e-scooter while she was intoxicated has pleaded guilty. Alicia Kemp, 25, from Worcestershire, was riding an e-scooter through Perth's CBD while over the legal alcohol limit and carrying a passenger when she struck Thanh Phan, 51. Mr Phan was rushed to hospital but died from his injuries days later. Kemp appeared via video link in the Perth Magistrates Court on Monday where she pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing death under the influence of alcohol. Thanh Phan, 51, was fatally struck by e-scooter rider Alicia Kemp, 25, who was over the legal alcohol limit at the time of the crash. ABC Credit: ABC Prosecutors dropped a dangerous driving causing bodily harm charge. She was remanded in custody and the matter was moved to the higher District Court where a sentencing date will be set on October 31. Her lawyer Michael Tudori told media his client was nervous and worried. 'She's a young foreign national girl in our prison,' he said outside court. 'She's relieved that one of the charges has been discontinued, and now she'll just move towards preparing for a sentencing later on in the year for this tragic death.' British backpacker Alicia Kemp, 25, pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing death under the influence of alcohol. Tiktok Credit: Supplied Mr Phan was the first pedestrian to die in WA from an e-scooter incident. His death prompted local government's in Perth's metro area to suspend e-scooter hire services and a national discussion about e-scooter safety. Australian Medical Association WA president Michael Page told NewsWire at least one person with major injuries caused by e-scooters presented to the Royal Perth Hospital's trauma unit each day with serious, and often, life altering injuries.
