Woman convicted of murdering partner on yacht files new court bid
Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht.
On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania.
The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction.
Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf.
HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression.
"Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said.
"Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment.
"When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration."
Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case.
The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10.
Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009.
Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder.
She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years.
She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term.
An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years.
A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole.
Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht.
On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania.
The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction.
Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf.
HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression.
"Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said.
"Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment.
"When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration."
Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case.
The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10.
Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009.
Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder.
She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years.
She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term.
An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years.
A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole.
Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht.
On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania.
The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction.
Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf.
HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression.
"Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said.
"Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment.
"When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration."
Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case.
The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10.
Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009.
Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder.
She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years.
She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term.
An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years.
A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole.
Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht.
On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania.
The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction.
Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf.
HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression.
"Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said.
"Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment.
"When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration."
Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case.
The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10.
Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009.
Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder.
She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years.
She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term.
An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
8 hours ago
- West Australian
Matt Wright trial: Pilot's alleged spray at boss over stormy weather egg collection request
A young pilot told the Outback Wrangler to 'get f--ked, get vaccinated and go fly his own helicopter' after his boss chewed him out for pulling out of an unsafe mission. Sebastian Robinson on Friday finished giving evidence after being grilled over four days in the trial of Aussie reality television star, Matt Wright. The Apple TV and Netflix star has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice during the investigation into a chopper crash that killed his co-star Chris 'Willow' Wilson. It is not alleged Mr Wright is responsible for the crash. On Friday the Northern Territory jury heard about the 'Australia Day incident' where the 28-year-old pilot and Mr Wright had a fight a month before the fatal crash. Mr Robinson said on January 26, he, Mr Wilson and fellow pilot Michael Burbidge were contracted for a crocodile egg collecting mission at the mouth of the Daly River, in the NT. The jury was shown photos of the chopper with an oncoming Wet Season storm looming in the background. Mr Robinson said he radioed Mr Burbidge to say 'it was too dangerous to continue, because the storm was huge', and they mutually agreed to head back into town. He said they went back to the Noonamah Tavern to watch the traditional Australia Day 'ute run' and have a 'beer and a feed'. Mr Robinson said Mr Wright called him 'very hostile and abusive', telling the young pilot 'What the f--k are youse doing back? Egg collecting's not meant to be f—king easy'. 'You sit out there, you f--king ... you wait the weather out. You f--king deal with it,' Mr Wright allegedly said. The jury has previously heard Mr Wright was not able to take part in egg collecting missions in early 2022 because he was an 'anti-vaxxer'. 'I told him to get f--ked, get vaccinated and fly his own helicopter,' Mr Robinson said on Friday. In a group chat with Mr Burbidge and Mr Wilson, the young pilot alleged Mr Wright 'called us all bludgers' for pulling out of the dangerous conditions. The young pilot this contributed to his decision to leave Mr Wright's Helibrook, and he establishing his own company Arnhem Helicopters. Mr Wright sent Mr Robinson a message the next day saying he was 'sorry for blowing up'. The trial continues on Monday.
Perth Now
8 hours ago
- Perth Now
Pilot's alleged spray at Outback Wrangler
A young pilot told the Outback Wrangler to 'get f--ked, get vaccinated and go fly his own helicopter' after his boss chewed him out for pulling out of an unsafe mission. Sebastian Robinson on Friday finished giving evidence after being grilled over four days in the trial of Aussie reality television star, Matt Wright. The Apple TV and Netflix star has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice during the investigation into a chopper crash that killed his co-star Chris 'Willow' Wilson. It is not alleged Mr Wright is responsible for the crash. On Friday the Northern Territory jury heard about the 'Australia Day incident' where the 28-year-old pilot and Mr Wright had a fight a month before the fatal crash. Pilot Sebastian Robinson and Outback Wrangler star Matt Wright on a crocodile egg collecting mission in January 2016. Photo: Supplied Credit: Supplied Mr Robinson said on January 26, he, Mr Wilson and fellow pilot Michael Burbidge were contracted for a crocodile egg collecting mission at the mouth of the Daly River, in the NT. The jury was shown photos of the chopper with an oncoming Wet Season storm looming in the background. Mr Robinson said he radioed Mr Burbidge to say 'it was too dangerous to continue, because the storm was huge', and they mutually agreed to head back into town. He said they went back to the Noonamah Tavern to watch the traditional Australia Day 'ute run' and have a 'beer and a feed'. Outback Wrangler Matt Wright and his wife Kaia Wright approaching the Supreme Court in Darwin. NewsWire / Pema Tamang Pakhrin Credit: NewsWire Pilot Sebastian Robinson during filming of Kane Chenoweth's documentary Sky Cowboy in February 2022. Credit: Supplied Mr Robinson said Mr Wright called him 'very hostile and abusive', telling the young pilot 'What the f--k are youse doing back? Egg collecting's not meant to be f—king easy'. 'You sit out there, you f--king ... you wait the weather out. You f--king deal with it,' Mr Wright allegedly said. The jury has previously heard Mr Wright was not able to take part in egg collecting missions in early 2022 because he was an 'anti-vaxxer'. 'I told him to get f--ked, get vaccinated and fly his own helicopter,' Mr Robinson said on Friday. In a group chat with Mr Burbidge and Mr Wilson, the young pilot alleged Mr Wright 'called us all bludgers' for pulling out of the dangerous conditions. The young pilot this contributed to his decision to leave Mr Wright's Helibrook, and he establishing his own company Arnhem Helicopters. Mr Wright sent Mr Robinson a message the next day saying he was 'sorry for blowing up'. The trial continues on Monday.
The Advertiser
2 days ago
- The Advertiser
Woman convicted of murdering partner on yacht files new court bid
A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole. Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht. On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania. The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction. Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf. HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression. "Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said. "Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment. "When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration." Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case. The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10. Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009. Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder. She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years. She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term. An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years. A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole. Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht. On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania. The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction. Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf. HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression. "Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said. "Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment. "When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration." Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case. The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10. Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009. Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder. She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years. She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term. An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years. A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole. Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht. On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania. The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction. Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf. HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression. "Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said. "Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment. "When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration." Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case. The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10. Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009. Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder. She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years. She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term. An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years. A woman convicted of murdering her de facto partner more than 15 years ago has appeared in court challenging the conditions of her parole. Susan Neill-Fraser was released in 2022 after spending 13 years behind bars over the 2009 disappearance of Robert Chappell from their yacht. On Wednesday morning, Neill-Fraser and lawyers acting on her behalf appeared in the Hobart Supreme Court seeking to progress an application against the Parole Board of Tasmania. The woman is seeking to amend her parole conditions that prevent her from speaking to third parties, including the media, to claim her alleged innocence and wrongful conviction. Legal advocate group the Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) is arguing the case on Neill-Fraser's behalf. HRLC legal director Sarah Schwartz said the application argued that the parole condition was "unreasonable", "improper" and contradicted constitutional rights to freedom of expression. "Freedom of speech and political communication are core democratic rights that belong to everyone, including and especially people who have been in prison," she said. "Parole should be a pathway to reintegration, not a way of continuing to impose punishment. "When parole conditions silence people or limit their freedom of expression, they violate basic human rights and increase the risk of reincarceration." Lawyers for the parole board indicated they were restricted by caretaker provisions on receiving instructions on how to proceed with the case. The matter, before Associate Justice Michael Daly, was adjourned until September 10. Mr Chappell disappeared from the couple's boat, Four Winds, on Australia Day, 2009. Police soon after charged Neill-Fraser with his murder. She pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury in October 2010 and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years. She has since maintained her innocence and has lodged numerous appeals during her prison term. An appeal court later reduced her sentence to 23 years, with a non-parole of 13 years.
