Mismatched financial expectations? How to cope in a relationship where one partner out-earns the other
However, it doesn't typically feel good when a fiancé refuses to contribute, claiming their money is only for 'fun,' not 'responsibilities.' This is particularly troubling given cost of living increases and how those are reflected in the cost of non-negotiable spending.
According to Statistics Canada, the average household spent about $76,750 annually on expenses in 2023, including housing, transportation and food, the three largest categories.
In a two-person household, those costs can quickly add up. And when only one person is footing the bill, the financial and emotional burden becomes even heavier.
Don't Miss
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich — and 'anyone' can do it
The Canadian economy is showing signs of softening amid Trump's tariffs — protect your wallet with these 5 essential money moves (most of which you can complete in just minutes)
I'm almost 50 and don't have enough retirement savings. What should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 solid ways you can catch up
The red flags of an unequal dynamic
While differences in income are normal, refusing to contribute entirely can trigger long-term problems.
When one partner sacrifices and handles 100% of the financial responsibilities, their personal finances may suffer down the road, while the other partner gains.
This creates several challenges:
Budget strain: Even with a six-figure salary, carrying the full weight of household costs limits your ability to save, invest or spend on yourself.
Lifestyle imbalance and negative emotions: When one person is financially constrained while the other uses their full income for leisure, it can foster resentment.
Power imbalance: Financial inequality can also seep into decision-making. The partner who pays for everything may feel overburdened and unheard, while the non-contributing partner may avoid accountability.
Future financial insecurity: Without shared financial planning, big goals — from buying a home to starting a family — may be delayed or derailed entirely.
It's about more than just paying the bills: Aligning your values, goals and decisions is important in a successful relationship.
How to address it before saying 'I do'
Before walking down the aisle, a couple in this situation needs to have a candid conversation in a productive, structured way. If you see yourself as the "giving" half of your relationship, here are a few practical steps to take to hopefully see change.
1. Have a values-based conversation
Frame the conversation not as a confrontation, but as a shared planning session for your future.
You can try something like: 'I want us to feel like we're building something together. Can we talk about how we want to manage money as a team?'
Focus on shared goals, like housing, travel, kids and retirement, and how to achieve them together.
Read more: 'You're going to live on beans and rice': This senior told Dave Ramsey she has debt and zero savings —
2. Consider financial counseling
If emotions are running high, a third party can help. Premarital or financial counselling can uncover deeper money beliefs and create shared understanding.
Resources, like the Canadian Association for Financial Empowerment, can help you locate professionals near you.
You can also seek help from a financial advisor, who can look at you and your partner's financial health and find ways to be more reasonable with your money, like finding ways to save for the future, while also finding avenues for realistic, personal indulgences.
3. Propose a fair cost-sharing model
A practical approach is using a cost-sharing model like a proportional contribution one.
Under this, you'd figure out the proportion of total household income you each bring in. This system keeps contributions equitable while acknowledging income disparities.
For example, say you earn 70% of your combined income and your partner earns 30%. You'd each contribute these proportions toward shared costs.
So, if those costs are $65,000 annually, you'd pay $45,500 per year, while your partner would pay $19,500 per year.
You can also look into a budgeting app, which can help bolster more thoughtful money management and create an actionable and trackable plan moving forward.
4. Set boundaries and deadlines
If your partner continues to resist contributing, it's worth asking yourself if this is a difference in values or a refusal to partner in life. Marriage is a financial partnership as much as an emotional one.
Put yourself first by setting a deadline to revisit the conversation and being honest with yourself about your limits.
What To Read Next
Here's how to retire in 10 short years no matter where you live in Canada — even if you're starting with $0 savings
Here are 5 expenses that Canadians (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among Canada's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio
Pet owners, here's how you can get up to 90% cashback on expensive emergency veterinary bills — and you can even get a free quote in 30 seconds
1. Statistics Canada: Survey of Household Spending, 2023 (May 21, 2025)
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Standex International Full Year 2025 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations
Standex International (NYSE:SXI) Full Year 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$790.1m (up 9.6% from FY 2024). Net income: US$55.8m (down 24% from FY 2024). Profit margin: 7.1% (down from 10% in FY 2024). EPS: US$4.68 (down from US$6.26 in FY 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Standex International EPS Misses Expectations Revenue was in line with analyst estimates. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 14%. The company's shares are up 8.9% from a week ago. Risk Analysis Before we wrap up, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Standex International (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
White House officials rush to defend Trump after shaky economic week
Donald Trump administration officials fanned out on Sunday's US political shows to defend the president's policies after a bruising week of poor economic, trade and employment numbers that culminated with the firing of labor statistics chief Erika McEntarfer. US trade representative Jamieson Greer said Trump has 'real concerns' about the jobs numbers that extend beyond Friday's report that showed the national economy added 73,000 jobs in July, far below expectations. Job growth numbers were revised down by 285,000 for the two previous months as well. On CBS News's Face the Nation, Greer defended Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer, a respected statistician, saying: 'You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers. There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways.' He added: 'The president is the president. He can choose who works in the executive branch.' Related: Senate confirms Trump ally Jeanine Pirro as top federal prosecutor for DC But William Beach, who served as Trump's commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) in his first presidency, warned that McEntarfer's dismissal would undermine confidence in the quality of US economic data. The BLS gave no reason for the revised data but noted that 'monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors'. 'This is damaging,' Beach said on Sunday on CNN's State of the Union. 'I don't know that there's any grounds at all for this firing. 'And it really hurts the statistical system. It undermines credibility in BLS.' McEntarfer on Friday published a statement on social media reacting to her dismissal, calling it the 'honor my life' to have served as BLS commissioner. She said the BLS employs 'many dedicated civil servants tasked with measuring a vast and dynamic economy'. 'It is vital and important work, and I thank them for their service to this nation,' McEntarfer's statement on the Bluesky platform said. Uproar over McEntarfer's firing has come as a series of new tariff rates are due to come into effect this month. While the president has predicted a golden age for the US economy, many economists warn that higher import tariffs could ultimately weaken American economic activity. On CBS, Greer said that Trump's tariff rates are 'pretty much set' and unlikely to be re-negotiated before they come into effect. The first six months of Trump's second terms have been characterized by a seesawing of tariff rate announcements that earned the president the moniker on Wall Street of Taco – 'Trump always chickens out'. But last week he issued an executive order outlining tariff modifications for dozens of countries after he had twice delayed implementation. Yet Greer also said many of the tariff rates announced 'are set rates pursuant to deals'. 'Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country,' he said. On NBC's Meet the Press, the national economic council (NEC) director, Kevin Hassett, said modified US tariff rates were now 'more or less locked in, although there will have to be some dancing around the edges about exactly what we mean when we do this or that'. Asked if tariff rates could change again, he said, 'I would rule it out because these are the final deals.' On Fox News Sunday, Hassett said he also supported McEntarfer's dismissal. 'I think what we need is a fresh set of eyes at the BLS, somebody who can clean this thing up,' he remarked. But former treasury secretary Larry Summers told ABC's This Week that McEntarfer's firing was 'way beyond anything that Richard Nixon ever did', alluding to the late former president who resigned in 1974 over the Watergate scandal. Related: Trump news at a glance: inquiry launched into Trump prosecutor as backlash grows over firing of statistics chief Summers said Trump's claim that the poor job numbers were 'phony' and designed to make him look bad 'is a preposterous charge'. 'These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals,' Summers said. 'There's no conceivable way that the head of the BLS could have manipulated this number. The numbers are in line with what we're seeing from all kinds of private sector sources.' Summers placed McEntarfer's firing, Trump's pressure on Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, to lower interest rates, and the strong-arm tactics that the administration has aimed at universities, law firms and media institutions in the same bucket. 'This is the stuff of democracies giving way to authoritarianism,' Summers said. 'Firing statisticians goes with threatening the heads of newspapers. 'It goes with launching assaults on universities. It goes with launching assaults on law firms that defend clients that the elected boss finds uncongenial. This is really scary stuff.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Asian markets fluctuate as traders weigh tariffs, US jobs
Asian markets flitted between gains and losses Monday as investors continued to digest last week's tariff blitz by Donald Trump and a US jobs report that fanned fears about the world's top economy. News on Friday that dozens of countries would be hit with levies ranging from 10 to 41 percent sent shivers through exchanges amid concern about the impact on global trade. With the date of implementation pushed back to Thursday, focus will be on talks between Washington and other capitals on paring some of the tolls back. The pain was compounded later by figures showing the US economy created just 73,000 jobs in July -- against 104,000 forecast -- while unemployment rose to 4.2 percent from 4.1 percent. Job gains from June and May were also revised down by nearly 260,000. The figures stoked concerns that Trump's tariffs are beginning to bite, with inflation also seen pushing back towards three percent. The reading also saw the president fire the commissioner of labor statistics, accusing her of manipulating employment data for political reasons. Bets on the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates at its September meeting shot up following the jobs numbers, with some analysts predicting it will go for a 50-basis-point reduction, rather than the regular 25 points. Yields on US Treasury bonds fell sharply as investors priced in the cuts. Investors will now be keenly awaiting every utterance from Fed boss Jerome Powell leading up to the next policy meeting, not least because of the pressure Trump has put on him to lower rates. Observers said news that governor Adriani Kugler will step down from the bank six months early will give the president a chance to increase his influence on decision-making. "Fed credibility, and the veracity of the statistics on which they base their policy decisions, are both now under the spotlight," said National Australia Bank's Ray Attrill. "Fed officials, such as New York President John Williams speaking after the data, profess to be open minded about the September Fed meeting, but Mr Market has already decided they are cutting -- ending Friday 88 percent priced for a 25-basis-points rate reduction." Still, Asian investors tried to get back on the horse after Friday's selloff, with Hong Kong, Shanghai, Singapore and Seoul up, while Tokyo, Sydney, Wellington, Taipei, Manila and Jakarta were all down. The performance was better than New York, where the S&P 500 and Dow each lost more than one percent and the Nasdaq more than two percent -- with some also questioning whether a recent rally to multiple records has gone too far. The dollar edged up but held most of its losses against its peers after tanking on the jobs report. And oil extended Friday's losses of almost three percent, which came after OPEC and other key producers agreed another output hike, fanning oversupply fears owing to the effects of Trump's tariffs and signs of a weakening economy. - Key figures at around 0230 GMT - Tokyo - Nikkei 225: DOWN 1.6 percent at 40,134.97 (close) Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: UP 0.4 percent at 24,607.19 Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.3 percent at 3,570.47 Dollar/yen: UP at 147.86 yen from 147.43 yen on Friday Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1561 from $1.1586 Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.3262 from $1.3276 Euro/pound: DOWN at 87.16 pence from 87.25 pence West Texas Intermediate: DOWN 0.4 percent at $67.06 per barrel Brent North Sea Crude: DOWN 0.4 percent at $69.36 per barrel New York - Dow: DOWN 1.2 percent at 43,588.58 (close) London - FTSE 100: DOWN 0.7 percent at 9,068.58 (close) dan/tym Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data