Bandh over Balasore student's death grinds Odisha to a standstill
Vehicle movement on several highways and major towns came to a grinding halt as Congress workers and other protesters hit the streets. Commuters also faced difficulty in travelling to and from railway stations and airports. Some railway services were also affected as rail roko agitations were also staged at multiple stations across Odisha.
Business establishments were also shut across the state, and thin attendance was recorded at educational institutions and government offices due to restrictions on the movement of vehicles.
In Bhubaneswar, the police detained several Congress leaders, including AICC Odisha in-charge Ajay Kumar Lallu, PCC president Bhakta Charan Das and others as they tried to breach security barricades and march towards the Lok Seva Bhawan.
'Our fight will continue till justice is done in the case. We will intensify the protest across the state. The government has been using the police force, but we will not be intimidated. The Chief Minister has to resign or take action against his minister, MP, MLA, and the Balasore SP,' said the PCC president.
The party had earlier appealed to people from all sections to support the statewide bandh call to pressure the government to take action and fix responsibility.
To deal with the bandh, the state government asked district magistrates and superintendents of police (SPs) to take preventive and precautionary measures to maintain law and order and to alert against any untoward incident.
Police personnel were deployed in large numbers across Odisha, especially in major towns. The police also deployed high-resolution AI cameras and drones at strategic locations.
Bhubaneswar police commissioner S Dev Datta Singh said there were no reports of violence during the bandh in Bhubaneswar and Cuttack.
The ruling BJP criticised the Congress, accusing it of politicising the issue of the college student's death. Bhubaneswar MP and BJP national spokesperson Aparajita Sarangi said the Congress and BJD have no moral right to protest on the issue.
'The Congress should see how it has treated women in Odisha during its rule. We are all aware of the incidents of crime against women during the rule of the BJD. As far as the BJP is concerned, we respect women a lot,' said Sarangi at a press conference.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Uttar Pradesh will merge government schools with low enrolment despite opposition
The Uttar Pradesh government's recent decision to merge government schools with low enrolment has drawn flak from the opposition. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav and Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra attacked the BJP government in the state, saying school mergers will make it difficult for children from poor and marginalised sections, particularly girls, to access education. The move has prompted protests from teachers and parents in the state. Since then, the Allahabad High Court has either dismissed petitions against the move or upheld the government decision. Here is what to know. In June, the UP Basic Education Department asked district-level officials to prepare a database of schools with low enrolment, along with mapping the nearest school where better infrastructure and resources are available, with the intention of 'pairing' the two schools. Officials have been mapping schools with enrolment below 50. The state's reasoning was the better utilisation of resources and teachers. The infrastructure that remains after the merger will be used to set up Balvatikas, or pre-primary classes. School mergers, seen as contentious, have been carried out in the past in UP and other states. A NITI Aayog project launched in 2017 in Odisha, MP and Jharkhand sought to introduce reforms in school education in these states. As part of the project, 4,600 schools with low enrolment were merged in Jharkhand, around 36,000 schools were reorganised into 16,000 schools in MP, and 1,800 schools were reorganised in Odisha. With the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 calling for the setup of school complexes or clusters and sharing resources for their effective utilisation, states have been merging schools with low enrolment in recent years. Over the past two years, the Education Ministry has also alerted the states about the declining enrolment at the primary and upper-primary levels in government schools. Consequently, the number of government schools has fallen across several states/UTs. In UP, for instance, data from the Unified District Information System for Education portal UDISE+ shows that the number of government schools fell from 1.63 lakh in 2018-19 to 1.37 lakh in 2023-24. Over this period, the state also saw a rise in private schools from 87,433 to 96,635. Similarly, in MP, government schools fell from 1.22 lakh to 92,439 over this period, while Odisha saw a drop from 55,483 to 48,671. Why were the government schools set up? Previous national policies and schemes on education have focused on ensuring universal elementary education (up to class 8). These have drawn on a mention of providing free and compulsory education to all children up to the age of 14 in the Directive Principles of the Constitution, and then Article 21A of the Constitution, which inserted this as a fundamental right in 2002. The 1986 National Policy on Education said that it gives 'unqualified priority to universalization of elementary education'. The Centre's Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) was launched in 2000-01 with this aim, and SSA funds were used to set up elementary schools. Nearly a decade later, the Right to Education Act (RTE) of 2009 guaranteed the right of 6- to 14-year-old children (class 1 to 8) to free and compulsory education in a 'neighbourhood' school. The RTE Act specifies that the appropriate government shall establish a school within the limits of each neighbourhood within three years of the Act's commencement. Subsequently, the RTE rules framed by the Centre in 2010, to implement the Act, specified the limits of a neighbourhood within which schools are to be set up – for classes 1 to 5, a school was to be established within 1 km of the neighbourhood, and for classes 6 to 8, a school was to be established within 3 km of the neighbourhood. In turn, when the states framed their RTE rules, they reiterated this and added specifications in some cases. The RTE rules for UP, for instance, say that for classes 1 to 5, a school shall be established within 1 km of a habitation which has a population of at least 300. For classes 6 to 8, this was a population of at least 800. In guidelines issued in 2011, the Centre said that the rationale behind establishing neighbourhood schools was to ensure universal access to elementary education, which requires schooling facilities within reasonable reach of all children. If schools are not located in or near the neighbourhood, children may not complete schooling even if they are formally enrolled in school, the Centre had reasoned. The need for 'neighbourhood' schools was noted by the Kothari Commission in its 1968 report. The Centre set up a commission headed by scientist and former University Grants Commission chairman, DS Kothari, that looked into all aspects of education from 1964 to 1966. Observing that only 85% students transferred from class 4 to 5, the report identified the non-availability of higher primary schools in the neighbourhood as one of the reasons for drop-out at this stage. The 'neighbourhood' school was also meant to serve another purpose. The commission noted that the neighbourhood school plan should be adopted as a step towards eliminating the segregation that now takes place 'between the schools for the poor and the underprivileged classes, and those for the rich and privileged ones.' 'The neighbourhood school concept implies that each school should be attended by all children in the neighbourhood irrespective of caste, creed, community, religion, economic condition or social status, so that there would be no segregation in schools,' the commission said. What has changed in the years since? The focus on elementary school enrolment, with the RTE Act and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, meant that several primary and upper primary schools have been set up with the aim of universal enrolment at that level. NEP 2020, however, also points to a resultant problem. While these efforts have 'helped to ensure near-universal access to primary schools, it has also led to the development of numerous very small schools,' it says. It referred to UDISE 2016-17 data, which showed that 28% of government primary schools and 14.8% of upper primary schools have less than 30 students. In 2023-24, UDISE+ data showed that 12,954 schools had zero enrolment, while 1,10,971 schools had only a single teacher. In 2016-17, a lower number of 1,08,017 schools had a single teacher. 'These small school sizes have rendered it economically suboptimal and operationally complex to run good schools, in terms of deployment of teachers as well as the provision of critical physical resources. Teachers often teach multiple grades at a time, and teach multiple subjects, including subjects in which they may have no prior background; key areas such as music, arts, and sports are too often simply not taught; and physical resources, such as lab and sports equipment and library books, are simply not available across schools,' the NEP states. Pointing out that the 'isolation' of small schools affects education, the NEP called for states/UTs to address these challenges by 2025 by grouping or rationalising schools, along with setting up school complexes or clusters to share resources. The concept of a 'school complex' was also part of the Kothari Commission Report of 1968. Why is the merger of schools contentious? Teachers' groups, politicians in the Opposition, and petitions in the Allahabad HC have opposed the mergers, saying students would have to go longer distances to get to school if the neighbourhood one is merged with another, making access more difficult, particularly for girls, and increasing the likelihood of drop-outs. A petition in the HC by parents of students in UP's Sitapur refers to the merger as a violation of the UP RTE Rules, which state that schools shall be within a distance of 1 km for children in classes 1-5. The HC dismissed the petition after pointing out that a literal interpretation of the Rules would result in absurdity since there are limitations on land and resources. Elementary school enrolment, meanwhile, is not yet universal. UDISE+ 2023-24 shows that the gross enrolment ratio (GER — enrolment at a level of education compared to the population of the age-group which is appropriate for that level of education), at the elementary level (classes 1 to 8) is 91.7%.
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Congress MPs will be among signatories: Jairam Ramesh on proposed motion against Justice Varma in Lok Sabha
The Congress will support and its MPs will be among the signatories to the motion to be brought against Justice Yashwant Varma in the Lok Sabha, senior party leader Jairam Ramesh said on Friday (July 18, 2025), asserting that then-CJI Sanjiv Khanna had "forced our hand" in the matter by writing to the President and the Prime Minister. In an interview with PTI, Mr. Ramesh also stressed that the Opposition would strongly push the issue of Justice Shekhar Yadav, against whom 55 Opposition MPs moved an impeachment notice in the Rajya Sabha last December for allegedly delivering a hate speech at a gathering last year. A fire incident at Justice Varma's residence in the national capital in March, when he was a judge at the Delhi High Court, had led to the discovery of several burnt sacks of banknotes in the outhouse. Though the Judge claimed ignorance about the cash, the Supreme Court-appointed committee indicted him after speaking to a number of witnesses and recording his statement. Justice Khanna had written to the President and the Prime Minister, recommending the removal. Asked about the government's move in gathering signatures for moving the motion against Varma, Mr. Ramesh said, "Government cannot impeach. The Constitution, in article 124, very clearly states that it is the MPs who move a motion — 100 MPs in the Lok Sabha or 50 MPs in the Rajya Sabha. "We are supporting; our MPs are also signing the motion in the Lok Sabha, and this is not for an impeachment but for setting up of a three-member committee by the Speaker under the The Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968," he said. "The committee will be set up, and it will investigate the matter, submit its report and on the basis of that report, presumably in the Winter Session of Parliament, there will be the process for the removal of the judge first in the Lok Sabha and then in the Rajya Sabha," Mr. Ramesh said. He emphasised that there should be a proper investigation, citing that the action against Justice Varma was initiated based on an in-house committee report. "...we are concerned about it, and there should be a proper investigation. The former CJI has forced our hand; he has submitted a report, there was no FIR and an FIR which should have been registered. He has virtually forced the hand of MPs by submitting the report to the president and to the PM based on an in-house committee report," the Congress leader said. Referring to Justice Yadav's issue, Mr. Ramesh said, "He (Justice Yadav) violated his oath, and he violated all principles of the Constitution. Now, seven months have passed, and we still don't know. I have met (Rajya Sabha) Chairman (Jagdeep Dhankar) repeatedly, and still that motion is pending," Mr. Ramesh said. "Whether he is sitting on it on his own or he is made to sit on it, I don't know. I respect the Chairman. I expected him... to give the go-ahead," he said and added," the least we expect is that a committee is set up to examine the behaviour of Justice Yadav." His remarks came on a day Justice Varma moved the Supreme Court seeking to invalidate a report by an in-house inquiry panel, which found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery row. Justice Varma has sought quashing of the May 8 recommendation by then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, urging Parliament to initiate impeachment against him. The government plans to move a motion to remove Varma in Parliament's Monsoon session beginning July 21. A report of the inquiry panel probing the incident had said that Justice Varma and his family members had covert or active control over the store room where a huge cache of half-burnt cash was found, proving his misconduct, which is serious enough to seek his removal. The three-judge panel headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of the Punjab and Haryana High Court conducted the inquiry for 10 days, examined 55 witnesses and visited the scene of the accidental fire that started at around 11.35 pm on March 14 at the official residence Justice Varma, then a sitting judge of the Delhi High Court and now in the Allahabad High Court. Acting on the report, former Chief Justice of India Khanna wrote to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi recommending the judge's impeachment.
Scroll.in
21 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Continuation of witch hunt': Rahul Gandhi on ED chargesheet against Robert Vadra in land deal case
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday claimed that the Enforcement Directorate chargesheet against his brother-in-law, Robert Vadra, in an alleged money laundering case was part of a 'witch hunt' orchestrated by the Bharatiya Janata Party-led Union government. Gandhi's statement came a day after the Enforcement Directorate named Vadra, Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's husband, in an alleged case linked to a 2008 land deal in Gurugram, reported The Indian Express. The central agency has also attached 43 immovable properties linked to Robert Vadra and his firms. 'My brother-in-law has been hounded by this government for the last ten years,' Gandhi, the leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, said in a post on X on Friday. 'This latest chargesheet is a continuation of that witch hunt.' The Congress leader added: 'I stand with Robert, Priyanka, and their children as they face yet another onslaught of malicious, politically motivated slander and harassment.' He said that he believed his family was 'brave enough to withstand any kind of persecution' and expressed confidence that 'the truth will eventually prevail'. My brother-in-law has been hounded by this government for the last ten years. This latest chargesheet is a continuation of that witch hunt. I stand with Robert, Priyanka and their children as they face yet another onslaught of malicious, politically motivated slander and… — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) July 18, 2025 The Enforcement Directorate's chargesheet against Robert Vadra is the first instance of a prosecution complaint being filed against the 56-year-old in a criminal case, PTI reported. On Thursday, Congress General Secretary Randeep Surjewala also described the case as an attempt at ' witch hunting ' by the Narendra Modi government. 'There is not an iota of illegality or whisper of a crime' in the Shikohpur land deal, the Congress leader claimed. 'Since when have sale and purchase of property (3.5 Acres of land in this case) have become illegal or criminal,' Surjewala asked. Earlier in the day, Robert Vadra's office had also stated that the Enforcement Directorate's case was 'nothing more than an extension of the political witch hunt by the present government', The Indian Express reported. The case The ED's chargesheet is based on a first information report filed by Gurugram Police on September 1, 2018, The Indian Express reported. The FIR alleged that in 2008, Vadra, through his company Skylight Hospitality, fraudulently purchased 3.53 acres of land in Shikohpur village of Gurugram's Sector 83 from Onkareshwar Properties for Rs 7.5 crore. Vadra later secured approval from the Haryana Town and Country Planning Department to develop a commercial colony on the land. A few months later, real estate giant DLF Group agreed to purchase the plot for Rs 58 crore – a seven times jump in the plot's value The alleged transaction took place when the Congress was in power in the state, with Bhupinder Singh Hooda serving as the chief minister. In 2018, a case was registered at the Kherki Daula police station in Gurugram against Vadra, Hooda, Onkareshwar Properties and Skylight Hospitality on charges of cheating, forgery, criminal conspiracy and corruption. They were booked under Sections 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 467 (forgery of valuable security, will), 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (using a forged document or electronic record as genuine) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act (criminal misconduct by a public servant) The FIR was based on a complaint by Surender Sharma, a resident of Rathivas village in Haryana's Nuh district. Sharma had alleged that Vadra 'conspired with influential builders, ministers and top government officers, misused their positions and committed a scam worth Rs 5,000 crore'. In 2023, the Haryana government told the Punjab and Haryana High Court no rules were violated in Vadra's land deal with DLF.
