Jeff Bezos' Venice Wedding Was Relatively Cheap
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Jeff Bezos' multimillion dollar wedding to Lauren Sanchez in Venice was relatively cheap...for him.
The cost of the nuptials on Friday was estimated between $47 million and $56 million, according to Reuters, citing Luca Zaia, president of the Veneto region where the Italian city of canals is based. And while this sum may appear lavish to any ordinary American, it amounted to just 0.0193-0.0230 percent of the Amazon founder's estimated $244 billion net worth, as recorded by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
The average and median net worth of an American family is $1,063,700 and $192,900 respectively, according to the most recent data from the U.S. Federal Reserve. This means Bezos' wedding was financially similar to an average American spending less than $250 on their wedding—about the cost of a family dinner or a new pair of sneakers.
To put that percentage into further context, Newsweek analyzed what similarly proportioned wedding spending would look like for Americans in professions such as construction, nursing and law.
Lauren Sanchez Bezos, left, and Jeff Bezos depart from the Aman hotel during wedding celebrations on June 28, 2025, in Venice, Italy.
Lauren Sanchez Bezos, left, and Jeff Bezos depart from the Aman hotel during wedding celebrations on June 28, 2025, in Venice, Italy.
Luca Bruno/AP Photo
Why It Matters
Bezos is currently the third richest person in the world, after Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
The comparatively negligible impact of the billionaire's wedding bill on his total wealth highlights the vast and growing gap between the world's richest individuals and the average American worker. Half of regular Americans anticipate going into debt to pay for their weddings, according to a survey earlier this month by U.S. News.
What To Know
Newsweek used ChatGPT to help calculate the dollar amount U.S. workers in several professions would need to spend on a wedding to match the same fraction of net worth as Bezos did.
Breaking Down the Proportions
A construction worker, whose average net worth is approximately $60,000, would only spend between $11.58 and $13.80 on their wedding, as that amount is 0.0193 percent to 0.0230 percent of their net worth. This is roughly the equivalent of two small lattes from Starbucks.
Nurses, whose average net worth was calculated to be approximately $125,000, could spend between $24.13 and $28.75 on their wedding. This is less than the cost of two bacon cheeseburgers from Five Guys.
According to the AI, journalists have a lower net worth than nurses, with just $100,000 as their total net worth, meaning they have even less to spend on their weddings if sticking to Bezos' budget ratio. Journalists could spend between $19.30 and $23 on a nuptial celebration—about as much as one fancy cocktail in New York City.
Teachers have a slightly higher budget of $38.60 to $46 based on an estimated $200,000 net worth. Meanwhile, the average American lawyer can afford to splash out, with $96.50 to $115 on their wedding, if sticking to spending a maximum of 0.0230 percent of their estimated $500,000 net worth.
How Net Worth Estimates Were Calculated
The AI constructed the approximate net worth figures from publicly available U.S. salary data, industry wage reports and national wealth surveys. For construction workers, median annual wages of $46,050 from the Bureau of Labor Statistics informed an estimated 30-year career saving a modest percentage of income, landing at a net worth of $60,000. Nurses, with average salaries near $89,000 and consistent retirement contributions, were estimated with net worth ranging from $125,000 to $175,000. Journalists—often burdened by lower salaries and potential student debt—were projected at $100,000. Teachers, benefiting from defined-benefit pensions, could reach $200,000 or more, while lawyers, despite student loan burdens, commonly reach at least $500,000.
Actual net worth can vary significantly due to factors such as debt levels, regional cost of living, career interruptions, investment returns and household dynamics. These figures should be viewed as illustrative models—not precise financial portraits of individual workers in these professions.
These calculations also do not take into account the age at which people in these professions reach this level of net worth. Most weddings occur when people are younger, meaning they may not have reached their highest earning potential by the time they get married.
Activists stage a protest against the Bezos wedding on the Rialto Bridge on June 28, 2025, in Venice, Italy.
Activists stage a protest against the Bezos wedding on the Rialto Bridge on June 28, 2025, in Venice, Italy.
Antonio Calanni/AP Photo
Bezos, 61, and Sanchez, 55, both getting married for the second time, tied the knot over the weekend in Venice after a nearly two-year engagement.
The wedding was met with protesters in the city who said the city should not be rented by "oligarchs," with lead protester Marta Sottoriva saying "our city has been sold to the highest bidder."
City officials disagreed with Sottoriva's "No Space for Bezos" campaign, saying Bezos donated money to Venetian causes, such as restoring council homes, as part of his agreement with the city.
Bezos, Sanchez and their approximately 200 celebrity guests, including Leonardo DiCaprio, several Kardashians and Oprah Winfrey, partied in Venice for several days, shutting off portions of the city from its residents.
What People Are Saying
Marta Sottoriva, leader of "No Space for Bezos," told The Guardian: "There's a lot of anger in the air because once again the council has enslaved itself to the logic of profit—our city has been sold to the highest bidder. Every time an event of this kind happens, the city comes to a standstill, certain areas become inaccessible and even more tourists arrive. This wedding really is the symbol of all that is wrong with Venice."
Hannah Holland, writing for MSNBC, said: "This wedding—the tenor, the clothes, the cost—indicate a callous indifference toward the realities the rest of the world is facing."
Usher leaves a hotel during celebrations for Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez Bezos' wedding, in Venice on June 28, 2025.
Usher leaves a hotel during celebrations for Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez Bezos' wedding, in Venice on June 28, 2025.
Luigi Costantini/AP Photo
What Happens Next
The wedding industry in the U.S. continues to be a highly lucrative business, with people spending more on weddings than ever before, according to Grand View Research. However, some couples are starting to reconsider their spending, opting to save up for a home or for children instead of a wedding party.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
16 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez's lavish Venetian wedding by the numbers
Jeff Bezos' wedding was expected to generate over $1 billion for Venice, Italy's tourism ministry said. The wedding party used 30 water taxis and booked up to five luxury hotels across the city. Each of the 200 guests generated $4.8 million in value for Venice's economy, per the tourism ministry's estimate. Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez's wedding in Venice didn't just turn heads. It pumped millions into the local economy and became a global PR showcase for the City of Canals, while simultaneously angering some locals. From water taxis to luxury hotels, here's what the numbers reveal about the high-profile celebration. A $1.1 billion boost Bezos' wedding generated an estimated €957.3 million, or about $1.1 billion, in total economic value for Venice. That is according to an analysis from Italy's Ministry of Tourism, based on data from the Italian consultancy firm JFC, the Veneto region, and media monitoring sources. Over 90% of that figure — about $1 billion — came from global media exposure, the tourism ministry said. The ministry attributed just $33.3 million to guests' spending and venue costs, with smaller contributions from transportation and hospitality services. While the city typically brings in $1.6 billion annually from 13 million visitors, Bezos' wedding alone reached 68% of that figure, despite involving just 200 guests. That translates to a staggering $5.6 million per guest, compared to just $125 per tourist in a typical year. 30 out of 280 water taxis reserved City officials confirmed the wedding party used 30 out of Venice's 280 water taxis, just over 10% of the entire fleet. Bezos, 61, and Sánchez, 55, floated into Venice via water taxi last Wednesday for their multiday nuptials, while numerous celebrities, like Kim Kardashian and Oprah, were seen boarding water taxis at the city's airport. 5 of Venice's most luxurious hotels booked As a hot spot for wealthy tourists, Venice has no shortage of luxury hotels, and many of them were booked out for Bezos and Sánchez. The couple stayed at the Aman Hotel, where rooms start from around $1,800 per night, going up to as much as $10,000 for the Grand Canal suite. Other five-star hotels like the St. Regis, the Gritti Palace Hotel, the Cipriani, and the Hotel Danieli were all said to be hosting wedding guests. As Business Insider's Joshua Nelken-Zitser reported, those trying to enter were turned away by guards, locked doors, and polite but firm "Not a chance" replies. 200 high-profile guests City authorities said the guest list was capped at around 200 attendees, including Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, and Queen Rania of Jordan. The small guest count helped reduce pressure on the city, which frequently hosts massive international events like G7 summits. 85% hotel occupancy Despite the buzz, Venice remained wide open for tourism. Local press reported 85% hotel occupancy across the city in June. "There was no 'Bezos effect' on bookings," Daniele Minotto, deputy director of the Venetian Hoteliers Association, told BI. He added that, unlike the Venice Film Festival, the wedding had no public-facing schedule or red carpet moments to draw spectators."It was not an invasive event," he said, noting that Venice is "used to dealing with much more impressive events." Roughly 80% of the wedding services — including Murano glass favors and traditional Venetian pastries — were reportedly sourced from local artisans, according to officials. While there were protests against Bezos and the wedding, the city touted the event as a " carefully organized celebration" that promoted sustainable, craft-based tourism.
Travel Weekly
23 minutes ago
- Travel Weekly
Etihad CEO Antonoaldo Neves on strategy and its surprise move into Charlotte
After years of struggle before and after the pandemic, Abu Dhabi-based Etihad has returned to profitability and is growing substantially. Recently, the airline surprised nearly everyone by announcing it will begin Charlotte service next May. Airlines editor Robert Silk spoke about the decision with Etihad CEO Antonoaldo Neves at the IATA Annual General Meeting in New Delhi this month. Antonoaldo Neves Q: Why Charlotte? A: It's such a big, underserved market. There's no airline flying from the Middle East to Charlotte. There's a lot of immigration to the Carolinas today. We are really excited. We think it's a unique value proposition. Q: Your partner American dominates that airport. Clearly codeshare business will be key for you there, right? A: Every time we have interline and codeshare it does help. But we also have markets in the U.S. where customers on codeshares are less than 5%. I'm not going to name the cities. But in the U.S. it ranges from 5% to 25%. Charlotte may be 5%. We don't know. Q: I read that even Charlotte Airport didn't know you were going to fly there until a couple days before your public announcement. How come? There was speculation that you made the decision because Donald Trump was in the region at the time. A: We have a seven-year plan for our destinations. Charlotte was there for the past 3.5 years. Mr. Trump's visit to the United Arab Emirates was a good marketing opportunity for us. So, we could have announced in March next year. And that was the plan. But my team told me, "Why not anticipate?" In the end, if we get some news coverage because of this for free, why not? We were planning to start negotiations with Charlotte Airport by the end of this year. But we called them and said, "Look guys, we need to do this because we believe there is a marketing opportunity." That's business, right? We need to take all the opportunities that we have to market and sell tickets. Q: You launch Atlanta flights on July 2. And you started Boston last year. After your previous U.S. peak in 2017, you had dropped Los Angeles, Dallas and San Francisco. Once you add Charlotte, you'll be back to six U.S. routes. Tell us about your U.S. strategy. A: Because we have U.S. Customs Preclearance in Abu Dhabi, we are in the unique position to offer people in the Gulf Cooperation Council, India and Southeast Asia, and to Americans, an amazing experience. Think about Boston: Many of our customers connect beyond Boston with our partner JetBlue; you don't have to pick up your bag. We'll move to about 40 weekly frequencies to the U.S. next year. That's nothing. When I was at TAP Portugal, we had about 20 to 30 weekly frequencies to the U.S. Today, if I'm not mistaken, they have weekly 80. I believe Etihad can get there one day, but we need to do it differently. But I don't see any reason we can't double capacity to the U.S. in the next five years. Q: How many new destinations would you anticipate in those five years? A: Maybe three to five. Q: How do you position yourself within a market with stalwarts Emirates and Qatar Airways as well as ambitious potential rivals in Saudi Arabia, even India? A: We are proud of the work we have been doing. The average global net margin is 3%. Last year we did 6%. But we want more. I see Emirates doing 15%. Qatar doing 9%. I want to get 10%, 12%, 15%. I need to have muscle to fight downturns and competition in the future. The market is growing so much in the region that I believe there is space for everyone to make money. We grew 25% last year. If we have a stronger carrier, we can grow the pie, and at the same we can be ready to fight if the pie's not growing.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Republicans try to get Trump's tax cuts over the line, setting aside cost concerns
By Richard Cowan and Bo Erickson WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Senate Republicans on Monday will try to pass President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, despite divisions within the party about its expected $3.3 trillion hit to the nation's debt pile. They were set for a marathon session in which the minority Democrats are allowed to offer an unlimited number of votes, part of the arcane process Republicans are using to bypass Senate rules that normally require 60 of the chamber's 100 members to agree on legislation. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released its assessment on Sunday of the bill's hit to the $36.2 trillion debt, figuring that it would add about $800 billion more than the version passed last month in the House of Representatives. Many Republicans dispute that claim, contending that extending existing policy will not add to the debt. Nonetheless, international bond investors see incentives to diversify out of the U.S. Treasury market. Democrats, meanwhile, hope the latest, eye-widening figure could stoke enough anxiety among fiscally minded conservatives to get them to buck their party, which controls both chambers of Congress. 'Republicans are doing something the Senate has never, never done before, deploying fake math and accounting gimmicks to hide the true cost of the bill," Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Sunday. "Republicans are about to pass the single most expensive bill in U.S. history to give tax breaks to billionaires while taking away Medicaid, SNAP benefits and good-paying jobs for millions of people." The Senate narrowly advanced the tax-cut, immigration, border and military spending bill in a procedural vote late on Saturday, voting 51-49 to open debate on the 940-page megabill. One powerful illustration of the Republican divide came on Sunday when Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina said he would not seek re-election, after Trump threatened to back a challenger to him in next year's midterm elections over his vote against the bill. Trump on social media has hailed the progress as a "great victory" for his "great, big, beautiful bill." In a separate post on Sunday, he said: "We will make it all up, times 10, with GROWTH, more than ever before." Trump wants the bill passed before the July 4 Independence Day holiday. While that deadline is one of choice, lawmakers will face a far more serious deadline later this summer when they must raise the nation's self-imposed debt ceiling or risk a devastating default. If the Senate succeeds in passing the bill, it will then go to the House, where members are also divided, with some angry about its cost and others worried about cuts to the Medicaid program. Republicans can afford to lose no more than three votes in either chamber to pass a bill the Democrats are united in opposition to. HITS TO BENEFITS The legislation was the sole focus of a marathon weekend congressional session marked by political drama, division and lengthy delays as Democrats seek to slow the legislation's path to passage. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, the other Republican "no" vote, opposed the legislation because it would raise the federal borrowing limit by an additional $5 trillion. The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. Senate Republicans, who reject the CBO's estimates on the cost of the legislation, are set on using an alternative calculation method that does not factor in costs from extending the 2017 tax cuts. Outside tax experts, like Andrew Lautz from the nonpartisan think tank Bipartisan Policy Center, call it a "magic trick." Using this calculation method, the Senate Republicans' budget bill appears to cost substantially less and seems to save $500 billion, according to the BPC analysis. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
