OPINION - Who's to blame for London's housing crisis? Labour of course
The numbers are not in dispute. The Mayor's latest affordable housing figures are a humiliation. Between April and June, there were barely over 300 affordable projects launched in London. We are now staring down the barrel of the worst three-year run for affordable housing since records began.
Billions have been poured in from central government, targets have been written in black and white, but the only thing missing is a Mayor with the will to build. Just what is his problem?
The Mayor's own reports show that in January to March this year just 1,210 private homes were started in the whole of London, a mere 5.5 per cent of his own target for the quarter. Worse still, 23 of our 33 boroughs saw precisely zero private starts.
Indeed, there are whole swathes of London where the only things breaking any ground are weeds.
And this is not because there's no land or no permission, Khan himself admits there are 300,000 homes which, despite having planning permission, have simply not been built. They languish there, with empty plots and dormant cranes, all the while Londoners pay record rents and poorer families crowd into temporary accommodation.
If you can believe it, the rot runs deeper still. Despite the rhetoric the number of starts have actually been declining in recent months. Private starts are down from 1,427 in January to March of 2025 to a measly 731 private starts in April and June of 2025.
And it is not hard to see why the backlog grows. All Sadiq Khan's so-called London Plan has done is to create more red tape for building, forcing demand out of London and onto the rest of England.
Higher taxes mean higher costs, which lead to projects stalling
But they only have themselves to blame. Nationally, Labour has made things worse. Labour's tax raid has choked the economy and the construction industry along with it. Every part of the economy has been hit, whether that be households, high streets and the building industry that should be delivering London's homes. Higher taxes mean higher costs for every brick, every beam, every worker. Projects stall, investment dries up and the crisis deepens.
And yet, instead of tackling the backlog, instead of forcing delivery, Labour in City Hall and in Westminster have taken a hammer to the very targets London needs to meet. Angela Rayner has cut London's overall housing target by more than 10 per cent and scrapped the formal review of the London Plan entirely, replacing it with the toothless partnership approach that continues to fail.
Incredibly, Angela Rayner has now told councils to put playing fields and allotments up for sale. They are where children learn to play sport and where neighbours meet, so to destroy them is to carve up the very spaces that help communities thrive. Once they are gone, they are gone for good.
Scandalously, while Londoners wait, Khan has set his sights on bulldozing the Green Belt. He has U-turned on a previously 'cast iron' commitment to protect the Green Belt and has now made clear that no park, no open space, no stretch of Metropolitan Open Land is safe. He's doing it with the full blessing of Angela Rayner and Labour's borough leaders. Labour's answer to a failure to build on brownfield is to pave over the lungs of our city.
Khan's Green Belt assault falls overwhelmingly in London's outer, greener boroughs, whether that be Bexley, Bromley, Havering, Hillingdon, Kingston, Richmond - the places that prize their open space, heritage and suburban character. These are the areas Khan is lining up for the bulldozers.
We should not be tearing up our Green Belt, we should be building in the city itself. People want to move to London, work in London and raise their families in London, so we must build in London. Every year that passes with brownfield sites lying derelict is a year of deliberate waste. These are sites that already have infrastructure, transport links, schools and hospitals nearby. Sites that could take the pressure off our suburbs, protect our open spaces and deliver homes where the demand is.
We should be using the land we already have, raising the skyline where it makes sense, and delivering homes that fit the character and needs of each borough. Brownfield first, built in the heart of the capital, not at the expense of the green spaces that keep it alive.
Astonishingly, when they were given the chance to defend those spaces, Reform UK sided with Labour.
Reform UK had the chance to stand up for Londoners when the Conservatives in City Hall put forward a motion in the London Assembly to protect our parks, open spaces and Green Belt. Instead of doing the right thing, Reform UK joined Labour to vote it down.
Londoners deserve a lot better than this coalition of failure.
That is not to mention the impact of immigration on London's housing. Under Sadiq Khan and Keir Starmer, immigration is swallowing up London's housing supply.
Between 2025 and 2030, London is expected to see a net increase of 973,000 through net migration. Every new arrival needs somewhere to live, and when housebuilding is collapsing, those homes do not appear from thin air. They are taken from the existing supply, in turn pushing up rents, pricing out first-time buyers and lengthening waiting lists. Yet, instead of recognising these pressures and adjusting policy to protect housing supply for Londoners, Khan and Starmer are fuelling the problem by opening the door wider, with no credible plan to meet the demand they continue to create. It is a reckless approach that sacrifices stability, fairness, and the opportunity of Londoners to have a home in their own city.
London's housing shortage is not the result of bad luck or forces beyond our control. It is the product of deliberate political choices. A Mayor who has strangled building with red tape for the better part of a decade and a Labour Government that has driven up costs with mammoth tax rises.
Londoners deserve a Mayor and a Government who will enforce delivery on the permissions we already have, who will defend our green spaces, who will build on brownfield first and who will put Londoners first. Not tomorrow, not next year, but now. And Conservatives are the only party with the will to do it – to cut the red tape, drive development where it is needed, protect the character of our communities and deliver the homes London needs - without destroying the city itself.
Gareth Bacon MP is Shadow Minister for Planning, Housing and London
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK independent space agency scrapped to cut costs
The UK Space Agency will cease to exist as an independent entity to cut the cost of bureaucracy, the government said on Wednesday. It will be absorbed by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) in April 2026. The government says this will save money, cut duplication and ensure ministerial oversight. But one leading space scientist said the move would lead to disruption in the short term and the UK losing ground to its international competitors over the long run. Dr Simeon Barber of the Open University feared that scrapping UKSA would lead to Britain's space sector "losing focus". "Around the world countries have been recognising the importance of space by setting up national space agencies, and for the government to be scrapping ours seems like a backward step," he said. UKSA was created 2010 in response to the growing importance of the sector to the economy. The development of small spacecraft, satellites and space instrumentation is a field that the UK excels at, thanks in part due to the agency. Its role is to develop the country's space strategy, coordinate research and commercial activities and liaise with international partners. During its tenure UKSA saw a UK astronaut, Tim Peake launched into space to work on the International Space Station and the development of Britain's own capability to launch small satellites and other small payloads into space from Scotland. The space sector generates an estimated £18.6bn a year and employs 55,000 people across the country. The agency, its budget and activities will now be absorbed into DSIT. It follows a commitment from Prime Minister Keir Starmer to reduce costs and cut the number of arms length government bodies, known as quangos (quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisations), starting with the abolition of NHS England announced in March. Space minister Sir Chris Bryant said: "Bringing things in house means we can bring much greater integration and focus to everything we are doing while maintaining the scientific expertise and the immense ambition of the sector." The merger will see the agency become a unit within DSIT, staffed by experts from both organisations and retaining the UKSA name. But supporters of the space agency, such as Dr Barber fear that this will mean a loss of the agency's dynamic, proactive approach which has proved to be so successful for the UK's space science and its space industry. He said there was a danger of moving to more bureaucratic, less incentivised ways of working, which he said were more typical of government departments, and were the reason the agency was created in the first place. "It feels like we're going to get stuck in the mud again," he told BBC News.

Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
‘Star Wars' actor Mark Hamill reveals he considered leaving the US when Trump won reelection
"Star Wars" actor Mark Hamill revealed to a UK newspaper that President Donald Trump's election nearly convinced him to leave America, telling his wife their options were moving to London or Ireland. Hamill is known for playing Luke Skywalker in the "Star Wars" films and for voicing the Joker in many "Batman" adaptations. He is also one of Hollywood's most outspoken liberal actors — a fact The Times' contributing editor Matt Rudd observed amid his lengthy interview. "Today he fights not with a lightsaber but with a keyboard," Rudd wrote. "Having left Facebook because he was mad at Zuckerberg and Twitter because he was mad at Musk, he now expresses his horror at the state of America via Bluesky." The writer noted further, "I avoid mentioning Trump until the end of our conversation because it's a subject that risks hijacking an entire afternoon. Sure enough, my late request for Hamill's state of the union results in a lengthy monologue." During the extensive interview with the British daily newspaper, Hamill was candid about the struggles he endured after Trump won the election in November. He was an outspoken supporter of then-President Joe Biden and also supported former Vice President Kamala Harris as Biden's appointed successor for the Democratic Party's nomination. The reality of the Trump administration, he says, is only something he can cope with by imagining it as a political thriller. "The bullying, the incompetence, the people in place… The only way I can deal with it without going crazy and wanting to open my veins in a warm tub is to look at it like a thick, sprawling political novel," the 'Star Wars' actor said. "It's entertaining in a way because this could actually be the end. Our status in the world has been crippled and that will reverberate for decades. Making Canada a 51st state? Do you know how offensive that is? And then taking over Greenland and renaming the Gulf of Mexico. The distractions are hilarious." "I still believe there are more honest, decent people than there are the Maga crowd," he says. "If I didn't, I'd move back to England," Hamill added. The actor noted that he indeed considered moving elsewhere in the English-speaking world as other famous liberal actors have done. The Times noted that "when Trump was re-elected, [Hamill] gave his wife a choice: London or Ireland." "She's very clever," Hamill said, recalling the conversation. "She didn't respond right away but a week later she said, 'I'm surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country.' That son of a b----, I thought. I'm not leaving." Fox News Digital reached out to the White House, and a spokeswoman blasted the actor."Since Mark has decided to stay in the United States, he will get to enjoy the many wins President Trump is securing for the American people — and really, who can blame him for seconding guessing a plan to move to the same place as Rosie O'Donnell…" the White House spokeswoman replied.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Council leaders weigh up legal challenges to migrant hotels after Epping ruling
Councils across England are considering launching their own legal actions after a district council in Essex secured a High Court victory temporarily blocking asylum seekers from being housed in a hotel in the area. Conservative-run Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency' about whether it could take similar action to Epping Forest District Council, which is also run by the Tories. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage indicated the 12 councils where Reform UK was the largest party would consider legal challenges following Tuesday's ruling. Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Mr Farage said the local authorities would do 'everything in their power to follow Epping's lead'. On Tuesday, a High Court judge ruled the former Bell Hotel in Epping must stop housing asylum seekers by September 12. Mr Farage added: 'The good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain. Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex.' The area had seen thousands of people turn out in protest about the housing of migrants in the Bell Hotel. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. In a post on Facebook, Broxbourne Council said: 'Broxbourne Council will now take legal advice as a matter of urgency about whether it could take similar action.' Meanwhile, the leader of South Norfolk District Council, which covers the town of Diss where a hotel housing asylum seekers has also been the subject of protests, said the council would not go down the same route. Conservative leader Daniel Elmer said the council was using planning rules to try to ensure it was families being housed in the area rather than single adult males. He said to do so, which would effectively convert the hotels into hostels, should require a change of use. Two men have been arrested and charged in connection with a protest in July outside the hotel in Diss, which houses more than 40 children. Cllr Elmer told the PA news agency: 'We make a big play about integration, and to replace families who have children in the local school system and have integrated into the local community would make no sense.' He added: 'If we can punish people who have put up sheds in their gardens without permission, then we can take action against hotels being converted into hostels without planning consent.' Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns'. She added: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.' Lawyers for the Home Office had warned the court that an injunction 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Edward Brown KC also said the injunction would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in Epping since a then-resident at the hotel was accused of trying to kiss a teenage girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12. He also refused to give Somani Hotels Limited, the hotel's owner, the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment.



