logo
The cost of being: A political adviser finishing their master's degree

The cost of being: A political adviser finishing their master's degree

The Spinoff19-06-2025
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a political adviser and master's student describes their financial situation.
Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here.
Gender: Female.
Age: 23.
Ethnicity: Pākehā.
Role: I work full time as a political adviser and am a master's student.
Salary/income/assets: My salary is $75,000 a year.
My living location is: Urban.
Rent/mortgage per week: $240 per week, not including other expenses like power and wifi. I live with two other flatmates and we split everything equally.
Student loan or other debt payments per week: My student loan is pretty high because I didn't work for most of my undergrad and have also added to it with the master's degree I'm currently finishing up – I get paid monthly so it's about $550 out of each pay check.
Typical weekly food costs
Groceries: I would say I spend about $100 a week on supermarket trips – I'm a terrible cook and get decision paralysis in the aisles, so it tends to be on snacky stuff and a lot of beverages. My shelf in the fridge is always empty!
Eating out: I eat out quite a bit on weekends (mostly at cafes) – I would estimate I spend about $30 a week on that.
Takeaways: I get takeaways during the week if I feel like I need a big dinner which I usually don't have the ingredients to cook – maybe $50 a week?
Workday lunches: $30 a week. Usually lunch for me is just a protein bar from the supermarket, but sometimes I branch out and go to a café or out with co-workers.
Cafe coffees/snacks: $15 per week (not counting my lunchtime protein bars as a snack – that's a meal!).
Other food costs: None.
Savings: I put anywhere from $500 to $1000 a month into my savings account (depending on outgoings). I would love to get more adept at investing, because my savings account is starting to have what feels like a useless amount of money to just be sitting there.
I worry about money: Sometimes.
Three words to describe my financial situation: Growing, impulsive, fortunate.
My biggest edible indulgence would be: Trying new cafes at the weekend – and smoked Havarti cheese!
In a typical week my alcohol expenditure would be: Unfortunately after a few weeks of sobriety I am back on the Courtenay Place grind. $50 a week.
In a typical week my transport expenditure would be: Nothing, because I walk everywhere. Even in winter.
I estimate in the past year the ballpark amount I spent on my personal clothing (including sleepwear and underwear) was: I think it would be about $1500, I got a new job last year so had to get some more professional office stuff, but I like to shop vintage/ second hand so a lot of my clothes are from Depop or stores along Cuba St.
My most expensive clothing in the past year was: I think it was a pair of Doc Martens I bought a few weeks back for $360. Still mustering up the courage to break them in.
My last pair of shoes cost: $280 for some nicer running shoes because my old ones hurt me.
My grooming/beauty expenditure in a year is about: Probably about $2000 (embarrassing!): $300 a year on hair-related activities, I replace my (very simple) skincare routine every few months which costs about $50 dollars, don't get through makeup too quickly so probably about $100 a year on that, and get my nails done monthly for about $100.
My exercise expenditure in a year is about: My gym costs $7 a week (so $364 a year?) – which I really make the most of and use almost every day.
My last Friday night cost: Nothing, unless you include the cost of my degree because I was working on my thesis the whole evening.
Most regrettable purchase in the last 12 months was: A pair of shoes I made the mistake of buying online, which didn't fit and which I forgot to return.
Most indulgent purchase (that I don't regret) in the last 12 months was: New bedding. I love my bed.
One area where I'm a bit of a tightwad is: Socks. Hate buying socks. But other than that, I'm not sure I'm a tightwad at all – maybe with having people pay me back, but I feel like that's fair.
Five words to describe my financial personality would be: Fun, I could die tomorrow.
I grew up in a house where money was: A frequent and stressful subject because my dad owned his own business and my mum always worked hard too. I felt a lot of anxiety about it growing up because of the negative ways it was discussed, but I was always fortunate to go to great schools and never had to worry about having food on the table.
The last time my Eftpos card was declined was: I don't think it has. I always know how much money is in my spending account.
In five years, in financial terms, I see myself: Student loan paid off (I hope I pray!), on a higher salary, renting somewhere nicer. It's not on my radar for the next while to even think about buying a house.
I would love to have more money for: International travel! I want to do Euro summer at least once.
Describe your financial low: Just last year, when I was doing an unpaid internship and tutoring at uni for extra money – I never felt like I had enough, had basically no savings, wouldn't eat much, and would have about $30 to my name some weeks after rent and bills.
I give money away to: The SPCA.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Consumer debt dips to $14.5b but 470,000 Kiwis are behind on payments
Consumer debt dips to $14.5b but 470,000 Kiwis are behind on payments

NZ Herald

timean hour ago

  • NZ Herald

Consumer debt dips to $14.5b but 470,000 Kiwis are behind on payments

'What we've noticed is that consumer arrears across all sectors, retail, energy, banking, credit card, buy now pay later, it's about 470,000 New Zealanders who are currently in arrears,' McLaughlin said. 'But over the last 12 months, that's stabilised at around about that level. We really saw a spike going back a couple of years ago where every year defaults and insolvencies climbed.' Consumer arrears vary across the country according to the latest Centrix Credit Indicator Report, with arrears higher in the North Island compared to the South Island. Tasman District had the lowest level of consumers in arrears at 8.2%, while Wairoa District had the highest at 18.12%. McLaughlin said although past weather events like Cyclone Gabrielle and flooding are factors, he thinks the uplift in the primary industries and the closure of manufacturing businesses are central to the change. A high milk price payout to dairy farmers has bolstered the rural economy. 'The first payments tend to go back to the lenders, back to the banks, because they're carrying a fair bit of debt over the period. 'The second lot went to the IRD and I think it's only now that the rural sector are going to have some disposable income, which hopefully will trickle down into the local economy.' McLaughlin said the South Island was benefiting from lower unemployment, high agricultural gains and lower housing costs, resulting in smaller mortgages. Financial hardship cases increased year-on-year for July, up 7.1%. Almost half (45%) relate to cases of mortgage payment difficulties, with the remainder coming from credit card debt (29%) and personal loan repayments (18%). The highest rate of financial hardship is among those aged between 35 and 49. McLaughlin said households are balancing their budgets a lot better than in the past, and are not spending money on discretionary items as much as they used to. He said buy-now-pay-later purchases and personal loan arrears were not increasing at levels like they were 18 months ago, with buy-now-pay-later arrears comprising about 8%-9% of borrowing. While the situation is good for households, McLaughlin said it places pressure on small to medium-sized businesses that rely on discretionary spending. '[Households are] saying 'if we can't afford it, we're not going to do it now, we're going to be conservative'. That's had a flow-on impact to those small businesses. 'Small businesses rely on their household mortgages to finance their business. They've had increasing wages and other costs going up, they've had interest rates going up and they've had their sales going down because people aren't spending the money.' McLaughlin thinks the current economic climate is affecting more people than during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2008, and said although the GFC affected people who were invested in the sharemarket, the fallout from Covid was across the population. He said the older demographic had been less impacted by what has happened because they are on better salaries, have greater job security and generally have lower mortgages. McLaughlin said the biggest challenge for borrowers at the moment is non-discretionary debt, and the flexibility being able to borrow money provides can help in times of need. Nation of Debt series Monday: NZ nears trillion-dollar debt burden Tuesday: Government debt: Are higher taxes inevitable? Thursday: Student debt: How big? How bad? Tom Raynel is a multimedia business journalist for the Herald, covering small business, retail and tourism.

Electricity Authority Moves To Level The Power Playing Field
Electricity Authority Moves To Level The Power Playing Field

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

Electricity Authority Moves To Level The Power Playing Field

The Electricity Authority Te Mana Hiko (the Authority) is moving to level the playing field between the four large gentailers (Genesis, Contact, Meridian and Mercury) and independent participants in the electricity market. The level playing field options were developed by the Authority, the Commerce Commission Te Komihana Tauhokohoko (Commerce Commission) and the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment under the Energy Competition Task Force. The Authority has today confirmed three targeted interventions to boost competition, build confidence in the wholesale market, and ultimately give New Zealanders better access to affordable electricity. "Confidence in the market underpins healthy retail competition and affordable power prices," says Electricity Authority Chair Anna Kominik. "We are concerned that aspects of the wholesale market may be eroding the confidence required for independent players to compete, and we are acting to address these concerns." The Authority is progressing these pro-competition interventions at pace, so changes could be in place by mid-2026: 1. Options for requiring gentailers to trade minimum volumes of the new wholesale electricity hedge product introduced in January to help independent participants manage their risk. Regulation would only apply if voluntary trading volumes do not grow. The issues and options paper is now available for feedback. 2. Code changes necessary to introduce mandatory non-discrimination obligations for the four large gentailers, with draft Code amendments published for feedback in October. This will provide greater confidence that the gentailers' wholesale businesses are not treating independent retailers differently to their own retail businesses. 3. A review of 'market making' in the electricity futures market to ensure it promotes healthy competition and transparency. This will be published for feedback in November. The Authority is also ready to intervene with urgent regulation if there is a sudden material reduction in the supply of shaped hedges, to maintain the market while an enduring solution is considered. By fixing costs when energy demand is highest, shaped hedges help retailers manage risk and keep prices stable and affordable, even in tight market conditions. "Targeted and timely interventions are needed to encourage new generators and independent retailers to enter, grow and compete in the market. These initiatives will promote healthy competition, retail innovation and investment in the sector - all of which are essential to deliver a reliable and affordable electricity supply," Kominik said. In February, the Authority sought feedback on options to level the playing field between the gentailers and independent generators and retailers, receiving over 40 written submissions and meeting with more than 20 submitters. The Authority is continuing to consider the broad range of views shared as it develops draft Code amendments for consultation and will respond to those views in the consultation paper. "We know from the conversations we're having that some feel that regulatory change is not happening fast or hard enough. The proposals being announced today target measures that can be rolled out in months, not years, driving timely progress while ensuring all parties can participate in and contribute to the process," says Kominik. "New Zealand's electricity market is undergoing significant change, and the Authority has a clearly signposted programme of proposed reforms and adjustments underway that keep the focus on security of supply and affordability. The Authority is prioritising practical measures with clear benefits and time for input to ensure policy changes are robust and in New Zealand consumers' long-term interests," says Kominik. Commerce Commission Chair and Task Force member Dr John Small says: "These initiatives are designed to work together to promote increased competition in the sector. Combined they increase transparency for market participants transacting with the gentailers and improve access to the wholesale electricity contracts they need. They would also give new players and investors confidence to enter the market and encourage the development of innovative new products and services. We don't expect these proposed changes would materially increase gentailers' costs but do expect they would lead to more choices and lower power prices over the long term." Visit the Task Force webpage to see the Pro-competition policy reform roadmap and read the Regulating the standardised super-peak hedge contract issues and options paper for more information. Notes About our proposed approach to regulating the wholesale electricity (super-peak) product The Authority is now seeking feedback on options for regulating the super-peak product, including market making on the over the counter (OTC) market as its preferred approach, should voluntary trading fail to deliver sufficient competition. These 'shaped' hedge contracts enable retailers to offer stable prices to consumers while managing their exposure to volatile morning and evening peak wholesale prices. This increases competition in the market, brings more power into the system, provides more choice for consumers, and puts downward pressure on retail prices. This type of product is becoming increasingly important as the electricity system becomes more reliant on renewable generation and spot market pricing becomes more volatile. Voluntary trading in the super-peak product began in January this year and while it has already improved availability and pricing, the market remains shallow, with limited seller diversity and low trading volumes. To address this, the Authority is proposing to set clear expectations for robust participation in voluntary trading by the gentailers, who own over 95% of flexible generation (which backs shaped hedge contracts), and signals that regulation may follow if trading does not improve. The Authority is also ready to intervene with urgent regulation if there is a sudden material reduction in the supply of shaped hedges. About our review of market making Market making is a service where a participant will quote prices for two sides of a market (ie both buys/bids and sells/offers) in a particular derivative, with a specified amount of volume and a specified bid-ask price spread. This service provides liquidity by ensuring there is always volume available to be bought or sold. In 2022, the Electricity Authority introduced mandatory market making in the electricity futures market, with the following objectives: To support a robust and reliable forward price curve. To increase the availability of risk management contracts for market participants. This framework was implemented through a combination of four regulated market makers (the gentailers) and one commercial market maker, who are required to provide certain volume of buy and sell offers for specific electricity futures products. The Authority is now undertaking a policy review of market making arrangements to ensure that current settings remain appropriate and aligned with our market making policy objective. As part of this review, we will also explore potential changes to strengthen market making services and ensure they continue to support a resilient and efficient electricity market. The Authority will consult on these proposals in November 2025. About the Energy Competition Task Force The Energy Competition Task Force was established by the Commerce Commission Te Komihana Tauhokohoko and Electricity Authority Te Mana Hiko, with the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, in August 2024 to investigate ways to improve the performance of the electricity market. The Task Force has been considering eight initiatives that will encourage more and faster investment in new electricity generation, boost competition, enable homes, businesses and industrials to better manage their own electricity use and costs, and put downward pressure on prices.

Group takes aim at new sustainability initiative
Group takes aim at new sustainability initiative

Otago Daily Times

time2 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Group takes aim at new sustainability initiative

All New Zealanders need an update on agricultural politics, Pomahaka farmer and Groundswell New Zealand co-founder Bryce McKenzie says. Groundswell was founded in 2020 to mitigate a wave of "unworkable" farming regulations launched by the government beginning about 2018. Over the last six weeks, the group has been responding to the New Zealand Taxonomy movement, a proposal before ministers to classify farming, business and other activity in terms of "sustainability". "Their 'sustainable' means in terms of climate emissions," Mr McKenzie said. "They want to set farms a target of one tonne of CO2 emissions per hectare then classify each farm as green, amber or red. "Green means 'determined to be sustainable', amber could 'transition into being sustainable' and red they recommend gets 'transitioned out of agriculture'." New Zealand Taxonomy is being promoted by the Centre for Sustainable Finance (CSF) in partnership with the government. The vision is for "a financial system that is more resilient, inclusive, robust and agile through the incorporation of environmental, social and economic considerations in financial decisions". "Sheep and beef farmers are around 3.9 tonnes now, and dairy are 9 to 11 tonnes per hectare. "If you close down all these farms, where is the food going to come from? That's we mean when we say 'unworkable'." New Zealand was acknowledged as a world leader in sustainable farming practice, and Groundswell argued New Zealand Taxonomy would damage the country's primary industry economy. In 2022, Ministry for Primary Industries predicted 650,000ha of sheep and beef farmland would be converted into forestry under the present Emission Trading Scheme by 2050, which could potentially impact New Zealand's 92,000 red-meat industry jobs. On its website, the Centre for Sustainable Finance, said "there's commentary lately making inaccurate claims about the New Zealand Taxonomy". "Let's be clear: the taxonomy is not about compliance or telling farmers how to run their businesses. It is a voluntary, market-led tool to help investors identify 'green' or 'sustainable' activities in New Zealand. It's about growing access to global capital, not adding green tape. 'Taxonomy' simply means classification — nothing to do with tax." "The New Zealand government has objectives of doubling the value of exports while staying in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement, growing and building resilience into the economy. "The New Zealand Taxonomy is about growing New Zealand access to global capital and markets." • Groundswell is also campaigning for "proper public debate" over the Gene Technology Bill, now under consideration by the Health Committee. The Bill's purpose is to "enable the safe use of gene technology and regulated organisms in New Zealand". Mr McKenzie said the bill had "one or two things that could be a benefit, but in a lot of ways I can see [the Bill] being detrimental to our international reputation that sells New Zealand's products overseas". He said at the very least the bill should also be considered by the Primary Production Committee, who understood the impact genetic technology could have on food production and markets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store