logo
It's late at the Statehouse and best practices are out the door

It's late at the Statehouse and best practices are out the door

Yahoo15-04-2025
Christmas is hands-down my favorite time of the year. And the end of session is hands-down my least favorite.
That's because for months, the General Assembly has chugged along at a reasonable pace, hearing bills, listening to Hoosiers, making changes, passing measures — even compromising a time or two.
And then we hit the final few weeks, and all best practices go out the door.
I'm going to lay out three examples we have seen in recent days that don't bode well for a transparent and accountable legislature. It's also why trust in public service continues to erode.
Senate Bill 1 was 46 pages when introduced as Gov. Mike Braun's reset plan to help homeowners. It grew under Senate Republicans to 91 pages. And after House Republicans made another amendment, it is a stunning 355 pages.
The GOP folded in tangentially related and even unrelated bills, possibly to harvest votes. And it made the product so endlessly complicated that even someone who has covered Indiana's property tax system since its court-ordered redesign is struggling to grasp it all.
It now includes a bill that was moving just fine on its own – Senate Bill 518 – and looked like an easy win for the GOP. It provides property tax sharing in some local school districts for public charter schools. It's a perfectly good debate to have on its own but now the measure is in this bill, which means Democrats didn't support it.
Opinion: Republicans question Diego Morales' spending: 'It looks like a campaign sign'
An amended version also had a long-sought business tax break via a phaseout of the business personal property tax. This came even though the purpose of the bill was long said to be giving homeowners relief from massive assessment and bill spikes. Cooler heads prevailed on second reading, though, and the elimination was removed.
Oh yeah, and the bill dissolves a school corporation in Randolph County that has almost all virtual students — which has nothing to do with the original intent.
Heck, the bill isn't even titled property tax relief anymore. It's now local government finance.
In the first half of session, House Bill 1662 had robust hearings, passed out of committee and then died on the calendar because it didn't have the votes. The bill has been labeled by critics as criminalizing homelessness but proponents say it's about squatters.
Now, at this late hour, it was suddenly put into Senate Bill 197 through an amendment. No one following the issue had notice of the amendment, so there was no public testimony. And it is likely headed back to the Senate to see if lawmakers there accept that change. Mind you, senators haven't heard one iota of testimony on the concept.
We're in the fourth month, but are still introducing language that has never passed a committee. Several bills filed at the outset were bans on advertising marijuana. None of them had a committee vote in the first half.
Briggs: Micah Beckwith and his Indiana DOGE bros are livin' large
Instead, a Republican lawmaker added it to a Bureau of Motor Vehicles bill he authored while it was in a Senate committee. The agency was none too pleased, and the language was removed the next week. But never fear, it was added again – this time to Senate Bill 73 on utility trailer sales. The language hasn't passed a single chamber, and most lawmakers have heard no testimony on the pros and cons of such a move. But it could very well become law anyway.
Yes, the session isn't over yet. And every day counts. But leaders can't be happy with some of the shenanigans that are just considered to be ho-hum legislating.
For the majority of session, decorum prevails. But when the end nears, everyone suddenly forgets that how a law is passed matters just as much as what is passed. And that's why the end of session will always be the worst time of year.
Niki Kelly is editor-in-chief of the Indiana Capital Chronicle, where this column first appeared. She has covered the Indiana Statehouse since 1999.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Indiana General Assembly's final weeks mean compromise | Opinion
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gov. Cox says he's ‘grateful' he didn't know about new law's impact on Senate president's relative
Gov. Cox says he's ‘grateful' he didn't know about new law's impact on Senate president's relative

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gov. Cox says he's ‘grateful' he didn't know about new law's impact on Senate president's relative

Gov. Spencer Cox speaks with members of the media during the governor's news conference broadcast by PBS Utah at the Eccles Broadcast Center in Salt Lake City on Thursday, August 21, 2025. (Pool photo by Rick Egan/The Salt Lake Tribune) An at times heated Utah Gov. Cox sparred with reporters Thursday over the fallout from reports that Utah Senate President Stuart Adams initiated passage of a law that later helped his 18-year-old granddaughter reach a plea deal in a criminal case involving sex with a 13-year-old. Cox said he didn't think an ethics investigation or a third-party review is warranted, saying 'there's nothing to investigate.' 'The facts are abundantly clear. It's been reported. I don't think anybody's denied that what happened, happened,' Cox said, adding he learned about the situation when The Salt Lake Tribune first reported it earlier this month. Cox argued the most pertinent question is whether Adams 'should have told me about it' or 'should he have leaned on me.' 'I can only imagine how people would have reacted if he had done that,' the governor said. 'Look, there have been times in my term as governor, when I've been so mad at Stuart Adams that I couldn't see straight on certain bills,' Cox said, without naming those instances. 'That has happened a couple of times. I can tell you this is not one of those times.' Cox said he believed Adams acted appropriately by not publicly weighing in on the bill or disclosing his relatives' involvement to other legislators other than his right-hand man, Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy. 'I think it was appropriate for the top person in the Senate not to weigh in on this bill, which is exactly what happened,' Cox said. In fact, Cox — who signed the bill after it passed last year — said he's 'very grateful that I had no idea that this was impacting someone in his family, in his granddaughter's family, because it may have changed the way I reacted to the bill.' Instead, he said he was able to focus only on the policy. The governor added that there's 'no controversy about whether people knew this was in the bill or not.' 'The only question I have is this is the right policy? And this is a really tough one, guys,' Cox said. 'This is a hard one. You have kids in high school being treated differently, depending on where their birthday falls during the year. And if their birthday falls in May instead of June, then they get treated the same as a 50-year-old who had a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old. And that's the question. Is that fair?' The Tribune reported that Adams, 'surprised by the severity of the charges' that were first filed against his relative, confided with Cullimore and asked him to look into the issue. The original charges included two counts of child rape and two counts of child sodomy, all first-degree felonies, with the possibility of 25 years to life in prison and requirements to register as a sex offender, the Tribune reported. Cullimore also said he consulted Cara Tangaro, the defense attorney representing Adams' granddaughter, for more information on the case and to help draft language that was later put into a sweeping criminal justice bill, SB213, during the Utah Legislature's 2024 session. That provision allowed lower-level charges to be filed against 18-year-olds still enrolled in high school, allowing them to be treated the same as 17-year-olds in similar cases. The bill was not retroactive, and Adams' relative was not charged with the lower penalties it created, but the new law was referenced in court hearings before the case was resolved with a plea deal. 'You saw the legislative change,' Tangaro told Judge Rita Cornish at sentencing, the Tribune reported. 'We all agree that's not retroactive, but the government did change their offer based on that.' Ultimately, Adams' 18-year-old relative took a plea deal that meant she would not serve additional time in jail, would serve four years on probation, and would not register as a sex offender, the Tribune reported. In the interview with and Deseret News, Adams said his granddaughter made a mistake, but he also argued she received appropriate penalties, saying she was arrested at her high school, spent eight days in jail, and spent more than 500 days under house arrest with an ankle monitor. 'What a humiliating event,' Adams told the outlets. 'Now we're heaping on her a scarlet letter on her forehead. It's wrong. The stories are wrong. … She's been convicted and tried, and now we're doing it again in the media and it's wrong.' The 13-year-old victim's mother, however, told the Tribune she felt like she was 'punched in the gut' after she learned about the law change, and she felt as though her child was an afterthought both in the policy debate and the criminal case. 'I feel like a law is the law, regardless of who you are, but that wasn't what was going on here,' the mother told the Tribune. 'I feel like [the 18-year-old] just got special treatment …and nobody was going to say anything about it.' In wake of the Tribune story, calls for Adams' resignation have come from some Democrats, including Sen. Nate Blouin, D-Millcreek, and Utah Democratic Party Chair Brian King. They've also come from some corners of the right, with roughly 100 mostly conservative people rallying at the Utah Capitol in Salt Lake City over the weekend to call for Adams to resign. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Adams has rejected those calls and has denied any wrongdoing, telling and Deseret News that he didn't tell legislators about the case involving his granddaughter in an effort to keep the process fair. In an interview with the outlets, Adams and Cullimore also argued that the bill's process was proper and not unusual. 'There's nothing unusual about how this bill came about,' Adams told the outlets. 'Every bill that we run has some type of connection to a constituent, to a lobbyist, to an industry leader, to a personal experience a legislator has.' Other Republican lawmakers, including Sen. Todd Weiler, R-Woods Cross, have defended Adams and the process that led to the bill's passage. He told and Deseret News that he didn't know about the connection to Adams' granddaughter when the bill was debated, and that's how it should be. At least one Republican legislator, however — the House sponsor of the bill, then-House Majority Whip Karianne Lisonbee, R-Syracuse — has expressed concerns that that section of the omnibus criminal justice bill didn't go through the same vetting process as the rest of the bill. In a statement issued last week, House Speaker Mike Schultz, R-Hooper, said due to 'heightened attention on SB213, I believe it's important to reconvene stakeholders for further discussion to ensure we have arrived at the right policy.' 'I have spoken with President Adams, and he agrees,' Schultz said. 'We will convene a working group to conduct a comprehensive review of state policy in this area to ensure our laws protect public safety, uphold accountability, and serve the best interests of all Utahns.' Cox on Thursday left the door open to changes to the law, saying when he signed the bill it was a 'close call.' 'Maybe it's not the right policy. Maybe now that we have an opportunity to reflect on it, maybe it doesn't go far enough or it goes too far, and that's what we do. That's the process,' Cox said. The governor again defended Adams' role in the bill. While he brought it to Cullimore to address, he didn't publicly debate it or tell legislators about his connection to the issue. 'Every single legislator has experiences in their life where they see something that they feel may be unjust, and that influences the way they bring legislation to the table,' Cox said. 'Again, I have lots of reasons to get upset with Stuart Adams. This was not one of them. I'm really grateful he never talked to me about it.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Play Farm Merge Valley

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store