Teacher with long Covid wins £42k for unfair sacking
Joanna White told an employment tribunal that her deputy headteacher told her that she 'just had to get on with it' after she raised concerns about her health.
A panel found that Dorothy Stringer School in Brighton was 'actively looking' to end her employment as quickly as possible after she took more than six months off sick.
Over a period of 20 months, Ms White had not been able to teach a 'full teaching load' for longer than four weeks without taking time off sick, the panel was told.
Ms White successfully sued the city council for disability discrimination and unfair dismissal, and has now been awarded £42,118.50 in compensation.
The tribunal, held in Croydon, south London, heard she started working at the secondary school in 2007.
Ms White already suffered from an autoimmune condition before the pandemic and received a warning about her number of absences in February 2020.
After testing positive for Covid in Nov 2020, she was off work until the start of the next academic term in January 2021.
The tribunal heard: '[Ms White]'s evidence was that on various occasions she raised with Mr [Richard] Baker [the deputy headteacher] and with Ms Poole, the head of year, that she was concerned about her health.
'Her evidence was that she was told by Mr Baker that 'there is no such thing as rest in teaching', and told by Ms Poole that she 'just had to get on with it'.
'Mr Baker accepted in evidence that he was aware that [Ms White] was feeling tired during that period, and that the school was aware of it, although he denied saying, 'there is no such thing as rest in teaching.''
Ms White told the school on March 3, 2021 that she had symptoms of Long Covid, and she was signed off work between March 10 and April 7 that year.
She was then off with the condition again between May 18, 2021 and December 12, 2021.
On January 27, 2022, Ms White was invited to a meeting in which she was given a second warning about her absence. Her employers thought they gave her a reduced workload on her return, but she felt it was 'equivalent'.
An occupational health report was written in August 2022, which outlined recommendations to reduce her workload in the next academic year.
The following month, however, she suffered concussion from a head injury and was signed off from work until November.
During this time, she was invited to a third meeting about her absences and warned she may be fired.
A school report noted: 'Since February 2021, a period of 20 months, [Ms White] had not been able to teach a full teaching load for longer than four weeks without a period of sickness absence.'
It also said the occupational therapist report said she would be 'unlikely to be able to teach a full timetable within the next year without considerable adjustments'.
The school's report concluded that she should be dismissed on the grounds of capability.
Employment Judge Adam Leith said that the decision breached the school's policies, ruling it was unreasonable to dismiss Ms White, and she was therefore discriminated against because of her disability.
The judge added: 'The school had a detailed and no doubt carefully drafted policy.
'Departing from it in a way which (essentially) shortcut the process, in and of itself, gave rise to the inference that the school was actively looking to bring [Ms White]'s employment to an end as expediently as possible.'
Ms White has chosen not to be a teacher anymore because of 'the way her trust with the school had been broken', the tribunal heard.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
16 minutes ago
- Medscape
Diabetes Tied to Slower Brain Recovery After TBI
TOPLINE: Diabetes was associated with reduced global cognition 2 weeks after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and less improvement in processing speed throughout the first year post-TBI compared to not having diabetes, a new cohort study showed. METHODOLOGY: The prospective cohort TRACK-TBI study included more than 1000 participants aged 17 years or older with TBI (mean age, 39 years; 67% men; 76% White individuals) who presented to one of 18 level 1 trauma centers in the US between 2014 and 2018. Participants underwent cognitive assessments at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-injury that evaluated verbal episodic memory, executive function, and processing speed alone and combined into a global cognitive factor score. Researchers analyzed associations between cognitive outcomes and the vascular risk factors of hypertension (17%), diabetes (7.5%), hyperlipidemia (9%), and smoking (30%). They adjusted the analysis for age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, severity of TBI, and histories of TBI and psychiatric conditions. TAKEAWAY: After adjustment for confounders, participants with diabetes had lower global cognitive factor scores at 2 weeks post-injury than those without diabetes (mean difference in change, -0.25; P < .05) and showed less improvement in processing speed over the first year post-injury (mean difference, -0.26; P < .05). Individuals with two or more vascular risk factors had lower global cognitive factor scores at 2 weeks post-injury than those without any vascular risk factors (mean difference, -0.21; P < .05), as well as worse verbal memory and processing speed (mean differences, -0.18 and -0.22, respectively; P < .05 for both). However, they had similar improvement over the first year. Cognitive performance did not differ significantly by hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or smoking status. In sensitivity analyses, participants with treated diabetes had worse cognitive outcomes than those without diabetes, including lower global cognitive factor scores at 2 weeks (mean difference, -0.32) and less improvement in global cognitive function over 1 year (mean difference, -0.29). IN PRACTICE: 'Given the modifiable nature of comorbid vascular risk factors, future work interrogating postinjury changes in vascular risk factor burden, over longer follow-up, is warranted,' the investigators wrote. SOURCE: The study was led by Andrea L. C. Schneider, MD, PhD, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia. It was published online on August 8 in JAMA Network Open. LIMITATIONS: Vascular risk factors were only assessed at enrollment, preventing the evaluation of post-injury changes in risk factor status. Information on disease duration or severity were unavailable. The study also experienced significant attrition leading to missing data. Additionally, the findings could not be generalized to milder injuries or more severe TBI cases managed beyond level 1 trauma centers. DISCLOSURES: The study was funded by the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke and by a grant from the Department of Defense. Several investigators reported having financial or other ties with various sources. Full details are provided in the original article. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Five 'high-priority' pathogens discovered entering Australia via airplane toilets
Five high-priority pathogens and superbugs have entered Australia on international flights, an investigation of wastewater in airplane toilets has revealed. The new research, led by the national science agency, CSIRO, confirms that air travel is a key pathway for antimicrobial-resistant bacteria to enter the country. Working with an international team of university scientists, the researchers found superbugs in every one of the 44 samples. Close to a third tested positive for a gene with resistance to last resort antibiotics that had not previously been found in Australia. Dr Warish Ahmed, a principal research scientist at CSIRO, said the research indicates testing aircraft wastewater could be a significant tool for detecting the spread of new diseases. He said the data collected could be particularly important for protecting vulnerable communities. 'The samples could be delivered to labs, and we could simply run PCR tests, looking for antibiotic-resistant genes and bacteria and offer the results in a couple of days,' he told Yahoo News Australia. 'But it would need the collaboration with airlines, university research institutions and public health units to make it happen.' Related: Alarm raised after strange backyard phenomenon worsens in Aussie region Region with highest concentration of resistant microbes Eighteen of the samples taken from flights originating in South Asia had a higher concentration of antibiotic-resistant genes than those from Europe. In many parts of the continent, antibiotics can be purchased over the counter without a prescription, allowing resistance to quickly grow. Other contributors to the variation between parts of Asia and Europe could be water and sanitation, population density, and public health policies, according to lead author Dr Yawen Liu, a visiting scientist at CSIRO from China's Xiamen University. 'By monitoring aircraft wastewater, we can potentially detect and track antibiotic resistance genes before they become established in local environments,' Liu added. 🥣 Disturbing problem caused by placing five common items in dishwasher ☠️ Calls to ban 4,200 chemicals 'of concern' found in common products 😳 Beach walker stumbles up new Australian ocean predator The study began during the Covid-19 pandemic, and the group's testing of aircraft wastewater has now concluded. They found pathogens were present in wastewater despite the use of strong disinfectants in treatment systems. The study was a collaboration between CSIRO, Xiamen University, the University of South Australia and Michigan Technological University. It was published in the journal Microbiology Spectrum. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
White House AI czar David Sacks says 'AI psychosis' is similar to the 'moral panic' of social media's early days
The White House AI advisor discussed "AI psychosis" on a recent podcast. David Sacks said he doubted the validity of the concept. He compared it to the "moral panic" that surrounded earlier tech leaps, like social media. AI can create a diet plan, organize a calendar, and provide answers to an endless variety of burning questions. Can it also cause a psychiatric breakdown? David Sacks, the White House official spearheading America's AI policies, doesn't think so. President Donald Trump's AI and crypto czar discussed "AI psychosis" during an episode of the "All-In Podcast" published Friday. While most people engage with chatbots without a problem, a small number of users say the bots have encouraged delusions and other concerning behavior. For some, ChatGPT serves as an alternative to professional therapists. A psychiatrist earlier told Business Insider that some of his patients exhibiting what's been described as "AI psychosis," a nonclinical term, used the technology before experiencing mental health issues, "but they turned to it in the wrong place at the wrong time, and it supercharged some of their vulnerabilities." During the podcast, Sacks doubted the whole concept of "AI psychosis." "I mean, what are we talking about here? People doing too much research?" he asked. "This feels like the moral panic that was created over social media, but updated for AI." Sacks then referred to a recent article featuring a psychiatrist, who said they didn't believe using a chatbot inherently induced "AI psychosis" if there aren't other risk factors — including social and genetic — involved. "In other words, this is just a manifestation or outlet for pre-existing problems," Sacks said. "I think it's fair to say we're in the midst of a mental health crisis in this country." Sacks attributed the crisis instead to the COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdowns. "That's what seems to have triggered a lot of these mental health declines," he said. After several reports of users suffering mental breaks while using ChatGPT, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addressed the issue on X after the company rolled out the highly anticipated GPT-5. "People have used technology, including AI, in self-destructive ways; if a user is in a mentally fragile state and prone to delusion, we do not want the AI to reinforce that," Altman wrote. "Most users can keep a clear line between reality and fiction or role-play, but a small percentage cannot." Earlier this month, OpenAI introduced safeguards in ChatGPT, including a prompt encouraging users to take breaks after long conversations with the chatbot. The update will also change how the chatbot responds to users asking about personal challenges. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword