EU will propose more flexibility for defence procurement, commissioner says
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The European Commission will propose next week to give governments more flexibility on defence procurement and make access to European funding easier, European Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius said on Tuesday.
"Without this simplification, nothing else in defence readiness will be possible to achieve," Kubilius told a conference in Brussels. "Putin will not wait for us to get our paperwork in order," he added.
The European defence industry has raised concerns about EU red tape and delays in accessing funds.
The proposal, expected to be presented on June 17, will aim to address some of these complaints.
"We intend to give more flexibility to member states in common procurements, more flexibility on framework agreements, and we intend to facilitate innovation procurement," he said, adding that the Commission also wants to make access to the bloc's defence fund "easier".
The commissioner said it would also be important to look at other rules that impact defence, pointing to permits, reporting obligations, competition rules and sustainable finance.
Kubilius said the Commission will propose simplifying a directive on defence procurement and a directive on intra-EU transfers of defence products.
(Reporting by Lili Bayer, editing by Bart Meijer)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
12 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trump says he will announce candidate for open Fed position in next couple days
KUALA LUMPUR: US President Donald Trump said on Sunday he will announce a candidate to fill an open position at the Federal Reserve in the next couple of days. The Fed said on Friday that Governor Adriana Kugler was resigning early from her term, leaving an opening for Trump, a sharp critic of the US central bank's leadership, to fill. COLUMN-OPEC+ gets lucky as it brings back oil output amid uncertainty: Russell (The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) By Clyde Russell LAUNCESTON, Australia, Aug 4 (Reuters) - A couple of months ago it would have been a brave call to say that OPEC+ would be able to bring back 2.5 million barrels per day of crude production and still keep oil prices anchored around $70 a barrel. But this is exactly what has occurred, with the eight members of the producer group winding back the last of their 2.2 million bpd of voluntary cuts by September, as well as allowing a separate increase for the United Arab Emirates. The eight OPEC+ members met virtually on Sunday, agreeing to lift output by 547,000 bpd for September, adding to the increases of 548,000 bpd for August, 411,000 bpd for each of May, June and July, as well as the 138,000 bpd for April that kickstarted the unwinding of their voluntary cuts. OPEC+ stuck to their recent line that the rolling back of production cuts was justified by a strong global economy and low oil inventories. It's debatable as to whether this is actually the case. Certainly, demand growth in the top-importing region of Asia has been lacklustre. Asia's oil imports were about 25.0 million bpd in July, down from 27.88 million bpd in June and the lowest monthly total since July last year, according to data compiled by LSEG Oil Research. While China, the world's biggest crude importer, has been increasing purchases in recent months, much of this is likely because of lower prices that prevailed when June- and July-arriving cargoes were arranged. It's also the case that China has likely been adding to its stockpiles at a rapid pace, and while it doesn't disclose inventories, the surplus of crude once refinery processing is subtracted from the total available from domestic output and imports was 1.06 million bpd over the first half of 2025. OPEC+ LUCK? It appears more likely that OPEC+ has largely been fortunate in that it has been increasing output at a time of rising risks in the crude oil market, largely from geopolitical tensions. The brief conflict between Israel and Iran in June, which was later joined by the United States, did lead to an equally brief spike in crude prices, with benchmark Brent futures reaching a six-month high of $81.40 a barrel on June 23. The price has since eased back to trade around the $70 mark, with some early weakness in Asia on Monday seeing Brent drop to around $69.35. But the point is that the Israel-Iran conflict arrested a downtrend in oil prices that had been in place for much of the first half of the year. Crude prices have also been supported in recent days by U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of wide-ranging sanctions against buyers of Russian oil unless Moscow agrees to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine. As with everything Trump, it pays to be cautious as to whether his actions will ultimately be as drastic as his threats. But it would also be foolhardy to assume that there will be no impact on crude supplies even if any eventual measures imposed by the United States are not as drastic as feared. There are effectively only two major buyers of Russian crude, India and China. Of these two, India is the far more exposed given its refiners export millions of barrels of refined products, many made with Russian oil. India imported 2.1 million bpd of Russian oil in June, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler, which is the second-highest monthly total behind only 2.15 million bpd in May 2023. In recent months, India has been buying about 40% of its crude from Russia and if it were to replace that with other suppliers, it would have a severe impact on oil flows, at least initially. It's likely that a combination of Middle East, Africa and Americas exporters could make up for India's loss of Russian barrels, but this would tighten supplies considerably and likely keep prices higher. Whether Russia and its network of shadowy traders and shippers could once again work around sanctions remains to be seen, but even if they could, it would still take some time for them to get Russian crude through to buyers. For now, much remains up in the air and OPEC+ members are following a smart strategy in taking advantage of the uncertainty to bring their production back and rebuild market share. How long this play can work is the question. Even if Russian barrels do leave the market, it's also possible that demand growth disappoints in the second half as the impact of Trump's trade war becomes more apparent, cutting global trade and lowering economic growth. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
New Straits Times
12 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
China's solar giants quietly shed a third of their workforces last year
BEIJING: China's biggest solar firms shed nearly one-third of their workforces last year, company filings show, as one of the industries hand-picked by Beijing to drive economic growth grapples with falling prices and steep losses. The job cuts illustrate the pain from the vicious price wars being fought across Chinese industries, including solar and electric vehicles, as they grapple with overcapacity and tepid demand. The world produces twice as many solar panels each year as it uses, with most of them manufactured in China. Longi Green Energy, Trina Solar, Jinko Solar, JA Solar, and Tongwei , collectively shed some 87,000 staff, or 31 per cent of their workforces on average last year, according to a Reuters review of employment figures in public filings. Analysts say the previously unreported job losses were likely a mix of layoffs and attrition due to cuts to pay and hours as companies sought to stem losses. Layoffs are politically sensitive in China, where Beijing views employment as key to social stability. Other than a 5 per cent cut acknowledged by Longi last year, none of the firms mentioned above have announced any job cuts or responded to questions from Reuters. "The industry has been facing a downturn since the end of 2023," said Cheng Wang, an analyst at Morningstar. "In 2024, it actually got worse. In 2025, it looks like it's getting even worse." Since 2024, more than 40 solar firms have delisted, gone bankrupt or been acquired, according to a presentation by the photovoltaic industry association in July. China's solar manufacturers built new factories at a fever pitch between 2020 and 2023 as the state redirected resources from the sinking property sector to what it used to call the "new three" growth industries: solar panels, electric cars and batteries. That building spree led to falling prices and a brutal price war made worse by U.S. tariffs thrown up against exports from the many Chinese-owned factories in Southeast Asia. The industry lost US$60 billion last year. While analysts say it is unclear whether job cuts continued this year, Beijing is increasingly signalling it intends to intervene to cut capacity, sending polysilicon prices soaring nearly 70 per cent in July while solar panel prices have increased more modestly. Major polysilicon producer GCL told Reuters on Thursday that top producers plan to set up an OPEC-like entity to control prices and supply. The group is also setting up a 50-billion yuan vehicle to buy and shut around a third of the industry's lower-quality production capacity. President Xi Jinping in early July called for an end to "disorderly price competition," and three days later the industry ministry pledged to calm price wars and retire outdated production capacity during a meeting with solar industry executives. While Beijing has not said when or how it will act, a source with direct knowledge of the matter said it was determined to focus on the issue before the end of the current five-year plan this year. Officials in eastern China's Anhui province, a manufacturing hub, told solar company executives in June to stop adding new manufacturing and shut production lines operating at under 30 per cent capacity, according to two industry sources who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. A board member at a solar firm in the province said new capacity had already required verbal approval from powerful state planner the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) this year. They asked for their company's name to be withheld because the discussions were private. NO EASY FIX But many provincial governments are likely to be reluctant to crack down hard on overcapacity, analysts say. These officials are scored on jobs and economic growth and are loathe to see local champions sacrificed to meet someone else's target. Trina Solar's chairman told an industry conference in June that new projects had begun this year despite the NDRC calling for a halt in February. The foot-dragging reflects the scale of the cull required. Jefferies analyst Alan Lau estimated at least 20-30 per cent of manufacturing capacity would have to be eliminated for companies to return to profitability. "There's a lot of overcapacity in China, like steel, like cement, but you don't see any industry in the past having industry-wide cash loss for one and a half years already," Lau said. Company-level losses are on the same scale as in real estate, another crisis-hit sector, even though solar is only about one-tenth the size, he said. "This is highly unusual and highly abnormal."
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
BoE rate cuts cost households billions
Muted impact: The BoE in London. Homeowners have yet to benefit, as many wait for mortgage deals locked in at higher rates to expire. — Reuters LONDON: Exactly one year since the Bank of England (BoE) started to cut interest rates, the pressure on households from the highest borrowing costs in a generation is still building. Bloomberg analysis of BoE savings and mortgage data shows that Britons in aggregate are an annual £11bil worse off than in July last year – despite four interest-rate cuts since then and the prospect of more to come. Those reductions hit savers hard as banks and building societies were quick to respond by lowering rates paid on customer deposits. But homeowners have yet to benefit, as many wait for mortgage deals locked in at higher rates to expire. The findings underscore the challenge facing policymakers to ease financial conditions for households and revive Britain's tepid growth rates as they gradually lower rates that stood at 5.25% just a year ago, the highest since the onset of the global credit crunch. Recovery hinges heavily on consumers, who contribute about 60% of the British economy. Yet many still seem more inclined to hoard money than spend it due to fears of more tax hikes in the autumn. A savings index compiled by GfK surged in July to the highest level since 2007. 'The implication is that the impact of rate cuts is going to be very gradual – amplified by the fact that the pace of cuts is also pretty glacial,' said James Smith, developed markets economist at ING. The UK central bank is widely expected to deliver a fifth quarter-point rate reduction to 4% on Thursday amid signs that the labour market is weakening in response to Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves' April tax hikes and global trade tensions. But with inflation at a 17-month high and hotter than the BoE projected in May, governor Andrew Bailey is likely to re-emphasise the need for caution over the pace of future easing. While the uptick has been driven by energy bills and other one-off factors, policymakers worry that workers may respond by bidding up wages to protect their purchasing power, with knock-on effects on prices. Falling rates have cost households almost £5bil in lost earnings on savings, including tax-free Individual Savings Accounts and time and sight deposits, according to calculations derived from the outstanding stock of cash deposits and effective interest rates over the past year. At the same time, interest costs on mortgages and unsecured debt, such as credit cards, are £6bil a year higher than 12 months ago. The BoE said the roll-off onto higher mortgage rates has further to run, with a typical borrower facing an additional £1,300 in annual home-loan payments in the next two years. Around one million are currently fixed above prevailing rates, meaning they will have to wait to reap the benefits of cheaper borrowing costs. The effective rate on Britain's £1.7 trillion mortgage stock has risen by almost 0.2 of a percentage point since July 2024, just before the first BoE cut. However, the rate on time deposits has fallen by 0.4 and by 0.2 on sight deposits, reducing returns on a combined £1.8 trillion of savings. Economists and traders expect the BoE to keep to its once-a-quarter easing cycle, putting rates on track to settle at around 3.5% by next spring. That would still leave benchmark borrowing costs well above the sub-1% levels seen in early 2022 before inflation took off into double digits. 'Alongside softer real pay growth and tighter fiscal policy, the lagged impact of past rate hikes on mortgagors will continue to weigh on consumer spending,' said Edward Allenby, UK economist at Oxford Economics. 'Furthemore, the BoE's rate-cutting cycle is unlikely to provide much of a tailwind for business investment and consumer spending over the next couple of years.' — Bloomberg
