Ukraine risks becoming to Trump what Afghanistan was to Biden
Yet there are similarities for President
Donald Trump
: resolving the conflict is proving no easy task, and he risks getting shackled with responsibility — and potentially blame — the longer it goes on.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Public Policy
others
Data Science
Operations Management
Technology
Design Thinking
Cybersecurity
Management
Product Management
Leadership
healthcare
PGDM
Data Analytics
Project Management
Healthcare
Finance
MCA
Degree
Digital Marketing
Artificial Intelligence
Data Science
Others
MBA
CXO
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
12 Months
IIM Calcutta
Executive Programme in Public Policy and Management
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Economics for Public Policy Making
Quantitative Techniques
Public & Project Finance
Law, Health & Urban Development Policy
Duration:
12 Months
IIM Kozhikode
Professional Certificate Programme in Public Policy Management
Starts on
Mar 3, 2024
Get Details
That's a feeling that has gained more credence as Trump wrestles with how to respond to President Vladimir Putin as he's stepped up deadly strikes against Ukraine. Trump has been foiled in his pledge to make peace quickly, forcing him to decide whether to get more involved or keep his distance.
Getting sucked into the conflict more deeply would provoke the ire of Trump's Make America Great Again base. But allowing Russia to make steady gains, while holding off on additional aid, might make him look weak and draw accusations that he didn't do enough to stop Putin.
'Trump's been in charge of US policy for almost six months and the war continues, and now it's on Trump,' said John Herbst, a former US ambassador to Ukraine, who's now with the Atlantic Council. 'He understands that he could get nailed big time if Putin wins on his watch.'
Live Events
The Afghanistan comparison may seem far-fetched given the fundamentally different nature of the two conflicts. At its high point, the US had 100,000 troops in Afghanistan and nearly 2,500 American military personnel died over the course of the 20-year war. Ultimately the US was unable to stop the Taliban and President
Joe Biden
got blamed for a US withdrawal — one that Trump laid the groundwork for in his first term.
The US has no troops on the ground in Ukraine, limiting itself to the flow of weapons and materiel. The conflict is in its fourth year and few analysts predict a massive collapse of the Ukrainian government or say Russia would be able to take over the whole country.
Even so, Trump has strenuously sought to distance himself from it, repeatedly saying the war never would have happened on his watch and suggesting he's not responsible for the outcome.
'It wasn't my war — it was Biden's war,' he said at a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte earlier this month. 'It's not my war. I'm trying to get you out of it.'
The Afghanistan comparison has slowly filtered into the conversation. Months before Trump won reelection in November, Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen, a senior fellow at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, warned Republicans about the dangers of blocking more aid to Ukraine.
'For Republicans, a time for choosing has arrived: Unless you want to be blamed for the fall of Kyiv the way Biden is blamed for the fall of Kabul, send military aid to Ukraine,' he wrote.
Almost a year later, this past February, Council on Foreign Relations President Michael Froman made the point just as sharply, warning that a hasty deal would be a 'grave error' that would also undercut Trump's desire to be seen as a peacemaker.
'If you thought the optics of the Taliban parading American Humvees through Kabul looked bad, imagine the Russians driving a convoy of Abrams tanks through Kharkiv,' Froman wrote.
Read More: Ukraine Proposes Russia Meeting, Kremlin Hedges on Putin-Trump
Last week, Trump announced a plan to get billions of dollars of US weapons to Kyiv, reversing an earlier pause in supplies, and gave Putin 50 days to agree to a ceasefire or face new sanctions — something allies have been urging for months.
'President Trump wants to stop the killing, which is why he is selling American-made weapons to NATO members and threatening Putin with biting tariffs and sanctions if he does not agree to a ceasefire,' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said.
The challenge for Trump is that some of his most die-hard MAGA supporters, including ally Steve Bannon, argue exactly the opposite — that deeper US involvement will be Trump's undoing.
'If President Trump sells them offensive weapons that can strike deep inside of Russia, I don't see how you avoid it becoming Trump's war,' Bannon said in an interview. 'The media, the Ukrainians, the Russians and the Neocons would all say it's Trump's war.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Trumps order to block woke AI in government encourages tech giants to censor their chatbots
Tech companies looking to sell their artificial intelligence technology to the federal government must now contend with a new regulatory hurdle: prove their chatbots aren't 'woke.' President Donald Trump's sweeping new plan to counter China in achieving 'global dominance' in AI promises to cut regulations and cement American values into the AI tools increasingly used at work and home. But one of Trump's three AI executive orders signed Wednesday — the one "preventing woke AI in the federal government' — also mimics China's state-driven approach to mold the behavior of AI systems to fit its ruling party's core values. Several leading providers of the AI language models targeted by the order — products like Google's Gemini and Microsoft's Copilot — have so far been silent on Trump's anti-woke directive, which still faces a study period before it gets into official procurement rules. While the tech industry has largely welcomed Trump's broader AI plans, the anti-woke order forces the industry to leap into a culture war battle — or try their best to quietly avoid it. 'It will have massive influence in the industry right now,' especially as tech companies 'are already capitulating' to other Trump administration directives, said civil rights advocate Alejandra Montoya-Boyer, senior director of The Leadership Conference's Center for Civil Rights and Technology. The move also pushes the tech industry to abandon years of work to combat the pervasive forms of racial and gender bias that studies and real-world examples have shown to be baked into AI systems. 'First off, there's no such thing as woke AI,' she said. 'There's AI technology that discriminates and then there's AI technology that actually works for all people.' Molding the behaviors of AI large language models is challenging because of the way they're built. They've been trained on most of what's on the internet, reflecting the biases of all the people who've posted commentary, edited a Wikipedia entry or shared images online. 'This will be extremely difficult for tech companies to comply with,' said former Biden official Jim Secreto, who was deputy chief of staff to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, an architect of many of Biden's AI industry initiatives. 'Large language models reflect the data they're trained on, including all the contradictions and biases in human language.' Tech workers also have a say in how they're designed, from the global workforce of annotators who check their responses to the Silicon Valley engineers who craft the instructions for how they interact with people. Trump's order targets those 'top-down' efforts at tech companies to incorporate what it calls the 'destructive' ideology of diversity, equity and inclusion into AI models, including 'concepts like critical race theory, transgenderism, unconscious bias, intersectionality, and systemic racism.' For Secreto, the order resembles China's playbook in 'using the power of the state to stamp out what it sees as disfavored viewpoints." The method is different, with China relying on direct regulation through its Cyberspace Administration, which audits AI models, approves them before they are deployed and requires them to filter out banned content such as the bloody Tiananmen Square crackdown on pro-democracy protests in 1989. Trump's order doesn't call for any such filters, relying on tech companies to instead show that their technology is ideologically neutral by disclosing some of the internal policies that guide the chatbots. 'The Trump administration is taking a softer but still coercive route by using federal contracts as leverage,' Secreto said. 'That creates strong pressure for companies to self-censor in order to stay in the government's good graces and keep the money flowing.' The order's call for 'truth-seeking' AI echoes the language of the president's one-time ally and adviser Elon Musk, who frequently uses that phrase as the mission for the Grok chatbot made by his company xAI. But whether Grok or its rivals will be favored under the new policy remains to be seen. Despite a 'rhetorically pointed' introduction laying out the Trump administration's problems with DEI, the actual language of the order's directives shouldn't be hard for tech companies to comply with, said Neil Chilson, a Republican former chief technologist for the Federal Trade Commission. 'It doesn't even prohibit an ideological agenda,' just that any intentional methods to guide the model be disclosed, said Chilson, who is now head of AI policy at the nonprofit Abundance Institute. 'Which is pretty light touch, frankly.' Chilson disputes comparisons to China's cruder modes of AI censorship. 'There is nothing in this order that says that companies have to produce or cannot produce certain types of output,' he said. 'It says developers shall not intentionally encode partisan or ideological judgments. That's the exact opposite of the Chinese requirement.' So far, tech companies that have praised Trump's broader AI plans haven't said much about the order. OpenAI on Thursday said it is awaiting more detailed guidance but believes its work to make ChatGPT objective already makes the technology consistent with what the order requires. Microsoft, a major supplier of email, cloud computing and other online services to the federal government, declined to comment Thursday. Musk's xAI, through spokesperson Katie Miller, a former Trump official, pointed to a company comment praising Trump's AI announcements as a 'positive step' but didn't respond to a follow-up question about how Grok would be affected. Anthropic, Google, Meta, and Palantir didn't immediately respond to emailed requests for comment Thursday. AI tools are already widely used in the federal government, including AI platforms such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini for internal agency support to summarize the key points of a lengthy report. The ideas behind the order have bubbled up for more than a year on the podcasts and social media feeds of Trump's top AI adviser David Sacks and other influential Silicon Valley venture capitalists, many of whom endorsed Trump's presidential campaign last year. Much of their ire centered on Google's February 2024 release of an AI image-generating tool that produced historically inaccurate images before the tech giant took down and fixed the product. Google later explained that the errors — including one user's request for American Founding Fathers that generated portraits of Black, Asian and Native American men — was the result of an overcompensation for technology that, left to its own devices, was prone to favoring lighter-skinned people because of pervasive bias in the systems. Trump allies alleged that Google engineers were hard-coding their own social agenda into the product, and made it a priority to do something about it. 'It's 100% intentional,' said prominent venture capitalist and Trump adviser Marc Andreessen on a podcast in December. 'That's how you get Black George Washington at Google. There's override in the system that basically says, literally, 'Everybody has to be Black.' Boom. There's squads, large sets of people, at these companies who determine these policies and write them down and encode them into these systems.' Sacks credited a conservative strategist for helping to draft the order. 'When they asked me how to define 'woke,' I said there's only one person to call: Chris Rufo. And now it's law: the federal government will not be buying WokeAI,' Sacks wrote on X. Rufo responded that, in addition to helping define the phrase, he also helped 'identify DEI ideologies within the operating constitutions of these systems.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
DOJ Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche meets Ghislaine Maxwell amid Trump-Epstein controversy
A top Justice Department official met on Thursday (July 24) with Ghislaine Maxwell — the convicted accomplice of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — as President Donald Trump faces mounting scrutiny over his alleged connections to the decades-old sex trafficking scandal. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously served as Trump's personal lawyer in multiple federal criminal cases, conducted the meeting with Maxwell at a federal courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida, according to a report from NBC News. Blanche confirmed the meeting was part of an ongoing effort to follow up on leads from Epstein's network. "If Ghislaine Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say," Blanche stated on Tuesday. "No one is above the law — and no lead is off-limits." The President, now 79, was once friendly with Epstein, though he has repeatedly claimed to have distanced himself from the disgraced financier. Trump's spokesperson, Steven Cheung, called the WSJ report 'fake news,' adding: 'President Trump cut ties with Epstein years ago and kicked him out of his Florida club for being a creep.' Last week, Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Journal after it reported he sent a 'sexually suggestive' birthday letter to Epstein in 2003. Maxwell, 63, is currently serving a 20-year sentence following her 2021 conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein's trafficking operation. She remains the only associate of Epstein convicted so far. The new DOJ meeting, however, signals continued interest in whether Maxwell may have information on additional high-profile individuals potentially involved in Epstein's crimes — a key concern among Trump's political base, who have long suspected a cover-up. The unexpected meeting drew immediate reaction from Capitol Hill, with Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse questioning Blanche's role and motive. 'Is he really going as [deputy attorney general] or is he going de facto as Trump's personal criminal attorney, Tom Hagen style?' Whitehouse asked, referencing the fictional mob lawyer from The Godfather. 'Will he promise her a pardon for silence, or for a Trump-friendly tale?' Whitehouse also demanded transparency, asking: 'Who will be in the room? What records will be kept?' Many of Trump's core supporters continue to push for full disclosure of Epstein's client network, a demand Trump echoed during his 2024 campaign when he pledged to 'release the Epstein files' if re-elected. Despite this promise, Trump has since downplayed the issue, calling the scandal a 'hoax'. A July 7 joint memo from the FBI and DOJ claimed that the Epstein documents 'did not contain evidence justifying further investigation,' and dismissed claims that Epstein kept a secret 'client list' or was murdered. Jeffrey Epstein was found dead by hanging in his New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges involving hundreds of victims, many of them minors.
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump pays tribute as 'great friend' Hulk Hogan dies at 71: 'He was MAGA all the way...'
President Donald Trump on Thursday paid tribute to his "great friend" and wrestling legend, Hulk Hogan, as the latter passed away at the age of 71. Hulk Hogan, whose real name was Terry Gene Bollea, was an avid supporter of the POTUS and campaigned for him and Vice President JD Vance at various points in the run up to the 2024 US election. President Donald Trump (L, AP Photo) and Hulk Hogan campaigning for Trump (AFP)(AP and AFP) Saying that Hogan was a "MAGA all the way," Trump remembered the times he took the stage seeking votes for him, including speaking at the Republican National Convention in July 2024 when the GOP formally endorsed Trump as the candidate. "We lost a great friend today, the 'Hulkster,'" Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. Hulk Hogan was MAGA all the way — Strong, tough, smart, but with the biggest heart." "He gave an absolutely electric speech at the Republican National Convention, that was one of the highlights of the entire week. "He entertained fans from all over the World, and the cultural impact he had was massive. To his wife, Sky, and family, we give our warmest best wishes and love," the Donald Trump added. "Hulk Hogan will be greatly missed!" How Did Hulk Hogan Die? What We Know The death of Hulk Hogan was first reported by the entertainment news website, TMZ. The report said that an emergency was called in at the residence of Hogan in Clearwater Beach, Florida, early Thursday morning. The report cited operators to state that the call was regarding a "cardiac arrest" situation. Also read: Hulk Hogan cause of death: How did the wrestling legend die? All on his health issues A paparazzi video of the incident at his home was obtained by TMZ, which showed medics and emergency responders trying to save his life before putting him on an ambulance and taking him to a local hospital. Emergency responders told the outlet that they responded to the call at 9:51 a.m. on Thursday. He was pronounced dead at the hospital at 11:17 a.m., Clearwater Police Major Nate Burnside said. The cause of his death will be officially confirmed by the coroner's office in the days to come.
