Yet another fiscal 'black hole'? Here's why this one matters
You're probably tired by now of hearing all about "black holes".
It's one of those phrases trotted out by journalists in an effort to make economic policy sound a little more interesting. And in some senses it's a massively misleading image.
After all, when people talk about fiscal holes, what they're really talking about is something rather prosaic: the amount of money it would take for the chancellor not to break her fiscal rules.
Those fiscal rules are not god-given, after all. They were confected by the chancellor herself. Missing them will not really result in Britain sliding into infinite nothingness. Even so, whatever you choose to call the dilemma she's faced with right now, it's certainly quite a big deal.
And understanding this helps provide a little context for the extraordinary events of the past few days, with markets sliding in the wake of Ms Reeves' teary appearance at Prime Minister's Questions.
Following that moment, the yield on UK government debt - the rate of interest we're being charged by international investors - suddenly leapt higher. Granted, the jump was nothing like what we saw in the wake of Liz Truss's mini-budget. And those yields dropped down after the prime minister backed the chancellor.
Even so, they underline one very important bit of context. The UK has become something of an outlier in global debt markets. For years, the yield on our benchmark government bonds was more or less middle of the industrialised-world pack. But since 2022's drama, it has hovered unnervingly high, above every other G7 nation.
That speaks to a broader issue. Britain might not have the biggest deficit in the G7, or for that matter, the highest national debt. Others (most notably France, and to some extent, too, the US) face even more desperate fiscal dilemmas in the coming years. But markets do still seem nervous about Britain.
Perhaps that's because of what they (and we) all endured in 2022 - when British gilt markets stepped briefly over the precipice, causing malfunctions all around the financial system (most notably in obscure parts of the pensions investment sector). But it also owes something to the fact that the chancellor's own fiscal plans are sailing worryingly close to the wind.
Reeves made f iscal rules matter
The main piece of evidence here is the amount of leeway she has left herself against her fiscal rules. As I said at the start, there's nothing gospel about these rules. But having created them and banged on about them for a long time, even those of us who are a little sceptical about fiscal rules would concede that breaking them is, as they say, not a good look.
Back in spring, the Office for Budget Responsibility thought the chancellor had about £9.9bn in leeway against these rules. But since then, she has u-turned on both the cuts in winter fuel payments and on personal independence payments. That reduces the £9.9bn down to barely more than £3bn.
But the real issue isn't just these U-turns. It's something else. The stronger the economy is, the more tax revenues come in and the more her potential headroom against the fiscal rules would be. By the same token, if the economy grows less rapidly than the OBR expected, that would mean less tax revenues and an even bigger deficit.
And if you compare the OBR's latest forecasts with the current average of forecasts among independent forecasters, or for that matter, the Bank of England, they do look decidedly optimistic. If the OBR is right and everyone else is wrong, then the chancellor "only" has to fill in the hole left by those U-turns. But if the OBR is wrong and everyone else is right, things get considerably more grisly.
Even a small downgrade in the OBR's expectations for productivity growth - say a 0.1 percentage point drop - would obliterate the remaining headroom and leave the chancellor with a £6bn shortfall against her rule. Anything more than that (and bear in mind, most economists think the OBR is out by more than that) and she could be £10bn or more underwater.
Now, there are plenty of very reasonable points one could make about how silly this all is. It's silly that so many people treat fiscal rules as tablets of stone. It's silly that government tax policy from one year to the next seems to hinge on how right or wrong the OBR's economic forecasts are.
Yet all this stuff, silly as it might all seem, is taken quite seriously by markets right now. They look at the UK, see an outlier, and tend to focus more than usual on black holes. So I'm afraid we're going to be talking about "black holes" for quite some time to come.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer urged to honour pledge to embed speaking skills in England's schools
The children's writer Michael Rosen, one-time political strategist Alastair Campbell and former education secretaries Charles Clarke and Estelle Morris have urged the prime minister to honour his pre-election pledge to embed speaking skills in England's schools. They are among 60 signatories to an open letter to Keir Starmer, calling on him to establish oracy as a core part of Labour's revised national curriculum and make it the fourth 'R' in education, alongside reading, writing and arithmetic. Supporters were delighted when Labour announced in 2023 that teaching oracy – often defined as developing skill in using spoken language – would be a central part of Labour's educational priorities if it won the next election. However, campaigners say it was not mentioned in the interim report of the government's curriculum and assessment review earlier this year, leading to fears oracy may have slipped down the educational agenda. The full report is due later this year. The letter, organised by Voice 21, the UK's leading oracy education charity, said: 'Two years ago you pledged that under your Labour government, every child would be supported to develop essential oracy skills – as part of the mission to ensure all young people are prepared for work and ready for life. 'We urge you to turn that promise into lasting change. In a world shaped by rapid advances in artificial intelligence, deepening social divides and persistent inequality, the skills of speaking, listening and communication have never been more urgently needed.' Rosen, who is a professor of children's literature at Goldsmiths, University of London, said: 'The backbone of language is our talk. It's the everyday way we make and change relationships, share the events of our lives, hear about other people's lives. 'It's where we forge our identities and culture, it's where and how we get a good deal of our understanding of what matters. We can learn and develop how to be better talkers and listeners. 'School is a perfect time for us to do that. This needs time and space and sensitive help from teachers. I hope this government backs an oracy programme in education.' Campbell, now a mental health campaigner and author, added: 'It's time every child had the chance to develop their oracy skills – it's key not just to confidence and deeper thinking but also for countering the rise in polarisation. Labour should make sure its curriculum review has a proper commitment to oracy.' Other signatories to the letter include author and educator Jeffrey Boakye, Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust, which champions social mobility, and Rupert Knight, associate professor in education at the University of Nottingham. Kate Paradine, Voice 21's chief executive, said: 'Sir Keir Starmer has acknowledged the importance of oracy and the need to embed it in the national curriculum. We are now urging the government to deliver on its manifesto commitment so that every child can benefit from a high-quality oracy education.' A Department for Education spokesperson said the government's plan for change would ensure every young person, irrespective of background, develops the skills needed to succeed in work and life, including in speaking and listening. 'We're already investing in evidence-based language interventions in the early years, including Nuffield Early Language Intervention, to support children's speech and language development and have strengthened our teacher training framework to place greater emphasis on high quality oral language. 'We will also consider how best to ensure pupils can communicate fluently and confidently as part of a cutting-edge curriculum, with final recommendations from the independent review due to be published in the autumn.'
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Indian prime minister makes UK state visit to sign landmark trade deal
India's prime minister, Narendra Modi, is visiting London to sign a landmark free trade agreement between his country and the UK, a pact viewed as a political and economic prize amid global trade tensions unleashed by the US president, Donald Trump. For Britain, eager to score a post-Brexit win, the deal is its most economically significant trade agreement since leaving the EU. For India, it marks its first major free trade pact outside Asia. For both, analysts say, the agreement signals a long-term economic partnership. 'The UK and India, in many ways we have complementarities. We have had a historical relationship. It's good to have a deeper trade relationship,' said Indian economist Sanjaya Baru. During Modi's two-day state visit starting on Wednesday, his fourth to the UK as prime minister, he will hold 'wide-ranging' talks with his counterpart, Keir Starmer, on trade, defence, technological cooperation and security, and will also pay a courtesy call on King Charles, according to an Indian government statement. India stood firm on key demands during negotiations, winning concessions on work visas, recognition of professional qualifications, and exemptions from national insurance contributions for Indian nationals working temporarily in the UK, all longstanding sticking points. Modi, accompanied by his commerce minister, Piyush Goyal, who led the negotiations, can claim India held its ground while the UK compromised, bolstering his message of India's rising global clout. However, the deal must still be ratified by both parliaments, likely delaying implementation until mid-2026. Under the agreement, 99% of Indian exports to the UK, spanning gems, textiles, engineering goods, leather, garments, and processed foods, will face zero tariffs. In return, the UK will see phased tariff cuts on 90% of its exports to India. Duties on scotch whisky will fall from 150% to 75% immediately and to 40% over 10 years. British cars, now facing tariffs of more than 100%, will see duties slide to 10% under a quota. Other gains include tariff relief on medical devices, pharmaceuticals, aircraft parts, and electronics. India's government hopes the agreement will inject new energy into its Make in India drive and revive foreign direct investment, which has slowed significantly. 'More than 5m export-related jobs in India can be linked to UK exports,' said Amrita Saha, a research fellow at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. 'Overall, I believe this agreement is a positive step for India's labour-intensive sectors,' she told the Hindu newspaper. Crucially, India kept agriculture, an industry that employs more than 40% of its workforce, off the table. This red line for New Delhi has also stalled its trade talks with the US. Still, only the broad contours of the agreement, which marks a significant departure from India's traditionally protectionist trade stance, are public. 'We will have to look at the fine print the morning after,' Baru cautioned. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Some provisions, such as phased duty cuts on scotch and cars, could face backlash from domestic producers. Indian whisky makers have already voiced worries about 'unfair competition' from imports. Also, in a significant first, British firms will gain access to India's vast government procurement market, a potential breakthrough for sectors such as clean energy, transport, and infrastructure. Notably absent from the deal are financial and legal services, as talks on a bilateral investment treaty, which would offer investor protections, remain unresolved. Another sensitive issue, the UK's proposed carbon tax known as the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), was also left out. The policy, which would levy taxes on imports from countries with looser emissions rules, is seen by India as unfairly targeting developing economies. For now, the two sides appear to have kicked that issue down the road. However, 'the carbon tax remains the elephant in the room. It could wipe out the benefits of the free trade agreement for Indian exporters,' warned Ajay Srivastava, head of the Global Trade Research Initiative in New Delhi.
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘War is very funny for the first couple of years': how Russia's invasion transformed Ukraine's comedy scene
Anton Tymoshenko is exhausted. Ukraine's most famous standup comedian – Volodymyr Zelenskyy doesn't count, since he is the president – has just returned from a gruelling European tour, involving 36 shows in 50 days. He played in Berlin, Paris and London. And Birmingham, where Tymoshenko tried unsuccessfully to buy Peaky Blinders merchandise. His audiences were made up of Ukrainians living abroad, many refugees. The tour raised nearly half a million dollars, all of which will go to Ukraine's armed forces. As well as being tired, Tymoshenko is angry at the situation his country finds itself in after Russia's invasion. 'War is very funny for the first couple of years. Then it becomes not so funny,' he says, speaking in Kyiv's popular comedy venue, the Underground Standup club. He quotes Mark Twain's observation that humour is tragedy plus time. 'We have tragedy plus tragedy plus tragedy,' he says, after a week in which Moscow has pummelled Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities with hundreds of kamikaze drones and missiles. The war has transformed Ukraine's once small standup scene. A decade ago most comedians spoke in Russian. The well resourced Kremlin flooded Ukrainian channels with Russian programmes and music. In 2022, when Russian tanks arrived, all comedians switched to performing in Ukrainian. In the weeks after Russia's attack they met online, told jokes, and shared content, with some beaming in from enemy-occupied territory. 'The war gave us a cultural boost,' Tymoshenko says. 'Russian comedy isn't really comedy since they don't tell the truth, especially about politics.' Since those difficult early months, standup has become enormously popular. In 2023, Tymoshenko filled Kyiv's 3,000-seat Palace of Ukraine. Last year, he toured North America, performing for the first time in English – a challenge that forced him to test out punchlines with friends. His New Jersey set involved gags about bomb shelters ('even if you tell a bad joke, people will stay') and weapons ('I understand you can't send them all. You need to keep some for your schools.') And Joe Biden ('He's very similar to Ukrainians. He looks like he can die at any second.') He acknowledges a debt to Zelenskyy, whose comedy studio Kvartal 95 was highly successful in Ukraine and noughties Russia, during Vladimir Putin's first years in the Kremlin. Long before he went into politics, Zelenskyy was celebrated as an entertainer and actor. 'Without him we would have had Russian stuff,' Tymoshenko says. At some point, however, the studio developed a 'monopoly on humour', producing dozens of TV shows and films, including the drama Servant of the People. In it, Zelenskyy plays the president, a role that propelled him in 2019 to a real-life landslide election victory. 'They tried to be everywhere and it became bad,' Tymoshenko says. He prefers Zelenskyy as a wartime leader. 'It's cool to have a guy like him in power. You get pretty strong Black Mirror vibes. It's not normal but the world is not normal, so it fits,' he says. Tymoshenko describes his own style of humour as 'pretty dark'. He jokes about death: 'Some people lost nothing. Some people lost everything. The challenge is to find a direction that works for everyone. People are tired of war. You have to find an original way to make them laugh and to not depress them.' Svyat Zagaikavich, the founder of the Underground Standup club, began performing in 2012 in a flat and cafe. After Putin's annexation of Crimea two years later, the club moved to new central premises in a subterranean former Irish pub opposite the Golden Gate, a Kyiv landmark. In Zagaikavich's view, Ukrainian standup has come of age: 'It's really dark humour. There are a lot of jokes about dead Russians. Before, some comedians would show stupid people by talking in Ukrainian. Now they do it by speaking Russian. You joke and do everything in life like it's for the last time.' For those stressed by war, comedy has an important social function, he says. 'We get a lot of feedback, like, 'You saved me from my mental problems.' Earlier we thought we comedians were doing cool work. Now we have a mission. It's to stop people from going crazy,' he says. Zagaikavich presents Ukraine's version of the humorous British quizshow QI. Its ex-host Stephen Fry was in Kyiv in 2022 for a conference on mental health, invited by Ukraine's first lady Olena Zelenska. He visited the club and gave Zagaikavich a signed photo with the words: 'Stephen Fry died here.' On a Sunday in mid-July, 100 people came to Ukraine's QI show, which was recorded in a theatre on Kyiv's much-bombed left bank. 'It's like therapy for us. It brings us together. We're tired of being serious about the war. You need to relax and chill out,' one fan Angelina Gromova, says. Another, Anna Prudii, says she watched Russian comedy before dumping it in 2014 for Ukrainian acts. 'It has helped me a lot. It cheers me up. In the last three years it became very popular,' she says. About Zelenskyy, she was diplomatic: 'I watched his show with my parents. It's of its time.' Comedian Nastya Zukhvala says that when she began doing standup organisers would give one token slot to a female performer. Now comedy is more equal, she says: 'We have more masculine men, running around doing rat-tat-tat. At the same time there is a lot of work for women. Sexism isn't the most effective way of fighting.' Zukhvala, who is a regular QI panellist, says her feminist brand of comedy has become 'rougher' and more patriotic because of the war. 'It's about everyday life. Everyone who lives in such crazy times and who prefers to resist becomes funnier,' she says. She is one of a dozen comedians who have done international tours to raise money for Ukraine's army. Zukhvala visited the UK. It was a mixed experience: there was a low point in Glasgow, she says, when the owner of a fish and chip shop told her to go home and 'kill Putin'. Tymoshenko and Zukhvala have performed all across Ukraine, including in the southern frontline city of Kherson. Russian soldiers and drone operators are camped out just across the Dnipro River. 'The city is almost empty. It's a very intense feeling. It wasn't a standard show. There were a lot of old people,' she says. After three years in Kyiv, Tymoshenko says his parents have recently returned to their home village outside Nikopol, another frontline city under regular artillery and drone fire. He grew up there in the countryside 'playing with sticks', before moving to Kyiv to study political science. The authors he read – Plato and Aristotle – do not reflect the non-ideal world today, a place of 'brute power and money'. He believes there will not be much to laugh about when the war finally ends: 'I'm sure Ukraine will win and Russia will burn. But we've lost so many people. You can't imagine Victory Day as 'Wow!'.' In the meantime, he suggests things are looking up for Ukrainian female comedians. 'We will only have female ones because we men will all have died,' he says blackly. Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield in the Guardian app for more nature coverage
