Controversial homeless village near Spanaway Lake clears another legal challenge
A project near Spanaway Lake promising to house nearly 300 chronically unhoused individuals has cleared the latest legal challenge made by a group who has opposed the project at every turn.
Despite having little-to-no success in their opposition to the development, the group says it is not giving up.
On March 28, a Thurston County judge denied the appeal of a Pierce County land examiner's decision to allow the Good Neighbor Village project to be constructed on land adjacent to multiple wetlands near Spanaway Lake.
Spanaway Concerned Citizens is a group representing neighbors to the project who oppose the development due to concerns regarding its potential impact on nearby wetlands and endangered species.
Tacoma Rescue Mission, one of Pierce County's largest homeless shelter operators, purchased the land at 176th Street and Spanaway Loop Road. With support from former Pierce County Executive Bruce Dammeier and the Pierce County Council, the organization planned to construct a micro-village community for those who have been living chronically unhoused.
Tacoma Rescue Mission's Executive Director Duke Paulson has promised the Good Neighbor Village will provide nearly 300 units of permanent supportive housing for veterans and the elderly.
In an interview with The News Tribune in May, Paulson said the village would serve people who don't have many sustainable, long-term options to get off the streets and they would come to the village to work, pay rent and rehabilitate themselves.
The cost of the project is estimated at more than $62 million and is projected to cost $3.2 million annually to operate upon its expected completion in 2029, according to project materials.
Spanaway Concerned Citizens and its attorneys presented their case last spring against the Good Neighbor Village during a Pierce County Land Examiner's hearing that lasted weeks.
Pierce County hearing examiner Alex Sidles decided to approve the project in June.
In September, Spanaway Concerned Citizens filed a petition in Thurston County Superior Court challenging the hearing examiner's decision.
The judges decision, filed on March 28, stated that Spanaway Concerned Citizens failed to meet the burden of proof and the land examiner's original decision was 'supported by substantial evidence' and was a 'correct interpretation of the law and application of the law to the facts of this case.'
In a newsletter sent April 7, Spanaway Concerned Citizens announced their lawyers had filed a motion in Thurston County Superior Court, asking the judge to reconsider her dismissal of their appeal. According to the letter, the challenge will make two arguments — Tacoma Rescue Mission does not own the entire project site and the proposed development contradicts the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan's requirements for housing density.
Lawyers representing Spanaway Concerned Citizens have previously argued Tacoma Rescue Mission does not own the entirety of the land they purchased to build Good Neighbor Village.
During the initial land use hearing last spring, their legal team cited a 1920 land easement in which a Pierce County drainage district acquired a strip of the property from a previous owner. They argued this strip of property still is owned by the drainage district and therefore could not be sold to Tacoma Rescue Village.
'We have made significant strides over the past two and a half years — and we are not stopping now,' Spanaway Concerned Citizens wrote in their April 7 newsletter.
In November, the project broke ground as construction crews began to clear trees and level ground where homes would be built. As Tacoma Rescue Mission and supporters of the Good Neighbor Village celebrated, they were met by picketed protesters representing Spanaway Concerned Citizens.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10-04-2025
- Yahoo
Controversial homeless village near Spanaway Lake clears another legal challenge
A project near Spanaway Lake promising to house nearly 300 chronically unhoused individuals has cleared the latest legal challenge made by a group who has opposed the project at every turn. Despite having little-to-no success in their opposition to the development, the group says it is not giving up. On March 28, a Thurston County judge denied the appeal of a Pierce County land examiner's decision to allow the Good Neighbor Village project to be constructed on land adjacent to multiple wetlands near Spanaway Lake. Spanaway Concerned Citizens is a group representing neighbors to the project who oppose the development due to concerns regarding its potential impact on nearby wetlands and endangered species. Tacoma Rescue Mission, one of Pierce County's largest homeless shelter operators, purchased the land at 176th Street and Spanaway Loop Road. With support from former Pierce County Executive Bruce Dammeier and the Pierce County Council, the organization planned to construct a micro-village community for those who have been living chronically unhoused. Tacoma Rescue Mission's Executive Director Duke Paulson has promised the Good Neighbor Village will provide nearly 300 units of permanent supportive housing for veterans and the elderly. In an interview with The News Tribune in May, Paulson said the village would serve people who don't have many sustainable, long-term options to get off the streets and they would come to the village to work, pay rent and rehabilitate themselves. The cost of the project is estimated at more than $62 million and is projected to cost $3.2 million annually to operate upon its expected completion in 2029, according to project materials. Spanaway Concerned Citizens and its attorneys presented their case last spring against the Good Neighbor Village during a Pierce County Land Examiner's hearing that lasted weeks. Pierce County hearing examiner Alex Sidles decided to approve the project in June. In September, Spanaway Concerned Citizens filed a petition in Thurston County Superior Court challenging the hearing examiner's decision. The judges decision, filed on March 28, stated that Spanaway Concerned Citizens failed to meet the burden of proof and the land examiner's original decision was 'supported by substantial evidence' and was a 'correct interpretation of the law and application of the law to the facts of this case.' In a newsletter sent April 7, Spanaway Concerned Citizens announced their lawyers had filed a motion in Thurston County Superior Court, asking the judge to reconsider her dismissal of their appeal. According to the letter, the challenge will make two arguments — Tacoma Rescue Mission does not own the entire project site and the proposed development contradicts the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan's requirements for housing density. Lawyers representing Spanaway Concerned Citizens have previously argued Tacoma Rescue Mission does not own the entirety of the land they purchased to build Good Neighbor Village. During the initial land use hearing last spring, their legal team cited a 1920 land easement in which a Pierce County drainage district acquired a strip of the property from a previous owner. They argued this strip of property still is owned by the drainage district and therefore could not be sold to Tacoma Rescue Village. 'We have made significant strides over the past two and a half years — and we are not stopping now,' Spanaway Concerned Citizens wrote in their April 7 newsletter. In November, the project broke ground as construction crews began to clear trees and level ground where homes would be built. As Tacoma Rescue Mission and supporters of the Good Neighbor Village celebrated, they were met by picketed protesters representing Spanaway Concerned Citizens.
Yahoo
28-11-2024
- Yahoo
Pierce County unanimously approves $53M spending increase for 2025 budget. Here's why
The Pierce County Council unanimously approved a $53 million supplemental budget for 2025 on Tuesday, Nov. 26, 2024. The Pierce County County-City building as seen on Monday, April 22, 2024, in Tacoma, Wash. A unanimous Pierce County Council has approved a supplemental budget proposal from the current Executive that would increase spending by about $53 million in 2025. Executive Bruce Dammeier, a Republican, proposed numerous changes to the mid-biennium supplemental budget earlier this month, including more funding for staffing and equipment for the Sheriff's Department, capital projects, affordable housing and the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department. According to county documents, most of the costs will be fully or partially offset by reallocations or savings in the existing budget. Other costs will be covered by fee revenue, tax revenues or contributions from other governmental jurisdictions. Advertisement At Tuesday night's meeting council members said they thought the supplemental budget was balanced and thanked department staff for working hard to make it a reality. Republican council member Dave Morell took time to pay respect to Dammeier and said although it can be challenging having seven council members with diverse ideas, 'I think this council came together with a sensible budget.' Morell noted that the bulk of the budget increases reflect the transfer of funds, including about $15 million to the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department and about $4.5 million in general fund increases. 'We have basically three sources of income: property taxes, sales tax and fees, and those kind of make up the bulk of the income that the county has. And due to inflation, labor costs, cost of material, everything has gone up at home and the government. So before us in the 2026-2027 budget, it gets more challenging,' he said. 'We'll have to really take a look at the budget, scrub things that we've kind of taken for granted, but I think this is a fiscally sound supplemental budget that we're putting forward. I think it leaves a strong fund balance, which we're going to need.' In September Dammeier vetoed a supplemental budget approved by the County Council that would have allocated millions in funding towards homeless services and housing projects, as previously reported by The News Tribune. Last year Dammeier signed a $3.2 billion county budget for 2024-2025. 'Many of the proposed increases in the Executive's proposal have merit, but some require further thought and analysis and are better suited for consideration next year,' Council Chair and Democrat Ryan Mello, who will take over as the newly-elected Executive next year, said in a press release this week. 'With leadership transitions occurring in several elected offices, including the Sheriff's Department, new budget priorities will likely emerge in 2025.' Where will the money go? Among the changes Dammeier proposed is increasing general-fund expenditures by about $4.5 million, increasing other fund expenditures by about $48.5 million in addition to creating about 20 full-time staff positions overall. The general fund supports services like the Sheriff's Department, corrections, courts, County Council and the Executive's Office, among others. Other expenditures, like special revenue funds, capital projects funds, enterprise funds, internal services funds and custodial funds, address affordable housing, health services, road funds, drug enforcement and investigations, housing and homelessness, human services, utilities and parks. Under the general fund, Dammeier proposed closing three vacant corrections deputy positions due to a lower average daily jail population and use that funding to support the addition of three positions in the Pre-Trial Services Department, according to a summary of the budget changes prepared Oct. 25. He also proposed to restore six deputy sheriff positions initially reduced in the 2024-2025 budget, as well as allocate $3.8 million for fleet upgrades and $593,680 to replace seven marked and unmarked Sheriff's Department vehicles due to 'an increase in totaled vehicles [that] has resulted in a shortage.' 'Costs are partially offset by the reallocation of $4,506,960 in budget savings,' the report said. Other expenditure changes in the supplemental budget include allocating $1.2 million to South Sound 911, about $3 million the clerk of the Superior Court, up to $1 million to the South Sound Housing Affordability Partners to support affordable housing projects, $245,000 for multiple community-focused programs to support youth activities and youth violence prevention and $500,000 to provide behavior health support to veterans.
Yahoo
22-11-2024
- Yahoo
Controversial homeless village breaks ground in Pierce County as picketers march nearby
While Pierce County elected officials and homeless advocates celebrate the groundbreaking of the Good Neighbor Village in Spanaway, neighbors to the project continue to protest. On Nov. 21, Tacoma Rescue Mission hosted a groundbreaking ceremony at its property at 176th Street and Spanaway Loop Road. The property, situated next to Spanaway Lake, will be the site of what is being called the Good Neighbor Village — a project that promises to provide nearly 300 permanent homes for chronically homeless people. The project has been a priority for Pierce County Executive Bruce Dammeier. Thevillage, which will require residents to pay rent, work and follow community guidelines, is modeled on a village for the formerly homeless in Austin, Texas. Counsel to Dammeier's office, Steve O'Ban, spoke at the groundbreaking of his visit to the community in Austin. He said after his two-week stay at the village he was 'stunned' by the power of the community there. 'It was quiet and peaceful,' O'Ban said. 'We felt safer there than we do in our own neighborhood in West Tacoma.' Since the beginning of the project's conception it has faced political and regulatory hurdles. A group known as Spanaway Concerned Citizens has fought the project at nearly every turn. The group has objected to the project over concerns that it would have adverse environmental impacts on multiple wetlands on the property as well protected Garry oak trees and endangered squirrel habitat. This spring, Spanaway Concerned Citizens hired lawyers who fought the project during a Pierce County Hearing Examiner hearing that lasted multiple weeks. In June, the hearing examiner approved the project. During the groundbreaking, Tacoma Rescue Mission executive director Duke Paulson celebrated the progress of the project, which recently was granted a clearing and grading permit from the county. Paulson said the project had been an 'intimidating' one, that he and others at the rescue mission had poured their hearts into, at times shedding tears through the obstacle-riddled process. Two protesters walk past security guards at the groundbreaking ceremonies at the site of the new Good Neighbor Village in Spanaway, Washington, on Thursday, Nov. 21, 2024. The women left the property on their own a few minutes later. Tony Overman/toverman@ As the groundbreaking took place, a small crowd of picketers with Spanaway Concerned Citizens protested outside the property. Debbie Clark lives down the street from the site and was there to protest. Clark told The News Tribune she felt the hearing examiner's approval of the project was 'politically motivated' and that the county hastily granted clearing and grading permits as a way to push the project through before any appeals. She worried about oak trees being cut down and black bears being displaced into the surrounding suburbs. Spanaway Concerned Citizens filed an appeal to the hearing examiner's decision in Thurston County Court on Sept. 16. During the groundbreaking, construction crews could be heard working in the wooded areas of the property. One could hear mechanical equipment, and voices hollering, followed by the snapping, cracking, and heavy thuds of trees being felled. Neighbors to the village often bring up concerns over the people that will live in the village. Clark told The News Tribune she was concerned about the kinds of transient people the project could attract and how that might affect property values in the area. 'These are not the kind of people that are wanting to better themselves,' she said of the potential residents of the village. Stephanie Dye also lives nearby and attended the protest. She told The News Tribune she feared the 'type of people coming into the area' and had already noticed an uptick in unhoused individuals. She blamed the village, which had not yet been built. 'Well, it's the only thing that has changed,' Dye told The News Tribune. She said she worried about the safety of her children amid construction. 'I understand that some fear the project because it is unknown,' Paulson said during the groundbreaking ceremony in an attempt to address concerns in the surrounding community. 'We want to be good neighbors to those around us. In the long run, we are partners with them.' Dammeier said outside community support would be 'critical' for the success of the village, which he envisioned to be 'inviting' instead of 'isolating.' 'It's going to take a community to deliver this,' he said.
