Meta taps top researchers from Google and Sesame for new AI lab
Meta has poached top engineers from multiple tech firms, including Google, for a new team focused on achieving a more advanced form of AI called artificial general intelligence.
Jack Rae, a principal researcher at Google DeepMind, is expected to join Meta's "superintelligence' team, according to multiple people familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity as the information is not public. Meta has also recruited Johan Schalkwyk, a machine learning lead at AI voice startup Sesame, other people said.
Alexandr Wang, co-founder and chief executive officer of Scale, is also expected to be part of the team after Meta finalizes a multibillion-dollar investment in the data labeling startup that could be announced as soon as this week.
The new group is part of an ambitious, and costly, effort by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to gain ground on rivals like Google and OpenAI after he was frustrated by the poor reception to the company's latest AI offering, Llama 4. Zuckerberg hopes the new hires can help improve Llama's models and build better AI tools for voice and personalization features.
Meta and Zuckerberg are offering compensation packages worth tens of millions of dollars over several years, including equity, according to people familiar with the matter. A spokesperson for Meta declined to comment. Rae confirmed he's leaving Google for Meta, but declined to comment further. Schalkwyk did not respond to a request for comment.
Zuckerberg has begun recruiting a brain trust of AI researchers and engineers, at times meeting with candidates at his homes in Lake Tahoe and Palo Alto, California. Often, the CEO has reached out to potential hires directly, according to people familiar with the process. Meta aims to hire around 50 people for the new team, including a chief scientist to help oversee the group, one person said.
The team is coming together as Meta is also nearing a deal to invest billions of dollars in Scale to bolster its AI efforts. Scale uses an army of contractors to label the data that tech firms such as Meta and OpenAI need to train and improve their AI models.
Wang, Scale's 28-year-old CEO, is an influential figure in the industry who has cultivated close ties with some in Washington. Other employees from Scale are likely to join Meta's superintelligence team after the investment is finalized, according to a person familiar with the deal.
The three pillars of AI development are chips, talent and data. Meta has lots of chips. The Scale partnership may help bolster its access to quality data. And with the power of its checkbook, Meta and Zuckerberg hope to make a bigger dent in the AI talent wars.
"There are very few people globally who can do those type of large AI trainings very, very efficiently,' said Vahan Petrosyan, co-founder of SuperAnnotate, an AI data platform. For that reason, he said, higher pay packages may make sense for companies like Meta.
Still, not everyone is jumping at Zuckerberg's recruitment push. At least one person at a leading AI research lab rejected a lucrative offer from Zuckerberg, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Meanwhile, Meta's competitors are racing to retain top talent. Google named Koray Kavukcuoglu, one of its top AI researchers, as its chief AI architect — a new senior vice president role that reports directly to Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai, according to an internal memo.
Kavukcuoglu will continue to serve as the GenAI unit lead and chief technology officer of Google DeepMind, Pichai said in the memo.
"Koray will help to accelerate how we bring our world-leading models into our products, with the goal of more seamless integration, faster iteration, and greater efficiency,' Pichai said.
Google didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
Massive Google Cloud outage disrupts popular internet services
NEW YORK (AP) -- Popular online services across the globe were disrupted Thursday due to ongoing issues at Google Cloud. Tens of thousands of users of Spotify, Discord and other platforms began noticing issues with their services early in the afternoon, according to Downdetector, which tracks outages. Outage reports for music streamer Spotify in particular, peaked around 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time before dropping off, and some users began saying their access was restored. Google's Cloud status page said an incident with their systems affected clients in the U.S. and abroad. The company also posted that services are starting to recover after its engineers identified and began to mitigate the issue. "We have identified the root cause and applied appropriate mitigations," Google Cloud said. It added that there is no estimate for when the issue would be fully resolved. Google Cloud, which hosts a significant amount of services on the internet, has become the fastest growing part of Alphabet Inc., even though the company still makes most of its money from Google's ubiquitous search engine. Google Cloud's revenue last year totaled $43.2 billion, a 31% increase from 2023. By comparison, Alphabet's overall revenue grew by 14% last year.
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
For Trump, resolving U.S.-China trade fight comes at a cost
U.S. President Donald Trump is hailing the latest trade framework with China as a game-changing breakthrough. Yet the deal he touted Wednesday represents little more than a reset back to earlier terms — and even that came at a cost. After fresh negotiations in London, tariff rates remain essentially unchanged. Rare earth shipments from China are set to return to pre-April 2 conditions. Meanwhile, a slew of thornier issues, including trade imbalances and malign activity, remain unresolved. While Trump cast the understanding as "GREAT' in a social media post on Thursday, his team acknowledged it largely formalized terms agreed to last month in Geneva, many of which are still shrouded in mystery. To seal the deal, the U.S. had to roll back a promised crackdown on visas for Chinese students. And the back-and-forth exposed that key U.S. industries are reliant on magnets largely sourced from China. "This is basically just a reset that's being packaged by the administration as a substantive agreement,' said Tim Meyer, a professor of international trade law at Duke University's law school. "It's possible in the future, China may have a stronger hand.' Trump came into office promising to radically remake the U.S.-China trade relationship and force Beijing to open markets to more American goods. Recent developments illustrate the difficulty of solving those problems, which have vexed each of the past three presidents. "We're going to be opening up China. That's bigger than what we signed, and I think had we not signed it, that wouldn't be happening,' Trump said Thursday at the White House. "It's going to happen fairly soon.' Going forward, China holds a strong hand because of its dominance supplying rare-earth materials that are essential ingredients in mobile phones, semiconductors and other technology. Trump also made clear how important those stocks are to the U.S., appearing far more eager than Chinese President Xi Jinping to get talks back on track by pining for a phone call for months. What's more, Trump's practice of making sweeping tariff threats — only to back down later — has signaled to other world leaders even modest concessions can secure retreats. Investors have grown so used to the pattern they've adopted the acronym "TACO' — or "Trump Always Chickens Out' — to describe the phenomenon. China has an edge going forward because of its dominance in rare-earth materials that are essential for mobile phones, semiconductors and other technology. | bloomberg "This is a Chinese TACO,' said Scott Kennedy, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "They have seen him in previous instances back down. They made a calculated gamble that he would back down, and he did.' The London talks were narrow by design — meant to touch on issues covered in Geneva — and therefore focused on matters such as rare earths rather than more sweeping problems including the U.S. trade deficit with China, a White House official said. Trump has said Beijing has more to lose in a trade war with the U.S., with its economy facing risks from losing access to the American market, and the recent flare-up underscored that vulnerability, the official said. Trade tensions between the U.S. and China exploded in April, when Trump imposed escalating tariffs on Beijing — reaching as high as 145% — and Xi's government retaliated with its own levies and new curbs on rare earth exports. The two countries lowered the duties in May following two days of trade talks in Geneva, but rates didn't budge further after this week's London negotiations. Trump said Wednesday the U.S. is imposing a 55% tariff on Chinese imports, essentially matching the levels he first laid out April 2. The deliberations this week came after an extended clash over last month's truce. U.S. officials accused China of stalling magnet shipments despite promises in Geneva, while Beijing vented anger with fresh Trump administration controls on chip design software, jet engines and student visas. After a call between Trump and Xi, the two sides agreed to sit down to find an off-ramp. For the U.S. president, who has long promoted himself as a dealmaker, reaching the agreements is often as important — if not more so — than their substance. He also prioritizes getting quick deals done directly with counterpart leaders, in contrast with Xi, who favors negotiations led by lieutenants in order to avoid being blindsided. It took most of Trump's first term to land a "phase one' trade deal with China that ended years of tit-for-tat tariffs; even then, few of Beijing's promised purchases of U.S. goods materialized. Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trade tensions between the U.S. and China exploded in April, when Trump imposed escalating tariffs on Beijing, and Xi hit back with its own levies and new curbs on rare earth exports. | bloomberg This week's announcement is not the final word on a China trade agreement — and it could provide a stepping stone toward a broader deal. Yet it's also unclear the framework will even hold given that the previous accord quickly broke down. Next steps — such as a possible Trump-Xi meeting — are uncertain, though the U.S. president said the leaders had agreed to reciprocal visits. The gyrations risk jeopardizing Trump's ability to secure more concessions in trade talks — especially with Beijing, said Leland Miller, chief executive officer of the China Beige Book and a member of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. "We keep ratcheting up the temperature and then ratcheting it back down, but returning to where we started isn't going back to zero. It's actually a net loss, because it eats up credibility along the way,' Miller said. "This is not just a return to the starting point; it's giving Beijing ammunition.' The relatively incremental progress contrasts with Trump's bold promises to immediately bring China to heel after years of "ripping off' the U.S. And it portends further challenges as the Trump administration struggles to land a range of trade deals with other nations. So far, only one framework agreement, with the U.K., has been finalized. Arrangements with India, Japan, the European Union and others remain works in progress. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick declared Wednesday that the White House is now turning to other deals, saying on CNBC that talks are in "good shape with lots of countries.' Trump also said he intended to send letters to trading partners setting unilateral tariff levels — again repeating an earlier threat to do so within two weeks. The U.S.-China talks also opened a new front in trade negotiations, putting export controls on the table in ways seen untenable before. China showed a new willingness to weaponize its rare earth supplies, and the U.S., in turn, curbed exports of plane parts, ethane used to make plastic and nuclear materials. Lutnick signaled some of those export moves were meant to create leverage for negotiations with Beijing, telling CNBC: "If you want to annoy us, the United States of America under Donald Trump is strong enough to annoy you back equally.' This suggests that some export controls imposed in the name of national security — and designed to keep sensitive technologies out of Beijing's hands — are now up for negotiation. U.S. officials have said, however, they're steadfast on keeping blocks on the most advanced semiconductors. And Trump's team has signaled it's prepared to ramp up controls again, if needed, to secure rare earth flows. Miller said haggling on export controls benefits Beijing. The U.S. exports at issue are equipment that can be used commercially in China or feed "their military machine,' Miller said. "Once you allow these things to be traded, you're giving Beijing leverage that otherwise it does not have.' Markets had a tepid reaction to the news Wednesday, indicating investors have started to become unmoved by Trump's trade pronouncements. Voters are growing increasingly skeptical of Trump's trade agenda. A new Quinnipiac University poll, conducted from June 5 to 9, found that 57% of voters disapproved of his handling of trade.
NHK
4 hours ago
- NHK
Trump: 'We have a golden share' in US Steel
US President Donald Trump has indicated that his country's government has a "golden share" in US Steel as part of a deal for Japan's Nippon Steel to acquire the American company. The holder of a golden share can veto selections and dismissals of board members and other important matters related to a company that has issued it. Trump spoke at the White House on Thursday. He said, "We have a golden share, which I control, or the president controls." He added, "It's 51-percent ownership by Americans." Trump is also believed to have referred to Nippon Steel when he said: "We have a company, great company. They're coming in from Japan. They're going to spend 17 billion dollars." Trump is believed to have revealed the amount of money Nippon Steel plans to invest in US Steel. It marked a rise of 3 billion dollars from the figure he disclosed during a speech in the eastern state of Pennsylvania on May 30. It remains unclear where the increase came from. Nippon Steel has been aiming to turn US Steel into a wholly owned subsidiary under the buyout plan. In January, then-US President Joe Biden blocked the plan, citing national security concerns. But in April, Trump instructed the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to conduct a fresh review. The committee finished its reexamination and reported it to Trump. A decision is expected soon, as the contract between the two companies is due to expire on Wednesday.
