The tightrope between policy disruption and diplomacy at Startup20
Image: Supplied
The Startup20 (SU20) midterm engagement was, by all accounts, a success. It brought together taskforce members, youth leaders, global partners, and policy stakeholders in a high energy environment designed to move beyond rhetoric and into action. There was a shared sense of urgency and commitment to shaping meaningful, global policy proposals ahead of the G20 Summit in November.
In her address, Minister of Small Business Development Stella Ndabeni-Abrahams highlighted the significance of South Africa's G20 Presidency under the theme "Solidarity, Equality and Sustainability," calling for urgent reform of global trade and financial systems to better serve vulnerable economies and communities. She stressed the importance of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in driving inclusive growth, innovation, and resilience, particularly within underserved rural and township communities. The Minister underscored the need to ensure MSMEs are not afterthoughts in policy, but rather strategic actors in economic development. She reaffirmed South Africa's proposal to establish a formal G20 MSME and Startup Working Group, positioning this as a potential legacy of the current G20 cycle.
At its core, the gathering was a working session. It included breakout groups to refine taskforce policy drafts, synergy mapping across themes, panel discussions with key experts, and collaborative dialogue that challenged participants to think not only about what we say in policy, but how we say it. This was not a passive conference; it was a space of co-creation.
After the midterm engagement, I've found myself reflecting not only on what we are building, but how we are building it, and most critically, how we are speaking it into being.
Language in policy is not neutral. It can build coalitions or break them. It can open doors or slam them shut. It is a tool of inclusion and imagination, but also, at times, of division and misunderstanding.
This became abundantly clear when one task force, in passionately critiquing restrictive global frameworks, used the term 'regulatory colonialism.' The intention, I believe, was to spotlight the disproportionate burden placed on African and Global South economies by rigid, one size fits all regulations imposed or incentivised by dominant global actors.
In a space that aims to co-create solutions across the G20 and beyond, this word landed with the force of centuries.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
And here lies the tension.
Africa has a long and painful history of linguistic erasure and imposed narratives. To reclaim language is to reclaim power. But we must also acknowledge the tightrope we walk in multilateral spaces, where the very policies we craft must be legible, palatable, and adoptable by stakeholders who do not share our histories.
Terms like 'regulatory colonialism' may resonate deeply within African contexts. But they risk alienating potential partners or diluting the intended message if the room becomes stuck debating semantics instead of substance.
This is not a call to silence bold language. On the contrary, it is a call to wield it strategically. Disruptive language can reframe and rehumanise policy. But to be effective, it must be grounded in clarity, in invitation, and not just indictment.
What I've come to understand, perhaps even more acutely after this engagement, is that being disruptive with language is both an art and a responsibility. In a policy context, especially one as nuanced and high stakes as SU20, words must do double duty: they must challenge, and they must connect.
We cannot afford to dull our messages into soft diplomacy. But we also cannot allow our most powerful insights to be lost in translation, or worse, rejected outright because of a single triggering phrase.
The question is not whether to be disruptive it is how to be disruptive while remaining heard. How to honour our truths while expanding our reach. How to challenge systems while building the coalitions needed to change them.
In the end, we must ask ourselves: are we speaking to be right, or are we speaking to create change? Because in spaces like SU20, our words don't just pronounce the world—they have the power to reshape it.
Boitshoko Shoke, Research and Impact Manager at 22 On Sloane.
Image: Supplied
Boitshoko Shoke, Research and Impact Manager at 22 On Sloane.
*** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma scoffs at Trump's handling of Africa
Former African Union (AU) Commission chairperson Dr. Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma has expressed her disappointment and frustration with United States President Donald Trump. Image: Timothy Bernard Former African Union (AU) Commission chairperson Dr. Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma has expressed her disappointment and frustration with United States President Donald Trump's approach towards Africa and South Africa. Jarring for her was Trump's assertion that there was a "white genocide" in the country, his trade demands and bid to recolonise the continent. Pretoria's relationship with Washington deteriorated significantly after Trump assumed office in January. Absent a trade deal, certain South African exports face the imposition of 30% tariffs, the highest for any sub-Saharan African nation, starting tomorrow. The development follows months of heightened tensions concerning various domestic and international policies. In addition to disputes over various issues, such as South Africa's accusation of genocide against Israel in Gaza at the International Court of Justice, Washington expelled Pretoria's ambassador Ebrahim Rasool in March after he criticised Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. According to Dlamini-Zuma, Trump is a "difficult person" who seems to prioritise American interests over global cooperation. Dlamini-Zuma referenced Trump's past comments on Africa, stating, "You must remember what he said in his first campaign before his first term…He said Africa needs to be recolonised. So what do we expect?" She emphasised the importance of African unity, saying if Africa was united, it would not be possible that Africa becomes recolonised. Dlamini-Zuma also criticised Trump's narrative on white genocide in South Africa, calling it "deliberate misinformation". She pointed out that crime was a significant issue in South Africa, but there was no evidence to support the claim of genocide against white people. "If you look at the statistics, it is the black people who die more, every time the statistics are given," she said. Dlamini-Zuma stressed Africa's need to collaborate and promote its interests. She advocated for the Africa Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) to boost intra-African trade and economic growth. "We need to work together and that's why we want an Africa continental free trade so that we must trade amongst ourselves and promote each other's interests," she said. She further emphasised the importance of empowering youth and women in Africa's development. She called on governments and stakeholders to provide accessible education and skills training, stating, "Young people have the right to education, and they must actively pursue it". She also urged young Africans to engage in sectors such as mineral processing and the ocean economy to drive sustainable growth. Dlamini-Zuma highlighted the need for Africa to decolonise its mindsets and prioritise inclusive development. "If we do not, we remain colonised," she said, emphasising the importance of self-determination and African-led development. As a pan-Africanist, Dlamini-Zuma said she was committed to promoting African development and restoring the continent's history. She also took the opportunity to announce the NDZ foundation-the Africa we want, saying the new organisation was in the pipeline and was meant to engage on issues on the African agenda. It is expected to be launched by the end of the year. International Relations expect Dr Noluthando Phungula mirrored Dlamini Zuma's views about Trump's attitude towards Africa and South Africa. 'Trump has been clear from the onset about his policy position. He is clear on putting America first, so it is quite disingenuous for South Africa or Africa to pull the humanity card when dealing with Trump." She described bilateral relations between Washington and Pretoria as a political drama. 'The Trump administration is at odds with Pretoria's prominent position in the International Court of Justice's case against Israel, which stands accused of genocide in Gaza,' Phungula said.
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
As if US tariff is not enough, more bad news for South African exporters
South African exports to the US will take longer and first go via Europe if exporters are willing to live with longer shipping times. As if the US tariff for South Africa of 30% on exports to the United States is not enough, there is more bad news for exporters to the US: one of the two shipping companies offering direct shipments to the US will phase out its service. Shipping company Maersk will start phasing out its AMEX service that local exporters use to transport goods to the US east coast from 1 October. This leaves only MSC on this route. The change is due to Maersk moving to a transhipment solution where cargo from South Africa going to the US must first go through the hubs in Europe before crossing the Atlantic. Unfortunately, this means that shipment times will increase substantially. Dr Ernst van Biljon, head lecturer and programme coordinator for M. Com in Supply Chain Management at the IMM Graduate School, says the announcement could not come at a worse time. 'This decision, after the recent imposition of a sweeping 30% US tariff on South African goods, delivers a double blow to our trade competitiveness and supply chain resilience.' ALSO READ: Government must actively manage fallout from US tariffs with trade crisis committee – BLSA Concern about losing direct shipping link to US He says the immediate concern is logistical: losing one of only two direct links to the US forces exporters to route cargo via Europe's congested ports, adding time, cost and uncertainty. 'For sectors like fruit, wine and automotive components where freshness, timing and delivery precision are critical, this is a serious disruption. Even if MSC maintains its direct route, the concentration risk remains high, with no room for error or backup. 'However, this is more than just a shipping reshuffle. It exposes South Africa's strategic vulnerability in global supply chains. Tariffs and transport constraints now combine to erode margins and undermine long-standing commercial relationships. 'With the US market becoming increasingly costly and complex to access, South African exporters must urgently build alternative routes, including deepened Brics and intra-African trade ties.' Van Biljon says this moment also underscores the urgent need for greater investment in smart supply chain technologies, particularly the internet of things-enabled cold chain tracking, real-time shipment visibility and predictive routing tools. 'These innovations not only improve risk management but are now essential for maintaining product integrity and meeting global service expectations.' He points out that this moment calls not only for political diplomacy but for a stronger coordinated national logistics strategy. 'The cost of inaction is not just short-term pain but long-term marginalisation from global trade corridors.' ALSO READ: US tariff of 30%: Rand weakest in 3 months, thousands of jobs in danger Shipping via Europe could be cheaper but longer Donald MacKay, CEO of XA Global Trade Advisors, says it is a little too early to call what the implications are of Maersk closing its direct route between South Africa nd the US. One must assume that MSC will become more expensive over time as it will have the monopoly. 'It is difficult to say what the implications are but it is something we have to watch closely. It is certainly not a good thing, particularly for products with a limited shelf life like fresh fruit. It is not good. South Africa is becoming more and more isolated. 'However, it seems that shipping this new route with Maersk is a bit cheaper. Although it takes more time, it could be better for those companies that care more about a slightly cheaper price even if they have to wait longer.'
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma condemns Trump's approach to Africa
Former African Union (AU) Commission chairperson Dr. Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma has expressed her disappointment and frustration with United States President Donald Trump. Image: Timothy Bernard Former African Union (AU) Commission chairperson Dr. Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma has expressed her disappointment and frustration with United States President Donald Trump's approach towards Africa and South Africa. Pretoria's relationship with Washington deteriorated significantly after Trump assumed office in January. Absent a trade deal, certain South African exports face the imposition of 30% tariffs, the highest for any sub-Saharan African nation, starting Friday. This development follows months of heightened tensions concerning various domestic and international policies. In addition to disputes over various issues, such as South Africa's accusation of genocide against Israel in Gaza at the International Court of Justice, Washington expelled Pretoria's ambassador Ebrahim Rasool in March after he criticised Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. According to Dlamini-Zuma, Trump is a "difficult person" who seems to prioritise American interests over global cooperation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Dlamini-Zuma referenced Trump's past comments on Africa, stating, "You must remember what he said in his first campaign before his first term…He said Africa needs to be recolonised. So what do we expect?" She emphasised the importance of African unity, saying if Africa was united, it would not be possible that Africa becomes recolonised. Dlamini-Zuma also criticised Trump's narrative on white genocide in South Africa, calling it "deliberate misinformation". She pointed out that crime is a significant issue in South Africa, but there is no evidence to support the claim of genocide against white people. "If you look at the statistics, it is the black people who die more, every time the statistics are given," she said. Dlamini-Zuma stressed Africa's need to collaborate and promote its interests. She advocated for the Africa Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) to boost intra-African trade and economic growth. "We need to work together and that's why we want an Africa continental free trade so that we must trade amongst ourselves and promote each other's interests," she said. She further emphasised the importance of empowering youth and women in Africa's development. She called on governments and stakeholders to provide accessible education and skills training, stating, "Young people have the right to education, and they must actively pursue it". She also urged young Africans to engage in sectors such as mineral processing and the ocean economy to drive sustainable growth. Dlamini-Zuma highlighted the need for Africa to decolonise its mindsets and prioritise inclusive development. "We need to decolonise minds. If we do not, we remain colonised," she said, emphasising the importance of self-determination and African-led development. As a pan-Africanist, Dlamini-Zuma said she was committed to promoting African development and restoring the continent's history. She also took the opportunity to announce the NDZ foundation-the Africa we want saying the new organisation was in the pipeline and was meant to engage on issues on the African agenda. It is expected to be launched by the end of the year. International Relations expect Dr Noluthando Phungula mirrored Dlamini Zuma's views about Trump's attitude towards Africa and South Africa. 'Trump has been clear from the onset about his policy position. He is clear on putting America first, so it is quite disingenuous for South Africa or Africa to pull the humanity card when dealing with Trump." She described bilateral relations between Washington and Pretoria as a political drama. 'The Trump administration is at odds with Pretoria's prominent position in the International Court of Justice's case against Israel, which stands accused of genocide in Gaza,' Phungula said.
