GOP senators mock Dems for ignoring Biden's cognitive decline AGAIN by skipping autopen hearing
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee skewered Democrats for burying their heads in the sand once again over the question of Joe Biden's cognitive decline by skipping a hearing about the alleged abuse of the aging president's autopen authority.
'Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years,' erupted Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).
'They knew. Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was mentally not competent to do the job,' he added. 'And they're not here because they can't defend themselves.'
Advertisement
During the hearing, titled 'Unfit to Serve: How the Biden Cover-Up Endangered America and Undermined the Constitution,' Republican senators voiced concern that the presidential autopen had been used for executive orders and pardons without Biden's knowledge.
GOP committee members also lampooned prominent Democrats who ran cover for the oldest-ever president's public slip-ups by playing a montage of their embarrassing evasions.
4 'Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was mentally not competent to do the job,' said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) of his Democratic colleagues.
EPA
Advertisement
'I can't even keep up with him,' said ex-White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who has since left the Democratic Party, in one clip. 'He is sharp. He is on top of things'
'He has knowledge. He has judgment. He has strategic thinking,' House Speaker emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said at another point in the video footage — despite having been part of the push to remove Biden from the 2024 Democratic ticket.
'Many elected officials, including some in this chamber, have used autopens — a mechanical device that replicates a signature. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, so long as we're the ones actually making the decisions,' said Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.).
'But under President Biden, the autopen became a troubling symbol,' he added. 'A symbol of an absentee president and an executive branch directed by nameless, faceless, aides that no one outside of Washington DC had ever heard of and no one ever voted for.'
Advertisement
The only Democratic members to show face at the hearing were Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) and ranking member of the Judiciary Committee Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.).
Earlier this month, President Trump ordered his administration to investigate 'who ran the United States while Biden was in office' and to look into the executive actions that had been signed with an autopen.
4 Senator Dick Durbin was one of the only Democrats to show face at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.
AFP via Getty Images
4 Former President Biden has denied that an autopen was used to sign policy documents without his go-ahead.
AP
Advertisement
Biden immediately snapped back in a written statement, vehemently denying the claims that he had not been the one making decisions in the Oval Office.
'I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' the ex-president's statement read.
In his opening remarks, Durbin expressed frustration that there had not been Judiciary Committee oversight hearings about the Minnesota assassinations, the arrest of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) at a Department of Homeland Security press conference, or the Los Angeles deployments of National Guard to quell anti-ICE riots.
'Apparently armchair-diagnosing President Biden is more important than the issues of grave concern which I've mentioned,' said Durbin.
4 Senator Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) has called Biden's time in the Oval Office the 'autopen presidency.'
AP
The Illinois senator also attempted to redirect attention from the former president by calling Trump's cognitive ability into question.
Republican committee members declined to entertain speculation about Trump's mental state, instead refocusing attention on Biden's decline and his administration's autopen use.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
42 minutes ago
- The Hill
Proposed sale of millions of acres of public land under GOP budget bill prompts backlash
Related video above: Trump and Musk feud continues over 'Big, Beautiful bill' (NEXSTAR) – Over 2 million acres of public land would go up for sale across 11 states under the current version of the Republican budget bill – a proposal that has met criticism from conservationists, hunting groups, local politicians and even some conservatives. Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee, who chairs the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, included the sale of federal lands – a longtime ambition of Western conservatives to cede lands to local control – in a draft provision of the so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Lee has defended the plan as a way to boost domestic energy production, create new revenue streams and increase housing. The Republican said in a video released by his office that the sales would not include national parks, national monuments or wilderness. They would instead target 'isolated parcels' that could be used for housing or infrastructure, he said. 'Washington has proven time and again it can't manage this land. This bill puts it in better hands,' Lee said last Thursday. Lee has struggled to convince some members of his own party, however, and a similar measure was rejected by the House. Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke led an effort to strip land sales out of the House version, saying he was a 'hard no' on similar measures. Montana was removed from the proposal over the protests of Zinke and other local officials. An analysis by The Wilderness Society found that more than 250 million acres currently under the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service are at risk of sale. Lee's proposal does not specify what properties would be sold. It directs the secretaries of interior and agriculture to sell or transfer at least 0.5% and up to 0.75% of U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management holdings. That equals at least 2.1 million acres (868,000 hectares) and up to 3.2 million acres (1.3 million hectares). The states potentially affected by the proposal are Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. The Wilderness Society and other conservation groups have reacted with outrage, saying it would set a precedent to fast-track the handover of cherished lands to developers. 'Shoving the sale of public lands back into the budget reconciliation bill, all to fund tax cuts for the wealthy, is a betrayal of future generations and folks on both sides of the aisle,' said Michael Carroll with The Wilderness Society. Others have expressed doubt that the lands potentially up for sale would ever be suitable for housing development. Some of the parcels up for sale in Utah and Nevada under the House proposal were far from developed areas. 'I don't think it's clear that we would even get substantial housing as a result of this,' Sen. Martin Heinrich, the ranking Democrat on the energy committee, said of the Senate version. 'What I know would happen is people would lose access to places they know and care about and that drive our Western economies.' Benji Backer, author of 'The Conservative Environmentalist,' has accused Sen. Lee on social media of 'secretly trying to sell' America's public land for development. 'I've never seen so many conservatives AND liberals stand together as I've seen in opposition of this proposed mass sale of public lands,' Backer posted on X. 'Conservation of our nation's beauty is a deeply patriotic and nonpartisan value.' An April poll sponsored by the Trust for Public and and conducted by YouGov found that, of the 4,000 Americans surveyed, 71% opposed the sale of public land. The opposition was bipartisan: 61% were Trump voters in 2024, and 85% Harris voters. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Support for regulating psychoactive hemp gains momentum in NC
Bipartisan support for restricting hemp in North Carolina is gaining steam, with GOP lawmakers unveiling yet another proposal Tuesday that would regulate intoxicating weed-like products in the state. Why it matters: The new legislation, backed by the state's most powerful Republican, is one of several bills proposed in recent months that would crack down on psychoactive hemp products in North Carolina. Though marijuana remains illegal in any form, the state is among the most lenient in the country in its regulation of hemp-derived consumables, but a bipartisan movement to change that has been building. What they're saying: "Stores selling these hemp products are popping up in towns across North Carolina, and children are getting ahold of these products," Senate Leader Phil Berger said in a press release about the bill Monday night. "Without these regulations, the availability of these dangerous products is only going to get worse." Driving the news: On Tuesday morning, Republican lawmakers in North Carolina's state Senate rolled out the most restrictive yet viable proposal yet to regulate hemp while moving to ban products made with any hemp-derived cannabinoids other than delta-9, the psychoactive component of marijuana. The bill would also set age and dosage limits and licensing and testing standards for sellers and manufacturers. Yes, but: It would not legalize marijuana, however — a proposal that has been floated in previous sessions but has yet to surface this year. Flashback: "It's really ironic that in some ways, the most liberal, pro-marijuana adult-use state in the country is North Carolina," Democratic Gov. Josh Stein told WRAL in an exclusive interview earlier this month, in which he also announced he was launching a task force to explore regulations on THC products and marijuana legalization "It's not Colorado, it's not Massachusetts, it's not these states that legalized it and then created a regulatory structure to sell it. It's North Carolina, where we have no rules whatsoever." State of play: As of now, the state has no limits — or age restrictions — on any cannabinoids with psychoactive effects much like those of THC, including delta-9. The new bill unveiled Tuesday, however, would outright ban "synthetic" high-inducing hemp products that can be found on shelves just a few blocks from the state legislature, including delta-8, THC-A, delta-7 and delta-10. The bill also appears to ban CBD, another hemp-derived cannabinoid. The cannabis plant has more than 100 cannabinoids. Some of them produce a weed-like high, while others, like CBD, are not. The other side: House Rules Chairman Rep. John Bell, who is the president of CBD and hemp manufacturer Asterra Labs, is "disappointed in the bill," he told Axios in a text message Tuesday. "This bill will destroy the hemp industry and move it out of state. Not one stakeholder was involved." He had not expressed the same opposition to another bill proposed earlier this session that would regulate his industry, though he told Axios at the time that the legislation wouldn't necessarily be a slam dunk for his company because it would implement new licensing fees and require changes to how it packages its products, for example. Democrats and Republicans alike expressed support for the new legislation, however, when it was unveiled in a committee hearing Tuesday morning. North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson also attended the committee meeting. "This is long overdue," Jackson, a Democrat, told lawmakers. "One of the major themes in terms of feedback that I've gotten from law enforcement and from families over the last six months has been about this issue — and usually happens when a family learns that it is truly the Wild West, at least with respect to what children are allowed to buy in these places."
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump confronts Juventus soccer team about 'men playing in women's sports' at White House
President Donald Trump host the popular Italian soccer club Juventus FC at the White House on Wednesday, as the team is in the U.S. for the Club World Cup. During the visit, as the players stood behind Trump's desk in the Oval Office, Trump broached the subject of transgender athletes in women's sports during a lengthy rant about former President Joe Biden. "He was never for open border, and you'd think, he was never for transgender for everybody, or men playing in women's sports," Trump said. The president then turned around to face the Juventus players and posed a question. "Could a woman make your team, fellas?" he asked. The players all exchanged glances, but none gave an answer. The president then turned to face the team's general manager Damien Comolli and pose the same question. "We have a very good women's team," Comolli said. But Trump pressed Comolli, repeating the question, "But they should be playing with women?" Comolli did not offer an answer that time. "See, they're very diplomatic," Trump mocked. Trump has made combating trans athletes in women's and girls sports a key pillar of his second administration's agenda. Trump signed the "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports" executive order on Feb. 5 after campaigning heavily on the issue in 2024. The order prompted the NCAA to change its gender eligibility policy to only permit biological females to compete in the women's category. However, Trump's executive order has been met with staunch resistance by Democratic state leaders across the country. Trump's administration is already engaged in a lawsuit against Maine, and has been sued by Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison over the issue as well. Federal Title IX investigations have also been opened into California and Massachusetts' high school sports leagues. A New York Times/Ipsos survey found the vast majority of Americans, including a majority of Democrats, don't think transgender athletes should be permitted to compete in women's sports. Of the 2,128 people who participated, 79% said biological males who identify as women should not be allowed to participate in women's sports. Of the 1,025 people who identified as Democrats or leaning Democrat, 67% said transgender athletes should not be allowed to compete with women. Among 1,022 Republicans, that number was 94%. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
