HC rejects Firoz Nadiadwala's plea to dismiss ₹24-crore suit over film financing dispute
MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Monday rejected a plea by filmmaker Firoz A Nadiadwala seeking dismissal of a ₹24-crore commercial suit filed against him on grounds that he was never formally served a writ of summons.
Justice Abhay Ahuja, who heard the matter, observed that since Nadiadwala had already appointed lawyers and was represented by senior counsel during earlier proceedings, formal service of summons was not required under the law.
The case stems from a financing agreement dated July 16, 2015, between Nadiadwala and businessman Anil Dhanraj Jethani, who had agreed to fund a film production. Jethani later filed a suit on August 19, 2015, to recover ₹24 crore, alleging non-payment of dues.
On September 1, 2015, the high court passed a consent order permitting Jethani to withdraw ₹12.5 crore deposited by another defendant. The remaining amount was to be paid by Nadiadwala before the release of his upcoming film Welcome to the Jungle, which was initially scheduled for December 28, 2024, but has since been delayed.
Following the enactment of the Commercial Courts Act in October 2015, the suit was reclassified as a commercial case. Nadiadwala later moved an application arguing that he had never been served a summons, and therefore, all subsequent orders—including the consent order—were invalid and contrary to the Civil Procedure Code.
His counsel further pointed out that Jethani had not taken any steps to issue or serve a writ of summons for over seven years and contended that the financing agreement remained unsigned by one party, raising questions about its enforceability.
Countering the claim, Jethani's senior counsel argued that once a defendant enters an appearance during interlocutory proceedings or files a vakalatnama, formal service of summons is no longer necessary. He accused Nadiadwala of acting in bad faith and attempting to evade a binding commitment made to the court.
The court noted that Nadiadwala had received copies of the plaint and exhibits on August 20, 2015, and that his legal team had participated in hearings on August 24 and 28 that year. It held that his participation established his awareness of the proceedings and dismissed his application accordingly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
Warped priorities: What Mumbai's suburban railway commuter deaths say about India's development dreams
On 9 June, 12 commuters fell off a suburban train near Thane as it jerked and swayed while navigating sharp curves. Four of them died, while the rest were severely injured. They were the latest victims of Mumbai's ageing and immensely overcrowded suburban railway network, an essential but deadly lifeline for the city's working class. Between 2005 and July 2024, a staggering 51,802 people died on Mumbai's suburban railways, according to an affidavit filed in the Bombay High Court by the Western and Central Railways, which together operate the city's three suburban networks. That's an average of seven deaths per day for nearly two decades, making it the deadliest suburban railway system in the world by a wide margin. Kolkata, with an average of 800 deaths per year, is second, while Jakarta, with around 100 deaths per year, is a very distant third. One could argue that not all these deaths are the fault of the Railways. This is true, but only to some extent. A few hundred die every year on trains or at stations due to natural causes. Another couple of hundred commit suicide on the tracks every year, on average. But these deaths still account for less than a fifth of the total fatalities. The rest are all accidents, caused by huge overcrowding, ageing and vastly stressed infrastructure, and a shocking absence of basic safety systems. Mumbai's suburban railway system is just 28 years shy of celebrating its bicentenary. The oldest suburban network in Asia is also one of the least modernised. Despite the astronomical increase in loads, the Colonial era infrastructure is essentially still in place. This led to incidents like the 2017 Elphinstone foot overbridge (FOB) stampede, which killed 23 commuters at rush hour. The causes of death are tragically predictable: commuters falling off moving trains, getting knocked off by electric poles while hanging out of overcrowded coaches, run over while crossing tracks due to poor access and track crossing FOBs. Several also get electrocuted while travelling atop packed trains, or are run over after slipping between the platform and the train. What's worse, the root causes and solutions for all these problems are known. Automatic locking doors on coaches will prevent people from hanging precariously from them. Boundary walls and fencing could prevent, or at least greatly reduce, the crossing of railway tracks. Better-located and wider FOBs, escalators, and elevators at stations could also prevent track crossings and stampedes. Vestibules between coaches would help redistribute crowding. CCTV in platforms and all coaches, with a 'talk back' facility to alert the motorman, would enhance safety while travelling. Extending the Railways' anti-collision system, Kavach, to the suburban network could avert collisions and accidents. Widening and lengthening platforms will reduce overcrowding and accidental falls onto the tracks at stations. Installing automatic platform screen doors in platforms, like in metro stations, will eliminate this. Altering track geometry at known accident spots will eliminate accidents like what happened earlier this week. In addition, a cyclical timetable, which commuter groups have been petitioning for since 2012, could increase frequency during peak hours by 30% and reduce overcrowding. All it needs is an enhanced signalling and a software change to the existing train control system. Also Read: Cabinet approves two multitracking projects for Indian Railways Neglected lifeline These are not futuristic, expensive dreams. They are 20th-century solutions that remain unimplemented a quarter of the way into the 21st century. The Railways already has the technology to implement all these solutions. It's not that the money doesn't exist or cannot be found. Over the past decade, based on available Budget numbers, between ₹5,000 and ₹6,000 crore have been allocated to the suburban railway network in Mumbai. Western and Central, suburban networks, meanwhile, earn almost ₹7,000 crore per year for the Railways. Governments also have no problem finding the money for projects that are seen as 'modern" and 'prestigious". For example, Mumbai's metro rail projects have a cumulative allocation of ₹65,000 crores. The two completed lines carry less than one-seventh of the load of the suburban network. The passenger fare is also vastly different. The average ride cost per kilometre is just 11 paise on the suburban network; it is over ₹2 per km even on the longest section of the metro. Also Read: Cabinet approves two multitracking projects for Indian Railways The real problem is that the users of the suburban railway – Mumbai's hard-working poor, the working class and the voiceless middle class – have no political agency. Their daily deaths have become so mundane that they cease to evoke any horror or anger. On most days, they no longer even register in the local news, let alone national headlines. This indifference and apathy are a blot on the world's fourth biggest economy, and India's aspiration to be recognised as a developed and prosperous middle-income country. It is a telling comment on our priorities. Also Read: Railways to take up Mission Amrit Sarovar projects, convert burrowed areas alongside tracks to artificial ponds
The Hindu
11 hours ago
- The Hindu
Bombay HC defers Celebi's appeal against Mumbai Airport's contract termination, awaits Delhi HC ruling
The Bombay High Court on Friday (June 13, 2025) has adjourned till July 10, 2025, the hearing of the petition filed by Celebi NAS Airport Services India Pvt Ltd, a Turkish-Indian joint venture providing ground handling services for airlines at various Indian airports, that has challenged the termination of its services by the Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL). The firm that has been providing services at various Indian airports, has faced multiple legal battles in Mumbai, Delhi, Gujarat and Chennai. On Friday, a Division Bench of Justices B. P. Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla was informed that overall, seven airports in India have cancelled the services of the Turkish airlines services firm and its subsidiaries. Representing the Union government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted to the Bench that the Turkish aviation firm has already filed similar petitions in the Delhi High Court and the Madras High Court seeking relief. 'The Delhi High Court has reserved its order after hearing extensive arguments from both sides. Thus, the Madras High Court has passed an order stating it will await the judgment of the Delhi High Court, since similarly worded arguments are made before Delhi High Court and its findings will have an impact on the issues in all the petitions,' Mr. Mehta told the judges and requested the Bench to consider passing a similar order and defer its proceedings until the Delhi High Court pronounces its verdict. Appearing for Celebi, senior advocate Chetan Kapadia, agreed with the Solicitor General's submission. The Bench considered the request and noted that it will wait for the Delhi High Court's verdict and adjourned the hearing till July 10, 2025. On May 26, 2025, the Bombay High Court restrained MIAL from finalising bids on May 17, to appoint a new agency and replace Çelebi's subsidiary for ground and bridge handling services at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport. The High Court said that its order will operate until the matter is heard by a regular Bench after the vacation. Celebi moved the Bombay High Court after the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS), under the Ministry of Civil Aviation, revoked its security clearance on the grounds of national security, amid heightened diplomatic tensions between India and Turkey, particularly over Turkey's stand in support of Pakistan during the Operation Sindoor. Celebi has filed three petitions, challenging the Centre's decision to revoke the security clearance and contract termination by the MIAL, terming the termination 'arbitrary' and 'illegal'.
The Hindu
19 hours ago
- The Hindu
Patanjali Foods moves Bombay High Court over land encroachments in Raigad
Patanjali Foods Private Limited has approached the Bombay High Court seeking directions to the Maharashtra government and its authorities to remove structures allegedly constructed and occupied illegally on the company's land at Patalganga, Savroli Kharpada Road, in Khalapur taluka of Raigad district. There are eight respondents named in the matter. The petition has arrayed the Maharashtra government and its statutory authorities — including the Special Planning Authority and the local Tehsildar — holding them responsible for safeguarding the land against encroachments and ensuring eviction of unauthorised occupants. The chief engineer and deputy executive engineer have also been named for allegedly allowing the encroachment and providing electricity connections to the illegal constructions. The petition accuses specific individuals — Sunil Malsure of illegally constructing a local politician's office (referred to as an SM office), Mayur Ravindra Devghare of building a hotel, and Sudesh Khandagale of erecting a tyre puncture repair shop on the said land. Advocate Apoorv Srivastava, appearing for the petitioner, submitted told The Hindu that despite raising the issue through meetings and written representations, government authorities had failed to take cognisance. 'By not taking any action, the authorities have allowed the illegal encroachers to unlawfully use, occupy and take possession of the land that belongs to Patanjali,' he said. The plea stated that, aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent authorities, the company was 'forced to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950,' and sought a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate directions directing the concerned authorities to initiate action against the alleged encroachers and trespassers. 'Illegal encroachments on the subject lands have increased from the date of purchase until today, and yet the respondents and its concerned authorities have shown no interference in the administration of the areas within its local limits and have allowed such miscreants to extend their hutments illegally to its full enjoyment on private land owned by the petitioners,' the petition stated. It further added that this situation 'has posed a great threat to the lives of the people associated with the petitioner's factory.' With regard to the tyre puncture shop, the company submitted that the unit operates an air-filling machine that poses a significant hazard. 'Any malfunction or mishap involving the said machine has the potential to cause grave disruptions to the factory's operations, extensive damage to its machinery, and possible loss of life or injury to its workers,' it said. The petition also claimed that Patanjali staff had found it difficult to remove the trespassers. 'They are reluctant to vacate the subject land, and there are apprehensions that they shall keep on illegally constructing one or the other structure on the subject land without any fear of the authorities,' the company stated. 'I will mention the matter in the coming week for an urgent hearing before the appropriate Bench,' Mr. Srivastava said. The matter is likely to be placed before a Division Bench comprising Justice Girish Kulkarni and Justice Arif Doctor.
