logo
Do international carbon credits fight climate change?

Do international carbon credits fight climate change?

Straits Times03-07-2025
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
FILE PHOTO: A coal-fired power station scheduled to shut down is seen in As Pontes, Spain, February 8, 2022. Picture taken February 8, 2022. REUTERS/Miguel Vidal/File Photo
BRUSSELS - The European Commission has proposed an EU climate target for 2040 that allows countries to count carbon credits bought from developing nations towards the EU goal for the first time.
Here's what that means, and why the EU move on Wednesday faced criticism from campaigners and some scientists.
WHAT ARE CARBON CREDITS?
Carbon credits, or offsets, involve funding projects that reduce CO2 emissions abroad in place of cuts to your own greenhouse gas emissions.
Examples include forest restoration in Brazil, or converting a city's petrol buses to electric. The buyer counts "credits" for those emission reductions towards its climate goal, and the seller gets finance for their green project.
Proponents say the system generates much-needed funding for CO2-cutting efforts in developing nations and lets countries work together to cut emissions around the world.
However, the reputation of CO2 credits has been dented by a string of scandals in which credit-generating projects failed to deliver the climate benefits they claimed.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore 193ha of land off Changi to be reclaimed for aviation park; area reduced to save seagrass meadow
Business More Singapore residents met CPF Required Retirement Sum when they turned 55 in 2024
Singapore PAP questions Pritam's interview with Malaysian podcast, WP says PAP opposing for the sake of opposing
Singapore 1 in 4 appeals to waive HDB wait-out period for private home owners approved since Sept 2022
Sport A true fans' player – Liverpool fans in Singapore pay tribute to the late Diogo Jota
Singapore Healthcare facility planned for site of Ang Mo Kio Public Library after it moves to AMK Hub
Singapore $500 in Child LifeSG credits, Edusave, Post-Sec Education Account top-ups to be disbursed in July
Business 60 S'pore firms to get AI boost from Tata Consultancy as it launches new innovation centre here
WHY IS THE EU BUYING THEM?
The European Commission proposed allowing up to 3 percentage points of the EU's 2040 target - to cut net emissions by 90% from 1990 levels - to be covered by carbon credits bought from other countries.
The EU's existing climate targets require countries to meet the goals entirely by cutting emissions at home.
The bloc's executive Commission said last year it hoped the EU could agree a 90% emissions-cutting target for 2040, with no mention of carbon credits.
Tumultuous geopolitics and the economic woes of European industries have since stoked political pushback, with governments from Germany to Poland demanding a softer target.
In response, the Commission said it would add flexibilities, and landed on carbon credits as a way to retain a 90% emissions-cutting goal while reducing the domestic steps needed to reach it.
EU countries and the European Parliament must negotiate and approve the goal.
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
The EU plan was welcomed by countries including Germany, which had pushed to include carbon credits in the goal, and by carbon credit project developers as a boost for climate finance.
But environmental campaigners said the EU was shirking domestic CO2-cutting efforts and warned against relying on cheap, low-value credits.
The EU's climate science advisers had also opposed buying credits under the 2040 target, which they said would divert money from investments in local clean industries.
The EU banned international credits from its own carbon market after a flood of cheap credits with weak environmental benefits contributed to a carbon price crash.
To try to address the risks, the Commission said it would buy credits in line with a global market and rules for trading carbon credits which the U.N. is developing. These include quality standards aimed at avoiding the problems that unregulated credit trading has faced in recent years.
Brussels will also propose rules next year on specific quality standards for the carbon credits the EU buys.
HOW MUCH WILL IT COST?
The EU doesn't yet know. Carbon credit prices today can be as low as a few dollars per tonne of CO2, up to more than $100, depending on the project.
EU emissions records suggest the bloc would need to buy at least 140 million tonnes of CO2 emissions to cover 3% of the 2040 target, roughly equivalent to the Netherlands' total emissions last year.
One senior Commission official said the bloc was determined not to hoover up cheap junk credits.
"I don't think that would have any additional value. The credits we see currently on voluntary carbon markets are very, very cheap, and that probably reflects a lack of high environmental integrity," the senior official said. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stocks to watch: CapitaLand Investment, CapitaLand Ascendas Reit, iFast, Lum Chang Creations
Stocks to watch: CapitaLand Investment, CapitaLand Ascendas Reit, iFast, Lum Chang Creations

Business Times

time5 hours ago

  • Business Times

Stocks to watch: CapitaLand Investment, CapitaLand Ascendas Reit, iFast, Lum Chang Creations

[SINGAPORE] The following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Wednesday (Aug 20): CapitaLand Investment (CLI) : The global real asset manager said on Tuesday that it will provide retail advisory services to Malaysian property developer Astaka for a new mixed-use project in Johor worth RM1.2 billion (S$364.5 million) in gross development value. Astaka chief executive Allen Khong said the project comprising a new lifestyle mall and a five-star hotel will be a key beneficiary of cross-border travel and retail activity thanks to the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone. The counter closed 1.1 per cent or S$0.03 up at S$2.70 on Tuesday. CapitaLand Ascendas Reit : The real estate investment trust on Wednesday announced the completion of the acquisition of two plots of freehold land in the UK, as previously planned . The plots are in Manton Wood and Towcester sites in the East Midlands, on which four new logistics properties are planned to be developed. The counter closed 0.8 per cent or S$0.02 up at S$2.70 on Tuesday. iFast : Shares of iFast on Tuesday had their biggest drop since April after Temasek-linked CP Invest offloaded about 14.4 million shares at a 6.7 per cent discount to the previous day's closing price. CGS International analyst Tay Wee Kuang said investors are likely taking this as a sign that iFast is 'fairly valued' at S$9.77. The counter closed 8.5 per cent or S$0.83 down at S$8.94 on Tuesday. Lum Chang Creations (LCC) : It is expected to report a 'significant improvement' in its profit before tax for its full year ended Jun 30, 2025, according to its profit guidance released on Tuesday. This is due to higher revenue from the improved progress of ongoing projects and the start of new projects undertaken in financial year 2025, compared with FY2024. LCC is expected to report its earnings on or before Aug 29. The counter closed on Tuesday S$0.03 or 7.2 per cent higher at S$0.445.

High-speed rail link proposal gets yet another airing
High-speed rail link proposal gets yet another airing

Business Times

time6 hours ago

  • Business Times

High-speed rail link proposal gets yet another airing

THE proposal for a high-speed rail (HSR) link between Singapore and Kuala Lumpur seems to be one of those ideas that refuse to die, despite all that has happened over the years. To go back a bit, a KL-Singapore HSR link was first mooted in the 1990s, with an estimated cost of about RM5 billion (S$1.5 billion today). It took more than 20 years for the project to be seriously considered, and by 2013 the estimated cost had ballooned to RM30 billion. The 350 km-long rail line, with purported train speeds of up to 350 kmh, finally led to a binding agreement with Singapore in December 2016. The aim was to have the line operational by 2026. The outbreak of Covid-19 and the election of a different coalition led to multiple postponements at Malaysia's request. Eventually, the agreement was abrogated in December 2020. Malaysia paid about S$102 million in compensation to Singapore for breaking the deal. Nevertheless, some important Malaysians want to revive the project and recent news reports say that three companies – YTL Corp, Berjaya Rail and China Railway Construction Corporation – have submitted detailed plans. Malaysia's Transport Minister Anthony Loke has ruled out any chance of government finance several times in the past. Even so, he said last month that the Anwar Ibrahim administration would make a final decision on the submissions by the end of this year. The timing of that decision seems elastic. Previously, it was reported that the deadline was the end of 2024. It is easy to understand the hesitation. Every HSR project in the world has been done with government financial backing. More importantly, few are operationally profitable, never mind the initial capital outlay. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up There is considerable Malaysian opposition to the prospect of a HSR for this very reason. Current estimates put the final figure of such an undertaking well north of RM80 billion. One Malaysian political wit sardonically suggested that it would be cheaper to give away free tickets for flights between the two cities than to borrow for the project. Democratic Action Party member Tony Pua based his calculations on information released by aviation data company OAG, which found that flights from Kuala Lumpur International Airport to Changi Airport were the busiest international route for 2023, at 4.9 million seats. Assuming each seat costs RM400, Pua said, it would add up to RM2 billion per year. At an interest rate of 5 per cent for an RM80 billion loan, the HSR project would cost the government RM4 billion in interest payments alone every year. 'So, the simple conclusion is, at RM4 billion interest cost for (the) HSR, the government might as well just pay for all flights between KL and Singapore and still save RM2 billion,' Pua said. Another critic argued that it would take 70 years for the proposed HSR to become financially viable, and pointed to European Union studies that had found financial justifications for such projects to be consistently overrated. Even in China, with its 48,000 km HSR network, only a handful of routes show operating profits. The rest run at a loss. It has also been argued that taxpayers from every other state in the Malaysian federation would have to foot the bill, while gains would be limited to those in the south of the peninsula. The Anwar government has good reason to fear being left holding the financial bag, if things go wrong. Clearly, then, it may serve its political interests to keep the idea of an HSR alive, but don't expect anything more.

EU's Kallas says new Russia sanctions package to be ready in September
EU's Kallas says new Russia sanctions package to be ready in September

Straits Times

time11 hours ago

  • Straits Times

EU's Kallas says new Russia sanctions package to be ready in September

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ms Kaja Kallas said the EU would continue targeting Russia's war economy over its invasion of Ukraine. BRUSSELS - European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Aug 20 the EU would continue targeting Russia's war economy and that the next sanctions package against Moscow should be ready by September. She was speaking after a virtual European Council summit about the war in Ukraine, a day after an extraordinary summit of Ukrainian and several EU leaders with US President Donald Trump in Washington. Ms Kallas said 'unity among EU leaders in today's virtual summit was palpable' and that she had placed the topics of Ukraine security and Russia sanctions at the top of the agenda for talks next week among EU foreign and defence ministers. '(Russian President Vladimir) Putin cannot be trusted to honour any promise or commitment. Therefore, security guarantees must be strong and credible enough to deter Russia from re-grouping and re-attacking,' she said in a post on X. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store