'I don't see Russia being serious about negotiations': Estonia's permanent secretary general of ministry of defence Kaimo Kuusk
Trump and Putin are slated to meet in Alaska on Aug 15 to try and facilitate a ceasefire in the Ukraine war. However, many in Ukraine and Europe remain sceptical that the Alaksa talks will yield anything substantial since neither Zelenskyy nor European representatives are going to be present.
Estonia, a frontline state in the Baltics, has stakes in this war.
Kaimo Kuusk
, Estonia's permanent secretary general of ministry of defence, who was also Estonia's ambassador to Ukraine, spoke to
Rudroneel Ghosh
during a visit to Tallinn in May, about the trajectory of the war, Russia's gameplan and Nato's startegy for the future:
Do you think a ceasefire could be achieved in Ukraine in the near future?
Not on equal terms because Russia is not negotiation on goodwill. From our own Estonian experience we know that Russia is a chronic liar.
It just doesn't stick to international treaties. From our independence 100 years ago, they started to violate the treaty almost immediately. In this case as well, I was in Ukraine as ambassador so I saw the Minsk agreements, the Normandy format of negotiations, and how Russia played with the process and did not respect any of the truce agreements.
So I don't see Russia being serious in negotiations. The only way to get fair peace for Ukraine is through additional pressure on Russia.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Become Fluent in Any Language
Talkpal AI
Sign Up
Undo
Only when Russia understands that time is not on their side and the cost of aggression will rise on the frontline through military aid for Ukraine – which Estonia is giving – and through sanctions and economic pressure on Moscow, will there be any results.
What do you make of drones in this war?
The role of drones in modern warfare is definitely one of the key lessons of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine. Different drone types have different tasks, so they have brought almost limitless combinations for their use on the battlefield.
Staying ahead of developments is now more important than ever.
'I don't see Russia being serious in negotiations. The only way to get fair peace for Ukraine is through additional pressure on Russia'
.
Do you have any evidence that Russia is planning a physical attack against Estonia in the near future?
We in Estonia through our intelligence work have been able to obtain information about Russia's military plans – separate from defence plans – against the West. They have actually had those plans for years, from the 1990s. This is nothing new for us. We know what we should be prepared for. We know what to expect. But if you are asking whether we have an imminent, clear and present danger, then I am saying no.
Because we are well prepared.
We are in Nato. And Russian manpower and military equipment are being destroyed on the Ukrainian front because Ukrainians are defending their own country ferociously. But as I mentioned, if Russia gets peace on their terms, the situation beyond our border can start to change rather rapidly.
It seems that Russia is testing Nato's resolve to invoke Article 5 or even Article 4 through tactics below a certain threshold across the region. Has Nato responded to these sufficiently?
Outside Ukraine, we have reacted absolutely well. Measures for vessels in the Baltic Sea, to protect undersea infra, our intel services are working well together to catch and thwart saboteurs targeting assets on Western soil.
How to measure how successful we have been? Well, we are living in peace.
With fears lingering that Trump might completely pull US support for Ukraine, do you think European members of Nato can step up and fill that gap?
US support for Ukraine has been absolutely important throughout the years of Russian aggression. I think US has seen, as we all, that this aggression has connections to other regions as well. Russia is supported by China, and we are already in Asia with that connection. So, if we want to face the threats in the Indo-Pacific region, then we have to deal with this aggression in Ukraine as well.
You can't just ignore and leave saying now I am going to fire fight the fire at the other side of the house although the fire is still burning on this side of the building.
So, it's logical that we continue to support Ukraine collectively.
Which also makes it clear that Europe needs to do more. To not only invest in our own defence but also help Ukraine more. If we are talking about possible security guarantees – again, I would continue to say never trust Russia – for peace then Kyiv's allies and friends from different regions need to do more. Estonia is ready to allocate also military units, which will be relevant to our compact size. We will be inside those forces because what is happening in Ukraine is important for security in our region
Russia and China seem to have formed an unbreakable compact. What is Europe's gameplan for Beijing?
Well, it's not unbreakable. I sometimes compare it to interests of criminal activists. When their interests are matching, then they cooperate. When one of the group members feels that the leader is not suitable anymore, a struggle can start among them. I think we in Europe have become more realistic about looking on China and that will also shape our foreign policy in the future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump reverses position on need for ceasefire before potential peace deal for ending Ukraine war
Day after meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, United States President Donald Trump has shifted his position, now hinting towards an overall peace agreement as the next step for ending the war. The US President has now reversed course, suggesting that the countries should straightaway work towards a peace deal.(AP) Trump had earlier made it clear that a ceasefire should take place before a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. However, the US President has now reversed course, suggesting that the countries should straightaway work towards a peace deal for ending the the 3 ½ year war, the Associated Press reported. The US President seemed to have abandoned a ceasefire as a requirement for further negotiations, a line which aligns with Russian President Putin. Putin has on several occasions said that Moscow was not seeking a temporary truce but a long-term settlement. "…It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up, Trump said in a post on Truth Social after speaking to Zelensky and European leaders. Trump, in his talks with European allies following his summit with Putin, said that the Russian President had asserted that he wants the key Donetsk and Luhansk regions which make up the Donbas. Zelensky had earlier refused to giving the territory of Donbas. However, Putin seemed open to halting the stalemate in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, with a freeze along the front lines, AP reported, quoting European officials familiar with the calls, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Following the meeting with Putin, Trump said in the press conference alongside the Russian President that he would 'call up NATO', European officials and hold a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The meeting between Trump and Zelensky is scheduled at the White House for Monday. While the other details about the potential next steps remain unclear, Trump's reversal on the ceasefire aspect has been evident.
The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump's Tariff Threat Tests India-US Relations
Published : Aug 16, 2025 19:25 IST - 6 MINS READ There is a distinct souring of sentiment in the narrative across India's 24-hour news channels. A news anchor opens her piece with a sarcastic diatribe on how, if only Trump were president of the USA in the past, so much could have been avoided through history; the First World War, the Second World War, all of it. The screen behind her displays an image of the US president with the text 'Earth is spinning better, thank Trump!'. The title of this video op-ed piece is 'Why Trump Should Never Win the Nobel Peace Prize'. It is a marked departure from the rapturous reception a second Trump term got only nine months back. A statement released then by India's External Affairs Ministry described how the two leaders had reaffirmed their commitment to a mutually beneficial and trusted partnership and agreed to remain in touch and meet soon. Social media and news coverage were awash with praise both for this sweeping victory and the warm and cordial relations between Mr Trump and Mr Modi. President Trump's decision and threat to now impose a 50 per cent tariff by the end of August because of India's purchase of Russian oil has escalated a stand-off over trade and led to a spiral of news flow; the US will regret treating India this way, warns one piece; US-India relations are at their worst, bemoans another. The social media clarion has sounded—it is time to ditch American products and companies like McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Amazon; although how exactly that will be done remains unclear. All this unfolding while a fresh deadline to this hefty tariff clocks down. So much has changed in nine months. India has for now been steely in its response; but both choices present hard outcomes. Global commodity data shows India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, which is about 37 per cent of its total imports. Since 2023, India has been the biggest market for Russian crude, and between the two largest buyers of Russian crude, India and China, it is India that is clearly more dependent. According to data and analytics company Kpler, India imported 89 million tonnes (seaborne crude) last year, which was more than China's import. Switching crude oil varieties and buyers is neither going to be easy nor practical for India's refineries, aside from the fact that it also threatens to ratchet up prices. Also Read | America's melting ice cube and other tariff fairy tales On the flip side, the collateral damage of a 50 per cent tariff slap will be large. There are a number of export-oriented industries that are already feeling jittery; textiles, for one, the gems and jewellery sector, another, where the US makes up 30 per cent of its exports. Many export-oriented industries are in fact also labour-intensive industries, and a hit to their fortunes will have a massive knock-on effect on jobs. The list of vulnerable companies includes the big gun, Reliance Industries, which signed a 10-year contract to buy nearly 5,00,000 barrels a day of crude from Russia's state-owned Rosneft, making it the biggest-ever energy agreement between the two nations. Reliance has been exporting its refined products to both Europe and North America. A breakdown in ties with Western countries will mean significant changes in its business and perhaps its profitability in the months to come. India's domestic advantage with a large consumer market has been pointed to, but whichever way you cut it, a tariff hike of this quantum will see economic damage and dented investor sentiment for the country. There are counter-arguments to the possibility of a grim reset in Indo-US ties. One, that this will be yet another flip-flop by the US President, where a resolution of some sort will be cobbled together before the end of August, which is the deadline set by him. Two, that the two countries are now intertwined across too human and financial capital strands; Indian tech firms have long been present in America's industry through its services and its engineers. Money now flows both ways through venture capital and significant equity market exposure. Ripping all that apart will take more than tariff sabre-rattling. All or some of this may prove to be true. But there are also two clear questions here that need to be reckoned with. India was used to being the 'pick me' candidate when it came to China, where there was tactical and strategic advantage in building strong relations with India to offset China's growing strength in the region. Many nations, the US included, are having a rethink about that approach. China is no longer taboo, and India is no longer the counterfoil to China's regional dominance. Worse yet is the distinct turn in relations between the US and India's other neighbour, Pakistan. What started with a rather embarrassing display of cornering credit, President Trump claimed he was the one to put a stop to an imminent war between India and Pakistan—a claim that has been consistently repeated while speaking on the subject. While Indian diplomatic channels frantically tried to belie that take, Pakistan not only concurred with the US President's statement, it went on to nominate Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Relations between the US and Pakistan have been on the upswing since then, ranging from private lunches with Pakistan's top military brass and talks about potentially boosting trade and commercial ties. It has left the Indian government with egg on its face and a disgruntled domestic mood. India and Pakistan, to America's mind are now firmly re-hyphenated. Also Read | Modi's foreign policy in shreds as non-alignment becomes multi-alignment How did it all turn sour so quickly when the singular narrative so far has been Prime Minister Modi's outstanding personal equation with Trump—from walking out hand in hand to address a rally in Houston, Texas a few years ago, to what is now being termed the lowest point in Indo-US ties in many decades; the 'great friendship' has not yielded any joy on economic ties. Perhaps the first lesson then is when policies—foreign, national, or economic—are built around personalities rather than nations, egos tend to get in the way. Especially when there is a domestic fan base that has been cheering the 'strongman' approach to cater to. There is also a view that this could be the moment India dives into structural reforms. In other words, this will be the catalyst for the great reset. As we wait on that outcome to emerge, it gives rise to the second question: Was that not the plan with the 'Make in India' campaign launched a decade ago? What has gone so sorely wrong ten years into its launch, where is the performance audit on the promised nation-building initiatives, the manufacturing thrust, more jobs for more people? This present round of tariff threats and ultimatums could go in any direction. Frankly, it does not even matter. The economic ground is shifting beneath the feet of both leaders. Time to see who has feet of clay. Mitali Mukherjee is the Director of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. She is a political economy journalist with more than two decades of experience in TV, print and digital journalism. Mitali has co-founded two start-ups that focussed on civil society and financial literacy and her key areas of interest are gender and climate change.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
No fresh hike in tariff over oil, Donald Trump hints
US President Donald Trump appeared to rule out increased tariffs on China for purchasing Russian oil following his summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, while also suggesting existing penalties on India may not escalate further, providing relief for countries caught in Washington's pressure campaign against Moscow. US President Donald Trump shakes hand with Russian President Vladimir Putin during their meet at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. (REUTERS) Trump indicated that secondary sanctions on major oil buyers were no longer under immediate consideration after his three-hour meeting with the Russian president on Friday. 'Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that,' Trump said of tariffs on China and more severe economic punishment for Russia for continuing the war in Ukraine. 'Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well,' Trump added. The comments came despite the summit failing to produce a deal to end the Ukraine war, which has raged since Russia's invasion in February 2022. Prior to the meeting, Trump said 'he (Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the if I did what's called a secondary sanction, or a secondary tariff, it would be very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I'll do it. Maybe I won't have to do it,' offering hints that could be construed positively in New Delhi. Trump's statement came amid talk that had the Alaska Summit not gone well, India could be hit with a harsher levy. 'We've put secondary tariffs on Indians for buying Russian oil. And I could see, if things don't go well, then sanctions or secondary tariffs could go up,' US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said in a television interview on Wednesday. The US has already imposed tariffs totalling 50% on India, including a 25% penalty for Russian oil purchases that will take effect on August 27, making India one of the most heavily penalised US trading partners. Trump's more conciliatory tone followed his earlier revelation that the India tariffs were designed to pressure Russia by cutting off oil revenue, with the president claiming Moscow 'called and wanted to meet' after losing its second-largest energy customer. India welcomed the Alaska summit between the Russian and American leaders, expressing support for dialogue-based solutions to the Ukraine conflict. 'India welcomes the summit meeting in Alaska between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Their leadership in the pursuit of peace is highly commendable,' the Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement released after the summit. 'India appreciates the progress made at the summit. The way forward can only be through dialogue and diplomacy. The world wants to see an early end to the conflict in Ukraine,' it added. Russia currently accounts for more than a third of India's energy purchases, up from less than 1% in 2022 following Western sanctions over the Ukraine invasion. China remains Russia's largest oil customer. India has defended its energy purchases as necessary for economic security, calling US targeting 'unjustified and unreasonable' whilst arguing that Western countries maintain their own trade relationships with Russia. Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke with both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin this month, offering Indian diplomatic support to aid the peace process in his call with the former. Modi has consistently called for dialogue and diplomacy since the invasion began, making separate visits to Russia and Ukraine last year whilst urging both leaders to return to negotiations. Trump announced following the summit that he would meet Zelensky in Washington on Monday, potentially followed by a trilateral meeting with Putin, as diplomatic efforts to end the conflict continue.
