Trump Slaps 104% Total Tariffs on China, Sparking Fresh Clash
Rabat – US President Donald Trump has sparked a new round of controversy and chaos to the global economy after he imposed a fresh wave of tariffs against China and dozens of partners.
As part of his larger 'Liberation Day' policies to put tariffs on countries, Trump has officially announced he is going through with his threat to tack on a 50% duty on China, raising the total tariff to 104%.
Trump announced on Tuesday at the Republican National Congressional Committee that 104% duties on imports from China will take place shortly after midnight.
At the gathering, Trump openly criticized the former administration's economic policies under former President Joe Biden. As a part of his 2024 campaign messaging, the current US president often remarked that the US has not been hard enough on other countries when it comes to global trade policies.
'Now it's our turn to do the ripping,' he said at the dinner, accusing China of 'ripping off' the US 'right and left.'
He also accused China of manipulating its currency.
'You got to hand it to them. They're manipulating their currency today as an offset against the tariffs,' he claimed.
He further slammed Biden for offering a grant of $6.6 billion to manufacturing giant TSMC, saying: 'If you don't build your plant here, you're going to pay a big tax.'
Biden granted TSMC the grant through the 2022 Chips and Sciences Act, seeking to help the company bring some of its most advanced manufacturing to the US.
Global response
China reacted to US threats and duty announcement, saying that it would take resolute and forceful measures to protect itself.
Yesterday, China's Commerce Ministry said it 'firmly opposes' the additional 50% tariffs on its imports, calling it 'a mistake upon a mistake.'
Following Trump's decision, economic experts, businesses as well as banking organizations around the world responded, pledging a thorough assessment to analyze the effect Trump's tariffs will have on the economy.
Bank of Japan governor Kazuo Ueda told his country's parliament that the bank will be on the watch to monitor the backlash of Trump's move on the Japanese economy.
'Domestic and overseas economic uncertainties have heightened due to US auto and reciprocal tariffs,' he said in a public statement.
The new tariffs will further exacerbate concerns as the world's economy has been shaken by broader baseline 10% tariffs that Trump slapped on many countries over the weekend.
Last week, Trump announced he would be implementing a unilateral 10% tariff on all imports from various nations, with higher levies on goods from different key partners.
The decision prompted remarkable market sell-offs across the world.
'European markets slumped again in early trading on Wednesday morning, as the major indices fell in the UK, Germany, France, and Spain,' the Guardian wrote, noting that the new falls are causing a tumultuous day on Asian markets.
European countries are expected to approve the EU's countermeasures against Trump's tariffs, and Canada is also following suit in pushing back.
Morocco also received the baseline 10% tariff, notably lower than the 30% the US imposed on Algeria and the 28% on Tunisia.
The stock market and global economy is reeling from these new tariffs. S&P 500, a stock market index that tracks the stock performance of 500 leading companies listed on the stock exchanges in the US, reportedly suffered its largest loss since the benchmark's creation in the 1950s.
'It is now nearing a bear market, defined as 20% below its most recent high,' Reuters reported, noting that US treasuries are also affected by the market turmoil. Tags: ChinaEuropean Union
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
20 hours ago
- Morocco World
LA Protests: Tensions Rise Between California Governor and Trump
Rabat — As the protests in Los Angeles stretch into their fifth day, tensions between California's Governor Gavin Newsom and US President Donald Trump have escalated dramatically. The unrest, initially sparked by federal agents targeting the migrant community, has now become a focal point for a fierce political confrontation. Most protests have remained largely peaceful, with many demonstrators calling for justice and reform. However, the situation has become more volatile following the federal government's decision to deploy thousands of troops to LA. Trump initially sent 2,000 National Guardsmen, but has since increased this number by an additional 2,000 troops and activated 700 Marines, further bypassing state authority and raising concerns about militarization and the suppression of civil dissent. A controversial deployment of troops Governor Gavin Newsom condemned this escalation, accusing Trump of 'trying to invoke chaos by sending 4,000 soldiers onto American soil'— inadvertently voicing out a reality that many in the global south have faced under American imperialism under the emblem of democracy. 'US Marines serve a valuable purpose for this country—defending democracy. They are not political pawns,' Newsom stated. 'The Secretary of Defense is illegally deploying them onto American streets so Trump can have a talking point at his parade this weekend,' he said, referencing the upcoming parade scheduled in Washington, DC, on June 14, to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the US military. Unsurprisingly, this date coincides with Trump's 79th birthday—conveniently aligning with his ego and desire for a grand spectacle. The state is now suing Trump for sending in troops without the governor's permission as it is highly unusual for the American military to have any domestic law enforcement role without a direct request from the governor. In a provocative move, Trump told reporters outside the White House that he would arrest Governor Newsom if he could. 'I would do it if I were Tom Homan,' Trump said, referring to the acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). 'I think it's great,' Trump added, suggesting he supports the idea of Newsom's arrest. In response, Governor Newsom took to X to condemn the threats, saying, 'This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or Republican—this is a line we cannot cross as a nation. This is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' When asked about the possibility of being arrested, Newsom remarked during an interview with Pod Save America, that he has been seriously considering this possibility which 'says everything you need to know about who's in the White House right now.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass echoed concerns about the federal escalation. Speaking to CNN, she argued that the unrest was a direct response to aggressive ICE raids and could have been avoided otherwise. 'This has been a recipe for pandemonium,' she said. Bass emphasized that most protests have been peaceful, only turning unruly after Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard. She insisted that if things had gotten out of control, it was the responsibility of the state—and not the federal government—to request troop deployment. 'We were told he was going to target violent criminals, but what he's really doing is sending troops to a city with a significant immigrant population and long-standing advocacy for immigrant rights,' she said, questioning the rationale behind ICE raids in Los Angeles. 'This makes no sense—particularly when they're happening at places like Home Depot, where people are simply trying to work.' Unsurprisingly, Trump did not recognize the ICE raids, police brutality and troop deployment as underlying causes for the escalating unrest. Instead, he dismissed the protesters as 'professional agitators' and insurrectionists who should be in jail– completely avoiding any acknowledgement of responsibility. Legitimate protests Despite the heightened unrest, Mayor Bass maintains that the National Guard is unnecessary at this stage and that the vandalism and violence are confined to a few streets downtown. She stressed that anyone committing crimes will be detained and that violence is not a legitimate way to promote a cause. Newsom has also urged protesters to remain peaceful, warning that those who take advantage of the chaos will be held accountable. 'If you're protesting peacefully. Stay calm. Look out for another.' However, many activists and observers have contested the idea of a 'peaceful protest,' arguing that protests are inherently disruptive and aimed at challenging the status quo. The LAPD has employed rubber bullets and flash-bangs—stun grenades that produce a bright flash and loud noise—to disperse crowds, claiming these measures are responses to protesters throwing objects at officers. However, footage from 9News showing a journalist being hit by a rubber bullet—despite being clearly identifiable as press and not near the protesting crowds–might suggest otherwise. Often likened to the Gestapo—the secret police agency of Nazi Germany– the US police have deep roots in the country's history of racial discrimination and systemic oppression, with recent incidents highlighting ongoing issues of excessive force against marginalized communities. As tensions escalate around the US, many around the world view this within the broader context of the country's history of violence both domestically and abroad–a natural outcome of the climate of violence and hatred it has fostered.
Morocco World
a day ago
- Morocco World
Morocco Launches 2025 Marhaba Operation to Welcome Moroccans Abroad
Rabat – Morocco has officially launched the 2025 edition of Operation Marhaba, a long-running campaign to welcome and help Moroccans living abroad on their summer return home. The operation is an annual initiative by the Mohammed V Foundation for Solidarity to welcome the Moroccan diaspora. This year's 25th edition kicked off on June 10, and it's bigger than ever with 26 welcome sites across Morocco and key European countries. The foundation, working with partners, has opened two new sites at Laayoune and Dakhla airports. This means 20 centers are now operational in Morocco's main ports and airports, helping travelers with arrivals and departures. Plus, there are special 'receiving rooms' at rest stops and border crossings like Bab Sebta and Mellil to make peak travel times smoother. Marhaba also has a strong presence in six European ports: Genoa (Italy), Sète and Marseille (France), and Motril, Almería, and Algeciras (Spain). These ports are key entry points for many Moroccans living abroad, and support teams are on hand to offer guidance and assistance even before travelers reach Morocco. Operation Marhaba also provides comprehensive support through a large team of over 1,200 people. This includes social workers, physicians, paramedics, foundation personnel, and volunteers who are available from June 10 to September 15. The entire operation is overseen by a central coordination office in Rabat. This office monitors activities at all reception points, manages resources, and ensures quick responses to any issues. It also runs a 24/7 dedicated helpline for travelers, accessible from Morocco and abroad via specific phone numbers for various countries. Operation Marhaba remains more than a logistical endeavor. It mirrors Morocco's ongoing relationship with its diaspora, a gesture of hospitality and solidarity rooted in shared identity and care. Speaking before the House of Councilors last week, Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita outlined this year's key arrangements. The maritime component will include 29 vessels operated by seven shipping companies across 12 routes linking ports in Italy, France, and Spain. Around MAD 28 million ($2.8 million) has been dedicated to enhancing reception infrastructure at Tanger-Med port. This year's operation expects an exceptional flow of roughly 3.5 million travelers, primarily Moroccans living in Europe, marking a 4% rise compared to previous years. Tags: Marhaba 2025Morocco diasporaoperation marhabaOperation Marhaba 2025
Morocco World
2 days ago
- Morocco World
Trump Deploys Troops as ICE Raids Spark Widespread Protests
Rabat– Protests erupted across Los Angeles this weekend after a series of aggressive immigration raids by federal agents. US President Donald Trump escalated the federal response by deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to the city in an effort to quell what he described as 'insurrectionist' unrest. 'Looking really bad in LA. BRING IN THE TROOPS,' said Trump. The protests began following sweeping Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids at multiple worksites, which immigrant rights groups and labor unions condemned as violent and fear-driven. Among those arrested was David Huerta, president of Service Employees International Union (SEIU) California, who was reportedly observing a raid peacefully when he was violently detained. Union leaders called the arrests part of a deliberate campaign to intimidate immigrant communities. 'As a union, we will always stand with our immigrant brothers, sisters, and siblings. We will not be intimidated into silence. We will keep showing up. We will keep fighting back,' said SEIU, emphasizing the direct link between workers and immigrants' rights. Clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement escalated rapidly across Los Angeles. Federal agents fired tear gas and flash-bangs outside a federal building, while protesters gathered at multiple locations, including a Home Depot in southeast LA Police reported property damage and began making arrests. Authorities alleged that some protesters looted stores, set up barricades, and attacked officers on the 101 Freeway–a major highway that cuts through Los Angeles– with fireworks and rocks. In response, the LAPD authorized the use of 'less lethal munitions,' as National Guard troops were deployed to join federal agencies on the ground. In the midst of police escalation, an Australian journalist was also injured. Lauren Tomasi, reporting live for Nine News, was shot with a rubber bullet despite being clearly identifiable as press and not being involved in the protests. Trump vs California The deployment marks the first time in decades that a US president has unilaterally sent National Guard troops into a state without its request or consent—raising serious concerns over Trump's continued disregard of the law and constitutional boundaries. Typically, such deployments require coordination with state governors or are carried out under the Insurrection Act, which was not invoked in this case. Instead, Trump used 'Title 10' of the US Code to federalize the Guard, placing them under direct presidential command. Legal scholars argue this move tests the limits of executive power and potentially violates the 10th Amendment, which protects state sovereignty. Without the legal cover of the Insurrection Act, the troops are restricted from engaging in law enforcement, and their presence has been criticized as an unlawful escalation rather than a legitimate response. California Governor Gavin Newsom fiercely condemned President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty' and demanding their immediate withdrawal. In an official letter to the Department of Defense, Newsom argued the order was unlawful, noting it bypassed the governor's authority in violation of federal law: 'This directive did not issue 'through the governor of the state' as required by section 12406.' Newsom stressed that local law enforcement was adequately handling the situation and warned that Trump's intervention was 'inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed.' Newsom formally requested the federal government rescind the order and return control of the Guard to the state, potentially laying the ground for a legal challenge. Legal experts raised concerns about the deployment. Trump did not invoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow broader military authority. Instead, he used Title 10 to place the Guard under federal control—an approach that typically requires coordination with state governors- actions in line with Trump's continued disregard of legal and constitutional boundaries. Although federal officials say the troops are only protecting immigration officers and property, civil rights advocates argue the military presence is inflaming an already volatile situation. Protests have now stretched into a fourth day, fueled by outrage over the raids, the arrests, and the use of military force in a major American city. Raids and federal quotas White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem met last month with ICE leadership and demanded the agency increase arrests to 3,000 per day—reportedly threatening job loss for officials who didn't comply. The result has been a dramatic escalation in enforcement nationwide, including the detention of over 2,200 individuals in a single day in early June. Many of those arrested had been enrolled in ICE's Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program—a monitoring system meant to provide a more humane and cost-effective alternative to incarceration while immigration proceedings are pending. Under the new enforcement orders, even asylum seekers who are following all the rules are being detained. In Los Angeles, families with pending cases were arrested after showing up for routine ICE check-ins—some, including children, were held for hours without food or water. Similar arrests have taken place in courtrooms across the country, even in cases where judges had dismissed deportation. Home to over ten million immigrants, California's resistance to the federal deployment also stems from its long-standing identity as a 'sanctuary state'. Under the California Values Act, local and state law enforcement are prohibited from using their resources to assist federal immigration agencies in most cases. This law limits cooperation with ICE—such as sharing information about detainees or honoring federal immigration detainers—unless an individual has been convicted of certain serious crimes. The aim is to protect undocumented residents from deportation over minor offenses and to foster trust between immigrant communities and local authorities— setting it apart from the federal government's punitive immigration approach.
