Legislators kill two taxes on carbon capture
By Nolan McKendry | The Center Square
Louisiana lawmakers have rejected two separate proposals that would have imposed new taxes on carbon capture and sequestration operators, stalling efforts to generate local revenue from the growing industry.
Rep. Shane Mack's House Bill 44, which proposed a per-ton injection tax on carbon dioxide stored underground, failed in committee last week in a 4-10 vote. The Livingston Parish Republican originally proposed a $3-per-metric-ton tax but amended it down to $1 in response to industry concerns.
'There are several industrial representatives that are comfortable with a $1 tax,' Mack said during testimony.
Under the bill, revenue from the tax would have been distributed to parishes where carbon is stored, based on the geographic footprint of each facility. The Louisiana Department of Revenue would have collected the tax, and the Department of Energy and Natural Resources would certify injection volumes.
The bill drew pushback from the oil and gas industry. Tommy Faucheux, president of the Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association, warned that imposing a tax too early in the industry's development could chill investment and drive CCS projects to other states.
A second measure, House Bill 646 by Rep. Robby Carter, D-St. Helena, proposed a 30% excise tax on the gross proceeds of geologic carbon storage. Carter voluntarily deferred the bill until next year, but not before voicing his broader concerns about CCS.
'I think everyone on the floor knows I'm against carbon sequestration,' Carter said. 'I see us in 50 or 60 years, St. Helena being like the problems with the coast — having a big problem with these wells, with the carbon bubbling up, or even having lakes form where they've fallen in, and having no money because we didn't get any money to take care of it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US senators call for Meta probe after Reuters report on its AI policies
By Jody Godoy (Reuters) -Two Republican U.S. senators called for a congressional investigation into Meta Platforms on Thursday after Reuters exclusively reported on an internal policy document that permitted the company's chatbots to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual.' Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children. "So, only after Meta got CAUGHT did it retract portions of its company doc," Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, said in a post on social media site X. "This is grounds for an immediate congressional investigation," Hawley said. A spokesperson for Senator Marsha Blackburn, a Republican from Tennessee, said she supports an investigation into the social media company. Blackburn also added that the report illustrates the need to pass reforms to better protect children online, such as the Kids Online Safety Act, a bill she co-sponsored which the Senate passed last year but which failed in the U.S. House of Representatives. 'When it comes to protecting precious children online, Meta has failed miserably by every possible measure. Even worse, the company has turned a blind eye to the devastating consequences of how its platforms are designed," Blackburn said. KOSA would make explicit a "duty of care" that social media companies have when it comes to minors using their products, focusing on design of the platforms and regulation of the companies. The standards described in the Meta document don't necessarily reflect 'ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found. In one example, the document notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.' Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, called the policies "deeply disturbing and wrong," adding that Section 230, a law that shields internet companies from liability for the content posted to their platforms, should not protect companies' generative AI chatbots. "Meta and Zuckerberg should be held fully responsible for any harm these bots cause,' he said. Sign in to access your portfolio
Boston Globe
15 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
California moving forward with partisan redistricting effort to counter Texas' move
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The Democrats' proposed maps still haven't been released. That's expected on Friday. Then, lawmakers plan to quickly approve them next week. Democrats hold supermajorities in both chambers. Advertisement Newsom, who is seen as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, urged Trump in a letter earlier this week to abandon his scheme, telling the president he is 'playing with fire' and 'risking the destabilization of our democracy.' The California map would only take effect if Texas and other states move forward with their own redistricting efforts, and they would remain through the 2030 elections. After that, Democrats say they would return mapmaking power to an independent redistricting commission approved by voters more than a decade ago. Advertisement There are 435 seats in the U.S. House and Republicans currently hold an 219-212 majority, with four vacancies. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census is conducted. Many states give legislators the power to draw maps but some, like California, rely on an independent commission that is supposed to be nonpartisan. The Thursday announcement marks the first time any state beyond Texas is officially wading into the mid-decade redistricting fight, kicking off a national standoff that could continue spilling into other states. California Democrats face more complex legal and logistical hurdles than Republicans do in Texas. It's not clear how voters would respond to the mid-decade effort after they voted to give the power of drawing congressional maps to an independent commission in 2010. In Texas, that power lies with the Republican-controlled Legislature. Some already said they would sue to block the effort, and influential voices including former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may campaign against it. 'Gavin Newsom's latest stunt has nothing to do with Californians and everything to do with consolidating radical Democrat power, silencing California voters, and propping up his pathetic 2028 presidential pipe dream,' National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said in a statement. 'Newsom's made it clear: he'll shred California's Constitution and trample over democracy - running a cynical, self-serving playbook where Californians are an afterthought and power is the only priority.' California Democrats already hold 43 of the state's 52 House seats, and the state has some of the most competitive House seats. Advertisement Elsewhere, leaders from red Florida to blue New York are threatening to write their own new maps, bucking the standard once-a-decade redistricting process that happens after the census. But none have moved as far as Texas and, soon, California, in advancing new maps. Missouri lawmakers are waiting for Gov. Mike Kehoe to call a special session to draw more favorable Republican maps, and a document obtained by The Associated Press shows the state Senate has received a $46,000 invoice to activate six redistricting software licenses and provide training for up to 10 staff members.
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas Democrats open door to returning under ‘two critical conditions'
Texas House Democrats who fled the state to break quorum and stall a GOP redistricting plan announced on Thursday that they will return to Texas only once 'two critical conditions' are met. The conditions are the legislature's adjournment sine die on Friday, as well as the introduction of redistricting maps in California that would 'neutralize' the proposed Texas changes, according to a new statement from the House Democratic Caucus. Texas Democrats fled the state earlier this month in a bid to deprive the state Legislature of the numbers it needs to function, stalling the GOP-friendly redistricting proposal from moving through an ongoing special session. Gov. Greg Abbott (R) is expected to call another special session, after the state House and Senate signaled that both chambers will sine die on Friday if a quorum isn't reached. 'If there's no quorum Friday, Special Session #2 will start immediately after Sine Die. Same agenda, with potential to add more,' Abbott said in a statement Tuesday, referring to the chambers adjourning. He said the next session will have 'the exact same agenda,' with 'no reprieve for the derelict Democrats who fled the state.' Meanwhile, California is expected to move forward with a plan that would counter would-be GOP gains in Texas, where the current proposal would net five red House seats, with redistricting that favors Democrats in the Golden State. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) was hosting an 'Election Rigging Response Act' event on Thursday to solidify plans. The quorum-breaking Democratic legislators face hefty fines for their absence, as well as threats of arrest and removal from their seats. But, in the GOP-controlled state House, the redistricting proposal is expected to easily move through the chamber once Democrats return and it has the numbers it needs to function.
