‘Slippery slope': Low FHB deposits spark NINJA loan fears
Research by Great Southern Bank reveals government assistance and financial help from family are making it easier than ever for first-time home seekers to buy a home.
The bank found the average first homebuyer — a third of whom were aged 35 and over — had secured a home loan with a deposit of between 7.7 per cent and 8.9 per cent in the past 12 months.
In Queensland, the government has announced a new Boost to Buy scheme allowing those earning $150,000 or less the ability to buy a home valued up to $1m with just a 2 per cent deposit.
Independent housing researcher, Cameron Kusher of Kusher Consulting, said governments' involvement in the housing market by way of incentives risked pushing up prices further.
In a post on his LinkedIn account, Mr Kusher said:
'I get that we want more people in homes, but 2 per cent deposits for $1 million homes? I fear it is only a few years until governments here in Australia are supporting NINJA loans and 100 per cent LVR mortgages.
Superannuation vs. property returns: What's the winner?
'It seems like a slippery slope to me, one that both sides of politics continue to dabble in.
'Not to mention the more that the government is involved in housing, via underwriting LMI, the more incentive they have for higher prices and thus the less incentive for lower prices.'
Maria McQullian, a broker of 25 years and owner of Concinnate Financial Services, said the majority of first homebuyers were securing their properties with a 5 to 15 per cent deposit.
'The First Home Guarantee (FHBG), Family Home Guarantee (FHG), family guarantor and lenders' mortgage insurance (LMI) discounts are all beneficial in situations where it might take years to save a 20 per cent deposit and could mean missing out on the opportunity to buy at current prices,' she said.
'Lenders can waive your LMI if you apply for a home loan through the Australian government's Home Guarantee Scheme (HGS).
'It allows eligible home buyers to get on the property market with a deposit as little as 2-5 per cent and Housing Australia guarantees the rest.
'The re-elected Albanese government has also promised first home buyers there'll be no LMI to pay so long as you have a 5 per cent deposit and meet eligibility criteria.'
Great Southern Bank's 'No Place Like Home Report' also revealed 43 per cent would look at government schemes for financial help, while about a quarter would ask their family for help or buy with a friend or sibling.
Great Southern Bank chief customer officer Rolf Stromsoe said customers were finding a variety of pathways to home ownership.
'These pathways play a crucial role in getting Australians on the property ladder sooner, and with a smaller deposit,' he said.
'Aspirational buyers should strongly consider talking to a home loan expert or broker about their support options — they may need less than they think.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
17 minutes ago
- ABC News
Legal Practice Board of WA faces parliamentary inquiry amid 'detailed list' of complaints
The tables will be turned on WA's legal watchdog as it faces a parliamentary inquiry into longstanding concerns about its operations. The Legal Practice Board of WA (LPBWA) is the independent regulator for the state's legal profession, deciding who is admitted to practice law, issuing annual practising certificates and resolving complaints about lawyers' conduct. But the LPBWA itself has been the subject of complaints for years, according to the profession's peak body. "Concerns about the board's governance and processes have been building for some time," Law Society CEO Kate Wellington told the ABC. "We appreciate the nature of the board's regulatory role. The board's purpose is public protection. "The legal profession, too, serves a public purpose and it is important that its ability to fulfil that purpose is not hindered by barriers to effective practice." Late last month, the Law Society said it presented a report to the board "based on feedback shared with us in a profession-wide survey, which pointed to delays, service challenges and problematic regulatory processes". The chair of state parliament's Public Administration Committee, which will probe the LPBWA, said the survey contributed to the committee's decision to open its inquiry. "People were talking about the timeliness of responses, the manner of interactions, a lot of technical issues around applications," Labor MP Kate Doust said. "It's quite a detailed list. "We were quite surprised at the nature of the responses in the survey and certainly the number of responses to the survey." Ms Doust said given the role the Legal Practice Board played in WA's legal system, the committee felt it necessary to investigate those complaints. "You want to make sure that people have got appropriate access and timely responses to the matters they have to deal with, their engagement with the board," she said. "There just seemed to be a fairly high rate of dissatisfaction with their engagement." The board's annual report for 2023-24 showed it failed to meet many of its time-based key performance indicators — for example, while it aimed to resolve 80 per cent of "consumer matters" within 90 days, it did so in just 42 per cent of cases. It also aimed to resolve 80 per cent of the "highest complexity significant investigations" within a year, but only met that timeframe 40 per cent of the time. The only time-based targets that were on track related to internal reviews of decisions. The committee is now calling for submissions to inform its wide-ranging investigation into "the operation and effectiveness" of the board. "This inquiry will give those impacted an opportunity to voice their concerns without fear," Ms Wellington said. In a statement, the board's executive director welcomed the opportunity to engage with the committee. "These are matters we take seriously. "Over the past 12 months the board has commenced a number of internal reforms aimed at improving service delivery, streamlining regulatory approvals and enhancing stakeholder engagement. "The board remains committed to maintaining the trust of the public, the legal profession and government." In May the LPBWA was hacked, resulting in "limited corporate correspondence" being taken, which it said included "minimal contact information" and "bank account details for the board and a very small number of third parties who have been directly notified". It forced the organisation to take some of its systems online and process lawyers' practising certificates manually.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Live updates: Australian share market to open flat, Wall Street little changed, US Fed rate-cut expectations trimmed
The Australian share market is set for a soft open as Wall Street ends flat, while a hotter-than-expected US producer prices report dampens expectations of potential interest rate cuts from the Federal Reserve. A report from the US Labor Department showed producer prices increased the most in three years in July due to a surge in the costs of goods and services, suggesting a broad pick-up in inflation was imminent. We'll bring you the latest on what's happening on the markets throughout the day in our live blog. Disclaimer: this blog is not intended as investment advice.
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Floored': Aussies slam shady new cafe tactic
It seems like every day, a new cafe or restaurant gets called out online for their exorbitant price tags. But this time, a Reddit post has gone viral for the opposite reason – cafes that have no price tags at all. This sneaky trend, which appears to be on the rise, leaves people blindsided when they reach the counter and realise what they have to pay. 'Prices are not getting displayed on food in cafes and bakeries?' the post in the r/Perth forum began. 'I mean, it's been happening for a few years and I'm sure it's probably an Australia-wide thing. 'I've noticed it with cafes all over the city that they deliberately don't display the prices. You have to ask what that tiny falafel wrap in the window, or small piece of lasagne or meat pie is going for.' The poster believes that the businesses know people don't like asking for the price, and would rather just accept it when the total is shown on the EFTPOS machine. 'I hate it. It's scammy and frustrating,' they concluded. According to the ACCC, a retailer doesn't have to display prices, but the customer must be informed of the price of an item before purchase. Businesses can communicate their prices in various ways, including in-store signage, online notifications, ordering apps, or verbally. Despite the practice being legal, commenters agreed it was frustrating. One person even called the tactic 'predatory'. 'When the price is higher than you expected, but you're already at the till, it's harder to speak up,' they said. 'It's so annoying!' someone else added. 'I like to know pricing so I can decide accordingly!' Another argued that by the time you're swiping your card, it's already too late to change your mind, so called it 'shady' behaviour. Others recalled experiences of being caught out by this move in the past. 'I was charged $23 for coffee and a small cake. Floored. I paid it but never went back,' one revealed. Some also shared how they've handled this situation before. 'I once yelled out from the other side of the deli, 'How much is this?' about ten times for different items, just to make a point,' one person commented. The trend among Australian cafes not displaying prices appears to be linked to ongoing economic pressures, particularly inflation and rising costs. Many cafes have faced increased costs for supplies, rent, wages, and utilities – making them hesitant to fix menu prices out of fear of frequent adjustments. 'If inflation stays low and as people get used to the higher prices, I think we'll see prices slowly start to be displayed again,' one commenter theorised. As another simply wrote, 'No price, no purchase'.
