Suzanne Harrington: 'North Korea currently looks more enticing than the USA as a destination'
Yet being of sound mind, we politely decline. Thanks, but no thanks. They laugh, nodding, rolling their eyes. They get it.
Another friend, a freelancer with a UK passport, is offered a fat fee to fly to Atlanta for a weekend's work – he's a photographer - but also declines.
He could do with the money, but finds the prospect of entering the US, even without a fancy camera in his bag, so stressful that he decides to forfeit the cash and stay at home.
He says he keeps thinking of those German teenage backpackers, Maria Lepere and Charlotte Pohl, who were strip-searched, handcuffed, body scanned, and locked in a cell overnight in Honolulu for the crime of not having booked advance accommodation, before being deported.
Now Irish students are cancelling planned cultural exchange trips to the US too, rather than potentially allowing the current regime's border guards to scrutinise their social media feeds or access their phones. Imagine uniformed meatheads scrolling through your private messages, like perverts sniffing through your knicker drawer. No thanks.
This is not the kind of culture fit for any form of exchange. Meanwhile, Harvard is running free online courses to educate their own citizens on the basics of their own democratic structures. Offering ordinary Americans a kind of Democracy for Dummies as they sleepwalk over the cliff into dictatorship.
The current US administration's ongoing propensity for picking fights with Harvard, women's reproductive rights, Canada, people of colour, Taylor Swift, people dependent on US foreign aid, Chinese students, trans people, migrants, the EU, Bruce Springsteen, Vladimir Putin, free trade, Oprah, Beyonce, facts, free speech, science, medicine, climate safeguarding, and probably gravity itself – while endorsing genocide, white supremacy, illegal deportations, medical quackery and the pardoning of criminals – continues to give the rest of us whiplash.
The kind of whiplash you get when someone you'd long regarded as perhaps a slightly racist neighbour turns out to be a raging psychopath; culturally speaking, the abrupt speed of this about-turn is causing our necks to snap.
We have our list of travel no-go zones, places our consulates advise us to proceed towards with great caution, or to swerve completely. You wouldn't book a sunshine holiday in South Sudan, pursue sex tourism in Iran, shoplift in Saudi.
We know about the tricky places. We proceed accordingly, or don't proceed at all. The US was never, ever on that list; we were schooled to regard it as a place of adventure and opportunity, a place where you could make it, maybe even hit the jackpot.
Now, thanks to its rapid slide from jackpot to jackboot, visiting America has become about as enticing as a colposcopy. Why would you want to go there, to contribute even a single dollar to its continued existence?
As a destination, North Korea currently looks more enticing, for the simple reason that North Korea is not pretending to be anything other than what it is – a mad dictatorship overseen by a mad dictator. No offence Malibu, but right now I'd rather be a tourist in Pyongyang.
Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
25 minutes ago
- The Journal
Debunked: Asylum seekers are not exempt from income tax for a year after they are allowed to work
WHILE SOME ASYLUM seekers are entitled to work in Ireland while waiting for a decision on their application, it is not true that they enjoy a 'tax-free year' while doing so. The claim, which was shared in a recruitment video for an anti-immigration group, appears to be a misunderstanding of a plan to charge working asylum seekers that are in accommodation provided through the International Protection Accommodation Scheme (IPAS). The claim was shared in a video featuring a man wearing a 'MÉGA'cap, which stands for Make Éire Great Again — a slogan used by some Irish fans of Donald Trump. Shouting at a crowd, he talks about migrants who want to 'impose their sharia law' and says Irish people now slaves. 'Jim O'Callaghan, not three months ago, came out on RTÉ — I only watch it to see what I'm catching him out on — but he came out and said some IPAS residents are currently employed. They may be asked to contribute to society in a year's time. Where's my tax-free year? I have to pay through the nose for everything.' The post containing the speech is a recruitment video for anti-immigration group Síol na hÉireann. It is unclear if the man in the video has a connection with Síol na hÉireann, which has previously been investigated by the Advertising Standards Authority for using footage of assaults in its recruitment material. The Journal has previously debunked posts by this group, including multiple false claims about black people attacking white people in Ireland. As of writing, one version of the video have been viewed more than 232,300 times on Facebook, and more than 22,000 times on X. Both were posted on 10 August. The claim made in the video is said to stem from an appearance by Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan on RTÉ. The Journal was unable to find an appearance matching the description, and a spokesperson from O'Callaghan's office said that they were unfamiliar with what the man in the video was speaking about. It seems likely that the video confuses O'Callaghan with Colm Brophy, who is a Minister of State at the Department of Justice. Advertisement Brophy has spoken publicly about plans to charge working asylum seekers for their accommodation. (O'Callaghan's office confirmed he supports the plan). However, these plans have little resemblance to what was being talked about in the video other than some shared terminology, such as uses of the term 'contribution'. The government's plans are not about changing how IPAS applicants are taxed. Rather, these plans involve charging asylum seekers who are entitled to work for accommodation in IPAS centres as a way to reduce the cost of the international protection system to the government. Currently, asylum seekers in Ireland can be granted permission to work if they have been waiting more than 6 months for the first decision on their application. The Sunday Independent reported that one proposal says that 11,400 people in IPAS centres are estimated to have an income and would be eligible to pay the fee. So, what has this got to do with a 'tax-free year'? Not much, it appears. 'Applicants for international protection are subject to the same system of taxation as all other people resident in Ireland,' a spokesperson for the Department of Justice told The Journal. 'There is no exemption from income tax for applicants under the International Protection Accommodation Scheme who have an entitlement to work in Ireland,' Revenue said in response to the online claims. Claims that asylum seekers or other foreign nationals have preferential treatment in Ireland are commonly spread by anti-immigration groups. Thai year, The Journal has previously debunked claims that immigrants get shorter prison sentences than Irish citizens; that traffic rules do not apply to non-Irish people; that the Irish government pays Ukrainians to repair their cars or has spent €200,000 per car to help isolated Ukrainians; and that taxes go toward subsidising foreign-owned businesses . Want to be your own fact-checker? Visit our brand-new FactCheck Knowledge Bank for guides and toolkits The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it here . For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide here . You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here . Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Daily Mirror
31 minutes ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
GAA members call on Association to sever ties with sponsor over Israel links
A lobby group of GAA members representing pro-Palestine groupings have called on the Association to sever ties with Championship sponsor Allianz Ireland. The grouping have taken a stance against the Irish subsidiary of the German based global financial giant, in the wake of a report last month from UN special rapporteur Francesca Albanese. Their campaign labelled 'Drop Allianz' was launched outside the Hogan Stand entrance at Croke Park on Wednesday. It features the groupings Gaels against Genocide, who met with GAA President Jarlath Burns in May 2024, Dubs For Palestine, Irish Sport for Palestine and Gaeil ar son Gaza. An open letter was handed in to the GAA calling on the Association to 'demonstrate its commitment to international humanitarian law and promptly cease its relationship with Allianz.' The letter is signed by more than 780 former and current county players and features some huge names from the world of GAA. These include Dr David Hickey, Neil McManus, Peter Canavan, Tómas Ó Sé, Joe Brolly, Shane McGuigan, Niall Cahalane, Terence 'Sambo' McNaughton, Danny Sutcliffe, Michael Darragh Macauley, Aoife Ní Chasáide, Jane Adams, Brendan Devenney and Sorcha Gormley. Allianz Ireland have sponsored the GAA's National Leagues in hurling and football for over 30 years and earlier this year signed a new five year deal, which is set to run until 2030. The Irish subsidiary of the international corporate giant recently signed a new three year deal as one of the GAA's six Championship sponsors, having completed an original three year agreement, which was signed in 2023. It is believed the Championship deal is worth in the region of €1 million per annum to the GAA. Allianz is one of three football Championship rights holders, with three more in hurling. The National Leagues, which covers both codes, deal is understood to be worth in the region of €800,000 per annum. Allianz are also a sponsor of the Camogie Association and primary schools body Cumann na mBunscol as well as Paralympics Ireland and the Olympic Federation of Ireland. They are currently running a campaign entitled 'Stop the Drop,' which they say is aimed at preventing children dropping out of sport. Colm O'Rourke speaking at Croke Park Albanese's report - entitled 'From economy of occupation to economy of genocide' - states that asset management firm, Pimco, owned by another part of the wider Allianz group are a major purchaser of Israeli treasury bonds." The report goes on to point out that the firm holds $7.3 billion in Israeli shares and bonds, with $1 billion purchased since the start of the conflict in Gaza. The report alleges that bonds purchased by a range of international finance companies have helped to prop up Israel's economy and fund their ongoing onslaught in Gaza. Michael Doherty of Gaels against Genocide said: 'As the largest sporting organisation in Ireland, the GAA must show leadership in this time of genocide. 'It cannot continue with a 'business as usual' approach. As a main sponsor of the GAA, Allianz presents itself as socially responsible and ethical.' The letter goes on to call on the GAA to implement a key recommendation of Albanese's report. This is that corporate entities must promptly cease all business activities and terminate relationships directly linked with, contributing to and causing human rights violations and international crimes against the Palestinian people. It is unclear how many Palestinians Israel have killed in Gaza such is the scale of the destruction, with reports ranging from 55,000 to 90,000. The UN estimates that almost 70percent of structures in Gaza, including hospitals and schools, have been damaged or destroyed with almost two million people displaced from their homes, some as many as 10 times. UN reports state that over 250 people have now died from starvation since Israel's blockade on food supplies began with a further 500 killed by the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) sourcing food at food banks The latest phase of the conflict began after the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, which killed almost 1,200 Israelis. The Albanese report also points the finger at some of the world's largest banks, stating that they stepped in and boosted market confidence by underwriting international and domestic bonds. The GAA were contacted but declined to comment, while a spokesperson for Allianz said: 'Our long-standing partnership with the GAA is about supporting Irish sport and communities. "Allianz Ireland is part of a global group, and while the wider group operates internationally across insurance and investment, as a matter of principle we do not comment on individual customers or business matters. "What we can say is that all Allianz business decisions are guided by strict legal standards and world-leading ESG principles.' Allianz' own website states: 'We regard respect for human rights as a minimum standard for responsible business. 'Allianz is committed to supporting and respecting the protection of international rights ensuring that Allianz is not complicit in human rights abuses.'
Irish Examiner
33 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Why are there so many conspiracy theories around wind farms?
When Donald Trump recently claimed, during what was supposed to be a press conference about an EU trade deal, that wind turbines were a 'con job' that 'drive whales loco', kill birds and even people, he wasn't just repeating old myths. He was tapping into a global pattern of conspiracy theories around renewable energy — particularly wind farms. (Trump calls them 'windmills' — a climate denier trope.) The idea fossil companies would delay access to renewable energy was nicely illustrated in a classic episode of 'The Simpsons', when Mr Burns builds a tower to blot out the sun over Springfield, forcing people to buy his nuclear power. Like 19th-century fears telephones would spread diseases, wind farm conspiracy theories reflect deeper anxieties about change. They combine distrust of government, nostalgia for the fossil fuel era, and a resistance to confronting the complexities of the modern world. And research shows that, once these fears are embedded in someone's worldview, no amount of fact checking is likely to shift them. Although we've known about climate change from carbon dioxide as probable and relatively imminent since at least the 1950s, early arguments for renewables tended to be seen more as a way of breaking the stranglehold of large fossil-fuel companies. The idea fossil companies would delay access to renewable energy was nicely illustrated in a classic episode of The Simpsons, when Mr Burns builds a tower to blot out the sun over Springfield, forcing people to buy his nuclear power. Back in the real world, similar dynamics were at play. In 2004, Australian prime minister John Howard gathered fossil fuel CEOs help him slow the growth of renewables, under the auspices of a Low Emissions Technology Advisory Group. Meanwhile, advocates of renewables — especially wind — often found it difficult to build public support, in part because the existing power providers (mines, oil fields, nuclear) tend to be out of sight and out of mind. Public opposition has also been fed by health scares, such as 'wind turbine syndrome'. Labelled a 'non-disease' and non-existent by medical experts, it continued to circulate for years. Academic work on the question of anti-wind farm activism is revealing a pattern: conspiracy thinking is a stronger predictor of opposition than age, gender, education or political leaning. In Germany, the academic Kevin Winter and colleagues found belief in conspiracies had many times more influence on wind opposition than any demographic factor. Worryingly, presenting opponents with facts was not particularly successful. If you think climate change is a hoax or a beat-up by hysterical eco-doomers, you're going to be easily persuaded that wind turbines are poisoning groundwater, causing blackouts or, in Trump's words, 'driving the whales loco'. In a more recent article, based on surveys in the US, UK and Australia which looked at people's propensity to give credence to conspiracy theories, Winter and colleagues argued opposition was 'rooted in people's worldviews'. If you think climate change is a hoax or a beat-up by hysterical eco-doomers, you're going to be easily persuaded that wind turbines are poisoning groundwater, causing blackouts or, in Trump's words, 'driving the whales loco'. Wind farms are fertile ground for such theories. They are highly visible symbols of climate policy, and complex enough to be mysterious to non-specialists. A row of wind turbines can become a target for fears about modernity, energy security, or government control. This, say Winter and colleagues, 'poses a challenge for communicators and institutions committed to accelerating the energy transition'. It's harder to take on an entire worldview than to correct a few made-up talking points. What is it all about? Beneath the misinformation, often driven by money or political power, there's a deeper issue. Some people — perhaps Trump among them — do not want to deal with the fact fossil technologies, which brought prosperity and a sense of control, are also causing environmental crises. And these are problems which are not solved with the addition of more technology. It offends their sense of invulnerability, of dominance. This 'anti-reflexivity', as some academics call it, is a refusal to reflect on the costs of past successes. It is also bound up with identity. In some corners of the online 'manosphere', concerns over climate change are being painted as effeminate. Many boomers, especially white heterosexual men like Trump, have felt disorientated as their world has shifted and changed around them. The clean energy transition symbolises part of this change. Perhaps this is a good way to understand why Trump is lashing out at 'windmills'. Marc Hudson is a visiting fellow at the University of Sussex Business School, University of Sussex
