US Plans to Ease Capital Rule Limiting Banks' Treasury Trades
(Bloomberg) -- The top US bank regulators plan to reduce a key capital buffer by up to 1.5 percentage points for the biggest lenders after concerns that it constrained their trading in the $29 trillion Treasuries market.
The Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency are focusing on what's known as the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio, according to people briefed on the discussions. This rule applies to the largest US banks, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley.
The proposal would lower a bank holding company's capital requirement under the eSLR to a range of 3.5% to 4.5%, down from the current 5%, according to the people, who didn't want to be identified discussing nonpublic information. The firms' banking subsidiaries would also likely see their requirement reduced to the same range, down from the current 6%, the people said.
The revisions resemble those from 2018, when President Donald Trump's regulators sought to 'tailor' the eSLR calculation that applied to US global systemically important banks, according to the people familiar with the matter. The people said the proposal's language could still change.
The proposal will look to change the overall ratio rather than exclude specific assets like Treasuries, as some observers had predicted. Still, it's expected to ask for public comment on whether the agencies should carve out Treasuries from the calculation, the people said.
The Fed said on Tuesday that it plans to meet on June 25 to discuss the plan. The other regulators hadn't yet announced their agendas on the enhanced version of the SLR.
Representatives for the Fed, FDIC and OCC declined to comment.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell and other officials supported possible revisions to the supplementary leverage ratio standards in a bid to bolster banks' roles as intermediaries in the market. In February, he told the House Financial Services Committee that he had been 'somewhat concerned about the levels of liquidity in the Treasury market' for a long time.
In April, President Donald Trump's tariffs rattled the markets, sharpening investors' focus on the SLR standards.
The industry has said the rule, which requires large lenders to hold capital against their investments in Treasuries, crimps their ability to add to those securities in times of volatility, as they are treated in line with much riskier assets. The SLR's applicability to Treasuries was suspended during the Covid crisis, but it has since been reinstated.
Leverage ratios are intended to act as a 'backstop' to risk-based capital requirements, Michelle Bowman, the Fed's vice chair for supervision, said earlier this month.
'When leverage ratios become the binding capital constraint at an excessive level, they can create market distortions,' she added.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has pointed to estimates that tweaking the rule could reduce Treasury yields by tens of basis points.
Still, it's unclear whether easing the leverage ratio would encourage banks to buy more Treasuries, said Jeremy Kress, a former Fed bank-policy attorney who now teaches business law at the University of Michigan.
'When regulators temporarily excluded Treasuries from the leverage ratio in 2020, most banks chose not to take advantage of this exclusion because doing so would have triggered restrictions on their ability to pay dividends and buy back shares,' Kress said. 'This experience suggests that if banks get additional balance sheet capacity from leverage ratio changes, they're more likely to use it for capital distributions to shareholders rather than for Treasury market intermediation.'
Graham Steele, another Fed alumnus who served as a Biden-era Treasury official, says there are more targeted solutions that could help the Treasury market issues.
'Unfortunately, the deregulation being contemplated won't remedy the situation; it will just make the financial system more fragile,' Steele said.
--With assistance from Christopher Anstey.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump surprises by backing Chinese and Indian grads to stay and launch companies in the US
Trump calls for Chinese and Indian graduates to stay in US and launch companies President Donald Trump has taken an unexpectedly supportive stance toward international students, particularly from China and India, marking a shift from earlier hardline immigration policies. In a recent press briefing, Trump strongly advocated for allowing foreign graduates to remain in the US and contribute to its economy by launching businesses and working in major American companies. Trump stated that international students, especially those who complete four-year degrees in US institutions, should not be forced to leave the country. He emphasized that highly skilled students from China and India often return home to start successful companies, which could have been established in the US had the students been permitted to stay. A shift from earlier visa clampdowns This latest development signals a surprising reversal from prior policies targeting Chinese students. In the past, the Trump administration had called for stricter visa vetting and even paused new student visa appointments globally, including in China. Additionally, Secretary of State Marco Rubio proposed revoking visas for students allegedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party or those studying critical technologies. Despite these initiatives, Trump now appears to favor retaining foreign talent. During his press briefing, Trump said, 'I've always been in favor of students coming in from other countries. That includes China.' While he acknowledged the need for security vetting, he added, 'You have to watch students, but you have to watch other people also.' Foreign students seen as economic contributors Trump made it clear that allowing foreign graduates to stay and work aligns with US economic interests. He cited examples where companies like Apple were unable to hire top graduates due to visa limitations. 'If you get educated for four years, you're willing to get educated for four years... I'm also in favor of having them stay,' he said, suggesting that a US education should be a path to permanent contribution. As reported by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), Trump pointed out that denying these students the opportunity to stay results in them building successful companies elsewhere. He said this pattern must change, adding, 'I think we'll probably end up doing something about that.' China and India lead in international student enrollment According to the US State Department, a total of 1.1 million foreign students were enrolled in US universities during the 2023–2024 academic year. Among them, India was the top contributor with 331,602 students, reflecting a 23 percent increase from the previous year. China followed with 277,398 students, marking a 4 percent decline. These two countries continue to represent the largest segments of the international student population in the US. While India has overtaken China as the top source of international students, Chinese nationals have historically dominated the numbers since 2009–2010. However, Chinese student enrollment has steadily declined since 2019–2020. Congress remains cautious despite White House shift Despite Trump's supportive comments, skepticism lingers in Congress. As reported by the SCMP, lawmakers continue to express concern over China's technological ambitions. Representative Bill Huizenga warned that Beijing is exploiting relationships with US universities to gain a technological edge. During a congressional hearing, he accused China of using 'state subsidies, forced tech transfers, economic espionage, chip smuggling,' and other means to dominate critical technologies. Officials from the Bureau of Industry and Security echoed these concerns, requesting a 133% increase in enforcement funding to prevent export control violations. As quoted by the SCMP, Undersecretary Jeffrey Kessler said, 'We could do a lot more with the additional resources... I'm concerned that many instances of wrongdoing go undetected.' Trump links student visas to trade diplomacy Trump has also tied the issue of student visas to broader trade negotiations with China. As reported by the SCMP, he said a trade deal was pending approval from President Xi Jinping and suggested that the agreement could include provisions supporting Chinese students in US institutions. While policy details remain unclear, Trump's remarks have introduced a new tone—one that positions international students not as risks, but as valuable contributors to America's innovation and economy. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Oil prices spike on Trump's threat to Iran, then level off, Asian equities slip amid geopolitical jitters
Representative image Oil prices steadied on Wednesday following a sharp surge the previous day, triggered by fears of escalating US involvement in the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict. The spike came after US President Donald Trump issued aggressive statements demanding Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and suggesting possible support for Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites. As Iran and Israel entered a sixth consecutive day of missile exchanges, Trump left the G7 Summit in Canada early, stating he sought a 'real end' to the hostilities rather than a mere ceasefire. In a series of posts on his Truth Social platform, he warned Iran against targeting US interests and claimed knowledge of the location of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.."We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there. We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now," he wrote. These remarks pushed oil prices more than 4% higher on Tuesday amid fears that an escalation could disrupt crude supplies, especially through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway responsible for around 20% of global oil transport, reported AFP. Analysts warned that any strike on Iranian nuclear sites could have severe regional consequences. "Washington's refuelling jets are already en route, and if Fordow gets hit, expect the Strait of Hormuz to become a maritime minefield, Houthi drones to swarm Red Sea shipping lanes, and every militia from Basra to Damascus to light up American forward outposts," said Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management. Despite a slight pullback in oil prices on Wednesday, markets remain volatile. Asian equities mirrored investor anxiety: Hong Kong, Shanghai, Singapore, Sydney, Manila, and Jakarta all posted losses, while Tokyo, Seoul, and Taipei saw modest gains. Wall Street's performance also weighed on sentiment. Weak US retail sales and an unexpected drop in factory output for May raised fresh concerns about the resilience of the American economy. However, the disappointing data bolstered speculation that the Federal Reserve may consider cutting interest rates later this year. While the Fed is expected to hold rates steady at the conclusion of its policy meeting Wednesday, investors are closely watching for revisions in its growth and inflation outlook amid growing geopolitical and economic uncertainties. KPMG senior economist Benjamin Shoesmith noted that the Fed would likely be cutting rates already were it not for the unpredictability surrounding tariffs and tensions in the Middle East. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Iran–Israel war: Crude oil prices rise to near 5-month high as Brent tops $76. More upside ahead?
Crude oil prices continue to remain elevated as tensions between Iran and Israel persist for the sixth consecutive day, pushing prices close to a five-month high. Traders are particularly worried about potential disruptions to Iran's crude oil exports of 1.5–2.0 million barrels per day (mmbpd), out of its total output of 3.4 mmbpd. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude climbed as much as 0.64% on Wednesday, after surging over 4.3% on Tuesday to reach its highest level since January. Brent crude futures gained 0.5% after rising 4.4% in the previous trading session to touch $76.70 per barrel, the highest level since February. As hostilities between the two nations deepen, with both sides escalating attacks since Friday, concerns are mounting over potential U.S. military involvement and the risk of a broader regional conflict. On Tuesday, U.S. President Donald Trump demanded Iran's "unconditional surrender" and warned of a possible strike against the country's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in a social media post ahead of his meeting with the national security team. While the Trump administration has maintained that the U.S. is not directly involved, the president's latest comments indicate a shift toward a more aggressive posture, signaling possible direct intervention in support of Israel's efforts to pressure Tehran. U.S. weapons are seen as critical to executing a more comprehensive strike against Iran's nuclear infrastructure than what Israel could achieve alone. Meanwhile, Israel's military confirmed it had launched strikes near Tehran and detected missile launches from Iran, with interception efforts reportedly underway. The conflict between the two countries began on Friday after Israel struck at Iranian nuclear and military facilities with the objective of preventing Iran from building a nuclear weapon. Meanwhile, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) said on Monday it expects the global economy to remain resilient in the second half of 2025, despite growing concerns over trade conflicts. However, it trimmed its forecast for oil supply growth from non-OPEC+ producers in 2026, signaling potential tightening in global energy markets. OPEC now expects U.S. output of tight oil, another term for shale, to hold steady next year at 9.05 million bpd/day. Last month, it expected small growth year on year and in January had forecast output in 2026 would reach 9.28 million bpd. In late May, OPEC+ agreed to increase oil production by 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) for July 2025. Meanwhile, another emerging concern driving crude prices higher is the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz—a key chokepoint for global oil trade. While this scenario has moved into focus amid rising tensions, experts believe the probability of such a closure remains low. A sustained disruption of Iran's crude oil exports by 0.5–1 million barrels per day (mmbpd) could add $5–10 per barrel to crude prices in the near to medium term, potentially pushing Brent crude to stabilise in the $75–80 per barrel range. However, domestic brokerage firm JM Financial believes that Brent is unlikely to rise significantly above $80 per barrel, citing a likely surplus of 1–2 mmbpd in CY25. This surplus, as per the brokerage, could stem from excess output growth by non-OPEC+ countries, the reversal of OPEC+'s 2.2 mmbpd voluntary cuts, and the availability of around 2 mmbpd of spare capacity with Saudi Arabia (plus an additional 1 mmbpd with the UAE), which could be deployed to offset any supply shock, especially given the strong relationship between U.S. President Trump and Saudi Arabia. (With inputs from agencies) Disclaimer: The views and recommendations given in this article are those of individual analysts. These do not represent the views of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.
