HAL, BEL, BEML to Mazagon Dock: Experts recommend these defence stocks to buy ahead of Indian Independence Day 2025
According to stock market experts, Trump's tariffs have triggered the realignment of the geopolitical setup, and some new equations are likely to take place. In that case, most affected countries are likely to find new avenues for export revenue, which they are expected to lose due to the imposition of Trump's tariffs. They advised investors to look at those defence stocks expected to benefit from the rise in the government's defence expenditures. However, they advised investors to look at the fundamentals of the companies before making any investment decision.
Speaking on the defence stocks to buy ahead of the Indian Independence Day 2025, Seema Srivastava, Senior Research Anallyst at SMC Global Securities, said, "India's defence sector is in a structural upcycle, driven by a Rs.16 trillion procurement pipeline, record Rs.23,622 crore exports in FY25 (up 12% YoY), and a push for self-reliance. HAL, BEL, BDL, and MDL provide stability, and L&T adds private-sector efficiency while niche tech firms offer high-growth potential. Policy support, rising export authorisations, and indigenisation could double exports to ₹ . 50,000 crore by 2029, ensuring long-term competitiveness and sustainable returns through a diversified investment approach."
Seema Srivastava of SMC Global Securities listed out the following five defence stocks:
1] Bharat Electronics Limited or BEL: During Q1 FY26, PAT rose 25% YoY to ₹ . 969.13 crore, underpinned by a sharp 560 bps expansion in operating profit margin to 27.9%, reflecting superior cost control and a favourable execution mix. While revenue growth was modest at 5.2%, the company's ability to convert this into strong profitability highlights operational discipline and execution strength. A slight 2.4% YoY decline in the order book to ₹ 74,859 crore is monitorable. Still, with ongoing defence modernisation, the Make in India push, and expanding export opportunities, BEL is well placed to replenish and grow its order pipeline. Its debt-free balance sheet, robust cash flows, and leadership across radar, missile systems, and electronic warfare provide a durable competitive moat.
The company is also strategically diversifying into non-defence areas like smart cities, solar, and cybersecurity, which can provide additional growth avenues and revenue stability. Supported by sustained government indigenisation initiatives and a proven track record of large-scale project execution, BEL offers long-term compounding potential.
2] BEML: BEML posted a narrowed net loss of ₹ 64.11 crore in Q1 FY26, down from ₹ 75.3 crore YoY, with EBITDA losses also reduced to ₹ 40.71 crore. Revenue remained flat at ₹ 633.99 crore, underscoring muted topline momentum and reflecting lean operations. Despite current softness, the company's robust order book of ₹ 9,945 crore offers multi-quarter visibility. Additionally, BEML won a significant ₹ 282 crore defence order for high-mobility vehicles, marking steady demand from the MoD. Strategic moves include diversification into futuristic mobility. BEML signed an MoU with IIT-Madras incubatee TuTr Hyperloop, expanding beyond traditional heavy equipment into innovative transport solutions.
The company also continues to benefit from India's record defence production uptick and export acceleration, creating a favourable policy backdrop. While near-term performance remains volatile, BEML's strong order pipeline, evolving portfolio, and alignment with national infrastructure and defence thrust lend it credible long-term upside. The key things to watch include disciplined execution, especially in converting orders into profitable revenues and managing its operational turnaround.
3] Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders: Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited's Q1 FY26 results reflect near-term profitability pressures, with net profit down 35% YoY and EBITDA margins contracting sharply due to higher procurement and human resources costs. However, the company's long-term investment case remains strong, anchored by its strategic role in India's naval modernisation and a robust financial track record. Between FY21–24, MDL delivered exceptional growth with ~33% CAGR in revenue and ~47% CAGR in net profit, supported by industry-leading return ratios (ROE ~27%, ROCE ~33%) and a debt-free balance sheet, enabling self-funded capacity expansion. Key strategic initiatives such as the upcoming Nhava dry dock facility, which will double shipbuilding capacity, and the proposed majority stake in Colombo Dockyard to expand into export markets highlight management's intent to scale operations beyond domestic contracts.
The strong defence order pipeline ensures multi-year revenue visibility, particularly in submarines, destroyers, and frigates. While FY26 may see margin volatility from execution cycles and input costs, MDL's operational leverage, expansion into higher-value projects, and export diversification should drive gradual profitability recovery. Given its strategic importance, technological capabilities, and capacity growth, MDL is well-positioned to capture long-term value from India's growing defence spend and global naval procurement opportunities.
4] Zen Technologies: The company's Q1FY26 performance, though marked by a temporary moderation in topline growth, reflects strong long-term fundamentals. EBITDA and PAT margins have been sustained, underscoring disciplined operations and cost efficiency. A healthy consolidated order book of ₹ . 754 crore, coupled with a debt-free balance sheet and robust liquidity of ₹ . 918 crore, provides financial resilience and the flexibility to pursue growth opportunities. Strategic acquisitions, such as the 76% stake in TISA Aerospace, signal entry into high-potential UAV and loitering munitions markets, aligning with evolving global defence demand. Subsidiaries ARIPL and UTS are already adding meaningful operational synergies, while integration efforts progress smoothly.
Moreover, according to the company's management, looking ahead to H1FY26, we remain confident in achieving our order inflow guidance of ₹ 800 crores. In addition, we expect orders to be placed under the government's emergency procurement plan, particularly for anti-drone systems. Its robust pipeline and continued policy support for indigenous manufacturing position the company well for sustained growth. The company's management mentioned that while FY26 is likely to be a year of consolidation, it would remain focused on executing its long-term strategy. It is confident in maintaining its targeted cumulative revenue of ₹ 6,000 crores over the next three financial years.
5] Astra Microwave Products: During Q1FY26, performance underscores a strong foundation for long-term growth. Consolidated revenue rose 29% YoY to ₹ 200 crore, with gross margin expansion to 46.7% and EBITDA margin improvement to 20.5%, reflecting operational efficiency and a favourable product mix. PAT surged 126% YoY to ₹ 16 crore, driven by robust execution and higher value-added orders. The consolidated order book stood at ₹ 2,236 crore as of June 30, 2025, ensuring multi-year revenue visibility. A key highlight was the August ₹ 135 crore DRDO radar system upgrade order, reinforcing Astra's technological leadership in advanced defence electronics.
The company's diversified portfolio across defence, aerospace, and space electronics, supported by in-house R&D, advanced test facilities, and AS9100D & ISO certifications, enhances its competitive moat in high-specification systems. Continued opportunities in QRSAM, missile subsystems, and space electronics align with India's push for indigenisation and rising defence budgets. With strategic capabilities from component-level RF/Microwave products to integrated systems, Astra is well-positioned to capture domestic and export demand.
On defence stocks looking strong on the technical chart, Ganesh Dongre, Senior Manager of Technical Research at Anand Rathi, said, "BEL, Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders and Cochin Shipyard shares are looking strong on the technical chart pattern. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) and Bharat Dynamics Ltd (BDL) also sound promising on the technical chart."
1] BEL: BEL's share price currently trades around ₹ 388, offering an attractive risk-reward setup. A stop-loss can be comfortably placed at ₹ 360, while the medium-term upside potential lies in the ₹ 430 to ₹ 440 range. This makes BEL a compelling candidate for technically driven investors seeking bullish setups.
2] HAL: HAL share price is trading at ₹ 4,525 and appears to be forming a base in the daily chart's ₹ 4,450 to ₹ 4,550 zone. Technically, it is in the oversold zone and has formed a bullish engulfing pattern, indicating potential upward momentum. Traders can consider buying at current levels with a stop-loss of ₹ 4,300 and a target price of ₹ 4,900.
3] Bharat Dynamics Ltd (BDL): Bharat Dynamics' share price is in the process of base formation and, in the short term, has formed a bullish engulfing pattern. The stock is currently oscillating between ₹ 1,500 and ₹ 1,600. A decisive move above ₹ 1,650 could take it towards ₹ 1,800 in the coming days. Investors can consider buying with a stop-loss of ₹ 1,400 and a target of ₹ 1,800.
4] Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders: Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders' share price has corrected nearly 50% from its May high and shows signs of base formation around the daily chart of ₹ 2,650 to ₹ 2,750 levels. With a medium-term recovery expected, investors can consider buying at the current market price of ₹ 2,750 with a stop-loss of ₹ 2,500 and a target of ₹ 3,100.
5] Cochin Shipyard: The Cochin Shipyard share is in the oversold zone and shows a rounding bottom pattern on the hourly chart, suggesting a potential reversal. Investors can buy on dips from ₹ 1650 to ₹ 1700 with a stop-loss of ₹ 1,500 and a target range of ₹ 1,900 to ₹ 2,000.
Disclaimer: The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or brokerage companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
US-Pakistan ‘counter-terrorism' dialogue: A cover to suppress Baloch movement
The US, apparently the world's most powerful democracy, entirely ignores the fact that it is the Pakistani practices that are fuelling the Baloch insurgency. (Image: X@BalochYakjehtiC) If you want to collapse in shock, read the latest gem from the US-Pakistan dialogue. This one is on counterterrorism and lauds Pakistan's actions in such laudatory terms as to make any intelligence officer of any country feel sick. Regardless of reality, it seems Trump's United States is on a headlong path against India and, worse, against logic. It might be an attempt to wean the country away from China and drag it firmly into the US camp, or it could be just petty point scoring. Whatever the motives, the news is not good. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The US-Pakistan Counterterrorism Dialogue Consider the Joint Statement, which says, 'Both delegations underscored the critical importance of developing effective approaches to terrorist threats, including those posed by the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), ISIS-Khorasan, and Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), and applauded Pakistan's continued successes in containing terrorist entities that pose a threat to the peace and security of the region and the world'. There's worse. The US 'expressed condolences for the loss of civilians and members of law enforcement agencies in terrorist incidents in Pakistan, including the barbaric Jaffar Express terrorist attack and the bombing of a school bus in Khuzdar'. There is nothing to indicate that the Jaffar bus attack killed innocent civilians, but the BLA did kill security forces and their colleagues in intelligence. True also, that the school bus attack in May 2025 was particularly horrifying. But the BLA is the last group ever to do such an attack on their own. It would set the Baloch against them, and they know it. Pakistan's agencies are not below killing their own or even the Chinese. Remember the attack on the latter at Dasu in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa last year that killed five Chinese travelling to a power project site? That was blamed on the Pakistanis themselves, to get Beijing to put pressure on Afghanistan on the TTP. And it worked. That's exactly what China did, pressuring Kabul to mend relations with Islamabad on May 21st post Sindoor, in an 'informal' trilateral interaction. Targeting Baloch Now it's the turn of the US. Its intelligence agencies are well aware of the fact that the Baloch have never ever targeted the US, not even when its logistics lines were going through their land to fight the mujahideen or later the Taliban. In fact, the odd reality is that the Majeed Brigade, now officially designated as a terrorist group, have only attacked the Chinese relentlessly for poaching on their land at the behest of the 'Punjabis'. Logic demands that the US should quietly give them a hand against their sworn competitor. But it seems not to be. The farcical nature of the whole joint statement is apparent from the fact that the Pakistani signatory was Nabeel Munir, Special Secretary to the United Nations. Not a single Pakistani counter-terrorism official or anyone from the Interior Ministry. Last year's dialogue also had similar representation but was far less laudatory and more matter-of-fact. It also noted US training of Pakistani personnel on counterterrorism. Most importantly, the 2024 statement made no mention of the BLA, though it was designated as a terrorist group in 2019. This time the focus is almost entirely on it, with the TTP just an add-on. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Accommodation of Pakistan's Balochistan Narrative by the US That is a worrying slide in policy, accommodating Pakistan's frequent complaints of Indian backing of the Baloch resistance. The one and only 'evidence' that Rawalpindi claims is the arrest of former navy officer Kulbushan Jadhav, who was kidnapped from Iran and brought into Pakistan and made to 'confess' to various sins. Compare this to the available data on Pakistanis not in prison for terrorist activities, drug running and the like, but the hundreds of protests and agitations organised every year on 'Kashmir Solidarity Day' or on any pretext whatsoever on Kashmir. There has yet to be a single protest in India on Balochistan. The Indian public is largely ignorant of the serious Baloch crisis which has been brewing since Pakistan's independence, with rebellion after rebellion leading to the kidnapping, torture and deaths of thousands. That includes entirely peaceful protestors like the charismatic Mehrang Baloch, nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize and now languishing in prison — with no access allowed to her family — and others like Mama Qadeer, leader of the 'Voice of Baloch', nominated for the Nelson Mandela peace award. Others, including their family members, lie incarcerated too. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Yet, the US, apparently the world's most powerful democracy, entirely ignores the fact that it is such Pakistani practices that are fuelling the Baloch insurgency. Even if a foreign power is training fighters, it cannot, by any stretch of the imagination or even with the largest purse, create the groundswell of support for the fighters among ordinary people. Also Baloch insurgency has turned a page. It is no longer a platform for the somewhat elite tribal leaders. BLA fighters are heavily part of student organisations and carry those ideals with them that lie with the youth. Shari Baloch, the first female suicide bomber, was an academic with an degree. An additional point the US agencies would obviously know. There is not a shred of obscurantism or extremism about the BLA. US Motivation and Further The question that then arises is US motivation for this unalloyed public support, with the State Department spokesperson reiterating the important role played by the US in ending the conflict while then referring to the US–Pakistan counterterrorism dialogue. But the curious part is that there isn't very much else. No great US financial largesse has come in. The F-16 package of $397 million is a technical package that also prevents these aircraft from being used against India. Neither have there been any weapons commitments — yet. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan gets almost its entire weaponry from China, but it is parity with India that Pakistan craves, now that the Terrorist Resistance Front, a proxy of Lashkar-e-Taiba, was designated by the US recently. There is another important aspect. It might also mean that US Central Command is legally free to act against BLA—at least with intelligence—much as it used its drones to kill TTP leaders, on Pakistan's urging. This is dangerous stuff. Meanwhile, the designation benefits China in multiple ways. As a commentator says, it will secure Chinese projects and deal a blow to India. The hope among Pakistanis and Chinese is that Trump will mention—at the very least—that India is a state sponsor of terrorism. It could happen. So far it seems this is a personal grudge held by Trump against India because Delhi refuses to recognise a US role in ending the recent conflict or accept mediation. The latter is non-negotiable, and the State Department bureaucracy probably understands that. The former is a different thing altogether. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Delhi could acknowledge that Islamabad—as expected—went running to the US the moment it faced serious damage to its installations. That has been true for almost every single conflict between the two. India should also have anticipated the Trump offer of mediation, given that he offered this to an exuberant Imran Khan in 2019. Pakistan took advantage of that. India got the 'bad guy' image again, as Rawalpindi knew it would. Time to change corners, as it's going to be the Baloch who will suffer. Acknowledge the historical truth of the Pakistan army using the US for its own mischievous ends. On no account must Islamabad be rewarded with 'mediation', simply because there is nothing to mediate. Especially since it has yet to detain or even mildly shake its finger at the many terrorists within its soil. Meanwhile, it's time to name and shame. Get each terrorist into the limelight through media and diplomacy. Ramp up the terrorist dialogue. As the late strategic affairs analyst K Subramanyam used to say, even if one person listens, that's good enough. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is Director (R&A) at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. She tweets @kartha_tara. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi To Visit India On Monday
Chinese Foreign Affairs Minister Wang Yi is set to visit India on August 18 (Monday) for the 24th Round of Talks Between the Special Representatives of China and India on the Boundary Question, Beijing confirmed on Saturday. "From August 18 to 20, Member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, Minister of Foreign Affairs and China's Special Representative on the China-India boundary question Wang Yi will visit India and hold the 24th Round of Talks Between the Special Representatives of China and India on the Boundary Question at the invitation of the Indian side," the Chinese Ministry for Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The visit is scheduled to take place shortly before Prime Minister Narendra Modi travels to China to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit scheduled to take place at Tianjin, from August 31 to September 1. The Chinese side also welcomed PM Modi's participation in the SCO Summit. At a briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said, "China welcomes Prime Minister Modi to China for the SCO Tianjin Summit. We believe that with the concerted effort of all parties, the Tianjin summit will be a gathering of solidarity, friendship and fruitful results, and the SCO will enter a new stage of high-quality development featuring greater solidarity, coordination, dynamism and productiveness." According to the Chinese Foreign Ministry, leaders of over 20 countries, including all member states of the SCO and heads of 10 international organisations, will attend relevant events of the summit, which, Jiakun said, will be the "largest summit in scale since the establishment of the SCO." This will be PM Modi's first visit to China since the Galwan clash in 2020, which severely strained bilateral ties. The breakthrough in bilateral talks, first after the Galwan Valley face-off between the soldiers of the two countries at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in June 2020, was made possible after India and China reached an agreement on patrolling along the nearly 3500-km LAC to end the four-year-long border confrontation. In July, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar visited China to attend the Meeting of the Council of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs in Tianjin. He also held discussions with his Chinese counterpart on the sidelines of the meeting. He also called on Chinese President Xi Jinping, along with his fellow SCO Foreign Ministers. Earlier in June, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh visited China to attend the SCO Defence Ministers Meeting. India had refused to endorse the joint declaration at the SCO Defence Ministers' meeting, citing the exclusion of concerns around terrorism as a key reason. India stated that it wanted concerns about terrorism reflected in the document, which was not acceptable to one particular country; therefore, the statement was not adopted. During his visit, Singh met his Chinese counterpart, Admiral Don Jun, and the two leaders had a "constructive and forward-looking exchange of views" on issues related to bilateral ties. In June, National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval also visited China to attend the 20th Meeting of the SCO Security Council Secretaries. In his intervention at the meeting, he highlighted the need to shun double standards in the fight against terrorism and take decisive actions against UN-proscribed terrorists and entities like LeT, JeM and their proxies and dismantle their terror eco-systems.
India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump-Zelenskyy To Meet On Monday, Ukrainian Presidents FIRST Reaction After Alaska Summit
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Saturday stated that he had a long conversation with US President Donald Trump and he informed that Ukraine reaffirmed its readiness to achieve peace. This came hours after the Alaska summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump concluded. Zelenskyy also said that Trump informed him about his meeting with Putin and their discussion. He also showed support for Amercian President's proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, Russia, and the US. "We had a long and substantive conversation with @POTUS. We started with one-on-one talks before inviting European leaders to join us. This call lasted for more than an hour and a half, including about an hour of our bilateral conversation with President Trump," Zelenskyy wrote on X. "Ukraine reaffirms its readiness to work with maximum effort to achieve peace. President Trump informed about his meeting with the Russian leader and the main points of their discussion. It is important that America's strength has an impact on the development of the situation," the post added. "We support President Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the USA, and Russia. Ukraine emphasizes that key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this," it continued. "On Monday, I will meet with President Trump in Washington, D.C., to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war. I am grateful for the invitation," the Ukrainian President said. We had a long and substantive conversation with @POTUS. We started with one-on-one talks before inviting European leaders to join us. This call lasted for more than an hour and a half, including about an hour of our bilateral conversation with President Trump. Ukraine reaffirms… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 16, 2025 Also Read: B-2 Bomber Roars Over Putin's Head During Alaska Summit With Trump | Watch Meanwhile, as per the news agency IASN the White House also confirmed that President Trump spoke to President Zelensky following his summit with President Putin in Alaska. On the other hand, Trump was also reportedly in contact with NATO leaders on Saturday. Trump-Putin Alaska Meet The high stakes meeting between Trump and Putin was held in Anchorage, Alaska. While the talks were described as "making progress", no concrete deal was reached. According to IANS, the meeting, held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, marked the first visit of a Russian head of state to the US in nearly a decade and the first face-to-face dialogue between American and Russian leaders since 2021. Also Read: Alaska Meet: Russia-Ukraine Conflict Discussed Without Zelenskyy | Highlights Putin reiterated Moscow's position and stated that Russia is 'sincerely interested in putting an end' to the conflict. However, he insisted that for a resolution to be reached, 'all the root causes of the crisis must be eliminated.' Earlier, on August 15, Zelensky had voiced hope that the Alaska meeting between Trump and Putin could open the door to three-way talks.
