House meeting of Chandigarh MC to discuss major proposals including tax defaulters' list, revenue initiatives
Among them, a particularly significant agenda item is a question raised by Councillor Maheshinder Singh Sidhu, seeking details of the top 20 property tax defaulters in the city.
In addition to the tax defaulter issue, the meeting will also discuss a policy guideline for managing community centres, Janj Ghars and Dharamshalas under the Corporation. The proposal aims to address observations raised in the audit report of 2023-24, particularly objections regarding the provision of free bookings for Below Poverty Line (BPL) families for marriages, under the existing policy. The audit had flagged the need for clearer regulation and accountability in this regard.
Moreover, several representations from public bodies and the Deputy Commissioner's office have raised concerns over noise pollution caused during functions in these venues. In response, a committee chaired by the Joint Commissioner was formed to review and draft a new policy. The committee's recommendations were earlier tabled in the House on March 25, but the proposal was deferred. Subsequently, the mayor constituted a committee of councillors to further refine the policy. The revised proposal is now being brought back for discussion, aimed at creating revenue streams while maintaining public welfare. However, opposition members have criticised the move, terming it an economic burden on the common public.
Another proposal on the agenda focuses on the commercial utilisation of gym and fitness centres currently operating in the city's community centres. The Corporation plans to issue Request for Proposals (RFPs) for its professional operation and management. At present, 29 community centres have gym facilities. Selected private operators will be given a three-year contract, with a possible one-year extension based on performance and mutual agreement. The proposal also mentions a 5 per cent annual increase in monthly license fees, helping the MC generate consistent revenue.
In yet another bid to boost municipal earnings, the House will take up the proposal for handing over the operation and maintenance of the Rose Club in Sector 16 under the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) mode. The agreement, if approved, would run for 10 years, with a possible two-year extension. Under the proposed terms, the selected service provider would be responsible for the repair and renovation of the Rose Club without altering its original structure. Facilities like a restaurant, gym, and library would also be operated under the same agreement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Today in Politics: Rahul, Priyanka Gandhi expected to lead Opposition charge on Day 2 of Op Sindoor debate
After a day-long discussion in the Lok Sabha on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, the special debate continues in the House on Tuesday. Among the big guns from the Opposition who are expected to address the Lower House are the Gandhi siblings, Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi and Wayanad MP Priyanka. At the same time, Union Home Minister Amit Shah is expected to address the House from the government side. The speakers from the Opposition have, by and large, focused their attacks on the alleged security lapses and intelligence failure, the alleged role the US government led by Donald Trump played in the ceasefire declaration, and the aircraft the Air Force lost in the May 7-10 military offensive against terror infrastructure in Pakistan. The government countered by saying that the Opposition was asking the wrong questions — this was the crux of Defence Minister Rajnath Singh's remarks, as Vikas Pathak reported — and clarified there was no link between the trade talks with the US and the halt in military operations against Pakistan. The Rajya Sabha, meanwhile, will start the debate on Tuesday. What punches the two sides land in the two Houses will be among the top political stories of the day. The Supreme Court will take up the reference made to it by the President under Article 143 of the Constitution, following the court's April 8 verdict setting a three-month deadline for the President and Governors to act on Bills passed by state Assemblies. Under Article 143(1), the President may refer a 'question of law or fact' to the Supreme Court for its opinion. The opinion, unlike a ruling, is not binding. On Tuesday, a five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice B R Gavai is likely to decide the schedule of the hearings, which are expected to begin sometime in the middle of August. The Tamil Nadu government has moved the court, urging it to declare the Presidential reference as not maintainable and return it as unanswered. It labelled the Presidential reference an 'appeal in disguise'. As Apurva Vishwanath quite lucidly explained in this article, in its 1991 opinion on the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, the court said Article 143 was not a mechanism for the executive to seek review or reversal of its established judicial decisions. The government can, however, file for a review of the April 8 ruling and move a curative petition in an attempt to reverse it. The Assam government is gearing up to conduct one of the biggest eviction drives of late, in eastern Assam's Golaghat district, reports Sukrita Baruah. Officials estimate that around 15,000 bighas (around 4,900 acres) of land in the Rengma Reserve Forest in the Uriamghat area of Golaghat will be cleared of 'encroachers' over two phases, with the first phase scheduled for Tuesday. Around 2,700 families, mostly Bengali-origin Muslims, live on this land. The Himanta Biswa Sarma government's eviction drive has been politically contentious, given that it comes at a time when the Mamata Banerjee government and the Trinamool Congress (TMC) have mobilised over the alleged mistreatment of Bengali migrant workers in various BJP-ruled states, including Assam, framing it as 'linguistic terrorism'. Assam's neighbouring states, too, are on guard about the possible influx of undocumented migrants into their territory and have heightened vigil in the border districts, Sukrita reported last week. To know how these eviction drives play out, affecting people's lives, read Sukrita's ground report from earlier this month: 'Even if you cry, your house won't be spared': Inside Assam's latest mega eviction drive
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
You'll sit there for next 20 years: Shah
New Delhi: Union minister Amit Shah slammed the Opposition in Parliament amid the heated debate on Operation Sindoor, when they raised questions on Foreign Minister S Jaishankar's assurance that the US had no role to play in the ceasefire. "I have an objection that they (Opposition) don't have faith in an Indian Foreign Minister, but they have faith in some other country," Amit Shah said. "I can understand the importance of foreign in their party. But this doesn't mean that all the things of their party should be imposed here in the House. This is the reason why they are sitting there (Opposition benches) and will remain sitting there for the next 20 years," the Home Minister added. Jaishankar was speaking about India's stand and response to Pahalgam attack during the debate on Operation Sindoor in Parliament. But with the Opposition making several interruptions during his speech, Amit Shah had stepped in. "Will you not believe your own foreign minister," Amit Shah said amid boos from the Opposition leaders. Jaishankar had reiterated that India had shot down Donald Trump's claims that he had mediated between India and Pakistan during Operation Sindoor and his offer to help reach a settlement on Pakistan's continued illegal occupation of Jammu and Kashmir.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Killing of terrorist who led Pahalgam strike blunts opposition's attack in House
Killing of terrorist who led Pahalgam strike blunts opposition's attack in House NEW DELHI: It was just a coincidence but it definitely blunted what seemed set to be one of opposition's lines of attack during the debate on Operation Sindoor . During the build up to the debate, opposition had looked prepared to corner govt for failing to nab the terrorists who massacred 26 civilians in J&K's Pahalgam. The killing of three alleged terrorists, including Suleiman, who is believed to the Pahalgam massacre's mastermind, in an encounter near Srinagar on Monday took the sting out of opposition's attack in the House. SP's Ramashankar Rajbhar, who had come prepared to question the govt on its "failure", did not drop the issue. "Why have the terrorists responsible for this attack not been arrested yet?" he asked. He referred to Rajnath Singh's statement about 100 terrorists having been killed in J&K and asked whether the number included those responsible for Pahalgam. The joy over the killing of Suleiman was articulated by BJP's Baijyant Panda, "As we are debating this issue, some of us must have seen in the news that Operation Mahadev is being conducted in J&K, targeted at terrorists and it appears that at least one of those eliminated today was involved in the Pahalgam attack."
