Musk quietly puts brakes on plans for new political party, WSJ says
Musk unveiled the 'America Party' in July after a public dispute with President Donald Trump on the tax cut and spending bill.
He has recently been focused in part on maintaining ties with Vice President JD Vance, the paper said, and has acknowledged to associates that forming a political party would damage his relationship with Vance.
Musk, the world's richest man, and his associates have told people close to Vance that the billionaire is considering using some of his financial resources to back Vance if he decides to run for president in 2028, the paper said.
The CEO of Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab and SpaceX spent nearly $300 million in 2024 to help Trump and other Republicans get elected, exerting enormous influence in the first few weeks of Trump's term as head of the newly created efficiency department (DOGE).
Reuters could not immediately verify the Journal report. Tesla and the White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment outside regular business hours.
Vance, who had called for a truce following Musk's all-public feud with Trump, reaffirmed his position this month and said he had asked Musk to return to the Republican fold.
Tesla shares are down more than 18% this year after it posted in July its worst quarterly sales decline in more than a decade and profit that missed Wall Street targets, though its profit margin was better than many had feared.
Musk also warned of "a few rough quarters" after the end of support for electric vehicles by the Trump administration.
Investors worry whether he will be able to devote enough time and attention to Tesla after locking horns with Trump over his ambitions for a new political party.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump team quietly ends guidance that forced school to accommodate students who don't speak English
The Trump administration has quietly rescinded a longstanding Department of Education guidance explaining how schools must comply with civil rights laws and court decisions mandating they provide services to English language learners, alarming education advocates. The guidance, issued in 2015, details how schools must comply with longstanding parts of U.S. law like Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which bars national origin discrimination. Courts have interpreted this provision to mean that schools must offer support services to students who don't speak English. Since taking office, the Trump administration has been pushing to prioritize English-speaking as a national priority while cutting support for the roughly 5 million U.S. public school students who don't yet speak the language, as well as non-English speakers more broadly. In February, the president signed an executive order designating English the official language of the U.S. while rescinding a federal mandate requiring agencies and institutions receiving federal funding to provide language assistance. Since then, the Department of Education has laid off nearly all the workers in its Office of English Language Acquisition. In July, the Department of Justice wrote in a memo to all federal agencies to 'minimize non-essential multilingual services' and argued that treating people differently based on English proficiency didn't necessarily constitute national origin discrimination. The memo added that by next January, the DOJ will create guidance to 'help agencies prioritize English while explaining precisely when and how multilingual assistance remains necessary,' part of the White House goal to "promote assimilation over division' through language policy. Critics said rescinding the Education Department guidance will, in fact, make it harder for U.S. students to learn English, while freeing up districts to potentially ignore past rulings and legal mandates to support pupils who are still learning the language without fear of federal enforcement. 'For a teacher, it was kind of like the Bible,' Montserrat Garibay, head of the Biden-era Office of English Language Acquisition, told The Washington Post, which first reported on the rescinded 2015 guidance. 'If, in fact, we want our students to learn English, this needs to be in place.' 'Instead of providing this office with more capacity and more resources to do exactly what the executive order says — to make sure that everybody speaks English — they are doing the total opposite,' she added. Last month, the administration temporarily withheld $890 million in English language learning funds and called for their elimination next year. 'We're put in a position where, we want you to learn English, but at the same time, we're going to de-emphasize anything that will help provide you the opportunity to learn English,' Jeff Hutcheson, the director of advocacy and public policy at the English-language learning group TESOL International Association, told K-12 Dive last month. Outside of education, other parts of the government have been quick to embrace the Trump administration's language mandates. 'HUD is ENGLISH only,' Housing Secretary Scott Turner wrote on X on Tuesday, sharing an image of eliminating a Spanish-language page on the Department of Housing and Urban Development website.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's new co-FBI deputy director once tried to subpoena abortion patients' records
Andrew Bailey, the newly appointed 'co-deputy director' of the FBI, demanded records about minors seeking abortions while he served as Missouri 's attorney general, but a judge temporarily blocked the subpoena. Bailey announced Monday that he was stepping into the role — which he will share with the bureau's current deputy director Dan Bongino — and leaving his post as Missouri attorney general. In March, Bailey subpoenaed Missouri Abortion Fund, a nonprofit that provides financial assistance for locals who can't afford the full cost of abortion care, as part of the state's 2024 lawsuit against Planned Parenthood Great Plains, court records show. The subpoena demanded the nonprofit hand over documents about minors seeking abortions as well as its communication with the branch of Planned Parenthood, records show. Parental consent is required for anyone under 18 seeking an abortion, Missouri law dictates. The subpoena was an 'an abuse of government power' and a 'fishing expedition,' Elad Gross, a lawyer for the nonprofit, which is not a party in the case, told the Missouri Independent in April. The attorney general's 'use of its governmental power to demand records from non-party Missouri Abortion Fund is a violation of the right to reproductive freedom,' Gross wrote in a filing, objecting to the subpoena. The judge overseeing the case temporarily blocked the subpoena in April. The Independent has reached out to the nonprofit and Planned Parenthood about Bailey's new role. In the lawsuit, filed in February 2024, accused Planned Parenthood Great Plains of 'trafficking' minors across state lines for abortions without obtaining parental consent. The suit stems from a video from Project Veritas, a far-right activist group known for recording undercover videos, that depicts a man asking Planned Parenthood workers if his alleged 13-year-old niece could get an abortion without her parents finding out. In an attempt to throw out the suit, Planned Parenthood called the scenario 'fictitious' and argued the video was heavily edited and inaccurate. The court has denied its motions to dismiss the case and Planned Parenthood has filed a counterclaim. This lawsuit is one of several attacks Bailey has made against reproductive rights groups. Last month, Bailey escalated his onslaught to a national scale. He sued Planned Parenthood Federation of America, alleging the nonprofit spread misinformation about the dangers of mifepristone, one drug in a two-drug regimen for medication abortions. Bailey's lawsuit comes as part of a larger effort — following the fall of Roe v. Wade — to question the safety of the abortion drug. Anti-abortion activists earlier this year pushed a report by right-wing think tank Ethics and Public Policy Center claiming serious complications from mifepristone use were 22 times higher than previously reported. Critics slammed the report as 'bogus.' The Trump administration has also targeted Planned Parenthood. President Donald Trump 's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' included a provision that would have stripped Medicaid funds from going toward nonprofits that received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023, including Planned Parenthood and a network of clinics in Maine. A federal judge last month ordered the government to continue reimbursing Planned Parenthood with Medicaid funds.
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's latest attempt to release secret Epstein files rebuffed as 'diversion' by Clinton-appointed judge
Donald Trump was handed another blow on Wednesday when a federal judge denied his administration's attempts to release grand jury testimony from the Jeffrey Epstein case. U.S. District Judge Richard Berman deemed Trump's Justice Department did not provide adequate reasoning to unseal the highly-protected materials. He also said that the grand jury motion was likely a 'diversion' coming from the Trump administration. '[T]he court denies the government's motion to unseal the Epstein grand jury transcripts and exhibits,' the Clinton-appointed judge wrote in his Wednesday decision. It comes after Attorney General Pam Bondi moved at the direct of the president this summer to request the documents be unsealed in attempts to satisfy Americans who were enraged over the lackluster review of the Epstein files. This story is breaking and will be updated.
