
Meta, Apple fined 700 million euros for violating EU antitrust rules
LONDON :European Union regulators on Wednesday imposed fines on Apple and Meta totalling 700 million euros ($877 million) for violating new antitrust rules, the first sanctions under landmark legislation aimed at curbing Big Tech's power.
Here is some reaction to the penalties:
APPLE IN AN EMAILED STATEMENT:
"Today's announcements are yet another example of the European Commission unfairly targeting Apple in a series of decisions that are bad for the privacy and security of our users, bad for products, and force us to give away our technology for free."
META IN AN EMAILED STATEMENT:
"The European Commission is attempting to handicap successful American businesses while allowing Chinese and European companies to operate under different standards.
"This isn't just about a fine; the Commission forcing us to change our business model, effectively imposing a multi-billion-dollar tariff on Meta while requiring us to offer an inferior service."
"FORTNITE" MAKER EPIC GAMES CEO TIM SWEENEY:
"Great news for app developers worldwide! (...) Today's decision benefits all developers - European developers and American developers alike. It highlights the need for America to similarly pass the Open App Markets Act to bring competition back to digital markets.
"Lobbyists and shills funded by American Big Tech had better not misportray Europe's modest fine for Apple's lawbreaking as a "European tax on American companies". To do so would be to try to gaslight the administration into a trade war to protect Apple's lawlessness."
ANDREAS AUDRETSCH, DEPUTY PARLIAMENTARY LEADER OF GREEN PARTY IN GERMAN FEDERAL PARLIAMENT:
"The fines (...) are clearly too low. The Commission should have taken tougher action; in previous proceedings, the Commission had imposed significantly higher fines in the billions.
"There must be no doubt that the Commission is prepared to exhaust all legal means to enforce European law. This is particularly important at a time when Donald Trump and U.S. tech oligarchs are deliberately trying to undermine European law.
"There must be no subjugation of Europe. If Apple and Meta let the 60-day deadline pass without paying the fines, further steps must be taken."
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (CCIA) EUROPE'S SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND HEAD OF OFFICE DANIEL FRIEDLAENDER:
"The DMA's (Digital Markets Act) credibility is being weakened by its unpredictable enforcement and shifting demands, combined with sweeping product-design mandates from the European Commission that disrupt the user experience and limit EU businesses' ability to reach consumers."
"(...) The DMA has become highly politicised, and could even force some companies to provide services at a loss. There is a huge opportunity for regulatory simplification in Europe – so far, however, the DMA decisions are going in the opposite direction."
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PRIVACY PROFESSIONALS' (IAPP) DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH & INSIGHTS JOE JONES:
"The fines land at a time of heightened scrutiny by the current U.S. Administration on the application of EU laws to U.S. companies.
"(...) Open questions include not only how will addressed companies respond to EU regulatory enforcement but how will overseas governments, including and especially the U.S., respond. The U.S. Administration has declared it will consider responsive actions like tariffs to combat certain foreign government policies levied against U.S. companies.
"The EU's digital rulebook not only has grown in size but has grown more complex as well as robust in its application, with fines and corrective measures being imposed.
EUROPEAN CONSUMER GROUP BEUC DIRECTOR GENERAL AGUSTIN REYNA:
"Today's decisions are important to show Big Tech that if they choose to operate on the EU's Single Market they must play by our rules.
"Apple and Meta have had ample time to comply with the (DMA) but instead have delayed compliance and tried to twist the rules to their advantage. Consumers deserve better choices, and businesses need fairer market conditions in digital markets, so the Commission must enforce the law.
"The (DMA) is a gamechanger in terms of opening up digital markets to more competition. The Commission must enforce the (law) effectively so that gatekeepers comply with all its provisions and consumers can reap the benefits of more and better choice in digital services."
RASMUS ANDRESEN, BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SPOKESPERSON FOR THE GREENS/EFA IN EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT:
"It is a long-overdue and important step that the EU Commission is finally using its regulatory power to rein in the U.S. tech giants.
"(...) With this action, Europe is sending a clear signal: the digital internal market is not a lawless space for billion-dollar tech companies. It is about fairness, real competition, and the protection of consumer rights and small businesses.
"Trump's calls for an end to EU tech regulation are extremely dangerous. It is good that the EU Commission is responding with the application of legislation. We decide on our own rules.
"But competition rules alone are not enough. We also need consistent and fair taxation of tech companies. It is unacceptable that an entire industry makes massive profits while simultaneously avoiding its responsibilities to society. The EU Commission should finally present a proposal to fairly tax the large tech companies in Europe."
GERMAN ECONOMY MINISTRY SPOKESPERSON:
"More competition in the European Union benefits not only consumers, but also all European, as well as non-European, SMEs and start-ups."
($1 = 0.8773 euros)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
29 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Eurostar plans 5-hour trains from London to Frankfurt, Geneva
Eurostar's plans come as it faces criticism over high prices and reliability. PHOTO: AFP LONDON - Eurostar Group Ltd plans to launch direct train services from London to Frankfurt and Geneva next decade, connecting the UK's capital to two of Europe's key financial centres. The journeys would each take roughly five hours, a spokesperson for the operator said. As part of the new services, Eurostar, which is majority-owned by France's state rail company SNCF, said it would invest approximately €2 billion (S$2.9 billion) to increase its fleet by around 30 per cent. Eurostar's plans come as it faces criticism over high prices and reliability. It could also face opposition from other operators pushing to launch rival services to end its 31-year monopoly on international trains from Britain. Mr Richard Branson's Virgin Group and FS Italiane Group are among the companies seeking to challenge Eurostar on its flagship route between London and Paris. Offering direct trains from London to Frankfurt and Geneva would allow bankers and other finance professionals to continue their work and make calls during their journeys, unlike on planes. Eurostar currently operates services in five countries: the UK, Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Germany. The most popular route, London to Paris, attracted more than 280,000 passengers in 2024. The company behind St Pancras, the London train station where Eurostar operates, and Getlink SE, the Channel Tunnel operator, said earlier in 2025 they wanted to open more services to France and new routes to Germany and Switzerland. In 2024, a report from campaign group Transport and Environment (T&E) rated Eurostar the worst-performing of 27 European rail services. The survey considered factors such as ticket prices, reliability and experience. Eurostar disputed the findings. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Blackstone plans US$500 billion Europe investment: CEO
BLACKSTONE is planning to invest as much as US$500 billion in Europe over the next 10 years, underlining the continent's growing appeal to investors during a period of geopolitical flux. 'We see it as a major opportunity for us,' chief executive officer Steve Schwarzman said in a Bloomberg Television interview on Tuesday. 'They are starting to change their approach here, which we think will result in higher growth rates. So this has worked out amazingly well for us.' Schwarzman's comments, which mark the 25th anniversary of the alternative asset manager's operations in London, are the latest sign of investment firms touting the attractiveness of Europe. At last week's SuperReturn International conference in Berlin, executives from behemoths such as BC Partners, Permira and Brookfield Asset Management talked up the case for Europe as an investment destination as global economic risks mount. When Blackstone opened its London office in 2000, the firm's only other office was in New York, according to a statement at the time. Then, it had raised more than US$13 billion for discretionary investment funds focused on alternative asset classes. Today, it is the world's largest alternative asset manager, with more than US$1 trillion in assets under management and offices in 27 cities around the world, according to its website. It is the largest fund manager in European real estate, according to industry group INREV. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up A bet on the continent's urban warehouses is one of Blackstone's largest and most profitable investments ever. The firm's London office, which is due to move to a new building that's currently under construction on Berkeley Square in Mayfair, now employs 650 people, Schwarzman said. The firm has about US$100 billion invested in the UK already, making it one of the largest foreign investors in the country, he added. Blackstone has poured capital into UK real estate bets, including a site for a data center in the north of England that has the potential to be Europe's largest. 'The UK government has been really helpful, really focused to make that happen,' Schwarzman said. Outside Europe, Blackstone is also looking to the Middle East as an investment destination, rather than simply a region in which it has raised vast sums of capital. While the region has traditionally been dominated by local businesses and capital, the rapid growth of cities including Riyadh and Dubai as international hubs is making it an attractive opportunity, he said. BLOOMBERG

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Hegseth defends troop deployment to Los Angeles at testy hearing
Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth (centre) defended the Pentagon's deployment of nearly 5,000 active-duty Marines and National Guard members to help police in Los Angeles quell sporadic unrest. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTIMES WASHINGTON – In response to often sharp questioning from House Democrats on June 10, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the Pentagon's deployment of nearly 5,000 active-duty Marines and National Guard members to help police in Los Angeles quell sporadic unrest – at an estimated cost of US$134 million (S$172 million). Mr Hegseth, a National Guard veteran, also suggested in testimony before the House Appropriations Committee that the use of the guard members, part-time citizen soldiers, for homeland defence would expand under President Donald Trump. 'I think we're entering another phase, especially under President Trump with his focus on the homeland, where the National Guard and reserves become a critical component of how we secure that homeland,' Mr Hegseth told lawmakers. Officials in Los Angeles, as well as other major cities across the country controlled by Democrats, have expressed concern that the military deployments in California could set a precedent and serve as a test run for other urban areas where the administration's aggressive immigration enforcement could prompt large protests. Mr Hegseth's appearance before the House Appropriations Committee – the first of three hearings he has on Capitol Hill this week – was widely anticipated by official Washington. It was his first congressional hearing since a Senate panel considered his nomination in January. In recent months, Mr Hegseth has sought to fend off a series of contentious issues that threatened to undermine his credibility inside the Pentagon and, more important, inside the White House. Perhaps most damaging were his disclosures on commercial chat app Signal of flight sequencing of American fighter jets in strikes on Yemen. Mr Hegseth has also seen the dissolution of his inner circle of close advisers. Four members of the team he brought to the Pentagon have left the department, three of them accused of leaking information and escorted from the building. A fifth – his chief of staff – has also departed his post. Democrats on the committee immediately homed in on those issues. 'Your tenure as secretary has been marked by endless chaos,' said Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, the committee's top Democrat. 'Your careless sharing of military secrets in a nonsecure Signal chat,' she added, 'could have placed American airmen in danger.' But Mr Hegseth did not engage the criticism, and the most contentious parts of the 2½-hour hearing soon pivoted to the Trump administration's decision to deploy 700 active-duty Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles. 'The president's decision to call the National Guard troops to Los Angeles was premature, and the decision to deploy active-duty Marines as well is downright escalatory,' said Rep. Betty McCollum, D-Minn. 'Active-duty military has absolutely no role in domestic law enforcement, and they are not trained for those missions.' But Mr Hegseth defended the deployment, telling lawmakers: 'We ought to be able to enforce immigration law in this country.' In a heated exchange with Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., Mr Hegseth cited his own experience as a National Guard soldier deployed against Black Lives Matter protesters five years ago. 'As a secretary of defence who's been in a unit holding riot shields outside the White House during the chaos of the summer of 2020,' he said, 'I know what it's like to be immediately deployed into a situation like that.' At one point, he ignored direct questions from Ms McCollum, the top Democrat on the panel's defence subcommittee, about the cost to deploy troops to Los Angeles. Instead, Mr Hegseth used his time to attack Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, Gov. Gavin Newsom of California, Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles and the Biden administration. A clearly frustrated McCollum yielded back her time. When he was questioned again about the mission's projected costs, Mr Hegseth deferred to the Pentagon's acting comptroller, Bryn Woollacott MacDonnell, who said that Marine and National Guard deployments – estimated to last 60 days – would cost about US$134 million, mainly for travel, housing and food. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.