logo
Netherlands makes formal request for new nitrates derogation

Netherlands makes formal request for new nitrates derogation

Agrilanda day ago
The government of the Netherlands has made a formal request to the European Commission to extend its nitrates derogation under the EU nitrates directive.
It had been thought that Ireland would be the only EU member state seeking an extension to the nitrates derogation when our current derogation expires on December 31 this year.
This had been the impression of Irish farm organisations, and also appeared to be the view of Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine Martin Heydon.
When a new coalition government came to power in the Netherlands last year, it indicated in its coalition agreement document that it would look to retain the derogation.
It now appears that the government there has now made the first official moves to implement that coalition policy.
Under the EU Nitrates Directive, farmers with a derogation can farm at stocking rates over the standard derogation limit of 170kg of nitrogen (N) per hectare. In Ireland at present, famers can avail of a derogation of 220kgN/ha.
Prior to January 1, 2024, the upper stocking limit of the derogation throughout Ireland was 250kgN/ha, though this had to be reduced due to rules around water quality (there are small pockets of the country where the higher limit still applies).
In a letter submitted this month to the Dutch House of Represeantives (the country's equivalent to the Dáil), the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries, Food Security and Nature, Femke Wiersma, said: "The derogation from the Nitrates Directive will expire on December 31, 2025. However, maintaining the derogation is of paramount importance for both Dutch agriculture and for the preservation of grassland and thus water quality.
"I inform the House that, in parallel with sending this letter, I have submitted an application to the European Commission for a new derogation," Minister Wiersma said.
The minister said that the content, scope, and conditions of a derogation will need to be further developed in discussions with the European Commission.
It also appears that the Dutch are seeking a region-specific derogation, in line with last year's coalition agreement.
The formal letter making the request for a derogation was sent directly to the European Commissioner for the Environment Jessika Roswall, who is the commissioner in charge of the Nitrates Directive.
A spokesperson for the European Commission confirmed to Agriland that the formal request for an extension of the derogation has been received by the commission.
In the letter, seen by Agriland, Minister Wiersma said (translated from Dutch): "On December 31, 2025, the Commission Implementing Decision of September 30, 2022, granting a request by the Netherlands pursuant to [the] directive concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, will expire.
"I therefore request you [the commissioner], on behalf of the Dutch government, to grant a new region-specific derogation from the standard use of 170kg of nitrogen per hectare per year for animal manure...for the Netherlands, effective January 1, 2026," the minister added.
She requested Commissioner Roswall to consider the request for a derogation and initiate the necessary decision making process.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trading principles for predictability — what the EU gave up to avoid a tariff war
Trading principles for predictability — what the EU gave up to avoid a tariff war

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Trading principles for predictability — what the EU gave up to avoid a tariff war

In the hours following the announcement that the US and EU had struck a deal last weekend on tariffs, European reaction was mixed. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the deal, which imposes 15% tariffs on most items going both ways, "creates certainty in uncertain times" and "delivers stability and predictability, for citizens and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic" as she tried to sell the deal to the 27 EU member states. But if Ms von der Leyen expected a lap of honour to ease her troubled start to her second term, one was not coming. "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission," French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou wrote on X of what he called the "von der Leyen-Trump deal". German Chancellor Friedrich Merz himself initially appeared satisfied, saying that the agreement "succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard". But by Monday, amid cross-party criticism, Mr Merz said the deal would "substantially damage" his nation's finances, but acknowledged that the negotiating team "couldn't expect to achieve any more" as Mr Trump's willingness to enter into a 30% trade war was apparent. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, an ally of Mr Trump, said the US president "ate von der Leyen for breakfast" while Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said he would support it "without any enthusiasm". Across the bloc, there has been criticism of Europe's perceived capitulation, with many echoing Mr Bayrou's sentiments that it poses fundamental questions about the cohesiveness of the project. German Green MP Sandra Detzer told her parliament that the EU "has agreed to a deal that abandons fundamental principles of rules-based global trade, instead of long-term stability". Ms Detzer's alarm is representative of a particular sharp end of the deal. According to one think tank, the deal will cost the German economy around €6.5bn in terms of its GDP in the first year, while experts have slashed the country's growth forecasts in recent months. Fabio de Masi, a German MEP, told EuroNews this week that not only was the deal bad, it was "a betrayal" for which Ms von der Leyen should resign. The bloc is set to face 15% tariffs on most of its goods including cars, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals entering the US, and 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth €643bn over three years. But as the tariffs were set to kick in on Friday, the two sides had not agreed on all of the details, which Ms von der Leyen's commission has stressed will be a "set of principles" and not a trade deal. On Thursday, commission spokesperson Olof Gill said that "from there will flow the additional negotiated exemptions that we're looking to bake into our agreement with the US". Drinks tariffs What shape those carveouts take is still to be decided, with a 15% tariff applying until they are. That is of particular concern to the drinks industry across the continent. From Irish whiskey to French and Spanish wines, exporters across Europe have been arguing for a carveout on their products. The US tariff on European spirits is currently 10%. Brussels is keen to reduce that to zero or, for wine at least, to the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) rates that are set on a fixed cost per litre basis, rather than in percentage terms. Until recently, spirits had benefited from zero tariffs between the US and EU following an agreement in 1997 that also included other countries such as Canada and Japan. That lasted until 2018, when the EU response to US steel and aluminium tariffs included increased duties on US bourbon and other spirits. These were suspended in 2021. From Irish whiskey to French and Spanish wines, exporters across Europe have been arguing for a carveout on their products. File photo US most-favoured-nation rates for wine are 19.8c per litre for sparkling and 6.3c per litre for most other wine, which equates to very low rates in most cases. But as Mr Trump signed an executive order overnight into Friday, there was no movement on the exemption and the drinks industry will, for now at least, pay the 15% rate. With EU officials privately briefing Reuters that negotiations could run into late autumn, that will mean financial pain for those businesses in the short-term, at least. Speaking to journalists at a press conference on Thursday, commission spokesperson Olof Gill said: 'The commission remains determined to achieve and secure the maximum number of carve-outs, including for traditional EU products such as wine and spirits. 'It is not our expectation that wine and spirits would be included as an exemption in the first group announced by the US tomorrow, and therefore that sector, as with all other economic sectors, will be captured by the 15% ceiling.' Motor tariffs In Germany, a number of car manufacturers revised down profit guidance on the back of the tariffs, which will face a 15% tariff as well, but for BMW, the impact of the agreement was "exaggerated". 'I think this tariff discussion is way exaggerated and also its effects on the industry,' chief executive Oliver Zipse told the Financial Times. 'What's more important is the question, are the products attractive?' Carveouts At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, enterprise minister Peter Burke updated ministers on the detail of the weekend's agreement, telling journalists that there will be exemptions to the tariff regime, with aviation one for which Ireland had successfully argued alongside others. 'The key thing is that there will be a number of carveouts. Obviously, aviation has been cited as zero-for-zero, but also in relation to agri-foods and potentially spirits.' Ireland, like many other countries, is banking on the carveouts agreed protecting key sectors like agri-foods and that the rate for pharmaceuticals would not exceed 15%. Like many countries across Europe, ministers here are privately saying that the deal is far from ideal, but also query what else is to be done. By Friday, they could point to Mr Trump's executive order, which imposed tariffs on many countries with whom he had not negotiated. But there is also acceptance that the tariff regime brings with it a new reality, one with which the EU needs to grapple. If countries are arguing for exceptions, how does the European negotiating team balance those interests? And what will the reaction be when the final deal is reached?

Ireland fined €1.54m by ECJ for delay in writing Work-Life Balance directive into Irish law
Ireland fined €1.54m by ECJ for delay in writing Work-Life Balance directive into Irish law

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Ireland fined €1.54m by ECJ for delay in writing Work-Life Balance directive into Irish law

The European Union's highest court has fined Ireland €1.54 million for delays in fully transposing the EU's 2019 directive on Work-Life Balance for Parents and Carers. The directive was due to have been fully transposed by the middle of 2022 but the legislation required to complete the process was not enacted until last year. The fine imposed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) is the fourth imposed on Ireland since 2020 for failing to transpose a directive in the anticipated timeframe following similar issues with regard to recent directives on anti-money laundering measures, audio visual services and electronic communications. The total fines imposed during the period now comes to just over €13 million. READ MORE The Work-Life Balance directive was intended to extend a number of entitlements to carers and parents with regard to time off work to allow them meet caring or support obligations, mainly to family members. Laura Bambrick, head of social policy and employment at the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, said part of the problem in this instance was that the government sought to go beyond what was required of it in its legislation and this, combined with complications associated with the pandemic, helped to prolong the process. 'The directive had a number of elements to it,' she says. 'It introduced paternity leave, paid parents' leave, it gave all workers the right of five days unpaid care leave for serious medical reasons, if a close relative or friend fell ill. It also allowed parents and carers to request flexible working and it was those last two that were late being transposed. 'Ireland has tended to be bad at transposing,' she continued. 'Being late, blocking, diluting the transposition. In this case, though, the period for transposition largely coincided with Covid and Ireland was one of the dozen countries given warnings about late transposition. 'What was specific to Ireland was that our Work Life Balance Bill became a miscellaneous piece of legislation, a lot of other bits including improvements to breastfeeding breaks, the introduction of domestic violence leave and the right to request remote working for all workers were all added.' In a statement, the Department for Children, Disability and Equality said it takes its responsibilities seriously regarding transposition of EU directives but that 'there were particular circumstances which delayed transposition of this directive, leading ultimately to today's penalty' It said many of the provisions required by the directive had been introduced before this deadline. Among other factors, it pointed to the pandemic as having contributed to delays and said the decision to attempt to deal with the issue of remote working had added to the time required to pass the required legislation. 'Ireland has made progress on reducing delays in transposing EU directives and is currently ranked second best overall in the EU, alongside Finland, in terms of timely transposition of EU Single Market Directives,' it said.

Tánaiste to meet family of Private Séan Rooney next week
Tánaiste to meet family of Private Séan Rooney next week

RTÉ News​

time4 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Tánaiste to meet family of Private Séan Rooney next week

Tánaiste Simon Harris has confirmed that he will meet the mother of Irish peacekeeper Private Seán Rooney, who was killed in Lebanon in 2022, after he was criticised for speaking publicly on the case before talking to her and her family. In a statement, Natasha Rooney criticised what she said was a "sham trial" in Lebanon that convicted and sentenced those involved in his death. She also referenced Mr Harris, saying: "In a country where victims' rights ought to be paramount, it would perhaps be wise for the Tánaiste to speak to me, before seeking to speak for me, in his public statements". In response, the Tánaiste - who is also Minister for Foreign Affairs and Defence - said that he accepted the point made and will "reserve any further comment" until he meets Pte Rooney's family next week. "I'll be meeting Natasha next week and I'm going to reserve any further comment until I meet her. "Natasha is a grieving mother fighting for justice for her son who died while serving with absolute distinction. "He has my absolute and total respect, as does his family, and I'll reserve making any further comments until I engage with Natasha directly," Mr Harris said. Pte Rooney, who was 24 and from Newtowncunningham in Co Donegal, was killed when their armoured vehicle was fired on in Lebanon on 14 December 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store