Indiana Supreme Court considers Attorney General suits against TikTok
Indiana Supreme Court Justices question defendants in a case between the Indiana Attorney General's Office and the owners of TikTok. (Screenshot from oral arguments)
Indiana's highest court weighed allegations of TikTok's alleged deceptive practices in the Hoosier State on Tuesday, skeptical of arguments from both sides about jurisdictional issues.
The two suits, heard together, were filed by Attorney General Todd Rokita against the popular, short-form video app in December 2022 in Fort Wayne. He accused TikTok and its parent company, ByteDance, of violating Indiana's Deceptive Consumer Sales Act with its age rating for those 12 and older — claiming that it contained more sexual content, profanity and drug references than advertised.
Rokita's TikTok legal battle part of array of contingency fee contracts
The above made TikTok unsafe for children, he continued. Additionally, he claimed in a separate lawsuit that the company failed to protect user data from the Chinese Communist Party.
Justices noted ongoing national security concerns about the app, including a rare bipartisan law requiring ByteDance to sell the app to an American company. President Donald Trump, who embraced the app in his second campaign, has intervened and delayed that law's implementation three times.
'Congress doesn't agree on much, but they agreed on this. And the (U.S.) Supreme Court said it's okay to (ban) in this context,' said Justice Christoper Goff. 'But now, we're on pause … this seems to be a completely unique circumstance. And I cannot, for the life of me, imagine, with all of that going on, why it would be appropriate for us, or reasonable for us, to cite the precedent to exercise jurisdiction here and write a rule for all time.'
Conservative and liberal lawmakers both cite worries about TikTok's parent company, Beijing-based ByteDance, and its ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Some have openly wondered if the app feeds user data to Chinese authorities, including Rokita.
'Our lawsuit against TikTok was filed to protect our children and to protect our data privacy that we allege is being stolen by the Chinese Communist Party. We maintain their business model intentionally deceives children and adults to drive up profits by saying it is appropriate for kids and that your personal data is safe. Neither is true,' the office said in a statement in 2023.
A trial court judge dismissed Rokita's suits but the Indiana Court of Appeals reinstated it. State attorneys on Tuesday countered that the 'federal law over the divestiture of ownership of TikTok has nothing to do with this case,' maintaining that the issue at hand was 'deceptive and misleading representations made to consumers.'
Attorney Brian Paul, representing TikTok and ByteDance, argued that the Indiana Supreme Court wasn't the appropriate venue for the case, which is the first issue before the justices.
'Indiana is seeking to punish TikTok for statements that were not made in Indiana, that are not about Indiana, that were not targeted at Indiana and were not tailored to Indiana,' Paul said in his opening remarks.
The state previously argued that justices could intervene because Hoosiers enter into user contracts with TikTok when they download the app.
Paul said because TikTok has no physical presence in the state, not even a server, Indiana wasn't appropriate for the lawsuit — though the company makes $46 million off of Hoosier data annually by using collected data to tailor advertiser content, plaintiffs said.
Justices seemed to doubt that reasoning, pointing to other products, like magazines shipped across state boundaries, and legal precedent.
'TikTok seeks to escape the rules that apply to everyone else, from print magazines to burger franchises,' said Solicitor General James Barta, arguing on behalf of the state.
Barta said that these 'daily exchange(s) of data' are used by the plaintiffs to craft 'addictive content' based on user locations to earn millions.
'And yet, TikTok says Indiana courts can do nothing to hold it accountable for misleading and deceptive statements that induced Indiana parents to download this app for themselves or for their children, and that ultimately end up harming children and other users,' Barta concluded.
Chief Justice Loretta Rush wondered if such a broad application of Indiana law might capture other apps and social media companies anytime a Hoosiers accepts a website's cookies or agrees to a user contract.
'Every one of those is going to be subject to (our jurisdiction) no matter where they're located or the product?' Rush asked. '… are we going to now have personal jurisdiction of any company that grabs and sells data in Indiana, no matter how small?'
That concern appeared to resonate with some of Rush's fellow justices.
'The implications for things like free speech, for interstate commerce seemed, to me, to be just breathtaking,' said Goff.
CONTACT US
In response, Barta said the core of the case was about deception and misleading consumers and that the state 'has a significant interest in protecting its consumers, in having its courts interpret its laws.'
Justice Derek Molter noted, however, that it was 'unusual' to claim a violation of Indiana's Deceptive Consumer Sales Act without the exchange of money.
'… it is core to TikTok's business model to be able to monetize users' time and attention and this is, of course, not the only company that does this,' Barta said. '… it would be awfully odd to say that the legislature has been completely unaware of this, and yet has decided to do nothing about it with the Deceptive Consumer Sales Act.'
He said the law doesn't cover 'free' transactions, but does apply to an exchange of goods and services. He contends that Tiktok users exchange their data for entertainment. The state is seeking civil penalties and a jury trial as allowed under that law.
Justices, led by Rush, indicated they would issue their ruling 'in due course.'
This story has been corrected to say the Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the trial court judge.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump admin sanctions three Mexican financial firms over suspected links to drug cartels
The Trump administration on Wednesday restricted US banks from making transactions with three Mexican financial firms over concerns that they are laundering money for drug cartels. The sanctions – the first implemented under the Fentanyl Sanctions Act and the FEND Off Fentanyl Act – targeted Mexican banks CIBanco and Intercam Banco and the brokerage firm Vector Casa de Bolsa, which have a combined $22 billion in assets, according to the Treasury Department. 'Cartels have exploited Mexico-based financial institutions to move money, enabling the vicious fentanyl supply chain that has poisoned countless Americans,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent wrote on X. 'Through the first use of a new powerful authority granted by Congress, Treasury will effectively require US financial institutions to sever ties with 3 Mexico-based financial institutions for laundering money on behalf of cartels,' Bessent added. 'Both the United States and Mexico are committed to financial systems with strong anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism controls and these actions affirm Treasury's commitment to using all tools at our disposal to counter the threat posed by terrorist organizations.' 4 Trump designated several Mexican drug cartels as terrorist groups earlier this year. REUTERS The sanctions were implemented after the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) determined that CIBanco, Intercam and Vector were 'moving money on behalf of cartels' and had become 'vital cogs in the fentanyl supply chain,' according to Bessent. FinCen's investigation found a 'long-standing pattern of associations, transactions, and provision of financial services' between CIBanco and Intercam and several Mexican drug trafficking groups, including Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) and Gulf Cartel. Between 2021 and 2024, CIBanco and Intercam processed over $3.6 million in purchases of fentanyl precursor chemicals from China, shipped to Mexico, for 'illicit purposes,' according to FinCen. The financial crimes watchdog further alleged that Intercam executives 'met directly with suspected CJNG members' in 2022 'to discuss money laundering schemes, including transferring funds from China,' and that a CIBanco employee 'knowingly facilitated the creation of an account to purportedly launder $10 million on behalf of a Gulf Cartel member' in 2023. 4 The sanctions were imposed under new authorities granted to Trump administration to combat illegal fentanyl. Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty Images 4 Treasury's financial crimes watchdog, FinCen, conducted the investigation against the Mexican banks. Vector's alleged dealings with drug cartels date back to 2013, according to FinCen, which found a Sinaola Cartel 'money mule' laundered at least $2 million from the US to Mexico through the brokerage firm. In 2021 alone, Vector 'remitted over USD 17 million in suspicious wire transfers to multiple China-based companies … on behalf of a company that was reportedly tied to an international drug trafficking organization,' according to FinCen. Since at least 2019, Vector processed fund transfers to 'over 20 China-based companies' that shipped fentanyl precursor chemicals to Mexico. 'Based on non-public information, as well as the volume and dollar amount of funds transfers that Vector processed over several years with these companies, FinCEN assesses that such transactions likely facilitated illicit opioid trafficking by Mexico-based [drug trafficking organizations],' the Treasury Department bureau noted. 4 The sanctions will prohibit US banks from making certain transactions with the three Mexican firms. FinCen also discovered that Vector processed 'bribes' paid by the Sinaloa Cartel to a former top Mexican law enforcement official who was convicted of corruption charges in 2023. The Treasury Department said it aims to deny anyone associated with Mexican drug cartels deemed Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and/or Specially Designated Global Terrorists by the Trump administration 'access to the US financial system.'
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Trump's budget director defends NPR, PBS, foreign aid cuts to senators
1 of 3 | White House budget director Russell Vought testifies at a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Wednesda. Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo June 25 (UPI) -- White House budget director Russell Vought on Wednesday urged U.S. senators to approve the Trump administration's proposed cuts of $8.3 billion in foreign assistance and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting. Vought testified before the Senate Appropriations Committee. The cuts, which are from the Department of Government Efficiency, are a tiny fraction of the nearly $7 trillion the federal government spends each year The House last week voted 214-212 to advance the request that reduces funds for the U.S. Agency for International Development, which has largely been dismantled, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps to fund NPR and PBS. Republicans have a 53-47 majority in the Senate. A simple majority is needed for passage. A group of protesters disrupted the meeting, saying "Vought's Cuts Kill," and "Vought Lies, People Die!" Capitol Police officers forcibly removed some protesters from the room, with at least one hitting his head on the floor. During his opening remarks, Vought touted the cuts as part of Trump's "steadfast commitment to cutting wasteful federal spending antithetical to American interests." "Most Americans would be shocked and appalled to learn that their tax dollars, money they thought was going to medical care, was actually going to far-left activism, population control and sex workers," Vought said. "To be clear, no lifesaving treatment will be impacted by this rescissions package." If Congress approves the cuts, the AIDS program would lose $400 million, and another $500 million would be stripped from global health programs that support child and maternal health, AIDS care and prevention of infectious diseases. Lawmakers from both parties have criticized the proposed cuts. "There's no way that President Trump's administration would allow such wasteful and questionable spending," Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine, told Vought. "So, I am puzzled why you would be cutting funds that the president signed in March as part of the continuing resolution." Trump signed legislation in March to keep the government open through September. Vought responded the costs are "largely multiyear funding," and that "there is some expiring funds with regard to fiscal year '25, but the way that this was structured was to find the waste. "We are $37 trillion in national debt," Vought said. "Our view is to see, when we look at these programs, can we do it cheaper, as evidenced by what we find, and then to reflect that, with some savings to the taxpayer." Collins also questioned the administration's proposed cuts targeting the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR. "These are not only the right thing to do for humanitarian reasons, but they're incredible instruments of soft power," she said. That includes "lifesaving multivitamins for pregnant mothers and the food supplement that's used for malnourished children." Collins held up a packet of Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food used to treat malnutrition in babies and young children. Sen. Lindsey Graham, the Republican serving South Carolina, said he was surprised that millions of dollars were being spent to support abortions and gender care under PEPFAR. The AIDS-fighting program has been credited for saving millions of lives since President George W. Bush launched it more than 20 years ago. Graham said he would approve the measure though he backs the program. "And to my Democratic colleagues: There is a consequence to this crap," Graham said. "The first thing I thought about: How is PEPFAR fraud, waste and abuse? Well, I had no idea there was one dollar spent like this." GOP members in the House and Senate have voiced concerns about the potential impact cuts would have on local stations and rural radio. "We have Native American radio stations in South Dakota. They get their funding through NPR," Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said during the hearing. "Ninety-some percent of what they use." The director called PBS and NPR "radical far-left networks," and "there is no longer any excuse for tax dollars to subsidize" them.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Usha Vance's new life in Trump's Washington
Less than a year ago, Usha Vance, onetime Democrat and the daughter of immigrants, was living a radically different life as a litigator for a progressive law firm while raising her children in Ohio. Many old friends are bewildered by her transformation. She may be the wife of the vice president, they say, but she must be appalled by the Trump administration's attacks on academia, law firms, judges, diversity programs and immigrants. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Others say she likes the respite from her legal career and the glamour and influence of her new role. (Vance, who clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts and was a top editor on The Yale Law Journal, referred to herself at a recent public appearance as a 'former lawyer.') She always supported her husband's ambitions, they note, even if she did not necessarily share them. People close to the vice president, who went from being a vocal critic of now-President Donald Trump to his running mate, argue that Vance went on a similar but less public journey that soured her on the left. Advertisement Either way, colleagues say, she is a model, at least for now, of a movement embraced by the White House and pushed by her husband that encourages women to have more children and celebrate the family as the centerpiece of American life. Advertisement 'I think she's doing a great job as second lady of the United States,' Vice President JD Vance said in March in Bay City, Michigan, with Usha Vance standing behind him. 'And here's the thing: Because the cameras are all on, anything that I say, no matter how crazy, Usha has to smile and laugh and celebrate it.' Vice President Vance kisses his wife, Usha, before taking the floor on the first day of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, in July 2024. DOUG MILLS/NYT Online critics slammed the vice president for sexism. But those who know the couple say that no matter her silence in public, JD Vance leans on his wife's counsel in private. 'Her influence on her husband is incalculable,' said the senior Trump administration official, who has worked with Usha Vance on and off for the past year and asked not to be named in order to speak freely. The official described the second lady as someone who has 'well considered' opinions on marriage, politics and faith, but holds herself at reserve. If Vance is not happy with all aspects of the Trump White House, friends say she would never let on. 'Her history and her upbringing suggest it,' the administration official said, 'but she's married to JD, and at some point you have to accept it.' The Vances have babysitters but no live-in nanny, and JD Vance leaves the West Wing many early evenings to have dinner with his family and help put the children to bed. He either returns to the White House afterward or works from his office in the vice president's official residence. The Vances have also taken their three children, now 8, 5 and 3, on official international trips, including to Good Friday services at the Vatican and to dinner in New Delhi with the prime minister of India. Both events generated video and photographs of the children with their parents seen all over the world. Advertisement Vance declined to be interviewed for this article, as did a large number of relatives, friends and colleagues. More than a dozen who did offer their perspectives did so on the condition of anonymity out of fear of angering her. Only recently has she tiptoed out on her own and offered a glimpse of herself and the purpose she sees in her new role. On June 1, she announced on social platform X the 'Second Lady's 2025 Summer Reading Challenge' for children, driven by her view that reading is an antidote to modern distractions, including her own. 'I'll be honest: I look at my phone far too often,' Vance said at a U.S.-India partnership forum in Washington this month. 'I, as a lawyer, was constantly receiving email, constantly responding, being quick. And being aware of what's going on at any given moment was an advantage. But it changes the way that you think. And so I myself have been challenging myself to read things that are increasingly challenging, increasingly long, sometimes increasingly boring, in an attempt to really bring that part of myself back.' The reading challenge, she said at the forum, is a 'bite-sized component of a larger project to continue expanding access to literacy.' The goal 'is to roll out little things bit by bit and see which ones work and which ones don't and then try to expand the ones that work. As a former lawyer, I get really bored if I don't have projects.' Advertisement A Cool Salve for a Hot Temper From the start, back when they first met at Yale Law School, Vance has been her husband's guide to the elite and a cool salve for his hot temper. One friend of the couple said he would not be vice president without her. 'I'm one of those guys who really benefits from having sort of a powerful female voice over his left shoulder saying, 'Don't do that, do that,'' JD Vance told Megyn Kelly in 2020. For a long time it was his grandmother, Mamaw. 'Now it's Usha,' he said. Vice President Vance and second lady Usha Vance in a private area during the 2024 Republican National Convention. DOUG MILLS/NYT Unlike JD Vance, whose roots are in a dysfunctional family of the white underclass captured in his bestselling memoir, 'Hillbilly Elegy,' Usha Vance is the eldest of two daughters of accomplished Indian immigrants, Krish and Lakshmi Chilukuri, both Brahmins from the South Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. They arrived in California in the early 1980s with a wave of English-speaking Indian engineers, doctors and scientists seeking opportunities in the United States. The Chilukuris settled in Rancho Peñasquitos, a planned San Diego neighborhood of Spanish-mission-style houses, where their home today is worth $1.4 million. Vance's father, Krish, worked as an aerospace engineer at United Technologies and Collins Aerospace for 30 years and is now a lecturer at San Diego State. Lakshmi, Vance's mother, is a molecular biologist and the provost of Sixth College, an undergraduate school at the University of California, San Diego. Advertisement Vance blazed her way through the local Mount Carmel High School, Yale College, a teaching fellowship in China and a prestigious Gates Foundation scholarship at the University of Cambridge in Britain. There she studied the development of copyright law in 17th-century England and wrote in the Gates scholars' yearbook that her interests were 'exploring urban neighborhoods, cooking & green markets, long walks, panicking about law school.' Whatever worries she may have had, friends describe her as a picture of confidence when she was back at Yale in 2010 to start law school. She and JD Vance were soon assigned as partners on a major writing assignment. He was awestruck. 'She seemed some sort of genetic anomaly, a combination of every positive quality a human being should have: bright, hardworking, tall and beautiful,' he wrote in a widely quoted passage in 'Hillbilly Elegy.' The feeling was not mutual at first. 'I think it's fair to say that JD was sort of the pedal in the relationship and I was a little bit of the brakes,' she told the crowd at the U.S.-India forum this month. 'Because I was sort of focused on the schooling part of it.' The two were a couple by their second year of law school, when they went to Washington for interviews with law firms. In an episode in his memoir, JD Vance recounted that he had returned dejected to their hotel room one night after feeling he had done badly with a favorite firm. Usha Vance tried to comfort him, he wrote, but he exploded and stormed out into the streets of downtown Washington. Usha Vance chased after him. 'She calmly told me through her tears that it was never acceptable to run away, that she was worried, and that I had to learn how to talk to her,' JD Vance wrote. Advertisement The two were married in 2014 in an outdoor wedding in Kentucky, near JD Vance's hometown, and spent the next decade crisscrossing the country as their jobs moved them from the East Coast to the West Coast and back to the Midwest. Along the way, Usha Vance gave birth to Ewan in 2017, Vivek in 2020 and Mirabel in 2021. Vance clerked for Judge Brett Kavanaugh in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and for Chief Justice Roberts, and worked for the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson in San Francisco and Washington. JD Vance became a partner in a venture capital fund co-founded by Peter Thiel, a Silicon Valley billionaire and major Trump supporter. Usha Vance watched her husband participate in a Fox News town hall in Columbus, Ohio, in November 2022, while Vice President Vance was running for US Senate. MADDIE MCGARVEY/NYT In 2017, after 'Hillbilly Elegy' had become a critically acclaimed explanation of the Trump working class to the elite, the couple moved to Cincinnati, where Usha Vance worked remotely for Munger. The couple bought a big $1.4 million Victorian in East Walnut Hills, a liberal-leaning neighborhood. Vance joined the board of the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra and put Post-it notes on wine bottles to remind her husband which were the good ones to use for guests. A Pivotal Hearing A pivotal moment for Usha Vance came in 2018, when Christine Blasey Ford accused Kavanaugh, by then a Supreme Court nominee, of sexually assaulting her at a high school party nearly 40 years earlier. Kavanaugh denied the accusation and was narrowly confirmed, but friends say that Vance was outraged by Democratic attacks on a man she admired. 'My wife worked for Kavanaugh, loved the guy — kind of a dork,' JD Vance told New York Times columnist Ross Douthat last year. 'Never believed these stories.' That same year, JD Vance went to a dinner of the Business Roundtable, a group of top American chief executives. He sat next to the head of a hotel chain who complained, JD Vance has recounted, that Trump's crackdown at the border had cut off the flow of low-wage immigrants, forcing him to hire American workers at higher prices. A friend said that both Vances were appalled by his complaints. 'One of the really deranged things that I think illegal immigration does to our society is it gets us in a mindset of saying we can only build houses with illegal immigrants, when we have 7 million — just men, not even women, just men — who have completely dropped out of the labor force,' JD Vance told Lulu Garcia-Navarro of the Times in 2024, recalling his encounter with the hotel chain executive. Americans will do those jobs, Vance said, but not for 'below-the-table wages.' When Vance became Trump's running mate in the summer of 2024, Usha Vance quit her job at Munger and threw herself into the vice presidential campaign. She and the children were often on the trail with him, and colleagues say she was a key part of the preparations for his debate with Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota. Vice President JD Vance and second lady Usha Vance visit the Taj Mahal with their children in Agra, India, on April 23. KENNY HOLSTON/NYT Becoming Second Lady Usha Vance has largely stayed out of the fray over the administration's political and policy agenda, even as her husband has continued to be a polarizing figure. At one point, he defended a far-right party in Germany, and at another, he successfully called for the reinstatement of an aide to Elon Musk who had quit after the revelation of racist posts he made on X. The one exception for Usha Vance was in March when she planned a trip to see a national dog sled race in Greenland, which Trump has said he wants to take over from Denmark. Vance made a cheerful video ahead of the trip, but it was ultimately downsized to a brief stop with her husband at a U.S. military base after strong objections from Greenlanders. In the coming months, Vance says she will continue to roll out second lady projects. For now, she continues to take her children to her office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, the one with the view of the Washington Monument. This article originally appeared in .
