US New Home Sales Surge Amid Price Cuts but Future Remains Uncertain
New U.S. single-family home sales unexpectedly surged by 10.9% in April, reaching a three-year high of 743,000 units annually, driven primarily by builders cutting prices to lure cautious buyers. This robust figure, however, was tempered by significant downward revisions for February and March, raising questions about the underlying strength of the housing market amid continued economic uncertainty and elevated mortgage rates.The median price for new homes fell 2% from last year to $407,200, highlighting builders' aggressive incentives aimed at countering the effects of rising mortgage costs, now nearing 7%. Market conditions remain challenging due to lingering consumer apprehension triggered by President Trump's escalating trade conflicts, including threats to impose steep tariffs on the European Union and Apple's foreign-manufactured iPhones, adding further volatility to an already fragile economic landscape. Market Overview: New home sales jumped 10.9%, defying expectations
Builders aggressively lowered prices amid high mortgage rates
Persistent economic uncertainty due to trade tensions Key Points: Median home price dropped 2% year-over-year to $407,200
Mortgage rates approaching 7% create affordability pressures
High inventory levels reminiscent of pre-2008 housing crisis Looking Ahead: Continued builder incentives expected as inventories remain high
Further market volatility anticipated amid ongoing trade tensions
Housing market likely to face prolonged softness through 2025 Bull Case: New single-family home sales surged 10.9% in April to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 743,000, the highest pace since February 2022, indicating some resilience in buyer demand despite economic headwinds.
Builders are actively offering price cuts and incentives, such as mortgage rate buydowns, to attract buyers, which helped reduce the inventory of available new homes to an 8.1 months' supply in April, down from 9.1 months in March.
Nearly half of all new homes sold in April were priced under $400,000, a higher share than in recent years, suggesting builders are successfully targeting more affordable segments of the market.
Mortgage rates, while still elevated, are expected by some analysts (like Fannie Mae) to potentially move lower throughout 2025, which could provide a boost to home sales if economic uncertainty from trade policies subsides.
Despite economic jitters and tariff concerns, if mortgage rates stabilize or decline further, and builders continue strategic pricing, the housing market could see more sustained activity. Bear Case: The April surge in new home sales was accompanied by significant downward revisions for February and March sales, raising questions about the underlying strength and consistency of the housing market recovery.
The median price for new homes fell 2% year-over-year to $407,200, indicating that builders are sacrificing margins to move inventory in a challenging environment of high mortgage rates (nearing 7%) and persistent economic uncertainty.
Unsold new home inventory remains near its highest level since 2007, signaling a persistent oversupply risk that could force builders to continue aggressive pricing or scale back new construction.
Existing-home sales dropped in April, and the total supply of existing homes hit a five-year high, indicating broader market weakness and affordability challenges for buyers.
Ongoing economic uncertainty, particularly from President Trump's escalating trade conflicts and tariff threats, is negatively impacting consumer sentiment and adding volatility to borrowing costs, which could dampen housing demand.
Analysts remain skeptical about sustained growth, warning that the recent gains could be short-lived due to structural pressures from high interest rates and uncertainty around federal fiscal policy, with the market likely to face prolonged softness through 2025. Despite April's uptick, unsold home inventory remains near the highest level since 2007, indicating persistent oversupply risks. Builders, cautious about breaking ground on new projects, are expected to further scale back, given the bleak outlook for sustained demand. This cautious stance reflects broader economic anxieties linked to ongoing tariff threats and fiscal policies that may further destabilize consumer confidence and borrowing costs.Analysts remain skeptical about sustained growth in the housing sector, warning that recent gains could prove short-lived due to structural pressures from high interest rates and uncertainty around federal fiscal policy. The market outlook remains subdued, with builders likely forced into continued aggressive pricing strategies as consumer sentiment struggles to stabilize amid turbulent economic conditions.
This article contains syndicated content. We have not reviewed, approved, or endorsed the content, and may receive compensation for placement of the content on this site. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
29 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Billionaire Warren Buffett Sold 39% of Berkshire's Stake in Bank of America and Is Loading Up on a Famed Consumer Brand That's Skyrocketed 7,700% Since Its IPO
May was a month to remember for Wall Street's most-famous billionaire money manager, Warren Buffett. On May 3, the company Buffett has been CEO of for six decades, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B), reported its first-quarter operating results, and the Oracle of Omaha announced during his company's annual shareholder meeting that he'd be stepping down as CEO at the end of the year. But this wasn't all. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Institutional investors with at least $100 million in assets under management were required to file Form 13F with the Securities and Exchange Commission by no later than May 15. Even though Berkshire's first-quarter operating results made clear that Buffett was a net seller of stocks for a 10th consecutive quarter, the company's cash flow statement didn't spill the beans on which stocks he was buying and selling. A 13F opens the proverbial hood for investors to see which stocks Wall Street's preeminent billionaire investor bought and sold in the first quarter. Based on Berkshire Hathaway's 13F for the March-ended quarter and various regulatory filings, we know that Buffett purchased 13 stocks, including a mystery company. On the flipside, Berkshire's chief oversaw the removal or reduction of eight stocks. What really stands out is Buffett's persistent selling of one of his (current) core holdings, and his continued purchasing of a beloved consumer brand that's skyrocketed since it became a public company 21 years ago. Bank of America stock gets the axe for the third consecutive quarter No sector tends to be favored more by the Oracle of Omaha than financials. Even though banks and insurance companies are relatively boring businesses that ebb-and-flow with the health of the U.S. economy, it's a sector that intrigues Berkshire's chief and for which he has a good understanding. For years, money-center giant Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) was Berkshire Hathaway's largest financial stock and No. 2 holding by market value, behind only Apple. But beginning on July 17, 2024 -- we know this specific date, because Berkshire Hathaway held in excess of 10% of BofA's outstanding shares, and was thus required to file Form 4 detailing all shares purchased and sold until its ownership dipped below 10% -- the selling spigot opened. For three consecutive quarters, Buffet has sold shares of Bank of America. What was once a position of more than 1.03 billion shares has been reduced by more than 401 million shares, or 39%. As of this writing on May 28, Bank of America has fallen to No. 4 in Berkshire's $276 billion portfolio, behind Apple, American Express, and Coca-Cola, in terms of market value. This persistent selling of Bank of America stock may very well be nothing more than benign profit-taking. Warren Buffett orchestrated a capital infusion with BofA in August 2011 that ultimately netted Berkshire the option to exercise warrants for up to 700 million shares of BofA stock at $7.14 per share. Buffett jumped at the opportunity to do so in mid-2017. With the peak marginal corporate income tax rate at its lowest level since 1939, locking in gains at an advantageous rate would be very Buffett-like. But it's also possible there are more nefarious reasons behind the Oracle of Omaha's steady paring of his company's Bank of America stake. For example, Bank of America is the most interest-sensitive of all money-center banks. When the Federal Reserve rapidly increased interest rates between March 2022 and July 2023, no big bank enjoyed a more tangible benefit to net interest income than BofA. Yet with the nation's central bank now in the midst of a rate-easing cycle, it's BofA that could see its net interest income hit hardest if rates dramatically fall. Additionally, Berkshire's CEO is an unwavering value investor -- and Bank of America is no longer the screaming bargain it once was. In August 2011, Bank of America's common stock was trading at a 62% discount to its book value. Through much of the first quarter, BofA stock traded at a 20% to 30% premium to its book value. While this isn't egregiously (or even historically) pricey, it's getting near Bank of America's priciest valuation, relative to book, since prior to the Great Recession. The Oracle of Omaha loaded up on this consumer goods stock for a third straight quarter While Warren Buffett has been continually reducing Berkshire Hathaway's exposure to Bank of America since July 2024, he's been building up a sizable stake, worth more than $1.2 billion (as of March 31, 2025), in one of America's most-famed consumer brands. In mid-November, when Berkshire Hathaway released its 13F detailing third-quarter trading activity, investors took note that Buffett put a slice of Domino's Pizza (NASDAQ: DPZ) on his proverbial plate. Berkshire Hathaway gobbled up 1,277,256 shares in the September-ended quarter, added 1,104,744 shares in the December-ended quarter, and topped things off in the latest quarter with 238,613 more shares. All told, Berkshire Hathaway now holds 2,620,613 shares of Domino's Pizza, which equates to a 7.7% stake in the company. Though Domino's Pizza stock wasn't much of a hit with investors through its first six years as a public company, it's been virtually unstoppable over the last 15 years. Inclusive of dividends, Domino's is nearing a total return of almost 7,700% since its July 2004 initial public offering (IPO). Domino's massive outperformance of the benchmark S&P 500, and the reason(s) Buffett has been a buyer, can be broken down to three factors. The first variable is an all-important intangible that can be a dealbreaker for Warren Buffett and his top advisors: trust. Domino's Pizza kicked off a fresh advertising campaign in 2009 that flat-out admitted its pizza was terrible and vowed to do better. The company's straightforward marketing campaign and efforts to engage and maintain transparency helped it win over consumers. It takes a long time to build trust with consumers, but Domino's has done an exemplary job. Secondly, Domino's management team has consistently laid out multiyear growth strategies and been able to achieve them. The latest of its plans is the "Hungry for MORE" initiative. Domino's five-year plan is to lean into technology to spruce up its supply chain and increase productivity. It'll also be relying on its franchisees to help build up the company's brand. With 31 consecutive years of international same-store sales growth under its belt, clearly the company is doing something right. Lastly, Berkshire's head honcho is a big fan of businesses with hearty capital-return programs -- and Domino's doesn't disappoint. It's raised its base annual dividend for 12 consecutive years and has been a relatively consistent buyer of its own stock. Share buybacks have the potential to increase earnings per share for companies with steady or growing net income. Should you invest $1,000 in Domino's Pizza right now? Before you buy stock in Domino's Pizza, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Domino's Pizza wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
CBC
30 minutes ago
- CBC
Scotiabank holds customer responsible for almost $20K in credit card fraud
Social Sharing Jordon Judge's cellphone rang as he sat in his local Vancouver coffee shop last October — caller ID said the person was from Scotiabank. He had no idea it was actually a fraudster who had manipulated the call display, a practice known as phone call "spoofing." The fraudster said he was calling to flag two suspicious charges that were coming through on Judge's Scotiabank Visa card. Judge said he hadn't approved those charges and the caller said they would be blocked. But two days later, Judge spotted two large charges on his credit card statement, totalling almost $20,000. "Those were not my charges," he told Go Public. "So it was definitely astonishment." Got a story you want investigated? Contact Erica and the Go Public team at gopublic@ It was the beginning of a long and frustrating process, during which Scotiabank continued to insist he was liable for the fraudulent charges. Credit card fraud is a growing problem. The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre doesn't track how much money people lose to it, but says that over the past three years, an increasing portion of identity fraud cases have involved compromised credit cards. WATCH | On the hook for $20K: Bank blames customer for $20K in credit card fraud | Go Public 5 hours ago Duration 2:09 The Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments says complaints related to fraud are the number one issue it deals with, and only e-transfers have more fraud complaints than credit cards. Under federal law, a person's maximum liability for unauthorized credit card transactions is generally capped at $50 unless the bank can prove the customer was grossly negligent in protecting their card. A cybersecurity expert says increasing fraud and the rise in complex technology means financial institutions should be conducting thorough investigations and providing clear evidence when holding customers liable. "All that the bank has done is accuse [Judge] of either negligence or malice," said Claudiu Popa, who has 35 years' experience in cybersecurity and wrote The Canadian Cyberfraud Handbook. "The bank has to prove that the customer is the one who perpetrated this quite significant and sophisticated fraud." Scotiabank declined an interview request, did not answer any written questions and instead sent a brief statement, reminding customers to safeguard their personal information. What happened The fraudster who called Judge asked for his birth date and mother's maiden name, which Judge shared. But then the fraudster asked him to share a "one-time passcode" — a type of two-step verification — that was texted to his phone. Judge says he refused to do that, because the message also told him not to share the code with anyone, and said that no one from Scotiabank would ever ask for it. The fraudster claimed that he stopped the charges from going through and hung up. But two days later, Judge discovered a charge for $17,900 to Anglia Ruskin University in the U.K. on his statement, and a second for $1,800, supposedly paid to someone by the name of Paula S. Taylor. "I wasn't worried at the time because I knew those weren't my charges," said Judge. "I thought I couldn't be held accountable for it." No transparency Judge filed a request for compensation with Scotiabank, which sent him a letter a few weeks later, saying the bank had "examined all relevant documentation" and concluded that he was responsible for the charges. The letter did not outline what evidence had been reviewed and did not explain why the bank concluded he should be on the hook for almost $20,000 — plus the growing interest. "When people sign up for credit cards, they're under the assumption that if they get scammed, they're not liable for the purchases made on their credit card," said Judge. "Apparently that's not the case." He appealed, and a second letter — from Scotiabank's Escalated Customer Concerns Office (ECCO) — also found Judge responsible, stating that a one-time passcode was used for the university charge, calling it "a feature that has a proven track record in mitigating fraudulent and nefarious activities". The ECCO letter said that because the code was sent to Judge's phone, it "indicates" that the code was disclosed. Judge appealed that decision, but Scotiabank's Customer Complaints Appeals Office also claimed in a letter that evidence "suggests" Judge revealed a one-time passcode. "Evidence that may 'suggest' something isn't evidence of a fact," said Geoff White, executive director of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre. "One would like to see more in terms of actual evidence demonstrating that the customer was negligent — rather than simply an assertion." White also said the onus shouldn't be on individuals to prove they are innocent of a crime. "The onus is in fact on institutions to take care of their systems," said White. "Make sure that their processes are secure." Popa, the cybersecurity expert, took a look at Scotiabank's correspondence and says the financial institution didn't provide evidence of "the most basic investigation," which would include reviewing a log of activities that would be time-stamped — such as showing when an individual received the one-time passcode and when it was entered into a web interface. "This was never provided," said Popa. "Nor was there an indication that this kind of log was inspected." Contrary to Scotia's insistence that a one-time passcode is a proven fraud deterrent, Popa says a code sent via email or SMS is vulnerable to "a number of different types of compromises" and is less safe than using an authenticator app. Cellphones can be hacked using malware or spyware and SIM cards can be hijacked — allowing fraudsters to intercept text messages. The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre also told Go Public that it recommends people use an authenticator app when possible. "Unlike SMS/text messages or email messages, authenticator apps generate time-sensitive passcodes that are not vulnerable to SIM swapping or potential text message and email interception," wrote CAFC spokesperson Jeff Horncastle. The Quebec-based advocacy group Option consommateurs has been calling on the federal government to strengthen protections for banking customers in cases of fraud. In a proposal to MPs earlier this year, the organization said the Bank Act should require transparency when a bank investigates, and clarify that the burden of proving the customer was highly negligent rests on the bank. Judge gets his money back Go Public contacted Anglia Ruskin University to ask about the charge on Judge's credit card. A representative said Scotiabank never contacted the university — another disappointment to Popa. "Why would you not contact an organization that you know exists?" asked Popa. "They have a duty to investigate and to protect their customers." After Go Public made several inquiries with the university, it said it conducted an investigation and reimbursed Judge. A spokesperson said it could not elaborate on its findings, such as whether the money was used to pay for someone's tuition. Go Public also asked Scotiabank several times what evidence it had to hold its customer responsible for the fraudulent charges. Although the bank did not reply, it recently credited Judge's bank account — covering the outstanding $1,800 paid to "Paula S. Taylor" and the interest that had accrued on both charges. Judge says no one from Scotiabank contacted him to explain the about-face. "I do think it's ridiculous that it took the media to get involved until they decided they would even act as if they cared," said Judge. Previously, Scotiabank had offered Judge $200 as a "goodwill gesture," but said he would have to acknowledge his claim was resolved and drop any further action. Judge declined. Although he has been fully compensated, Judge had to push for almost eight months, and is still left without any answers about why Scotiabank insisted for so long that he was responsible for the fraud. "My biggest concern is that there are people in his situation … who may not have the ability to pressure their financial institution to be more transparent or to recognize the fact that they might not be guilty," said Popa, the cybersecurity expert. "People are out there who are simply being silently victimized."
Globe and Mail
44 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Billionaire Bill Ackman Wants to Be the Next Warren Buffett, and He Is Buying an AI Stock Up 855% in 10 Years (Hint: Not Nvidia)
In 1965, Warren Buffett took control of Berkshire Hathaway. He said that in hindsight it was a "doomed" textile mill "headed for extinction." But he saved the business, and laid the foundation for lasting growth, by shifting its focus to insurance. That brilliant decision created a steady inflow of investable capital in the form of insurance premiums, and Buffett used that cash to great effect over the years. Berkshire's market value has increased more than 5,500,000% since Buffett took control, for an average annual return of 20% over six decades. Buffett deserves much of the credit. He (along with the late Charlie Munger) engineered acquisitions, stock purchases, and share buybacks that ultimately turned Berkshire into a trillion-dollar business, one of only 11 in the world at this writing. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » While Buffett plans to step down as chief executive at Berkshire this year, billionaire Bill Ackman hopes to recreate his success with Howard Hughes Holdings. Ackman recently added another 900 million shares to his hedge fund, bringing his total ownership to 46.9%. He plans to turn Howard Hughes into a "modern-day version of Berkshire" by acquiring controlling interests in private and public companies. If Ackman succeeds, he could become the "next Warren Buffett." Here's the artificial intelligence stock he just bought. Bill Ackman just bought Amazon, an AI stock up 855% in the last decade Bill Ackman ranks among the 20 most successful hedge-fund managers as measured by net gains, according to LCH Investments. And Pershing Square outperformed the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) by 24 percentage points over the last five years. Those accomplishments make Ackman an excellent source of inspiration. Importantly, he purchased three stocks during the first quarter: Hertz Global, Uber Technologies, and Brookfield Corporation. Those trades were disclosed in a Form 13F filed last month, but Pershing more recently added Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), an artificial intelligence (AI) stock that rocketed 855% over the last decade. Pershing's chief investment officer Ryan Israel said: "We felt that the company would be able to work through any slowdown in the cloud computing division Amazon Web Services, and we did not judge that tariffs would have a material impact on the earnings in the retail business." Interestingly, Ackman has a very concentrated portfolio that included fewer than a dozen stocks as of the first quarter. Chipmaker Nvidia was not one of those stocks. Amazon has three major growth opportunities Amazon's market value exceeds $2 trillion today, but it could be much larger in a few years. The company has a strong presence in three growing industries, as detailed below: Not only does Amazon run the largest online marketplace in the U.S., but it also expects to gain market share this year. Domestic retail e-commerce sales are forecast to increase 8% annually through 2028, according to eMarketer. Amazon is the third-largest adtech company in the world and is rapidly taking share from industry leaders Google (part of Alphabet) and Meta Platforms. Retail ad spending is forecast to increase 17% annually in the U.S. through 2028, according to eMarketer. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the largest public cloud operator, as measured by infrastructure and platform services spending. Cloud computing sales are forecast to grow at 20% annually through 2030, according to Grand View Research. Importantly, retail advertising and cloud services revenues not only are growing faster than online retail sales, but also have higher margins. That will make Amazon more profitable over time. But the company is also developing about 1,000 generative AI applications that will improve productivity and efficiency across its retail business, from front-end tasks like customer service to back-end tasks like coding. AWS is ideally positioned to monetize AI. It already operates the largest public cloud as measured by revenue and customers, but it has also introduced new products at all three layers of the computing stack. That includes custom chips for AI training and inference at the infrastructure layer, AI-model development tools like Bedrock at the platform layer, and AI applications like Amazon Q at the software layer. That three-tiered strategy is paying off. CEO Andy Jassy recently told analysts: "Our AI business has a multibillion-dollar annual revenue run rate," and "continues to grow triple-digit year-over-year percentages." Most Wall Street analysts anticipate upside in Amazon stock in the next year Amazon shares soared 855% over the last decade as the company built strong positions in online retail, digital advertising, and cloud computing. And Wall Street is still predominantly bullish. Among the 71 analysts who follow the company, 96% rate the stock a buy, and the median target price is $235 per share, which implies 14% upside from the current share price of $205. Wall Street expects Amazon's earnings to increase at 10% annually through 2026. That makes the current price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 33 look somewhat expensive. But I think analysts are underestimating the company, as they have in the past -- Amazon topped the consensus earnings estimate by an average of 21% during the last six quarters. Long-term investors should feel comfortable buying a small position today. Should you invest $1,000 in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors.
